Ceph Object Gateway
```mediawiki Template:Infobox Server Configuration
Technical Documentation: Server Configuration Template:Stub
This document provides a comprehensive technical analysis of the Template:Stub reference configuration. This configuration is designed to serve as a standardized, baseline hardware specification against which more advanced or specialized server builds are measured. While the "Stub" designation implies a minimal viable product, its components are selected for stability, broad compatibility, and cost-effectiveness in standardized data center environments.
1. Hardware Specifications
The Template:Stub configuration prioritizes proven, readily available components that offer a balanced performance-to-cost ratio. It is designed to fit within standard 2U rackmount chassis dimensions, although specific chassis models may vary.
1.1. Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The configuration mandates a dual-socket (2P) architecture to ensure sufficient core density and memory channel bandwidth for general-purpose workloads.
| Specification | Detail (Minimum Requirement) | Detail (Recommended Baseline) |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Intel Xeon Scalable (Cascade Lake or newer preferred) or AMD EPYC (Rome or newer preferred) | Intel Xeon Scalable Gen 3 (Ice Lake) or AMD EPYC Gen 3 (Milan) |
| Socket Count | 2 | 2 |
| Base TDP Range | 95W – 135W per socket | 120W – 150W per socket |
| Minimum Cores per Socket | 12 Physical Cores | 16 Physical Cores |
| Minimum Frequency (All-Core Turbo) | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache (Total) | 36 MB Minimum | 64 MB Minimum |
| Supported Memory Channels | 6 or 8 Channels per socket | 8 Channels per socket (for optimal I/O) |
The selection of the CPU generation is crucial; while older generations may fit the "stub" moniker, modern stability and feature sets (such as AVX-512 or PCIe 4.0 support) are mandatory for baseline compatibility with contemporary operating systems and hypervisors.
1.2. Random Access Memory (RAM)
Memory capacity and speed are provisioned to support moderate virtualization density or large in-memory datasets typical of database caching layers. The configuration specifies DDR4 ECC Registered DIMMs (RDIMMs) or Load-Reduced DIMMs (LRDIMMs) depending on the required density ceiling.
| Specification | Detail | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | DDR4 ECC RDIMM/LRDIMM (DDR5 requirement for future revisions) | |
| Total Capacity (Minimum) | 128 GB | |
| Total Capacity (Recommended) | 256 GB | |
| Configuration Strategy | Fully populated memory channels (e.g., 8 DIMMs per CPU or 16 total) | |
| Speed Rating (Minimum) | 2933 MT/s | |
| Speed Rating (Recommended) | 3200 MT/s (or fastest supported by CPU/Motherboard combination) | |
| Maximum Supported DIMM Rank | Dual Rank (2R) preferred for stability |
It is critical that the BIOS/UEFI is configured to utilize the maximum supported memory speed profile (e.g., XMP or JEDEC profiles) while maintaining stability under full load, adhering strictly to the Memory Interleaving guidelines for the specific motherboard chipset.
1.3. Storage Subsystem
The storage configuration emphasizes a tiered approach: a high-speed boot/OS volume and a larger, redundant capacity volume for application data. Direct Attached Storage (DAS) is the standard implementation.
| Tier | Component Type | Quantity | Capacity (per unit) | Interface/Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boot/OS | NVMe M.2 or U.2 SSD | 2 (Mirrored) | 480 GB Minimum | PCIe 3.0/4.0 x4 |
| Data/Application | SATA or SAS SSD (Enterprise Grade) | 4 to 6 | 1.92 TB Minimum | SAS 12Gb/s (Preferred) or SATA III |
| RAID Controller | Hardware RAID (e.g., Broadcom MegaRAID) | 1 | N/A | PCIe 3.0/4.0 x8 interface required |
The data drives must be configured in a RAID 5 or RAID 6 array for redundancy. The use of NVMe for the OS tier significantly reduces boot times and metadata access latency, a key improvement over older SATA-based stub configurations. Refer to RAID Levels documentation for specific array geometry recommendations.
1.4. Networking and I/O
Standardization on 10 Gigabit Ethernet (10GbE) is required for the management and primary data interfaces.
| Component | Specification | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Network Interface (Data) | 2 x 10GbE SFP+ or Base-T (Configured in LACP/Active-Passive) | Application Traffic, VM Networking |
| Management Interface (Dedicated) | 1 x 1GbE (IPMI/iDRAC/iLO) | Out-of-Band Management |
| PCIe Slots Utilization | At least 2 x PCIe 4.0 x16 slots populated (for future expansion or high-speed adapters) | Expansion for SAN connectivity or specialized accelerators |
The onboard Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) must support modern standards, including HTML5 console redirection and secure firmware updates.
1.5. Power and Form Factor
The configuration is designed for high-density rack deployment.
- **Form Factor:** 2U Rackmount Chassis (Standard 19-inch width).
- **Power Supplies (PSUs):** Dual Redundant, Hot-Swappable, Platinum or Titanium Efficiency Rating (>= 92% efficiency at 50% load).
- **Total Rated Power Draw (Peak):** Approximately 850W – 1100W (dependent on CPU TDP and storage configuration).
- **Input Voltage:** 200-240V AC (Recommended for efficiency, though 110V support must be validated).
2. Performance Characteristics
The performance profile of the Template:Stub is defined by its balanced memory bandwidth and core count, making it a suitable platform for I/O-bound tasks that require moderate computational throughput.
2.1. Synthetic Benchmarks (Estimated)
The following benchmarks reflect expected performance based on the recommended component specifications (Ice Lake/Milan generation CPUs, 3200MT/s RAM).
| Benchmark Area | Metric | Expected Result Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Compute (Integer/Floating Point) | SPECrate 2017 Integer (Base) | 450 – 550 | Reflects multi-threaded efficiency. |
| Memory Bandwidth (Aggregate) | Read/Write (GB/s) | 180 – 220 GB/s | Dependent on DIMM population and CPU memory controller quality. |
| Storage IOPS (Random 4K Read) | Sustained IOPS (from RAID 5 Array) | 150,000 – 220,000 IOPS | Heavily influenced by RAID controller cache and drive type. |
| Network Throughput | TCP/IP Throughput (iperf3) | 19.0 – 19.8 Gbps (Full Duplex) | Testing 2x 10GbE bonded link. |
The key performance bottleneck in the Stub configuration, particularly when running high-vCPU density workloads, is often the memory subsystem's latency profile rather than raw core count, especially when the operating system or application attempts to access data across the Non-Uniform Memory Access boundary between the two sockets.
2.2. Real-World Performance Analysis
The Stub configuration excels in scenarios demanding high I/O consistency rather than peak computational burst capacity.
- **Database Workloads (OLTP):** Handles transactional loads requiring moderate connections (up to 500 concurrent active users) effectively, provided the working set fits within the 256GB RAM allocation. Performance degradation begins when the workload triggers significant page faults requiring reliance on the SSD tier.
- **Web Serving (Apache/Nginx):** Capable of serving tens of thousands of concurrent requests per second (RPS) for static or moderately dynamic content, limited primarily by network saturation or CPU instruction pipeline efficiency under heavy SSL/TLS termination loads.
- **Container Orchestration (Kubernetes Node):** Functions optimally as a worker node supporting 40-60 standard microservices containers, where the CPU cores provide sufficient scheduling capacity, and the 10GbE networking allows for rapid service mesh communication.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The Template:Stub configuration is not intended for high-performance computing (HPC) or extreme data analytics but serves as an excellent foundation for robust, general-purpose infrastructure.
3.1. Virtualization Host (Mid-Density)
This configuration is ideal for hosting a consolidated environment where stability and resource isolation are paramount.
- **Target Density:** 8 to 15 Virtual Machines (VMs) depending on the VM profile (e.g., 8 powerful Windows Server VMs or 15 lightweight Linux application servers).
- **Hypervisor Support:** Full compatibility with VMware vSphere, Microsoft Hyper-V, and Kernel-based Virtual Machine.
- **Benefit:** The dual-socket architecture ensures sufficient PCIe lanes for multiple virtual network interface cards (vNICs) and provides ample physical memory for guest allocation.
3.2. Application and Web Servers
For standard three-tier application architectures, the Stub serves well as the application or web tier.
- **Backend API Tier:** Suitable for hosting RESTful services written in languages like Java (Spring Boot), Python (Django/Flask), or Go, provided the application memory footprint remains within the physical RAM limits.
- **Load Balancing Target:** Excellent as a target for Network Load Balancing (NLB) clusters, offering predictable latency and throughput.
3.3. Jump Box / Bastion Host and Management Server
Due to its robust, standardized hardware, the Stub is highly reliable for critical management functions.
- **Configuration Management:** Running Ansible Tower, Puppet Master, or Chef Server. The storage subsystem provides fast configuration deployment and log aggregation.
- **Monitoring Infrastructure:** Hosting Prometheus/Grafana or ELK stack components (excluding large-scale indexing nodes).
3.4. File and Backup Target
When configured with a higher count of high-capacity SATA/SAS drives (exceeding the 6-drive minimum), the Stub becomes a capable, high-throughput Network Attached Storage (NAS) target utilizing technologies like ZFS or Windows Storage Spaces.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the Template:Stub, it is useful to compare it against its immediate predecessors (Template:Legacy) and its successors (Template:HighDensity).
4.1. Configuration Matrix Comparison
| Feature | Template:Stub (Baseline) | Template:Legacy (10/12 Gen Xeon) | Template:HighDensity (1S/HPC Focus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Sockets | 2P | 2P | 1S (or 2P with extreme core density) |
| Max RAM (Typical) | 256 GB | 128 GB | 768 GB+ |
| Primary Storage Interface | PCIe 4.0 NVMe (OS) + SAS/SATA SSDs | PCIe 3.0 SATA SSDs only | All NVMe U.2/AIC |
| Network Speed | 10GbE Standard | 1GbE Standard | 25GbE or 100GbE Mandatory |
| Power Efficiency Rating | Platinum/Titanium | Gold | Titanium (Extreme Density Optimization) |
| Cost Index (Relative) | 1.0x | 0.6x | 2.5x+ |
The Stub configuration represents the optimal point for balancing current I/O requirements (10GbE, PCIe 4.0) against legacy infrastructure compatibility, whereas the Template:Legacy is constrained by slower interconnects and less efficient power delivery.
4.2. Performance Trade-offs
The primary trade-off when moving from the Stub to the Template:HighDensity configuration involves the shift from balanced I/O to raw compute.
- **Stub Advantage:** Superior I/O consistency due to the dedicated RAID controller and dual-socket memory architecture providing high aggregate bandwidth.
- **HighDensity Disadvantage (in this context):** Single-socket (1S) high-density configurations, while offering more cores per watt, often suffer from reduced memory channel access (e.g., 6 channels vs. 8 channels per CPU), leading to lower sustained memory bandwidth under full virtualization load.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Maintaining the Template:Stub requires adherence to standard enterprise server practices, with specific attention paid to thermal management due to the dual-socket high-TDP components.
5.1. Thermal Management and Cooling
The dual-socket design generates significant heat, necessitating robust cooling infrastructure.
- **Airflow Requirements:** Must maintain a minimum front-to-back differential pressure of 0.4 inches of water column (in H2O) across the server intake area.
- **Component Specifics:** CPUs rated above 150W TDP require high-static pressure fans integrated into the chassis, often exceeding the performance of standard cooling solutions designed for single-socket, low-TDP hardware.
- **Hot Aisle Containment:** Deployment within a hot-aisle/cold-aisle containment strategy is highly recommended to maximize chiller efficiency and prevent thermal throttling, especially during peak operation when all turbo frequencies are engaged.
5.2. Power Requirements and Redundancy
The redundant power supplies (N+1 or 2N configuration) must be connected to diverse power paths whenever possible.
- **PDU Load Balancing:** The total calculated power draw (approaching 1.1kW peak) means that servers should be distributed across multiple Power Distribution Units (PDUs) to avoid overloading any single circuit breaker in the rack infrastructure.
- **Firmware Updates:** Regular firmware updates for the BMC, BIOS/UEFI, and RAID controller are mandatory to ensure compatibility with new operating system kernels and security patches (e.g., addressing Spectre variants).
5.3. Operating System and Driver Lifecycle
The longevity of the Stub configuration relies heavily on vendor support for the chosen CPU generation.
- **Driver Validation:** Before deploying any major OS patch or hypervisor upgrade, all hardware drivers (especially storage controller and network card firmware) must be validated against the vendor's Hardware Compatibility List (HCL).
- **Diagnostic Tools:** The BMC must be configured to stream diagnostic logs (e.g., Intelligent Platform Management Interface sensor readings) to a central System Monitoring platform for proactive failure prediction.
The stability of the Template:Stub ensures that maintenance windows are predictable, typically only required for major component replacements (e.g., PSU failure or expected drive rebuilds) rather than frequent stability patches.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️
- REDIRECT Ceph Object Gateway
Ceph Object Gateway: Technical Deep Dive - Server Configuration
This document provides a comprehensive technical overview of a server configuration optimized for running the Ceph Object Gateway (RGW). It covers hardware specifications, performance characteristics, recommended use cases, comparisons with alternative configurations, and essential maintenance considerations. This is intended for experienced systems administrators and server hardware engineers responsible for deploying and maintaining Ceph-based storage solutions.
1. Hardware Specifications
The Ceph Object Gateway benefits significantly from a balanced hardware configuration. A typical deployment node requires careful consideration of CPU, RAM, storage, and networking. The specifications below represent a robust configuration designed to handle moderate to high workloads. Scaling is achieved by adding more RGW nodes to the cluster. This configuration assumes a Ceph cluster with separately managed OSD (Object Storage Device) nodes.
| Component | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6338 (32 cores/64 threads per CPU) | Higher core counts are beneficial for handling concurrent requests. Consider AMD EPYC equivalents. CPU Performance Benchmarks |
| RAM | 256 GB DDR4 ECC Registered 3200MHz | Crucial for metadata caching and handling large object requests. More RAM generally improves performance. Memory Management in Ceph |
| System Board | Supermicro X12DPG-QT6 | Supports dual CPUs, ample RAM slots, and multiple PCIe slots for network and storage expansion. Server Motherboard Selection |
| Storage (Bootstrap & Metadata) | 2 x 1.92TB NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD (RAID 1) | Used for the RGW metadata database (typically LevelDB or RocksDB) and bootstrapping the Ceph cluster. High IOPS are critical. Ceph Metadata Storage |
| Network Interface Card (NIC) | 2 x 100GbE Mellanox ConnectX-6 Dx | High bandwidth is essential for handling object storage traffic. RDMA support is highly recommended. Ceph Network Configuration |
| Power Supply Unit (PSU) | 2 x 1600W 80+ Platinum Redundant | Provides reliable power and redundancy. |
| RAID Controller | Integrated on Motherboard (Software RAID preferred for flexibility) | Hardware RAID is generally not recommended for OSDs but can be used for the metadata drives with caution. RAID Configurations for Ceph |
| Chassis | 2U Rackmount Server | Standard rackmount form factor for efficient space utilization. |
| Operating System | Ubuntu Server 22.04 LTS | A well-supported Linux distribution. CentOS Stream is also common. Ceph Supported Distributions |
Detailed Storage Breakdown: The SSDs chosen for metadata are specifically selected for their low latency and high IOPS. While capacity is important, performance is paramount for the RGW’s metadata operations. The RAID 1 configuration provides redundancy, protecting against SSD failure. The OSD nodes, which handle the bulk of the data storage, are not detailed here as they constitute a separate hardware configuration. See Ceph OSD Hardware Recommendations for more information.
2. Performance Characteristics
Performance of the Ceph Object Gateway is heavily influenced by the hardware configuration and the workload. The following benchmark results are based on testing with the specifications above, using the `radosgw-perf` testing tool and a simulated workload of 1 million objects with varying sizes (1KB to 10MB). These results are approximate and can vary based on network conditions and cluster configuration.
- Object PUT (Small Objects - 1KB): 250,000 OPS (Operations Per Second)
- Object GET (Small Objects - 1KB): 400,000 OPS
- Object PUT (Large Objects - 10MB): 10,000 OPS
- Object GET (Large Objects - 10MB): 15,000 OPS
- Latency (Average GET - Small Objects): 0.5ms
- Latency (Average PUT - Small Objects): 1.2ms
- Throughput (Maximum): 50 Gbps (observed, limited by network infrastructure)
Real-World Performance: In a production environment with a mixed workload, the sustained throughput is typically between 20-40 Gbps. The performance is also influenced by the number of OSDs and their performance characteristics. Proper tuning of Ceph parameters, such as the number of placement groups and the object size, is crucial for optimizing performance. Ceph Performance Tuning
Benchmarking Tools: `radosgw-perf` is the primary tool for benchmarking the RGW. Other tools, such as `fio` and `iperf3`, can be used to assess the performance of the underlying storage and network infrastructure. Ceph Benchmarking Tools
3. Recommended Use Cases
The Ceph Object Gateway configuration described above is well-suited for a variety of use cases, including:
- Cloud Storage: Providing a scalable and reliable object storage service for cloud applications. Ceph as a Cloud Storage Backend
- Backup and Disaster Recovery: Storing backups and providing a disaster recovery solution. The scalability and data redundancy features of Ceph are particularly valuable in this context. Ceph for Backup and Recovery
- Media Storage: Storing large media files, such as images, videos, and audio. The high throughput and scalability of Ceph make it ideal for media streaming and delivery. Ceph for Media Storage
- Archival Storage: Storing infrequently accessed data for long-term retention. Ceph's object lifecycle management features can automate the process of moving data to lower-cost storage tiers. Ceph Object Lifecycle Management
- Large-Scale Data Analytics: Providing a storage platform for big data analytics applications. Ceph and Big Data Analytics
- Web Application Hosting: Storing static assets (images, CSS, JavaScript) for web applications. Integrating Ceph with Web Servers
The RGW's S3 compatibility is a key advantage, allowing applications that are already designed to work with Amazon S3 to seamlessly integrate with Ceph.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
The following table compares the described Ceph Object Gateway configuration with two alternative configurations: a lower-cost entry-level configuration and a high-performance configuration.
| Configuration | CPU | RAM | Storage (Metadata) | NIC | Estimated Cost (USD) | Performance Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry-Level | Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4310 (12 cores/24 threads per CPU) | 128 GB DDR4 ECC Registered 3200MHz | 2 x 960GB NVMe PCIe Gen3 SSD (RAID 1) | 2 x 25GbE Mellanox ConnectX-5 | $8,000 - $12,000 | Moderate |
| Recommended (This Configuration) | Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6338 (32 cores/64 threads per CPU) | 256 GB DDR4 ECC Registered 3200MHz | 2 x 1.92TB NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD (RAID 1) | 2 x 100GbE Mellanox ConnectX-6 Dx | $15,000 - $20,000 | High |
| High-Performance | Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (40 cores/80 threads per CPU) | 512 GB DDR4 ECC Registered 3200MHz | 2 x 3.84TB NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD (RAID 1) | 2 x 200GbE Mellanox ConnectX-7 | $30,000 - $40,000 | Very High |
Considerations: The entry-level configuration is suitable for small deployments and testing purposes. However, it may struggle to handle high workloads. The high-performance configuration is ideal for demanding applications that require maximum throughput and low latency. The recommended configuration represents a good balance between performance and cost. Cost Analysis of Ceph Deployments
Alternative Storage Solutions: Other object storage solutions include:
- Amazon S3: A widely used cloud-based object storage service. Comparison: Ceph RGW vs. Amazon S3
- MinIO: A high-performance object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 APIs. Comparison: Ceph RGW vs. MinIO
- OpenStack Swift: An object storage component of the OpenStack cloud platform. Comparison: Ceph RGW vs. OpenStack Swift
5. Maintenance Considerations
Maintaining a Ceph Object Gateway cluster requires careful attention to several key aspects:
- Cooling: The high-density server hardware generates significant heat. Adequate cooling is essential to prevent overheating and ensure reliable operation. Rack-mounted cooling solutions and proper airflow management are crucial. Data Center Cooling Best Practices
- Power Requirements: The servers require a substantial amount of power. Ensure that the data center has sufficient power capacity and redundancy. Utilize redundant power supplies (as specified above) to protect against power outages. Data Center Power Management
- Software Updates: Regularly update the Ceph software and operating system to benefit from bug fixes, security patches, and performance improvements. Follow a well-defined update procedure to minimize downtime. Ceph Software Updates and Maintenance
- Monitoring: Implement comprehensive monitoring to track the health and performance of the cluster. Monitor key metrics such as CPU utilization, memory usage, disk I/O, and network traffic. Ceph Monitoring Tools and Techniques Utilize tools like Prometheus and Grafana for visualization.
- Log Analysis: Regularly analyze logs to identify potential issues and troubleshoot problems. Centralized logging systems can simplify log management. Ceph Log Analysis and Troubleshooting
- Drive Failure Handling: Ceph is designed to handle drive failures gracefully. However, it is important to have a process in place for replacing failed drives promptly. Ceph Drive Failure and Recovery
- Network Configuration: Maintain a stable and reliable network connection between the RGW nodes and the OSD nodes. Monitor network latency and bandwidth utilization. Ceph Network Troubleshooting
- Security: Implement appropriate security measures to protect the data stored in the Ceph cluster. This includes configuring access control policies, encrypting data in transit and at rest, and regularly auditing security logs. Ceph Security Best Practices
Remote Management: Implementing a robust remote management solution, such as IPMI or Redfish, is essential for managing the servers remotely. Server Remote Management Techniques ```
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️