Storage Capacity
Technical Deep Dive: High-Capacity Storage Server Configuration (Model: ST-HCS-9000)
This document provides an exhaustive technical analysis of the ST-HCS-9000 server configuration, specifically optimized for maximum Storage Capacity and high-density data retention workloads. This configuration prioritizes raw storage volume and sustained throughput over ultra-low latency, making it ideal for archival, big data lakes, and massive media repositories.
1. Hardware Specifications
The ST-HCS-9000 is engineered around a high-density 4U chassis designed to maximize the storage-to-rack-unit ratio while maintaining adequate thermal management for dense HDD arrays. The architecture is built on a dual-socket platform to support the substantial PCIe lane requirements necessary for high-speed NVMe caching and extensive HBA connectivity.
1.1. Chassis and System Board
The foundation of the ST-HCS-9000 is its purpose-built chassis, optimized for drive density.
| Component | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Chassis Model | ST-HCS-C4U-D90 | 4U Rackmount, optimized for front/mid/rear hot-swap bays |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X13DPH-T Dual Socket | Supports Intel Xeon Scalable (5th Gen) |
| DIMM Slots | 32 (16 per CPU) | Supports up to 8 TB total RAM via 256 GB RDIMMs |
| Power Supplies | 2x 2200W (2+1 Redundant) | Platinum efficiency, supporting peak load during simultaneous drive spin-up and intensive I/O operations. |
1.2. Central Processing Units (CPU)
The processing requirement for a high-capacity storage node is often focused on data integrity, parity calculation (e.g., ZFS or RAID management), and network saturation handling, rather than single-threaded application performance.
| Component | Specification | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Model | 2x Intel Xeon Gold 6548Y+ | 32 Cores / 64 Threads per socket (Total 64C/128T). High core count supports parallel I/O and background scrubbing. |
| Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz | |
| Max Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz | |
| L3 Cache | 60 MB (Per CPU) | |
| TDP (Total) | 350W (Per CPU) | |
| PCIe Lanes | 112 Lanes Total (PCIe Gen 5.0) | Crucial for populating all SAS HBAs and high-speed NICs simultaneously. |
1.3. Memory Configuration
The memory configuration is sized to support large OS caches, metadata operations, and high-performance ZFS ARC (Adaptive Replacement Cache) sizes, which are critical for managing metadata across petabytes of storage.
| Component | Specification | Configuration Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Total System Memory | 1024 GB (1 TB) | Optimized for metadata handling in large-scale file systems. |
| Module Type | DDR5-4800 Registered DIMM (RDIMM) | |
| Module Size | 64 GB per slot | |
| Configuration | 16 x 64 GB DIMMs populated (8 per CPU, balanced configuration) | Ensures optimal memory channel utilization and ECC integrity. |
1.4. Primary Storage Subsystem (Data Drives)
This configuration is tailored for maximum raw capacity using enterprise-grade HDDs, balancing energy efficiency with density.
| Component | Specification | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Enterprise Nearline SAS (NL-SAS) HDD | |
| Capacity per Drive | 24 TB (CMR, 7200 RPM) | |
| Interface | 12 Gb/s SAS | |
| Total Front Bays | 72 Bays (3 Rows of 24) | |
| Total Raw Capacity | 1,728 TB (1.728 PB) | |
| RAID Configuration | RAID 6 (Configurable via HBA) | Allows for dual drive failure within any designated RAID group. |
1.5. Secondary Storage Subsystem (Caching/Metadata)
To mitigate the inherent latency of high-density HDDs, a dedicated, high-speed NVMe tier is integrated for metadata logging and read/write caching.
| Component | Specification | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Enterprise U.2 NVMe SSD (PCIe 4.0 x4) | High endurance, low latency. |
| Capacity per Drive | 7.68 TB | |
| Total NVMe Capacity | 30.72 TB (4 Drives) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 Slot (Dedicated Riser) | |
| Role | ZIL/SLOG or dedicated metadata volume |
1.6. Storage Controllers and Interconnects
Managing 72 SAS drives requires high-port-count, high-throughput HBAs. We utilize a dual-controller architecture for redundancy and load balancing across the PCIe bus.
| Component | Specification | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| Primary HBA (Controller 1) | Broadcom 9500-24i (24 Internal Ports) | Manages drive bays 1-36. Supports SAS4/SATA. |
| Secondary HBA (Controller 2) | Broadcom 9500-24i (24 Internal Ports) | Manages drive bays 37-72. |
| Tertiary HBA (Expansion) | Broadcom 9500-16e (External Ports) | Reserved for future JBOD expansion via SAS expanders. |
| NVMe Adapter | PCIe 4.0 x8 U.2 Adapter Card | Connects the 4 NVMe drives to the CPU PCIe lanes directly. |
1.7. Networking
High-capacity servers must be able to ingest and serve data without becoming a network bottleneck. This configuration specifies dual 100GbE connectivity for maximum throughput.
| Component | Specification | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Network Interface Card (NIC) | Mellanox ConnectX-6 Dx Dual Port 100GbE | |
| Interface Type | QSFP28 (Optical/DAC) | |
| Total Bandwidth | 200 Gbps Aggregate | |
| Offloads | RDMA (RoCE v2) and TSO support. |
2. Performance Characteristics
The performance profile of the ST-HCS-9000 is characterized by extremely high sequential throughput capabilities, offset by moderate random I/O latency due to the reliance on high-capacity HDDs. Performance tuning focuses heavily on ensuring the CPU and RAM can service the metadata demands of the large drive array efficiently.
2.1. Sequential Throughput Benchmarks
Benchmarks were conducted using FIO (Flexible I/O Tester) against a RAID 6 array configuration (68 drives active, 4 spares) utilizing ZFS as the underlying volume manager.
| Workload Metric | Configuration | Result (Aggregate) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequential Read (128K Block) | RAID 6 (ZFS) | 11.5 GB/s | Achieved by overlapping I/O across both HBAs and utilizing 100GbE NICs. |
| Sequential Write (128K Block) | RAID 6 (ZFS, w/ NVMe SLOG) | 8.9 GB/s | Write performance is limited by the parity calculation overhead and the sustained write speed of the NL-SAS drives. |
| Sequential Read (128K Block) | Cache Hit (Metadata in 1TB RAM) | > 150 GB/s (Internal Bus Speed) | Theoretical maximum based on internal memory bandwidth. |
2.2. Random I/O Performance
Random I/O is the primary bottleneck in high-capacity HDD arrays. The performance gains here rely heavily on the 30 TB NVMe cache tier.
| Workload Metric | Configuration | Result | Latency Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Random Read (4K Block) | RAID 6 (HDD Only) | ~2,500 IOPS | P99 Latency: > 15 ms |
| Random Read (4K Block) | RAID 6 (With NVMe Cache) | ~45,000 IOPS | P99 Latency: < 1.5 ms (For cached metadata/hot blocks) |
| Random Write (4K Block) | RAID 6 (With NVMe SLOG) | ~18,000 IOPS | Achieved by synchronously logging writes to the high-speed NVMe ZIL/SLOG device before committing to the slower HDDs. |
2.3. Scalability and Network Saturation
The 200 Gbps networking capability allows the server to sustain near-theoretical maximum throughput for large file transfers.
- **Sustained Throughput:** The system demonstrated the ability to sustain 11.0 GB/s reads over the dual 100GbE links for periods exceeding 48 hours, confirming the thermal and power systems can handle sustained high utilization.
- **CPU Overhead:** During peak throughput (11.5 GB/s), the CPU utilization across all 128 threads averaged 35%. This overhead is primarily attributed to kernel network stack processing and ZFS checksum verification. This leaves significant headroom for Deduplication or Compression routines if enabled.
2.4. Power Consumption and Thermal Profile
Power consumption is a critical performance characteristic for high-density storage.
- **Idle Power Draw:** Approximately 450W (When drives are spun down or in deep sleep mode, managed via SAS expander power states).
- **Peak Load Power Draw:** 3,100W (Simultaneous CPU turbo boost, all drives active, heavy network traffic).
- **Thermal Management:** The system requires high-airflow cooling (minimum 60 CFM per rack unit). The 4U chassis utilizes 6x 120mm high-static-pressure fans operating at 70% duty cycle under full load to maintain internal temperatures below 25°C ambient. ASHRAE guidelines must be strictly followed for optimal component longevity.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The ST-HCS-9000 configuration is specifically engineered for environments where data volume and long-term retention outweigh the need for instantaneous, low-latency access to every single block.
3.1. Big Data Data Lakes and Analytics
This configuration is perfectly suited for housing large, infrequently accessed datasets required by data science and analytical platforms.
- **Hadoop/Spark Storage:** Ideal for deploying as a high-density HDFS NameNode storage secondary, or as a primary storage target for large Parquet/ORC files where sequential read performance (scanning large datasets) is paramount. The high core count supports the numerous map/reduce tasks accessing the data concurrently.
- **Archival Tiers:** Serving as the primary cold or warm storage tier, utilizing Tiered Storage policies to stage less active data onto the massive HDD pool while keeping metadata and active working sets in the NVMe cache.
3.2. Media and Content Repositories
Massive video libraries, raw scientific imagery, and high-resolution geospatial data benefit directly from the sheer capacity and sequential read speeds.
- **Video Editing Proxies/Masters:** Storing terabytes of 4K/8K source material. The 11.5 GB/s read rate allows multiple editors (via NFS or SMB) to stream high-bitrate content simultaneously without buffering issues, provided the network fabric is also 100GbE capable.
- **Scientific Simulation Outputs:** Housing the massive checkpoint files generated by high-performance computing (HPC) clusters.
3.3. Backup and Disaster Recovery Targets
For organizations requiring long-term, on-premises retention for regulatory compliance or immediate local recovery, the 1.7 PB raw capacity offers substantial buffer space.
- **Immutable Storage:** When paired with appropriate software (e.g., WORM features in the file system layer), this hardware provides a robust, high-density target for immutable backups.
- **Tape Library Offload:** Serving as the immediate staging area before data is moved to LTO archives.
3.4. Virtualization Storage (Secondary)
While not optimized for primary, high-IOP virtual machine storage (which requires lower latency), it excels as a secondary datastore for VDI non-persistent desktops or long-term archival of VM snapshots and templates. The 16-way RAID protection provides enterprise-level data safety for these secondary workloads.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the ST-HCS-9000, we compare it against two common alternatives: a high-performance all-flash configuration (ST-HFA-4000) and a density-optimized, lower-power configuration (ST-HCS-5000).
4.1. Configuration Comparison Table
This table highlights the fundamental trade-offs in system design: Capacity vs. Performance vs. Cost/Density.
| Feature | ST-HCS-9000 (This Configuration) | ST-HFA-4000 (High-Performance All-Flash) | ST-HCS-5000 (Density Optimized HDD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Size | 4U | 2U (Max 24 Drives) | 5U (Max 90 Drives) |
| Raw Capacity (Approx.) | 1.7 PB | 192 TB (Using 7.68TB U.2 SSDs) | 2.16 PB (Using 24TB eMLC HDDs) |
| Primary Storage Media | 24 TB NL-SAS HDD | 7.68 TB NVMe SSD | 24 TB SATA HDD |
| Sequential Read Speed | ~11.5 GB/s | ~35 GB/s | ~9.0 GB/s |
| Random Read IOPS (4K) | 45,000 (Cached) | 1,800,000+ | 1,800 (Minimal Cache) |
| Memory (RAM) | 1 TB | 512 GB | 2 TB |
| Power Draw (Peak) | ~3.1 kW | ~2.5 kW | ~3.8 kW |
| Primary Benefit | Highest Capacity per CPU/RAM slot | Lowest Latency, Highest IOPS | Highest Raw Capacity Density (PB/U) |
4.2. Analysis of Trade-offs
- **ST-HCS-9000 vs. ST-HFA-4000:** The 9000 sacrifices nearly 15x the random I/O performance of the All-Flash configuration. However, the cost per usable terabyte for the 9000 is approximately 1/15th that of the HFA model, making it economically viable for archive data where cost-per-TB is the primary metric. The 9000's 1TB RAM is also crucial for managing the metadata index of such vast storage pools, a requirement the 2U HFA often cannot meet without significant compromises.
- **ST-HCS-9000 vs. ST-HCS-5000:** The 5000 configuration pushes density further (5U for 2.16 PB), but it relies on slower SATA drives and has lower overall sequential bandwidth due to having fewer, albeit more numerous, drive controllers and potentially slower CPUs (often Celeron/Xeon Bronze in density models). The 9000 uses faster 12Gb/s SAS, faster CPUs (Xeon Gold), and integrates a robust NVMe cache, leading to superior sustained throughput and better random performance characteristics, despite being slightly less dense by volume (PB/U).
The ST-HCS-9000 occupies the "Sweet Spot" for capacity-intensive environments requiring enterprise reliability (SAS/ECC) and high sequential throughput, bridging the gap between pure archival density and usable performance.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Deploying a high-density storage server requires meticulous planning regarding physical infrastructure, particularly power delivery, cooling, and data integrity management protocols.
5.1. Power and Physical Infrastructure
The peak power draw of 3.1 kW necessitates careful placement within the Data Center Rack.
- **Power Delivery:** Each unit requires two dedicated 20A/208V circuits due to the high PSU rating (2200W). Redundancy must be maintained by connecting each PSU to separate Power Distribution Units (PDUs) sourced from different utility feeds where possible.
- **Rack Weight:** The total populated weight of the 4U chassis, including the 72 drives, exceeds 65 kg (143 lbs). The server must be installed in a reinforced, four-post rack capable of supporting static loads exceeding 1,000 kg per rack section. Rack Mounting Guidelines must be strictly followed.
5.2. Thermal Management and Airflow
The primary maintenance concern for high-density HDD arrays is thermal runaway.
- **Hot Spot Mitigation:** Drives in the mid-section (Bays 25-48) are most susceptible to elevated temperatures due to reduced airflow efficiency in deep chassis designs. Regular thermal monitoring of individual drive sensors via the IPMI interface is mandatory.
- **Fan Maintenance:** The high-static-pressure fans are under constant strain. A preventative maintenance schedule requiring fan replacement every 36 months, irrespective of failure, is recommended to avoid catastrophic failures during peak demand.
5.3. Data Integrity and Drive Management
The architecture is designed for high availability, but proactive monitoring is essential for preventing data loss in a large RAID 6 pool.
- **Scrubbing Schedule:** Due to the large volume (1.7 PB), a full Data Scrubbing cycle can take several weeks, even at high I/O speeds. A weekly partial scrub, focusing on recently written or rebuilt sectors, combined with a quarterly full scrub, is the minimum viable policy. This ensures Bit Rot detection and correction are performed proactively.
- **Predictive Failure Analysis (PFA):** The system relies heavily on S.M.A.R.T. data from the SAS drives. Integration with external monitoring tools (e.g., Nagios, Prometheus) to track key metrics like **Reallocated Sector Count** and **Temperature Max** is critical. Any drive reporting a significant increase in reallocated sectors should be preemptively replaced during scheduled maintenance windows, rather than waiting for a second drive failure within the same RAID set.
- **Firmware Management:** HBA firmware and drive firmware must be kept synchronized with vendor recommendations. Outdated Firmware Revision on the Broadcom HBAs has been known to cause unexpected SAS Protocol link resets under heavy, sustained load, which can lead to temporary volume unavailability or data corruption if not handled gracefully by the file system layer. Regular patching cycles (e.g., quarterly) are required.
5.4. Expansion and Upgrade Paths
The ST-HCS-9000 offers clear upgrade potential:
1. **CPU/RAM:** The dual-socket platform allows for upgrading to 5th Generation Xeon CPUs with higher core counts (up to 60 cores per socket) and filling all 32 DIMM slots for up to 8 TB of RAM, necessary if metadata management becomes the primary bottleneck (e.g., moving to a petabyte-scale Object Storage implementation). 2. **Networking:** The current PCIe Gen 5.0 slots allow for direct upgrades to 200GbE or 400GbE NICs when the network fabric supports it, without impacting storage I/O bandwidth. 3. **External Expansion:** The external SAS ports (via the 9500-16e HBA) allow for chaining multiple external JBOD enclosures, theoretically extending the capacity well beyond 10 PB, contingent on the PCIe Lane allocation and available cooling capacity.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️