Quantum Computing
- Technical Deep Dive: The QPU-Accelerated HPC Server Platform (Quantum Computing Configuration)
This document provides a comprehensive technical overview and operational guide for the specialized server configuration designed for hybrid quantum-classical computation, often referred to as the **QPU-Accelerated HPC Platform**. This configuration is engineered to tightly integrate classical high-performance computing (HPC) resources with dedicated Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) control planes, optimized for near-term quantum algorithms (NISQ era) and advanced simulation tasks.
- 1. Hardware Specifications
The QPU-Accelerated HPC Server is not a traditional monolithic server but rather an integrated rack-scale system designed for low-latency communication between the classical control hardware and the cryogenic/vacuum-based quantum processing unit environment. The specifications below detail the *classical host system* required to manage, compile, and execute the control sequences for the attached QPU.
- 1.1. System Overview and Form Factor
The system utilizes a specialized 4U rack-mountable chassis designed for high-density component integration and robust shielding against electromagnetic interference (EMI), crucial for preserving qubit coherence.
| Parameter | Specification | Notes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4U Rackmount, Dual-Node Capable | Optimized for thermal segregation between classical and control electronics. | Chassis Depth | 1050 mm | Accommodates deep I/O modules and extensive cooling infrastructure. |
| Power Supply (PSU) | 2 x 3000W Redundant (N+1) Titanium Rated | Total capacity up to 6000W peak draw for CPU/GPU/Control Electronics. | |||
| EMI Shielding | Integrated Mu-metal and Copper Layering | Required shielding attenuation of >60 dB up to 20 GHz. | |||
| Operating Temperature (Ambient) | 18°C to 24°C (Strictly Controlled) | Essential for maintaining stability of attached control hardware. |
- 1.2. Classical Host Compute Nodes (x2)
The system houses two independent, yet tightly coupled, high-core-count host nodes responsible for pre-processing, compilation, error mitigation routines, and sequencing the microwave/RF pulses directed to the QPU.
- 1.2.1. Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The configuration mandates high core counts coupled with substantial L3 cache to handle the large state vector simulations and optimization routines common in quantum algorithm development.
| Component | Specification (Node 1 & Node 2) | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Model | 2 x Intel Xeon Scalable (e.g., Sapphire Rapids 8480+) or AMD EPYC Genoa Equivalent | High core density (up to 64 Cores/128 Threads per socket). |
| Core Count (Total System) | 256 Cores / 512 Threads | Required for parallel execution of variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) loops. |
| Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz (Minimum Sustained) | Prioritizing core count and memory bandwidth over peak single-thread frequency. |
| L3 Cache Size | 112.5 MB per CPU (Total 225 MB) | Critical for reducing latency in accessing compiled quantum circuits. |
- 1.2.2. Random Access Memory (RAM)
Quantum control software, especially when simulating intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) circuits, is extremely memory-intensive. We specify high-speed, high-density DDR5 ECC memory.
| Parameter | Specification | Link to Related Topic |
|---|---|---|
| Total System Memory | 4 TB DDR5 ECC RDIMM (2 TB per Node) | DDR5 technology offers significant bandwidth improvements. |
| Memory Speed | 4800 MT/s (Minimum) | Optimized for maximum throughput to the CPU memory controller. |
| Configuration | 32 x 64GB DIMMs per Node | Utilizing all available memory channels for balanced performance. |
| Memory Bandwidth (Aggregate) | > 1.2 TB/s per Node | Essential for rapid state vector manipulation. |
- 1.3. Accelerator and Control Plane Hardware
The defining feature of this configuration is the integration of specialized hardware for near-real-time control and simulation acceleration.
- 1.3.1. Quantum Control Plane Interface (QCPI)
The QCPI is a dedicated PCIe card responsible for translating classical instructions into low-latency analog/digital control signals for the QPU cryostat electronics.
| Feature | Specification | Importance |
|---|---|---|
| Interface Bus | PCIe Gen 5 x16 (Dual Slots Required) | Maximum throughput for waveform data transfer. |
| Latency Target (Host to QPU Instruction Dispatch) | < 500 ns | Direct impact on gate fidelity and circuit depth. |
| Onboard Memory (FPGA Buffer) | 64 GB HBM2e | Buffering complex, time-sensitive pulse sequences. |
| Digital-to-Analog Converters (DACs) | 32 Channels (16-bit, 5 GS/s per channel) | Required for driving multiple qubit control lines simultaneously. |
- 1.3.2. Simulation Acceleration (GPU/FPGA)
While the QPU performs the actual computation, classical simulation of quantum circuits (for verification or algorithm design) requires massive parallelization.
- **GPU Configuration**: 4 x NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPUs (SXM or PCIe form factor, depending on chassis cooling).
* **Purpose**: Accelerating tensor network contractions and state vector simulations up to $2^{28}$ qubits classically.
* **Interconnect**: NVLink/NVSwitch required for high-speed GPU-to-GPU communication within the host nodes. NVLink topology must support bi-sectional bandwidth exceeding 900 GB/s.
- 1.4. Storage Subsystem
Storage requirements focus on high-speed access for large datasets, compiled circuit definitions, and intermediate results from iterative quantum experiments.
| Tier | Type/Interface | Capacity | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Boot/OS | 2 x 1.92 TB NVMe U.2 (RAID 1) | 3.84 TB Usable | Operating system and foundational software (e.g., Qiskit Runtime, Cirq). |
| High-Speed Scratch/Working Data | 8 x 7.68 TB NVMe PCIe Gen 4/5 (RAID 10) | ~46 TB Usable | Storing large state vectors during simulation runs. Requires extremely low IOPS latency. NVMe-oF support is optional but recommended for future expansion. |
| Persistent Data Archive | 4 x 30 TB SAS SSD (RAID 6) | ~90 TB Usable | Storing finalized experimental results and validated quantum codebases. |
- 1.5. Interconnect and Networking
Low-latency communication between the two host nodes and the external HPC cluster (for data staging and results analysis) is paramount.
- **Intra-Node Communication (Host-to-Host)**: 2 x 400 GbE or InfiniBand NDR (Non-blocking topology). This is used primarily for synchronized state management and checkpointing between the two processing nodes. NDR provides latency below 1 microsecond.
- **QPU Interface (Control Path)**: Dedicated internal fiber links connecting the QCPI to the QPU control racks (typically managed by the QPU vendor, e.g., IBM Quantum or Google Quantum AI hardware).
- **External Cluster Connectivity**: 2 x 200 GbE ports for standard data ingress/egress to the main data center fabric. 200 GbE ensures rapid transfer of simulation inputs.
---
- 2. Performance Characteristics
The performance of a Quantum Computing Server configuration is bifurcated: the classical performance metrics (solving the control problem) and the effective quantum throughput (measured by algorithm success rate and fidelity).
- 2.1. Classical Performance Benchmarking
The classical hardware must demonstrate superior capability in handling the overhead associated with quantum execution.
- 2.1.1. Simulation Benchmarks
When simulating circuits that approach the limits of the current QPU (e.g., 100-150 qubits), the classical host must maintain acceptable computation time.
| Benchmark Metric | QPU-Accelerated Host (4TB RAM, 4x H100) | Baseline HPC Node (2TB RAM, 2x A100) | Improvement Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to Simulate 1000 Shots (VQE Optimization Step) | 18.5 minutes | 45.2 minutes | 2.44x |
| State Vector Calculation Time (128 Qubits, Full Depth) | 4 hours 12 minutes | 7 hours 55 minutes | 1.85x |
| Memory Access Latency (Simulated State Vector) | 12 ns (Mean) | 19 ns (Mean) | 1.58x |
The performance gain is largely attributable to the increased memory bandwidth (DDR5 vs. DDR4/HBM2 on the older baseline) and the superior tensor processing units (TPUs) on the H100 accelerators used for the simulation layer.
- 2.2. Quantum Throughput Metrics
These metrics are highly dependent on the underlying QPU technology (e.g., superconducting transmon, trapped ion, photonic). However, the *server system* directly impacts the execution efficiency of the control pulses.
- 2.2.1. Gate Fidelity and Coherence Impact
The primary performance characteristic influenced by the server is the **Gate Error Rate (GER)**, which is inversely related to the precision and timing stability of the QCPI.
- **System Jitter Reduction**: The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the QCPI minimizes data transfer latency, which translates directly into reduced timing jitter in the pulse sequencing.
* **Observed Jitter**: Target < 50 picoseconds RMS deviation from the programmed pulse timing. This is critical for achieving high two-qubit gate fidelity (ideally $>99.5\%$). Gate Fidelity is the single most important metric for useful quantum computation.
- 2.2.2. Circuit Compilation Efficiency
The time required to compile a high-level quantum instruction set (e.g., QASM 3.0) into the low-level microwave pulses required by the specific QPU architecture is a significant bottleneck.
- **Compilation Time**: For a standard 200-gate circuit mapping onto a 127-qubit architecture, the system achieves compilation times averaging **450 milliseconds**. This rapid turnaround allows for thousands of iterative optimization steps within a standard 8-hour computing window, drastically improving the convergence rate of optimization algorithms like VQE.
- 2.3. Energy Efficiency (Performance per Watt)
While power consumption is high (see Section 5), the performance density is critical. The inclusion of specialized accelerators (H100s) and high-efficiency CPUs allows for a better ratio of computational work per unit of energy consumed compared to older CPU-only simulation clusters.
- **Effective FLOPS/Watt (Simulation)**: Measured at approximately 1.8 TFLOPS/Watt (FP64 equivalent) across the entire classical stack dedicated to quantum tasks.
---
- 3. Recommended Use Cases
This QPU-Accelerated HPC configuration is specifically tailored for hybrid algorithms where rapid iteration between classical optimization and quantum execution is required. It is overkill for simple demonstration or educational purposes.
- 3.1. Quantum Chemistry and Materials Science Simulation
This is the primary driver for this hardware class.
- **Molecular Simulation**: Executing VQE or Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) algorithms to determine ground state energies of molecules (e.g., Nitrogen Fixation, complex catalysts). The system’s high RAM capacity allows researchers to simulate larger basis sets or utilize advanced error mitigation techniques that require larger classical buffers. Quantum Chemistry benefits directly from the rapid compilation cycle.
- **Electronic Structure Calculation**: Using the hardware to explore the phase diagrams of strongly correlated electron systems, which are intractable for classical Density Functional Theory (DFT) methods beyond small unit cells.
- 3.2. Optimization Problems
Solving complex combinatorial optimization problems where the quantum advantage is sought through algorithms like the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA).
- **Logistics and Scheduling**: Solving instances of the Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) or Max-Cut problems on graphs up to $N=1000$ nodes, where the quantum circuit depth is constrained by current QPU coherence times. The classical host manages the annealing schedule or the QAOA layer optimization. Combinatorial Optimization relies heavily on the rapid iteration cycle enabled by the fast compilation.
- 3.3. Quantum Machine Learning (QML)
Implementing hybrid QML models, particularly those involving variational circuits.
- **Data Encoding and Feature Mapping**: The high-speed GPU array is essential for preprocessing large datasets into quantum feature spaces (quantum embedding layers). The system can handle batches of data encoding necessary for training a Quantum Neural Network (QNN). QML research heavily depends on this hybrid processing capability.
- 3.4. Quantum Error Correction (QEC) Circuit Development
Developing and testing active error correction protocols requires extremely precise timing and rapid feedback loops to measure syndrome bits and apply correction operations within the coherence window.
- The QCPI's low latency (<500 ns) is mandatory for implementing real-time decoding circuits necessary for testing Surface Code implementations or other topological codes on the attached QPU.
---
- 4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the QPU-Accelerated HPC Server, it is useful to compare it against two common alternatives: a pure classical HPC node and a dedicated classical quantum simulator appliance.
- 4.1. Comparison Matrix: Server Configurations
| Feature | QPU-Accelerated HPC (This System) | Pure Classical HPC Node (Standard) | Standalone Quantum Simulator Appliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Goal | Hybrid Execution & Control | Classical Simulation & General Compute | High-fidelity, large-scale simulation only |
| QPU Integration | Direct, Low-Latency Control Path (QCPI) | None | None (Simulates QPU behavior) |
| Max Simulated Qubits (Practical) | ~28 Qubits (using 4x H100) | ~32 Qubits (using 4x H100, higher clock overhead) | ~50 Qubits (Optimized dedicated hardware) |
| Control Latency | Sub-Microsecond | N/A | N/A (Software execution only) |
| CPU Core Count (Typical) | 128+ Cores | 128+ Cores | 64 Cores (Focus on GPU/Memory) |
| Cost Profile (Relative) | $$$$$ (High R&D integration cost) | $$$ (Standard HPC) | $$$$ (Specialized ASIC/FPGA simulation hardware) |
- 4.2. Advantages over Pure Classical HPC
The key differentiator is the **Control Plane Integration**. A standard HPC node, while capable of running simulation software (like IBM Qiskit running in local mode), cannot interface with the physical QPU hardware. The QCPI and its associated low-latency I/O links (PCIe Gen 5) bridge the classical domain to the quantum domain, enabling real-time feedback necessary for NISQ algorithm execution. Quantum Control Systems are the necessary bridge.
- 4.3. Advantages over Standalone Simulators
Standalone simulators (often proprietary hardware optimized purely for tensor contraction) excel at running *simulations* of large, deep circuits that are currently impossible on physical QPUs (e.g., simulating 50 qubits with 1000 gates). However, they cannot execute *actual* quantum hardware jobs. The QPU-Accelerated Server is designed for the immediate reality of NISQ devices, prioritizing rapid iteration on physical hardware over theoretical simulation depth.
---
- 5. Maintenance Considerations
The complexity of integrating classical high-power components with sensitive quantum control electronics necessitates stringent maintenance and environmental controls. Data Center Infrastructure standards must be elevated for this configuration.
- 5.1. Cooling Requirements
The aggregate thermal design power (TDP) of the dual host nodes, combined with the four high-power accelerators, pushes the thermal envelope significantly.
- **Total Peak Power Draw**: Estimated at 5.5 kW sustained, with peaks potentially reaching 6.2 kW during intensive compilation and simulation phases.
- **Cooling Strategy**: Direct liquid cooling (DLC) is strongly recommended for the CPUs and GPUs, utilizing cold plates connected to an external CDU (Coolant Distribution Unit). Air cooling is generally insufficient to maintain the required ambient temperature stability within the rack enclosure.
- **Chassis Airflow**: Must maintain a delta-T across the chassis of less than 5°C to ensure the sensitive QCPI module remains within its operational thermal envelope, even if the main compute components are liquid-cooled.
- 5.2. Power Quality and Redundancy
Given the reliance on precise timing signals derived from the power monitoring systems, power quality is non-negotiable.
- **UPS Requirement**: Must be connected to a high-capacity, online double-conversion Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) system capable of sustaining the full load for at least 30 minutes.
- **Power Sequencing**: Strict adherence to the OEM power-up sequencing protocol is required. The QPU control electronics must be powered *only* after the host system has stabilized its internal power rails and the QCPI firmware has initialized, preventing transient voltage spikes from corrupting the firmware or cryo-control sequence memory. Power Distribution Units must support granular sequencing control.
- 5.3. Software and Firmware Management
The tight coupling between the classical operating system and the quantum control hardware requires specialized lifecycle management.
- **Firmware Synchronization**: Firmware for the CPUs (BIOS/BMC), GPUs (VBIOS), and the QCPI FPGA must be rigorously version-controlled and synchronized. An incompatibility between the host OS kernel driver and the QCPI FPGA bitstream version can lead to catastrophic timing errors or read/write failures to the QPU control registers.
- **Operating System**: A hardened Linux distribution (e.g., RHEL or Ubuntu LTS) is standard. It must be configured with real-time kernel patches (PREEMPT_RT) to minimize OS scheduling latency interference with the quantum control loop execution thread. Real-Time OS considerations are vital here.
- **Security**: Due to the sensitive nature of proprietary quantum algorithms being tested, the system must adhere to strict network segmentation policies, isolating the control network from the general data center fabric. Server Hardening procedures must include disabling unnecessary services and implementing mandatory access controls (MAC) on all I/O peripherals.
- 5.4. Calibration and Drift Compensation
The system requires frequent calibration checks to account for component drift, particularly in the analog-to-digital conversion stages of the QCPI.
- **Drift Monitoring**: Automated scripts must run daily to check the calibrated zero-points of the DACs and ADCs against known reference signals.
- **Recalibration Cycle**: Full system recalibration, which involves pausing QPU operations and running diagnostic pulse sequences, should be scheduled quarterly or immediately following any major hardware component replacement (CPU, RAM, or QCPI). This ensures that the classical control pulses remain phase-coherent with the physical state of the qubits. Quantum Calibration Techniques documentation must be kept current.
---
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️