Storage Options
Server Configuration Documentation: Advanced Storage Options (Model: Titan-S9000)
This document details the technical specifications, performance metrics, recommended deployment scenarios, comparative analysis, and maintenance requirements for the Titan-S9000 server platform, specifically configured for high-density, high-throughput storage workloads.
1. Hardware Specifications
The Titan-S9000 is engineered on a dual-socket, 4U rackmount chassis, optimized for maximum internal drive capacity while maintaining robust computational capabilities for storage controller functions (e.g., RAID management, compression, deduplication, and NVMe-oF targets).
1.1 Core System Architecture
The foundation of the Titan-S9000 leverages the latest generation server platform architecture, supporting PCIe Gen 5.0 connectivity and high-speed memory channels.
| Component | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Chassis Form Factor | 4U Rackmount | Supports extensive drive bays and cooling redundancy. |
| Motherboard Chipset | Intel C741 / AMD SP5 (Config Dependent) | Varies based on CPU selection; both support advanced I/O. |
| CPU Sockets | 2 (Dual Socket) | Supports Intel Xeon Scalable (Sapphire Rapids/Emerald Rapids) or AMD EPYC (Genoa/Bergamo). |
| Maximum Thermal Design Power (TDP) | Up to 350W per CPU | Requires high-airflow cooling solutions. |
| BIOS/UEFI | AMI Aptio V | Supports secure boot and remote management via BMC. |
| Base Management Controller (BMC) | ASPEED AST2600 | Provides IPMI and Redfish management interfaces. |
1.2 Processor (CPU) Configuration
The selection of CPUs directly impacts the maximum achievable storage I/O throughput, particularly for software-defined storage (SDS) solutions requiring heavy computation for parity calculations or advanced data features.
| Model Tier | CPU Model (Example) | Cores/Threads | Base/Max Clock (GHz) | PCIe Lanes (Total) | L3 Cache (MB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Throughput | Intel Xeon Platinum 8480+ | 56C / 112T | 2.3 / 3.8 | 112 (PCIe 5.0) | 112 |
| Optimal Balance | AMD EPYC 9354P | 32C / 64T | 3.2 / 3.7 | 128 (PCIe 5.0) | 256 |
| Density Optimized | Intel Xeon Gold 6444Y | 16C / 32T | 3.6 / 4.1 | 80 (PCIe 5.0) | 45 |
Refer to CPU Architecture Standards for detailed core performance metrics.
1.3 Memory (RAM) Subsystem
The memory subsystem supports high-speed DDR5 ECC RDIMMs, crucial for caching metadata and write buffers in high-performance storage arrays.
| Parameter | Specification | Impact on Storage |
|---|---|---|
| Type | DDR5 ECC RDIMM / LRDIMM | Error correction is mandatory for data integrity. |
| Speed Support | Up to 5600 MT/s (JEDEC standard) | Faster speeds reduce latency for metadata lookups. |
| Maximum Capacity | 8 TB (using 256GB LRDIMMs) | Essential for large-scale ZFS ARC or software RAID parity. |
| Channels per Socket | 12 Channels (Total 24) | Provides massive aggregate memory bandwidth. |
| Configuration | Minimum 16 DIMMs installed for balanced performance across all memory controllers. |
1.4 Storage Bay Configuration and Backplane
The Titan-S9000 chassis is designed for maximum flexibility in drive media, supporting a mix of NVMe and SAS/SATA drives via intelligent backplanes.
| Bay Type | Quantity | Interface Support | Backplane Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Access (Hot-Swap) | 36 x 3.5"/2.5" Bays | SAS3 (12Gb/s) or SATA III (6Gb/s) | Dual-Port SAS Expander Backplane (SFF-8643/8644 connectivity) |
| Mid-Chassis (Hot-Swap) | 8 x 2.5" U.2 Bays | NVMe (PCIe 5.0 x4) | Dedicated PCIe switch fabric connection for low latency. |
| Rear Access (Optional) | 4 x 2.5" Bays | SAS/SATA/NVMe (via OCP Mezzanine) | Used typically for boot drives or cold storage tiers. |
1.5 Storage Controller and Host Bus Adapters (HBAs)
The choice of controller dictates the maximum raw I/O bandwidth and the capability for advanced features like hardware RAID offload or NVMe namespace management.
Option A: High-Speed NVMe Focus
- **Controller:** Broadcom/Avago MegaRAID 9680-8i (or equivalent) in HBA/IT Mode.
- **Connectivity:** PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.
- **Function:** Primarily used for direct-attached NVMe management or pass-through (JBOD mode) when software RAID (e.g., Linux mdadm) is preferred. Supports up to 16 NVMe devices directly via U.2 risers.
Option B: Mixed SAS/SATA Focus (High Density)
- **Controller:** Dual LSI SAS 9405W-16i HBAs.
- **Connectivity:** Dual PCIe 5.0 x8 connections for redundancy and load balancing.
- **Function:** Manages the 36 front bays. Each HBA supports 16 internal ports (via expanders), allowing full saturation of the 36 bays with dual-path redundancy. Supports data scrubbing and advanced error recovery.
1.6 Networking Interface Cards (NICs)
Storage performance is often bottlenecked by the network interface. The Titan-S9000 supports high-bandwidth fabric connections essential for Network Attached Storage (NAS) and Storage Area Network (SAN) deployments.
| Interface | Quantity (Standard) | Speed | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseboard Management (BMC) | 1 | 1GbE | Out-of-band management. |
| Primary Data Fabric (LOM) | 2 (Redundant) | 25GbE (SFP28) | Standard NAS/iSCSI traffic. |
| High-Speed Fabric (PCIe 5.0 Slot) | Up to 3 slots available | 100GbE or 200GbE (InfiniBand/RoCE) | Required for high-performance NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe-oF) deployments. |
2. Performance Characteristics
The performance profile of the Titan-S9000 is highly dependent on the chosen storage media (HDD vs. SAS SSD vs. NVMe SSD) and the controller mode (Hardware RAID vs. HBA Pass-through). These benchmarks reflect a configuration utilizing 24 x 3.84TB SAS SSDs in a distributed RAID-6 configuration managed by software (e.g., Ceph OSDs).
2.1 Latency and IOPS Benchmarks
Benchmarks were conducted using FIO (Flexible I/O Tester) against the primary storage pool, targeting 70% sequential read/write and 30% random I/O mix.
| Configuration | Sequential Read (GB/s) | Sequential Write (GB/s) | Random 4K Read IOPS | Random 4K Write IOPS | Average Read Latency (µs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Titan-S9000 (SAS SSD RAID-6) | 18.5 | 16.2 | 550,000 | 480,000 | 210 |
| Titan-S9000 (NVMe U.2 RAID-0, 8 Drives) | 65.1 | 58.9 | 1,850,000 | 1,620,000 | 45 |
| Titan-S9000 (HDD Nearline, RAID-6) | 3.2 | 2.8 | 450 | 380 | 1,200 |
Analysis: The significant gap between SAS SSD and NVMe performance highlights the bottleneck shifting from the physical drive interface to the PCIe Gen 5.0 controller lanes and CPU parity processing when using NVMe devices. For maximizing IOPS, the NVMe configuration is mandatory. For raw capacity and cost efficiency, the SAS/HDD configuration remains viable, though latency increases by over 500%.
2.2 Throughput Scaling and Bottlenecks
The system's PCIe 5.0 infrastructure (up to 112 usable lanes from dual CPUs) allows for significant I/O aggregation.
- **SATA/SAS Bottleneck:** The 12Gb/s SAS interface limits a single 3.5" HDD to approximately 250 MB/s sustained throughput. With 36 drives, the theoretical aggregate throughput is $36 \times 250 \text{ MB/s} = 9000 \text{ MB/s}$ (72 Gbps). The backplane and HBA configuration must handle this without significant queuing delay.
- **NVMe Bottleneck:** An 8-drive NVMe array configured in RAID-0 utilizes 8 PCIe 5.0 x4 lanes ($\approx 32 \text{ GT/s}$ per lane). This configuration yields $8 \times 15.7 \text{ GB/s per lane} = 125.6 \text{ GB/s}$ theoretical raw bandwidth. The recorded 65.1 GB/s in the benchmark suggests controller overhead (metadata access, storage OS stack) accounts for approximately 48% overhead in this highly aggressive configuration.
Further investigation into PCIe Topology Mapping is required for optimizing NVMe placement across the CPU Integrated I/O hubs (IIO).
2.3 Power Consumption Under Load
Power efficiency is critical for high-density storage servers. Consumption was measured at the PDU inlet under a sustained 80% I/O load.
| Component Set | CPU TDP (Total) | Drive Power Draw (Estimated) | Total System Draw (Watts) | Efficiency (TB/Watt) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDD Density (36x 10TB NL-SAS) | 450W | 360W (10W/drive) | 1050W | 3.4 TB/Watt |
| SAS SSD (36x 3.84TB) | 450W | 250W (7W/drive) | 950W | 1.38 TB/Watt |
| NVMe (8x 7.68TB U.2) | 550W (Higher performance CPUs used) | 120W (15W/drive) | 1180W | 0.52 TB/Watt |
Conclusion: While NVMe offers superior performance per IOPS, HDDs remain significantly more power-efficient when measured by raw storage capacity delivered per watt consumed.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The hardware capabilities of the Titan-S9000 position it as a versatile platform suitable for several demanding storage roles, depending on the media configuration.
3.1 High-Capacity Archival and Backup Target
- **Configuration Focus:** Maximizing the 36 front bays with high-capacity (16TB+) Nearline-SAS HDDs.
- **Rationale:** The 4U form factor allows for 576TB raw capacity (using 16TB drives) or over 1.1PB raw capacity in a dual-server rack configuration. The system's dual CPUs provide sufficient processing power for hardware or software-based data compression/deduplication before writing to disk, maximizing effective capacity.
- **Related Technology:** Tape Library Integration or Cloud Storage Gateways.
3.2 Software-Defined Storage (SDS) Cluster Node
- **Configuration Focus:** Balanced CPU (e.g., 32-core AMD EPYC) with 128GB+ RAM, utilizing HBA pass-through mode for all drives (NVMe and HDD).
- **Rationale:** Ideal for running distributed file systems like Ceph, GlusterFS, or Storage Spaces Direct (S2D). The high number of PCIe lanes ensures that the storage controllers (HBAs) and the 100GbE network cards do not contend for bandwidth on the same CPU root complex. The large memory capacity supports robust OSD caching.
- **Key Requirement:** Strict adherence to Storage Cluster Configuration Guidelines to ensure uniform performance across nodes.
3.3 High-Performance Compute (HPC) Scratch Space / Local Flash Array
- **Configuration Focus:** Populating the 8 U.2 bays with high-endurance, high-IOPS NVMe drives (e.g., 15.36TB drives). Offloading networking to dedicated 200GbE adapters.
- **Rationale:** This configuration acts as ultra-low-latency local storage for high-performance computing jobs, database acceleration, or high-frequency trading platforms where sub-100 microsecond latency is critical. The system can present this storage via NVMe-oF to client nodes, eliminating traditional network overheads.
- **Constraint:** Capacity is limited (max 122TB raw NVMe in this setup), making it a performance tier, not a capacity tier.
3.4 Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Host Storage
- **Configuration Focus:** Mixed media: NVMe for OS/Metadata/Boot, SAS SSDs for primary user profiles.
- **Rationale:** VDI environments experience high levels of random I/O during boot storms. The combination of fast NVMe for the hypervisor and high-endurance SAS SSDs for pooled user data provides a resilient, performant storage layer capable of handling hundreds of concurrent user sessions. This requires careful management of VDI Storage Metrics.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
The Titan-S9000 (4U, High-Density) must be evaluated against smaller form factors (e.g., 2U optimized for NVMe) and higher-density, lower-power storage servers (e.g., 5U/JBOD expansion chassis).
4.1 Comparison Table: Form Factor and Density
This table compares the Titan-S9000 against two common alternatives in the enterprise storage space.
| Feature | Titan-S9000 (4U) | 2U NVMe Optimized Server | 5U High-Density JBOD (Controllerless) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form Factor | 4U | 2U | 5U |
| Max 3.5" Drives | 36 | 8 (Max) | 72 (Typically) |
| Max NVMe U.2 Drives | 8 (Internal) + Riser Support | 24 - 30 (Front accessible) | 0 (Requires Host Connection) |
| CPU Capability | Dual Socket, High TDP (350W/CPU) | Dual Socket, Moderate TDP (250W/CPU) | None (Relies on Host) |
| Internal Expansion Slots (PCIe) | 7 x PCIe 5.0 Slots | 4 x PCIe 5.0 Slots | 1 x PCIe 5.0 slot (for Host Connection Card) |
| Primary Role | Balanced Density/Performance | Pure Performance/Low Latency | Capacity Expansion |
4.2 Performance Trade-offs Analysis
The primary trade-off involves sacrificing some raw NVMe density (found in 2U servers) for the flexibility to include a massive amount of slower, cheaper spinning media or SAS SSDs within the same chassis.
- **Vs. 2U NVMe Optimized:** The 2U system offers superior density for *only* NVMe drives (e.g., 30 drives). However, the Titan-S9000 can host 36 SAS drives *plus* 8 NVMe drives, offering a better blended performance/capacity ratio if the workload demands both tiers of storage. The 2U system is inherently limited by its smaller thermal envelope and fewer PCIe lanes available for expansion cards (NICs).
- **Vs. 5U/JBOD Expansion:** The Titan-S9000 serves as the intelligent controller node. It manages the RAID/SDS layer. The 5U JBOD serves only as an enclosure, requiring a separate host server (often another Titan-S9000) to manage the drives via SAS cables. The Titan-S9000 offers superior processing power per terabyte stored compared to a system relying on external SAS expanders.
4.3 Cost of Ownership (TCO) Considerations
While the initial purchase price (CapEx) of the Titan-S9000 is higher due to the complex backplane and cooling required for 36+ drives, the density consolidation can lower TCO. By fitting the compute and the storage into 4U instead of using a 2U compute server connected to a separate 4U JBOD, rack space utilization improves significantly.
- **Rack Density:** $\approx 3$ times the storage capacity per rack unit compared to a standard 2U storage server.
- **Power Efficiency (Capacity Focus):** When configured with HDDs, the Titan-S9000 provides the best $/TB efficiency achievable in a self-contained server unit.
See Total Cost of Ownership Modeling for Storage Infrastructure for detailed amortization schedules.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Maintaining a high-density, high-I/O server requires rigorous attention to thermal management, power redundancy, and drive replacement procedures.
5.1 Thermal Management and Airflow
The Titan-S9000 utilizes high static pressure fans optimized for dense drive arrays that restrict airflow paths.
- **Fan Configuration:** Typically configured with 5+1 redundant, hot-swappable fan modules. Fan speed is dynamically governed by the BMC based on CPU/GPU temperature sensors and the backplane temperature sensors (which monitor drive bay ambient temperature).
- **Minimum Airflow Requirement:** 150 CFM (Cubic Feet per Minute) across the motherboard complex is required at full load (350W CPUs + 36 drives generating heat).
- **Rack Environment:** Must be deployed in racks certified for high-density cooling (e.g., hot aisle containment). Deployment in standard 30-inch depth racks is recommended to allow sufficient space behind the unit for cable management without impeding rear exhaust flow.
- **Dust Control:** Due to the high fan RPMs required, dust accumulation significantly degrades cooling performance. Regular filter cleaning or deployment in positive-pressure data halls is essential to prevent thermal throttling, which directly impacts Storage Performance Consistency.
5.2 Power Redundancy and Requirements
The system requires significant power input, especially when populated with high-speed SAS SSDs or NVMe drives drawing peak power during initialization or heavy write operations.
- **PSU Configuration:** Shipped standard with dual 2000W 80+ Titanium certified redundant power supplies (N+1 configuration).
- **Input Requirements:** Requires dual 20A, 208V circuits for full deployment (e.g., 36 SSDs + dual 300W CPUs). A single 30A 120V circuit may only support the system in a low-utilization HDD configuration. Load balancing across two separate Power Distribution Units (PDUs) is mandatory for high availability.
- **Power-Up Sequencing:** Due to the inrush current associated with charging capacitors across 36+ drives, a controlled power-up sequence via the Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI) or integrated rack PDU sequencing is advised to prevent tripping upstream circuit breakers.
5.3 Drive Replacement and Predictive Failure Analysis
Hot-swapping drives in a high-density chassis requires adherence to specific procedures to avoid data loss or system instability.
1. **Identification:** Use the BMC interface or the drive management utility (e.g., Dell OpenManage Server Administrator, HPE Insight Manager) to identify the failed drive and confirm its physical location. 2. **Status Check:** Verify that the drive status LED is solid amber (failure) and that the surrounding drives are operating within normal temperature parameters. 3. **Eject Procedure:** Initiate the drive lock mechanism. For SAS/SATA drives, depress the release lever fully. For U.2 NVMe drives, ensure the ejection mechanism is fully depressed to disengage the hot-plug connector safely. 4. **Rebuild Process:** Once the replacement drive is inserted, the system automatically initiates the rebuild process (for RAID configurations). Monitoring the rebuild progress is crucial, as the system operates under increased stress and vulnerability during this period. Performance degradation during rebuilds can be severe, especially with large HDDs (e.g., >10TB). Consult RAID Rebuild Optimization Techniques. 5. **Predictive Failure:** The system actively monitors SMART data and HBA error counts. Drives reporting high corrected error rates should be proactively replaced during scheduled maintenance windows rather than waiting for hard failure, minimizing impact on Storage Availability SLAs.
5.4 Firmware and Software Updates
Maintaining synchronized firmware across all storage components is paramount for stability.
- **Critical Components:** BIOS/UEFI, BMC, HBA/RAID Controller Firmware, and Backplane Expander Firmware.
- **Dependency Chain:** HBA firmware updates often require specific BIOS settings (e.g., PCIe bus configuration) to function correctly. Updates must follow vendor-provided sequences. Failure to update the backplane firmware in sync with the HBA firmware can lead to intermittent connectivity loss under heavy load, often manifesting as "phantom drive drops."
Server Maintenance Schedules should allocate quarterly time slots specifically for storage firmware maintenance.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️