Server Hardware Overview
Server Hardware Overview: The 'Titan' Compute Node Configuration
This document provides a comprehensive technical overview and deep-dive analysis of the 'Titan' Compute Node configuration, a high-density, enterprise-grade server platform designed for demanding computational workloads, virtualization density, and high-throughput data processing.
1. Hardware Specifications
The Titan configuration is engineered around a dual-socket motherboard architecture, optimized for power efficiency without compromising raw computational throughput. All components are enterprise-grade, validated for 24/7 operation under heavy load.
1.1. Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The system supports dual-socket configuration utilizing the latest generation of high-core-count processors, balancing clock speed with Instruction Per Cycle (IPC) performance.
| Parameter | Specification | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Architecture | Intel Xeon Scalable (4th Gen - Sapphire Rapids) or AMD EPYC (Genoa/Bergamo equivalent) | |
| Socket Count | 2 | |
| Primary CPU Model (Example) | Intel Xeon Platinum 8480+ (56 Cores, 112 Threads per CPU) | |
| Total Core Count (System) | 112 Cores (2 x 56 Cores) | |
| Total Thread Count (System) | 224 Threads (Hyper-Threading Enabled) | |
| Base Clock Frequency | 2.2 GHz (Variable based on specific SKU) | |
| Max Turbo Frequency (Single Core) | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
| L3 Cache Size (Total) | 112 MB per CPU (Total 224 MB) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) per CPU | 350W (Configurable to 400W TDP variants) | |
| Instruction Set Support | AVX-512, AMX (Advanced Matrix Extensions) |
Note on CPU Selection: The platform is designed for socket compatibility across major vendors, requiring careful validation of firmware updates to ensure optimal memory channel interleaving and cache coherence.
1.2. Random Access Memory (RAM) Subsystem
Memory capacity and speed are critical for high-density virtualization and in-memory database operations. The design maximizes DIMM population density while adhering to strict channel balancing requirements.
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| DIMM Type | DDR5 Registered ECC (RDIMM) |
| Maximum Memory Capacity | 8 TB (Utilizing 32 x 256GB DIMMs) |
| Standard Configuration (Base Model) | 1 TB (16 x 64GB DIMMs) |
| Memory Speed Supported | Up to 4800 MT/s (JEDEC standard maximum for this generation) |
| Memory Channels per CPU | 8 Channels per socket (Total 16 Channels) |
| Interleaving Factor | 4-way interleaving recommended for optimal bandwidth saturation. |
| Memory Topology | Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) architecture. Critical monitoring of NUMA locality is required for application tuning. |
The system supports Persistent Memory (PMEM) modules (e.g., Intel Optane DC persistent memory) in specific slots, allowing for hybrid configurations that blend high-speed volatile RAM with byte-addressable, non-volatile storage tiers.
1.3. Storage Subsystem
The Titan configuration prioritizes ultra-low latency storage for boot volumes and metadata, coupled with high-capacity NVMe arrays for application data. The system utilizes a modular drive cage supporting multiple interface standards.
| Location/Type | Interface | Maximum Count | Capacity per Unit (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boot/OS Drives | M.2 NVMe (PCIe 5.0 x4) | 2 (Redundant Pair) | 1.92 TB |
| Primary Data Storage | U.2/E1.S NVMe SSD (PCIe 5.0) | 24 Bays | 15.36 TB |
| Secondary Storage (Optional Bay) | SAS/SATA SSD/HDD (2.5" Hot-Swap) | 8 Bays | 7.68 TB (SSD) / 22 TB (HDD) |
| RAID Controller | Hardware RAID HBA (e.g., Broadcom MegaRAID 9700 series) | 1 (Integrated or Add-in Card) | |
| Supported RAID Levels | 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 50, 60 |
The PCIe 5.0 interface provides a theoretical aggregate bandwidth exceeding 64 GB/s directly to the CPU sockets for the primary NVMe array, significantly reducing storage latency compared to previous generations. SAN connectivity is typically managed via the dedicated Network Interface Cards (NICs).
1.4. Expansion Slots and I/O
The motherboard features extensive PCIe lane availability, crucial for high-speed networking and specialized accelerators (GPUs/FPGAs).
| Slot Designation | Physical Size | Electrical Lanes | Purpose/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCIe Slot 1 | Full Height, Full Length (FHFL) | x16 | Primary GPU/Accelerator |
| PCIe Slot 2 | FHFL | x16 | High-Speed Fabric Interconnect (e.g., InfiniBand or 400GbE NIC) |
| PCIe Slot 3 | FHFL | x8 | Secondary HBA or Management Card |
| OCP 3.0 Slot | Mezzanine | N/A | Dedicated slot for Network Interface Module (up to 400GbE) |
The total available PCIe lanes per socket typically exceed 80 lanes (PCIe 5.0), providing ample bandwidth headroom for future component upgrades.
1.5. Networking
Integrated networking is often insufficient for clustered environments; thus, the Titan relies on high-speed add-in cards.
| Interface Type | Quantity (Standard) | Speed | Connection Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Management (IPMI/BMC) | 1 (Dedicated) | 1 GbE | RJ-45 |
| Base Data Ports (Integrated) | 2 | 25 GbE | SFP28 (Optional Offload) |
| High-Performance Fabric Ports | 2 (Add-in Card) | 100 GbE or 200 GbE | QSFP28/QSFP-DD |
The use of RDMA capabilities via 100/200GbE interfaces is heavily utilized in High-Performance Computing (HPC) workloads running on this platform.
1.6. Power and Cooling
Power delivery is modular and highly redundant, designed to handle peak loads from fully populated CPUs and multiple accelerators.
| Component | Specification |
|---|---|
| Power Supply Units (PSUs) | 2 (Redundant, Hot-Swappable) |
| PSU Rating (Per Unit) | 2200W (80 PLUS Titanium Efficiency) |
| Input Voltage Range | 100-240 VAC (Auto-Sensing) or 200-480 VDC (Optional) |
| Total System Peak Draw (Estimated) | ~3500W (With dual 350W CPUs and 4 high-power GPUs) |
| Cooling System | Redundant High-Static Pressure Fans (N+1 configuration) |
| Acoustic Profile | Optimized for data center cooling infrastructure; high-noise profile under heavy load. |
Redundancy is mandatory, typically configured in an N+1 or 2N topology depending on the surrounding facility design.
2. Performance Characteristics
The true measure of the Titan configuration lies in its ability to translate raw specifications into quantifiable performance gains across various workloads.
2.1. Computational Benchmarks
Performance is assessed using standardized industry benchmarks that stress different aspects of the hardware pipeline (CPU throughput, memory bandwidth, and instruction set utilization).
2.1.1. LINPACK (HPL)
LINPACK measures Floating Point Operations Per Second (FLOPS), critical for scientific simulation.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Theoretical Peak DP (Double Precision) | ~10.5 TFLOPS (CPU Only) |
| Achieved HPL Score (Observed) | ~7.8 TFLOPS (Approx. 74% efficiency) |
| Key Limiting Factor | Memory bandwidth saturation and thermal throttling under sustained load. |
The efficiency rate is high for a CPU-only system, indicating effective utilization of the integrated Vector Processing Units (VPUs) and high-speed DDR5 memory channels.
2.1.2. SPECrate 2017 Integer Benchmarks
This benchmark assesses multi-threaded integer throughput, vital for transactional databases and web server workloads.
The Titan configuration, with 112 physical cores, typically achieves aggregate SPECrate scores in the range of 65,000 to 75,000, demonstrating superior density compared to previous dual-socket generations. The high core count allows for excellent scheduler efficiency.
2.2. Memory Bandwidth Analysis
The 16-channel DDR5 configuration provides substantial theoretical bandwidth, but real-world performance is often constrained by NUMA topology and memory controller efficiency.
- **Theoretical Peak Bandwidth (DDR5-4800):** ~1.22 TB/s (Aggregate for both sockets).
- **Observed Read Bandwidth (Single NUMA Node Stress):** ~580 GB/s.
- **Observed Read Bandwidth (Bi-NUMA Stress):** ~1.05 TB/s (Demonstrating efficient cross-socket communication via UPI/Infinity Fabric).
Applications sensitive to memory latency, such as high-frequency trading platforms or complex graph databases, benefit significantly from the high channel count, minimizing stalls waiting for data access. Latency optimization remains a key tuning parameter.
2.3. Storage I/O Performance
Focusing on the PCIe 5.0 NVMe array (24 drives in RAID 10 configuration):
- **Sequential Read Throughput:** Exceeding 35 GB/s.
- **Random 4K IOPS (QD128):** Over 12 million IOPS.
- **Latency (P99):** Consistently below 150 microseconds under saturation.
This level of I/O performance is crucial for all-flash array performance and large-scale data ingestion pipelines.
2.4. Power Efficiency Metrics
Efficiency is measured by performance per Watt (Perf/W). For general-purpose virtualization:
- **Observed Performance/Watt (VM Density):** Approximately 1.8 to 2.1 standard VM instances per 100W consumed under typical utilization (40-60% CPU load).
This metric is significantly improved over previous generations due to architectural efficiency gains in the silicon fabrication process and the high-efficiency Titanium-rated PSUs.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The Titan configuration is intentionally over-provisioned in terms of compute density and I/O capability, making it unsuitable for low-utilization tasks. It excels where density, speed, and reliability are paramount.
3.1. Enterprise Virtualization and Cloud Infrastructure
This configuration is ideal as a high-density hypervisor host (e.g., VMware ESXi, KVM, Hyper-V).
- **High VM Density:** The 112 cores allow for consolidation ratios exceeding 80:1 for standard VDI or web serving workloads.
- **Guaranteed Performance:** The large L3 cache and high memory capacity ensure that even demanding guest operating systems receive dedicated, low-contention resources.
- **Licensing Optimization:** The high core count often provides the best return on investment for core-based software licensing models.
3.2. High-Performance Computing (HPC) Clusters
For scientific modeling, weather prediction, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD):
- **MPI Workloads:** Excellent performance in Message Passing Interface (MPI) environments due to low-latency inter-socket communication (UPI/Infinity Fabric) and high-speed fabric interconnects (InfiniBand/RoCE).
- **Memory-Bound Simulations:** The massive RAM capacity (up to 8TB) supports large, stateful simulations that cannot be easily partitioned across smaller nodes.
3.3. In-Memory Databases and Analytics
Systems requiring immediate access to massive datasets benefit most.
- **SAP HANA/Oracle:** Can host significantly larger in-memory database instances than previous server designs. The high NVMe throughput supports fast checkpointing and transaction logging.
- **Big Data Processing (Spark/Hadoop):** While dedicated storage nodes are often used, the Titan acts as a powerful execution node, capable of rapidly loading data blocks from the local NVMe array into memory for processing.
3.4. AI/ML Training Inference (Limited GPU Support)
While not the primary GPU-optimized platform (which would utilize more PCIe slots for accelerators), the Titan serves well for:
- **Data Pre-processing:** Rapid feature engineering and data transformation prior to feeding accelerators.
- **Inference Serving:** Deploying complex, CPU-optimized inference models where latency is more critical than raw training throughput.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the Titan configuration, it is compared against two common alternatives: the standard Enterprise Workhorse (fewer cores, higher clock speed) and the Ultra Density Density Node (higher core count, lower clock speed, specialized for scale-out).
4.1. Comparative Specification Table
| Feature | Titan (High-Density Compute) | Workhorse (Balanced SKU) | Density Node (Scale-Out Focus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores (Total) | 112 | 64 | 192 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 TB | 4 TB | 4 TB |
| Primary Storage Interface | PCIe 5.0 NVMe (24 Bays) | PCIe 4.0 SAS/SATA (12 Bays) | PCIe 5.0 NVMe (8 Bays) |
| Typical TDP (Max Load) | 3.5 kW | 2.5 kW | 4.0 kW |
| Memory Bandwidth (Aggregate) | ~1.2 TB/s | ~0.8 TB/s | ~1.0 TB/s (Optimized for fewer, denser DIMMs) |
| Target Workload | Virtualization, HPC, Large DBs | General Purpose, Web Serving | Distributed Caching, Microservices |
4.2. Performance Trade-offs
- **Titan vs. Workhorse:** The Titan offers nearly double the raw core count and significantly higher I/O bandwidth (PCIe 5.0 vs. 4.0). The Workhorse variant, however, typically operates at a slightly higher clock speed per core, making it superior for legacy applications or single-threaded performance bottlenecks. Single-threaded performance often favors the Workhorse SKU.
- **Titan vs. Density Node:** The Density Node maximizes core count (e.g., using lower TDP, higher core count AMD EPYC Bergamo) but sacrifices maximum memory capacity and often reduces per-core L3 cache size. The Titan is preferred when memory footprint per process is large (e.g., Java heaps, large database buffers), whereas the Density Node is better for highly parallel, embarrassingly parallel tasks that fit within smaller memory envelopes.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Deploying and maintaining the Titan configuration requires adherence to strict environmental and operational protocols due to its high power density and complex interconnects.
5.1. Power and Electrical Requirements
The system's high TDP necessitates careful planning regarding rack power distribution.
- **Circuit Loading:** A standard rack populated solely with Titan nodes (assuming 4 nodes per rack) can easily draw 14kW continuously. This requires 3-Phase power distribution (e.g., 400V input) rather than standard single-phase 208V/240V circuits to manage current draw effectively. Power density limits must be respected.
- **PSU Failover Testing:** Due to the reliance on high-wattage PSUs, periodic testing of PSU failover (pulling one unit while the system is under 80% load) is essential to validate the remaining unit’s ability to maintain required voltage rails without immediate thermal throttling.
5.2. Thermal Management
The primary maintenance concern for high-TDP systems is heat dissipation.
- **Airflow Requirements:** The system demands high static pressure fans in the chassis and high CFM (Cubic Feet per Minute) delivery from the rack/row cooling infrastructure. Minimum recommended front-to-back temperature differential ($\Delta T$) should be maintained at or below $18^{\circ}\text{C}$ for sustained peak operation.
- **Component Placement:** The placement of high-power PCIe cards (like 400GbE or accelerators) must follow the motherboard's thermal zoning guidelines to prevent localized hotspots, which can trigger thermal throttling on adjacent components.
5.3. Firmware and Driver Management
Maintaining system stability relies heavily on synchronized firmware levels across all critical subsystems.
- **BIOS/UEFI:** Must be kept current to ensure optimal memory timings, UPI/Infinity Fabric link stability, and accurate power management reporting to the BMC. Outdated BIOS versions can lead to significant performance degradation in NUMA-sensitive workloads.
- **HBA/RAID Firmware:** Storage controller firmware must be matched precisely with the OS kernel drivers to avoid data corruption or unexpected I/O errors, especially when utilizing advanced features like Storage Spaces Direct (S2D) or ZFS volumes spanning multiple HBAs. Driver matrix adherence is non-negotiable.
5.4. Diagnostics and Monitoring
Effective monitoring is crucial for proactive maintenance. Key metrics to monitor include:
1. **Memory ECC Error Rates:** High corrected error rates indicate potential DIMM degradation or marginal voltage stability. 2. **UPI/Fabric Link Errors:** Uncorrectable errors on the inter-socket interconnect suggest physical layer issues (e.g., dust in the socket or slight physical misalignment). 3. **Power Rail Voltage Deviation:** Monitoring the 12V and auxiliary rails via the BMC to catch early signs of PSU aging. 4. **Thermal Margins:** Ensuring that the delta between ambient intake temperature and CPU junction temperature ($T_{\text{jctn}}$) remains within the specified safety margin, typically $20-25^{\circ}\text{C}$ below the thermal throttle point.
The detailed operational procedures for these maintenance tasks are documented separately in the Titan Operations Manual.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️