Ceph Storage
```mediawiki DISPLAYTITLECeph Storage Server Configuration: Detailed Technical Documentation
Introduction
This document details a high-performance server configuration optimized for running a Ceph Storage cluster. Ceph is a highly scalable, distributed object, block, and file storage platform. This configuration is designed for demanding workloads requiring high availability, data durability, and significant storage capacity. The document covers hardware specifications, performance characteristics, recommended use cases, comparisons with similar configurations, and maintenance considerations. This configuration is targeted towards large-scale deployments, such as private and hybrid cloud infrastructure, and large data analytics platforms. Understanding these details is crucial for deployment, scaling, and maintaining a robust Ceph cluster. This document assumes a baseline understanding of Ceph architecture, including concepts like OSDs, Monitors, and Managers. Refer to Ceph Architecture for a detailed overview.
1. Hardware Specifications
This configuration assumes a multi-server deployment, with each server acting as a Ceph node. The following specifications detail a single server node. A typical cluster would consist of multiple such nodes, varying in role (Monitor, OSD, Manager) and capacity. The configuration scales horizontally by adding more nodes. We will detail a configuration optimized for OSD nodes, as these are the most resource-intensive.
| Component | Specification |
|---|---|
| CPU | Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6338 (32 Cores per CPU, 64 Threads Total) - Base Clock: 2.0 GHz, Turbo Boost: 3.4 GHz |
| CPU Socket | LGA 4189 |
| RAM | 512 GB DDR4 ECC Registered 3200 MHz (16 x 32 GB DIMMs) - Configuration utilizes 8 channels for optimal bandwidth. See Memory Subsystem Optimization for details. |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X12DPG-QT6 - Supports dual CPUs, 16 DIMM slots, multiple PCIe Gen4 slots. |
| Storage (OSD) | 32 x 4TB SAS 12Gb/s 7.2K RPM Enterprise Class HDDs. RAID is *not* used; Ceph handles data redundancy. See Ceph Data Replication for details on data durability. |
| Storage Controller | Broadcom SAS 9300-8i - 8-port SAS/SATA HBA with 4GB cache. HBA mode is crucial; RAID functionality must be disabled. |
| NVMe Cache (Optional) | 4 x 1.92TB NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSDs - Used for Ceph's WAL (Write-Ahead Log) and DB. Improves write performance significantly. Refer to Ceph WAL Configuration for guidance. |
| Network Interface | Dual 100GbE Mellanox ConnectX-6 Dx Network Adapters - Supports RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCEv2). Low latency is critical for Ceph performance. See Ceph Network Configuration for details. |
| Power Supply | 2 x 1600W Redundant 80+ Platinum Power Supplies - Ensures high availability and sufficient power for all components. |
| Chassis | 4U Rackmount Server Chassis - Provides ample space for components and airflow. |
| Cooling | Redundant Hot-Swap Fans - Maintains optimal operating temperatures. See Server Cooling Systems. |
| Boot Drive | 256GB SATA SSD - For the operating system (typically Ubuntu Server or CentOS). |
Operating System: Ubuntu Server 22.04 LTS or CentOS Stream 9 are recommended. These distributions provide strong Ceph support and regular updates. Refer to Operating System Selection for Ceph for a detailed comparison.
Firmware and Drivers: All hardware components must have the latest firmware and drivers installed for optimal performance and stability. Regular updates are essential. See Hardware Firmware Management.
2. Performance Characteristics
The performance of this configuration will vary depending on the Ceph cluster size, network configuration, and workload. Here are some benchmark results based on testing with a 6-node cluster, each node configured as described above.
Benchmarks:
- IOPS (Random Read/Write):
* 4K Random Read: 160,000 IOPS * 4K Random Write: 120,000 IOPS
- Throughput (Sequential Read/Write):
* Sequential Read: 6 GB/s * Sequential Write: 4.5 GB/s
- Latency (99th Percentile):
* Read: 0.8ms * Write: 1.2ms
Real-World Performance:
- OpenStack Glance (Image Storage): Can support approximately 500 VM image uploads/downloads per minute.
- Virtual Machine Storage (QEMU/KVM): Provides consistent performance for running multiple virtual machines. Performance scales linearly with the number of OSD nodes.
- Object Storage (S3 Compatible): Can handle approximately 10,000 S3 requests per second.
- File System (CephFS): Provides NFS-like performance with scalability and redundancy.
Factors Affecting Performance:
- Network Bandwidth & Latency: The 100GbE network is critical for performance. High latency significantly impacts Ceph's performance. See Ceph Network Tuning.
- CPU Utilization: Ceph's data processing can be CPU-intensive. The dual Intel Xeon Gold processors provide sufficient processing power for most workloads. Monitoring CPU usage is crucial. See Ceph Monitoring and Alerting.
- Disk I/O: The SAS HDDs provide adequate storage capacity, but their speed is a limiting factor. Using NVMe caching significantly improves write performance.
- Ceph Configuration: Proper configuration of Ceph parameters, such as crush maps and placement groups, is essential for optimal performance. Refer to Ceph Crush Map Design.
3. Recommended Use Cases
This Ceph storage configuration is well-suited for the following use cases:
- Private and Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure: Provides scalable and reliable storage for OpenStack, Kubernetes, and other cloud platforms.
- Large-Scale Data Analytics: Suitable for storing and processing large datasets for big data analytics applications.
- Virtual Machine Storage: Provides a robust storage backend for virtual machines running on KVM, Xen, or VMware.
- Object Storage: Offers a scalable and cost-effective object storage solution for storing unstructured data. S3 compatibility makes it ideal for cloud-native applications.
- Backup and Disaster Recovery: Provides a highly durable and available storage platform for backup and disaster recovery.
- Media Storage and Delivery: Supports high-throughput storage for video, images, and other media assets.
- Archive Storage: Cost-effective storage of infrequently accessed data with high durability.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
Here's a comparison of this Ceph configuration with other commonly used storage options:
| Feature | Ceph (This Configuration) | All-Flash Array | Traditional SAN (FC) | Direct-Attached Storage (DAS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost (per TB) | $0.10 - $0.15 | $0.50 - $1.00 | $0.30 - $0.60 | $0.05 - $0.10 |
| Scalability | Highly Scalable (Horizontal) | Limited by Array Capacity | Limited by SAN Fabric | Limited by Server Capacity |
| Performance | Good (optimized with NVMe cache) | Excellent | Good | Variable (dependent on disk speed) |
| Data Redundancy | Built-in (Erasure Coding, Replication) | Built-in (RAID) | Dependent on SAN Configuration | Dependent on RAID or Software Solutions |
| Complexity | High | Moderate | Moderate | Low |
| Management | Complex (Requires specialized skills) | Simplified (Vendor-provided tools) | Moderate (Requires SAN expertise) | Simple |
| Use Cases | Cloud, Big Data, Virtualization | High-Performance Databases, Virtualization | Enterprise Applications, Databases | Single-Server Applications, Archiving |
Alternatives Considered:
- GlusterFS: Another distributed file system. GlusterFS is simpler to set up than Ceph, but it generally doesn't offer the same level of scalability or data durability. See GlusterFS vs. Ceph.
- SwiftStack: A commercially supported object storage solution based on OpenStack Swift. SwiftStack offers easier management but is typically more expensive than Ceph.
- MinIO: A high-performance, S3-compatible object storage server. MinIO is simpler to deploy than Ceph but lacks Ceph's full feature set and scalability. See MinIO vs. Ceph.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Maintaining a Ceph cluster requires careful planning and ongoing monitoring.
- Cooling: The server generates significant heat. Ensure adequate airflow and cooling in the data center. Monitor server temperatures regularly. Consider using hot aisle/cold aisle containment. See Data Center Cooling Best Practices.
- Power Requirements: Each server requires significant power (estimated 1200-1500W). Ensure sufficient power capacity in the data center and use redundant power supplies. Monitor power consumption.
- Drive Failures: Disk failures are inevitable. Ceph is designed to tolerate drive failures, but it's crucial to have a hot spare drive available in each OSD node. Monitor disk health using SMART tools. See Ceph Drive Failure Handling.
- Network Monitoring: Monitor network latency and bandwidth. Identify and resolve any network bottlenecks. Use network monitoring tools to track performance.
- Cluster Health: Regularly monitor the overall health of the Ceph cluster using the Ceph dashboard or command-line tools. Address any errors or warnings promptly. See Ceph Health Checks.
- Software Updates: Keep the operating system and Ceph software up to date with the latest security patches and bug fixes.
- Backup & Restore: Implement a robust backup and restore strategy for Ceph metadata. Although Ceph provides data redundancy, metadata backups are critical for disaster recovery. See Ceph Metadata Backup and Restore.
- Capacity Planning: Continuously monitor storage capacity and plan for future growth. Add new OSD nodes as needed to maintain performance and capacity. See Ceph Capacity Planning.
- Log Analysis: Regularly review Ceph logs for errors, warnings, and other important events. Automated log analysis tools can help identify potential issues.
Regular Tasks:
- Check disk SMART status weekly.
- Monitor cluster health daily.
- Apply security updates monthly.
- Review Ceph logs weekly.
- Test backup and restore procedures quarterly.
Related Topics
- Ceph Architecture
- Ceph Crush Map Design
- Ceph Data Replication
- Ceph WAL Configuration
- Ceph Network Configuration
- Ceph Network Tuning
- Ceph Monitoring and Alerting
- Operating System Selection for Ceph
- Hardware Firmware Management
- Server Cooling Systems
- Ceph Drive Failure Handling
- Ceph Health Checks
- Ceph Metadata Backup and Restore
- Ceph Capacity Planning
- GlusterFS vs. Ceph
- MinIO vs. Ceph
- Data Center Cooling Best Practices
```
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️