Server Cost Analysis
Server Cost Analysis: Optimized Mid-Range Enterprise Workstation (Model: ACE-MRA-4200)
This document provides a comprehensive technical analysis of the **ACE-MRA-4200** server configuration, specifically designed to offer an optimal balance between raw computational power, memory density, and storage I/O capacity for budget-conscious enterprise deployments. The analysis covers detailed hardware specifications, measured performance metrics, ideal use cases, competitive comparisons, and essential maintenance considerations.
1. Hardware Specifications
The ACE-MRA-4200 is engineered around a dual-socket platform utilizing modern, high-efficiency silicon. The primary goal of this configuration is maximizing core count and memory bandwidth within a standard 2U rackmount form factor, while maintaining a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) significantly lower than high-end, four-socket systems.
1.1. System Board and Chassis
The foundation is a proprietary dual-socket server board (Chipset: Intel C741 equivalent) supporting up to 2TB of DDR5 ECC RDIMMs across 16 DIMM slots (8 per CPU). The chassis is a robust 2U rackmount unit, designed for high-density deployments in standard data center racks.
| Component | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Form Factor | 2U Rackmount | Optimized airflow design. |
| Motherboard | Dual-Socket Proprietary Board | Supports PCIe Gen 5.0 and CXL 1.1. |
| Power Supplies (PSUs) | 2 x 1600W 80+ Platinum, Hot-Swappable | Redundant configuration (N+1 capable if configured for dual-input). |
| Cooling Solution | High-Static Pressure Blower Fans (4x) | Optimized for dense component cooling. |
| Management Controller | Dedicated BMC (IPMI 2.0 / Redfish Compliant) | Remote power cycling, sensor monitoring, and firmware management. |
1.2. Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The configuration utilizes two mid-to-high-end server processors selected for their superior core-per-dollar ratio and high memory channel support.
| Parameter | CPU 1 (Primary) | CPU 2 (Secondary) |
|---|---|---|
| Model Family | Intel Xeon Scalable (e.g., Emerald Rapids 8500 Series Equivalent) | Identical to CPU 1 |
| Cores / Threads | 32 Cores / 64 Threads | Total System: 64 Cores / 128 Threads |
| Base Clock Frequency | 2.4 GHz | |
| Max Turbo Frequency (All-Core) | 3.8 GHz | Dependent on thermal envelope. |
| L3 Cache (Total) | 120 MB (Per CPU) | 240 MB Total L3 Cache. |
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 220W | Total CPU TDP: 440W. |
| Memory Channels Supported | 8 Channels per CPU | Total 16 channels. |
The choice of these processors ensures high parallel execution capability crucial for virtualization and database workloads.
1.3. Memory Subsystem
Memory capacity is configured to support extensive virtualization environments or large in-memory caches. We utilize high-density DDR5 ECC Registered DIMMs operating at a high effective speed.
| Parameter | Specification | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Total Capacity | 512 GB | Configured using 16 x 32 GB DIMMs. |
| Type | DDR5 ECC RDIMM | Error Correction Code support mandatory for enterprise stability. |
| Speed / Data Rate | 4800 MT/s (PC5-38400) | Achieved with all 16 slots populated, respecting Intel's memory speed scaling guidelines. |
| Configuration | 16 DIMMs (All channels populated) | Ensures optimal memory interleaving and utilization of all available memory channels. |
| Maximum Supported Capacity | 2.0 TB | Requires population with 128GB DIMMs (Future Upgrade Path). |
Sufficient memory bandwidth is critical; reference the detailed calculation for this configuration.
1.4. Storage Subsystem
The storage configuration prioritizes high-speed, low-latency primary storage via NVMe SSDs, complemented by high-capacity, cost-effective SATA SSDs for bulk storage or backups.
The system features 8 front-accessible 2.5" drive bays.
| Tier | Drive Count | Capacity per Drive | Total Capacity | Interface / Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Boot/OS | 2 x M.2 NVMe (Internal) | 1.92 TB | 3.84 TB (Mirrored) | PCIe Gen 4.0 x4 |
| Primary Data (NVMe) | 4 x U.2 NVMe SSDs | 7.68 TB | 30.72 TB (RAID 10 Equivalent) | PCIe Gen 4.0 x4 via HBA |
| Secondary Bulk Storage | 2 x 15.36 TB SATA SSDs | 15.36 TB | 30.72 TB (RAID 1) | SATA III 6Gbps via PCH |
The configuration relies on a robust Hardware RAID Controller (e.g., Broadcom MegaRAID SAS 9580-8i equivalent) to manage the U.2 NVMe array, providing necessary resilience and I/O aggregation.
1.5. Networking and I/O Expansion
The I/O capabilities are designed to support high-throughput networking and GPU acceleration if required, leveraging the platform's native PCIe Gen 5.0 lanes.
| Component | Specification | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| Onboard LOM | 2 x 10GbE Base-T (RJ-45) | 1 |
| PCIe Expansion Slots | 4 x PCIe Gen 5.0 x16 slots (Full Height, Half Length) | 1 physical slot available for OCP 3.0 mezzanine card. |
| Dedicated Network Interface Card (NIC) | 2 x 25GbE SFP28 | 1 slot occupied (Requires specialized NIC card). |
| Accelerator Support | Up to 2 x Double-Width GPUs (e.g., NVIDIA L4/A40) | Requires removal of secondary storage cages or specialized riser configuration. |
The utilization of PCIe Gen 5.0 ensures that high-speed components, such as the NVMe storage and external accelerators, do not become I/O bottlenecks.
2. Performance Characteristics
Performance evaluation focuses on metrics critical for cost-sensitive workloads: sustained throughput, latency, and power efficiency per operation (Performance/Watt).
2.1. Synthetic Benchmarks
Synthetic benchmarks provide a baseline understanding of the hardware's theoretical limits across core computational domains.
- 2.1.1. Compute Performance (SPECrate 2017 Integer)
The dual 32-core setup yields a high aggregate score, demonstrating strong performance for highly parallelizable tasks such as batch processing and web serving.
| Configuration | Score | Power Efficiency Metric (Score/Watt) |
|---|---|---|
| ACE-MRA-4200 (64 Cores) | ~1250 (Aggregate) | ~0.56 |
| Previous Gen (Dual 28-core, DDR4) | ~980 (Aggregate) | ~0.45 |
| High-End (Dual 56-core, DDR5) | ~2100 (Aggregate) | ~0.62 |
The relative improvement in efficiency (0.56 vs 0.45) over the previous generation highlights the value proposition of modern process nodes, even in mid-range offerings. Detailed analysis of microarchitectural improvements is available in supporting documentation.
- 2.1.2. Memory Bandwidth and Latency
With 16 active memory channels running at 4800 MT/s, the aggregate theoretical bandwidth is substantial.
- **Theoretical Peak Bandwidth (Aggregate):** $16 \text{ channels} \times 64 \text{ bytes/transfer} \times 4.8 \times 10^9 \text{ transfers/sec} \approx 4.915 \text{ TB/s}$
- **Observed Sustained Bandwidth (STREAM Triad):** Approximately 3.9 TB/s (Read/Write mixed).
Latency testing shows an average NUMA-remote access latency of 150ns, which is acceptable for most general-purpose workloads but necessitates careful NUMA topology awareness for highly sensitive HPC applications.
2.2. Storage I/O Performance
The primary performance metric here is sustained IOPS and latency for the mixed NVMe array.
| Drive Type | Configuration | Sustained IOPS | Average Latency (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 x 7.68TB U.2 NVMe (RAID 10) | 4-Wide Stripe | ~650,000 IOPS | 0.18 ms |
| 2 x 1.92TB M.2 (Mirrored OS) | RAID 1 | ~180,000 IOPS | 0.25 ms |
The storage subsystem is capable of handling demanding transactional workloads (OLTP) while maintaining low latency, a significant advantage over configurations relying solely on SATA or SAS SSDs. This performance is directly tied to the availability of dedicated PCIe Gen 4.0 lanes managed by the HBA.
2.3. Power Consumption Profile
Power consumption is a critical factor in TCO. The ACE-MRA-4200 exhibits excellent efficiency under typical load conditions.
- **Idle Power Consumption:** ~180W (2N+P configuration, minimal installed storage).
- **Typical Load (75% CPU Utilization, Active Storage):** ~650W.
- **Peak Load (Stress Test 100% CPU/Storage I/O):** ~1150W (Below PSU capacity).
The use of 80+ Platinum PSUs ensures that power conversion losses are minimized, contributing to better overall PUE metrics.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The ACE-MRA-4200 configuration is optimally positioned where high core density and substantial, fast memory are required, but where the absolute peak performance of flagship CPUs (e.g., 128+ cores) is not economically justifiable.
3.1. Enterprise Virtualization Host (Hypervisor)
This server excels as a primary host for standard virtualization platforms (VMware ESXi, Microsoft Hyper-V, KVM).
- **Justification:** 64 physical cores provide ample headroom for hosting 50-80 standard virtual machines (VMs) with guaranteed resource allocation. The 512GB of high-speed RAM supports large memory reservations for critical VMs. The robust I/O subsystem prevents storage contention bottlenecks commonly seen in oversaturated environments.
- **Key Feature:** Excellent VM density relative to acquisition cost.
3.2. Medium-Scale Database Server (OLTP/OLAP)
For departmental SQL servers or smaller, high-transaction e-commerce backends, this configuration provides the necessary IOPS and memory capacity.
- **Justification:** The 30TB of high-speed NVMe storage allows for large portions of the active database to reside in fast storage, minimizing disk waits. The high core count aids in parallel query execution (OLAP) and transaction processing (OLTP).
- **Consideration:** For extremely large datasets (>50TB actively accessed), a configuration with higher NVMe bay density (4U chassis) might be necessary.
3.3. Application and Web Services Cluster Node
In clustered environments (e.g., Kubernetes nodes, large Java application servers), this hardware provides predictable, high-throughput service delivery.
- **Justification:** Consistent performance across 64 threads, coupled with fast networking capabilities (25GbE option), makes it suitable for microservices orchestration where rapid response times are linked to core availability.
3.4. CI/CD and Build Farm Workstation
For large software development organizations, the ACE-MRA-4200 can serve as a powerful build server.
- **Justification:** Compiling large codebases benefits immensely from high core counts and fast local storage for temporary artifacts and caching. The system can manage multiple parallel build jobs efficiently.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To validate the cost-effectiveness of the ACE-MRA-4200, we compare it against two common alternatives: a lower-cost/lower-density model (ACE-SRA-2100) and a higher-performance model requiring greater initial investment (ACE-HRA-8400).
4.1. Configuration Benchmarks Comparison
| Feature | ACE-MRA-4200 (Mid-Range Optimized) | ACE-SRA-2100 (Entry-Level Single Socket) | ACE-HRA-8400 (High-End 4-Socket) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | **Form Factor** | 2U Rackmount | 1U Rackmount | 4U Rackmount | | **CPU Configuration** | 2 x 32-Core (Total 64 Cores) | 1 x 36-Core (Total 36 Cores) | 4 x 40-Core (Total 160 Cores) | | **Total RAM Capacity** | 512 GB DDR5 | 256 GB DDR5 | 2 TB DDR5 ECC | | **Primary Storage (NVMe)** | 30.72 TB (U.2) | 15.36 TB (M.2/U.2) | 61.44 TB (U.2/PCIe Card) | | **Max PCIe Gen** | Gen 5.0 | Gen 5.0 | Gen 5.0 | | **Estimated Acquisition Cost (USD)** | $18,000 - $22,000 | $9,500 - $11,500 | $55,000 - $70,000+ | | **SPECrate 2017 Integer (Est.)** | ~1250 | ~600 | ~4500 | | **Power Draw (Typical Load)** | ~650W | ~450W | ~1800W | | **TCO Metric (Score per $1000 Invested)** | **~5.68** | ~5.21 | ~6.54 (Higher initial cost dilutes immediate ROI) |
- Note: TCO Metric is a simplified calculation based on benchmark score relative to acquisition cost, assuming a 5-year depreciation cycle.*
4.2. Architectural Trade-offs Analysis
- 4.2.1. Single Socket vs. Dual Socket (ACE-SRA-2100 vs. ACE-MRA-4200)
The ACE-MRA-4200 offers nearly double the compute density (64 vs. 36 cores) and significantly more memory bandwidth (16 channels vs. 8 channels) compared to the single-socket alternative. While the acquisition cost is higher, the performance gain often exceeds the price increase, especially when factoring in the reduced rack space utilization and lower management overhead associated with fewer physical servers for the same workload. The trade-off is slightly increased complexity due to NUMA management.
- 4.2.2. Mid-Range vs. High-End (ACE-MRA-4200 vs. ACE-HRA-8400)
The jump to the 4-socket ACE-HRA-8400 provides a significant performance uplift (more than 3x the cores). However, the cost scales disproportionately. The ACE-MRA-4200 is the superior choice when: 1. Workloads scale well across 64 cores but do not saturate 128 cores. 2. Budget constraints mandate a lower initial capital expenditure (CapEx). 3. The application is sensitive to the increased latency inherent in 4-socket interconnects (e.g., QPI/UPI links).
The ACE-MRA-4200 represents the "sweet spot" for maximizing resource utilization per dollar spent on compute infrastructure that does not require extreme memory capacity (>1TB).
5. Maintenance Considerations
Maintaining the ACE-MRA-4200 requires attention to power delivery, thermal management, and component lifecycle management, particularly given the high-density NVMe storage.
5.1. Power Requirements and Redundancy
The system is designed for continuous operation in a redundant power environment.
- **Input Voltage:** Dual 200-240V AC inputs recommended for full PSU redundancy.
- **Total System Power Draw (Peak):** $\approx 1200\text{W}$ (Includes 10% overhead).
- **PDU Capacity:** Rack PDUs supporting at least 2.5kW per server unit are recommended to handle peak loads and ensure comfortable headroom for future upgrades (e.g., adding a PCIe Gen 5.0 accelerator card).
- **PSU Redundancy:** The dual 1600W Platinum PSUs allow the server to operate at full load even if one PSU fails, provided the input power source remains stable. Refer to the PDU sizing guide.
5.2. Thermal Management and Airflow
The 2U chassis design relies heavily on forced air cooling.
- **Ambient Inlet Temperature:** Must maintain 18°C to 27°C (ASHRAE Class A3 compliance recommended).
- **Airflow Direction:** Standard front-to-back configuration. Ensure proper blanking panels are installed in unused PSU and drive bays to maintain directed airflow across the CPU heatsinks and memory modules.
- **Noise Levels:** Due to the high static pressure fans required for dense component cooling, noise levels can exceed 65 dBA under full load. Proper acoustic dampening in the data center environment is advised. Cooling capacity planning must account for the 440W CPU TDP plus the significant power draw from the NVMe array.
5.3. Component Lifecycle and Field Replaceable Units (FRUs)
Key components are designed for hot-swapping to minimize downtime.
- **Hot-Swappable Components:** PSUs, cooling fans, and 2.5" NVMe/SATA drives.
- **Firmware Management:** Regular updates to the System BIOS and the RAID HBA firmware are crucial for stability, especially when adopting new OS kernels or virtualization hypervisors.
- **Memory Replacement:** While ECC RDIMMs are highly reliable, replacement of failed modules should follow a strict procedure to ensure the replacement module matches the speed and rank configuration of the existing modules to maintain optimal performance across all memory channels.
5.4. Storage Reliability and Monitoring
The high-performance NVMe storage requires proactive monitoring.
- **Wear Leveling:** Monitoring the **Media Wear Indicator (MWI)** via SMART data for the U.2 drives is non-negotiable. Drives approaching 75% write endurance should be scheduled for replacement during the next maintenance window.
- **RAID Controller Health:** Event logs from the hardware RAID controller must be closely scrutinized for predictive drive failures or controller cache write-policy degradation. The controller relies on the onboard Supercapacitor Backup Unit (SBOU) to protect write cache during power fluctuations.
By adhering to these guidelines, the ACE-MRA-4200 configuration provides a robust, high-performance platform with a manageable operational cost profile, making it a strong candidate for strategic infrastructure investment.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️