NUMA Architecture
NUMA Architecture: Deep Dive into Non-Uniform Memory Access Server Configuration
This document provides a comprehensive technical analysis of a server platform configured utilizing Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) architecture. This architecture is fundamental to modern high-core-count, multi-socket server systems, optimizing data locality and minimizing latency for memory-bound workloads.
1. Hardware Specifications
The reference platform detailed here represents a high-density, dual-socket server optimized for enterprise virtualization and large-scale database operations, leveraging the inherent benefits of NUMA organization.
1.1 Core System Topology
The system employs a dual-socket motherboard configuration utilizing the latest generation server processors. The key feature is the explicit separation of CPU complexes, each with its own dedicated memory controller and local memory pool.
| Component | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Motherboard Platform | Dual-Socket Socket P+ (LGA 4189/4677 Equivalent) | Supports Intel UPI or AMD Infinity Fabric interconnects. |
| Interconnect Bus Speed (CPU-to-CPU) | 11.2 GT/s UPI 2.0 or 4.0 GT/s Infinity Fabric (per link) | Critical for NUMA inter-node communication latency. |
| Total CPU Sockets | 2 | Defines the number of distinct NUMA nodes (N=2). |
| BIOS/UEFI Features | Explicit NUMA Node Interleaving Control (Disabled by default for optimal performance) | Crucial setting for workload mapping. |
1.2 Central Processing Units (CPUs)
Both sockets are populated with identical, high-core-count processors designed for dual-socket communication efficiency.
| Parameter | Value | Impact on NUMA |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Model Family | Cascade Lake Scalable / AMD EPYC Genoa Equivalent | Determines L3 cache size and memory controller capabilities. |
| Total Cores (Physical) | 64 Cores (128 Threads) | Total system cores: 128 physical cores (256 logical threads). |
| Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz | Standard operating frequency. |
| L3 Cache Size (Last Level Cache - LLC) | 36 MB per Core Cluster (Total 2304 MB per Socket) | Determines local data residency for high-frequency access. |
| Memory Channels Supported | 8 Channels per Socket | Direct connection to the local memory bank. |
1.3 Memory Configuration (RAM)
Memory is strictly partitioned across the two NUMA nodes. Proper population is critical to maintain balanced access latency. The configuration utilizes Registered DIMMs (RDIMMs) running at maximum supported frequency.
| Parameter | Value (Per NUMA Node) | Total System Value |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | DDR4-3200 ECC RDIMM / DDR5-4800 ECC RDIMM | Error Correction Code is standard for server environments. |
| DIMM Capacity | 64 GB | High-density modules used to minimize DIMM count per channel. |
| DIMMs Populated | 8 DIMMs per Socket | Fully populating 8 of the 8 available channels per socket. |
| Total Memory Capacity per Node | 512 GB | 512 GB (Node 0) + 512 GB (Node 1) = 1024 GB Total. |
| Memory Bandwidth (Theoretical Peak) | ~204.8 GB/s per Node | Critical metric for memory-bound applications. Link: Memory Bandwidth |
NUMA Memory Layout Note: Accessing memory local to Node 0 from CPU complex 1 results in an access latency penalty approximately 1.5x to 2.5x higher than accessing local memory (Node 1). This penalty is quantified in Section 2.1 Latency Analysis.
1.4 Storage Subsystem
The storage configuration is designed to minimize I/O bottlenecks, although the primary performance characteristic remains memory access latency.
| Component | Quantity | Connection/Interface |
|---|---|---|
| NVMe SSD (Boot/OS) | 2 x 960 GB U.2 | PCIe Gen 4 x4 lanes, configured in RAID 1. |
| High-Speed Workload Storage | 8 x 3.84 TB AIC NVMe Drives | Directly attached via PCIe switch to the Root Complex (RC) of the primary CPU. |
| Bulk Storage (SAN/NAS) | N/A (Externalized) | Assumed external high-availability storage layer. Link: Storage Area Networks |
1.5 Interconnect and I/O
The I/O structure is critical, as high-speed peripherals (like 100GbE NICs or specialized accelerators) must be mapped correctly to the appropriate NUMA node to prevent cross-socket traffic over the UPI link.
| PCIe Lane Allocation | PCIe Gen 4.0/5.0 |- | Total Available Lanes (Approx) | 128 Lanes from CPU 0, 128 Lanes from CPU 1 | Managed via the CPU integrated PCIe Root Complex controllers. Link: PCIe Topology |- | Network Interface Card (NIC) | 2 x 100 GbE Mellanox ConnectX-6 | NIC 1 mapped to PCIe slots controlled by Node 0; NIC 2 mapped to Node 1. |}
2. Performance Characteristics
The performance of a NUMA system is highly dependent on the operating system scheduler's ability to maintain Link: Process Affinity. Unlike Symmetric Multiprocessing (SMP) systems where all memory is equidistant, NUMA performance exhibits distinct variances based on access patterns.
2.1 Latency Analysis
Latency is the defining metric for NUMA performance evaluation. Measurements are taken using hardware performance counters and specialized memory benchmarking tools (e.g., STREAM, LMbench).
| Access Type | Node 0 CPU Accessing Node 0 RAM (Local) | Node 0 CPU Accessing Node 1 RAM (Remote) |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache Access | ~0.5 ns | N/A (L1 is always local) |
| L3 Cache Access (Local to Core Complex) | ~12 ns | N/A |
| Local DRAM Access (Node 0) | ~70 ns | N/A |
| Remote DRAM Access (Node 1 via UPI/Fabric) | ~120 ns - 160 ns | ~70 ns (If Node 0 CPU accesses Node 1 RAM) |
Observation: The remote penalty factor is approximately 1.7x to 2.3x. This substantial difference mandates careful workload placement for optimal throughput. Link: Memory Latency
2.2 Throughput Benchmarks
The following benchmark results reflect synthetic memory bandwidth tests (STREAM benchmark) when the workload is optimally bound to its local memory.
Configuration A: Optimal NUMA Binding (Process Affinity = Local) A 64-thread application running entirely on Node 0 accessing only Node 0's 512GB RAM.
- **Read Bandwidth:** ~195 GB/s
- **Write Bandwidth:** ~180 GB/s
- **Total System Throughput (Node 0 + Node 1):** ~390 GB/s
Configuration B: Poor NUMA Binding (Interleaved/Unaware) The same 128-thread application where threads are haphazardly scheduled across both CPUs, resulting in 50% local and 50% remote memory access patterns.
- **Effective System Throughput:** ~280 GB/s - 310 GB/s
- **Performance Degradation:** 20% - 30% reduction compared to optimal binding.
This data confirms that while the raw hardware capacity remains the same, software configuration dictates the realized performance ceiling in a NUMA environment. Link: Operating System Schedulers
2.3 Inter-Node Communication Performance
The UPI/Infinity Fabric link is the bottleneck for workloads that require frequent synchronization or data exchange between the two CPU complexes.
| Metric | Value | Context |- | Peak Interconnect Bandwidth (Bi-directional) | ~25 GB/s (Estimate based on 11.2 GT/s UPI) | This bandwidth is shared by all cross-socket memory traffic and I/O requests. |- | Inter-Node Latency (Cache Line Ping-Pong) | ~250 cycles (approx. 45 ns) | Time taken for a cache line to be invalidated on one socket and fetched by the other. Link: Cache Coherency Protocols |}
For applications that can tolerate high latency or are embarrassingly parallel (where communication is minimal), the NUMA architecture delivers superior aggregate core count performance. For highly threaded, tightly coupled algorithms, the bandwidth limitation of the interconnect becomes the primary constraint. Link: Scalability Limits
3. Recommended Use Cases
NUMA architecture excels in scenarios where large datasets fit within the local memory footprint of a single CPU complex, or where workloads can be cleanly partitioned into independent sets of threads and memory.
3.1 Enterprise Virtualization Hosts
This is arguably the most common and effective use case. Hypervisors (like VMware ESXi, KVM, Hyper-V) are NUMA-aware and excel at "pinning" Virtual Machines (VMs) to specific physical NUMA nodes.
- **Scenario:** Hosting 10 dense VMs, each requiring 64GB RAM and 16 Cores.
- **Optimal Mapping:** Assign 5 VMs entirely to Node 0 (5 x 16 Cores = 80 Cores available) and 5 VMs entirely to Node 1.
- **Benefit:** Each VM enjoys near-zero remote memory access penalties, maximizing VM density and performance predictability. Link: Virtual Machine Placement Strategies
3.2 Large-Scale In-Memory Databases (IMDB)
Databases like SAP HANA or large PostgreSQL/SQL Server instances benefit immensely from NUMA awareness, provided the working set fits within the local 512GB pool, or the query planner can route subsequent data access intelligently.
- **Configuration Tactic:** Configure the database instance to utilize only the cores and memory associated with one physical socket initially. If scaling beyond 512GB is required, use explicit database configuration settings to manage memory allocation across nodes. Link: Database Memory Management
3.3 High-Performance Computing (HPC) Workloads
Applications using Message Passing Interface (MPI) libraries can be highly optimized. If the MPI rank mapping aligns with the physical NUMA topology (i.e., Rank 0-63 runs on Node 0, Rank 64-127 runs on Node 1), communication overhead is minimized.
- **Requirement:** The HPC scheduler (e.g., SLURM) must have explicit NUMA topology awareness enabled. Link: MPI Process Topology
3.4 Web Serving and Caching Layers
High-throughput caching layers (e.g., Redis clusters spanning multiple processes) that are socket-aware can dedicate one process instance per NUMA node, dedicating local CPU cores and local memory channels to that specific instance. This prevents resource contention between the processes that would occur on an SMP system. Link: Caching Architecture
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To fully appreciate the NUMA dual-socket configuration, it must be contrasted against single-socket systems (S-Socket) and higher-degree multi-socket systems (4-Socket or higher).
4.1 NUMA (2-Socket) vs. Single-Socket (1-Socket)
The single-socket configuration offers the absolute lowest possible memory latency, as all memory is directly local to the single CPU complex.
| Feature | 2-Socket NUMA (Reference) | 1-Socket SMP (e.g., Single EPYC/Xeon) |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Core Count | 128 Cores | 64 Cores (Max for current generation 1S) |
| Maximum Local Memory Latency | ~70 ns | ~60 ns (Slightly lower due to no cross-socket hardware) |
| Aggregate Memory Bandwidth | ~400 GB/s | ~200 GB/s |
| Cost Efficiency (Performance/Dollar) | High (Scales well beyond 1S limits) | Moderate (Limited by single CPU scale) |
| Management Complexity | High (Requires OS/Application awareness) | Low (Uniform memory access) |
Conclusion: The 2-Socket NUMA configuration provides nearly double the processing power and memory bandwidth of a 1-Socket system at the cost of introducing measurable remote access latency. It is the standard choice for high-density workloads that exceed the practical limits of a single CPU package. Link: Single Socket Limitations
4.2 NUMA (2-Socket) vs. 4-Socket/8-Socket Systems
Increasing the number of sockets introduces more NUMA nodes (N=4 or N=8), which increases complexity significantly.
- **4-Socket System:** (4 NUMA Nodes). Memory access between nodes is still relatively fast, often using a ring interconnect (e.g., Intel Mesh Architecture). Remote latency is typically only slightly higher than 2-socket remote latency, but the total number of potential remote hops increases.
- **8-Socket System:** (8 NUMA Nodes). Interconnect topology becomes complex (e.g., QPI points or complex fabric meshes). The latency penalty for accessing memory on the "farthest" node can be 3x to 4x the local access time.
| Parameter | 2-Socket NUMA (N=2) | 4-Socket System (N=4) | 8-Socket System (N=8) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Count Potential | Up to 128 | Up to 256 | Up to 512 |
| Average Remote Latency Penalty Factor | ~1.7x | ~2.0x | ~3.0x+ |
| Ease of Workload Pinning | High | Moderate | Low (Requires sophisticated partitioning) |
| System Cost | Baseline | High | Very High |
Conclusion: The 2-Socket NUMA configuration represents the optimal trade-off point for most enterprise workloads, balancing high core count and bandwidth aggregation with manageable latency penalties. Systems with 4 or 8 sockets are reserved for monolithic applications that require extreme amounts of RAM (e.g., petabyte-scale data warehousing) where the slight increase in latency is acceptable compared to the impossibility of fitting the workload onto 2 sockets. Link: Multi-Socket Interconnects
5. Maintenance Considerations
While the operational performance relies on software configuration, the physical maintenance of a NUMA server requires attention to thermal management and power stability, exacerbated by the high density of components.
5.1 Thermal Management and Cooling
High-core-count CPUs generate substantial thermal output (TDP). In a dual-socket configuration, the thermal density is concentrated in two physical areas on the motherboard.
- **TDP Profile:** If using 250W TDP CPUs, the system generates 500W+ of heat just from the processors, excluding chipset and memory.
- **Airflow Requirements:** Requires high static pressure fans and optimized chassis airflow pathways to ensure adequate cooling across both CPU heatsinks simultaneously. Insufficient cooling leads to thermal throttling, which reduces core clock speed and significantly impacts the observed latency profile across the UPI links as the CPUs attempt to manage power states. Link: Thermal Throttling
- **Thermal Paste Application:** Re-application of thermal interface material during maintenance must ensure perfect contact on both sockets, as uneven cooling can cause one node to throttle while the other operates normally, leading to unpredictable performance asymmetry.
5.2 Power Requirements and Redundancy
The increased memory density and dual CPU power draw necessitate robust power infrastructure.
- **PSU Sizing:** A minimum of 1600W redundant (1+1) Platinum/Titanium rated Power Supply Units (PSUs) is standard for this configuration. Link: PSU Efficiency Ratings
- **Power Delivery Consistency:** NUMA performance is sensitive to voltage fluctuations. The UPI/Infinity Fabric link relies on precise timing. Poor quality power delivery can introduce transient errors or instability in the high-speed interconnect, manifesting as intermittent remote memory failures or increased error correction overhead.
5.3 Firmware and Driver Updates
Maintaining the system firmware is paramount for NUMA stability and performance.
- **BIOS/UEFI:** Updates frequently include microcode patches that refine the memory controller timings and the Quality of Service (QoS) mechanisms governing the UPI/Fabric links. Always ensure the BIOS version explicitly supports the installed memory type and speed to guarantee correct channel population recognition. Link: BIOS Tuning
- **OS Kernel/Hypervisor:** The operating system scheduler relies on accurate Machine Check Exception (MCE) reporting and topology information provided by the BIOS. Outdated drivers can misinterpret the NUMA layout, leading to incorrect process affinity assignments and the performance degradation discussed in Section 2.2. Link: Kernel Topology Awareness
5.4 Maintenance of I/O Affinity
When servicing or replacing components connected via PCIe (e.g., adding a new GPU accelerator or NIC), administrators must verify the new device's physical slot mapping relative to the CPU Root Complexes.
- **Hot-Add/Hot-Swap:** If the system supports hot-add features, ensure the device driver correctly identifies and registers the new resource on the intended NUMA node. Failure to do so forces all subsequent memory accesses for that device across the UPI link, effectively penalizing the entire system performance until the process affinity is corrected. Link: PCIe Hot-Plug Management
Summary and Conclusion
The dual-socket NUMA architecture represents the current sweet spot for enterprise computing, offering massive parallelism (up to 128 physical cores) and high aggregate memory bandwidth (approaching 400 GB/s). Its successful deployment hinges entirely on the awareness and configuration of the operating system and application software to respect the physical boundaries of the two distinct memory domains. When correctly managed through process affinity, pinning, and topology-aware scheduling, this configuration delivers predictable, high-throughput performance across demanding workloads such as virtualization and large-scale data processing. Deviation from optimal affinity results in performance degradation directly attributable to the measured remote memory latency penalty.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️