HTTPS
Secure Web Server Configuration: HTTPS Optimized Stack (Server Model: Titan X-Pro 4U)
This technical document details the specifications, performance profile, and operational requirements for a high-throughput, security-hardened server configuration specifically optimized for serving HTTPS traffic. This configuration is designed to handle intensive TLS/SSL Offloading operations, maintaining low latency even under peak encrypted load.
1. Hardware Specifications
The baseline hardware platform for this HTTPS configuration is the **Titan X-Pro 4U Rackmount Server**, selected for its superior PCIe lane availability, high core count density, and robust power delivery system necessary for sustained cryptographic operations.
1.1 Central Processing Unit (CPU)
The primary determinant for HTTPS performance is the CPU's ability to execute cryptographic algorithms (e.g., AES-GCM, ChaCha20-Poly1305) rapidly. We utilize recent-generation server processors equipped with dedicated AVX-512 instructions, specifically for accelerated polynomial multiplication and hashing.
| Component | Specification | Rationale for HTTPS |
|---|---|---|
| Model | 2x Intel Xeon Platinum 8480+ (Sapphire Rapids) | High core count (56C/112T per socket) for handling high concurrency of new TLS handshakes. |
| Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz | Stable frequency for sustained cryptographic workloads. |
| Max Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz (Single Core Burst) | Beneficial for initial handshake latency. |
| Core Count (Total) | 112 Cores / 224 Threads | Excellent parallelization capability for managing thousands of simultaneous secure connections. |
| L3 Cache Size | 112 MB per socket (224 MB Total) | Larger cache reduces memory latency during key retrieval and session state management. |
| Instruction Sets | AVX-512_VNNI, SHA Extensions, AES-NI | Essential for hardware acceleration of AES encryption/decryption and SHA-2 hashing required in modern TLS 1.3 ciphersuites. |
1.2 Random Access Memory (RAM)
Memory is critical for storing TLS Session Cache data, connection buffers, and the operating system kernel. High-speed, low-latency memory is prioritized over maximum capacity, though significant capacity is maintained for large web application hosting.
| Component | Specification | Rationale for HTTPS |
|---|---|---|
| Type | DDR5 ECC Registered (RDIMM) | DDR5 offers significantly higher bandwidth (up to 6400 MT/s) compared to DDR4, crucial for moving session data quickly. |
| Speed | 5600 MT/s (Configured) | Optimized speed profile balancing stability and performance. |
| Capacity (Total) | 1 TB | Allows for caching extensive session tickets and application data. |
| Configuration | 16 x 64 GB Modules (8 channels populated per CPU) | Ensures optimal memory channel utilization for maximum throughput. |
1.3 Storage Subsystem
The storage subsystem focuses primarily on rapid operating system and certificate loading, and high-speed logging, rather than serving bulk content (which is often offloaded to Content Delivery Networks).
| Component | Specification | Rationale for HTTPS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Boot Drive (OS/Logs) | 2x 960GB NVMe PCIe 4.0 U.2 SSD (RAID 1) | Provides extremely fast read/write for certificate loading and high-volume access log flushing. |
| Secondary Data Storage (Application/Static Assets) | 4x 7.68TB Enterprise SATA SSD (RAID 10) | High endurance and moderate capacity for frequently accessed application binaries or small static assets. |
| HBA/Controller | Broadcom MegaRAID 9580-16i (PCIe Gen 4 x16) | Low-latency controller supporting NVMe passthrough where necessary. |
1.4 Networking Interface Cards (NICs)
Network throughput directly impacts the sustained rate of encrypted data transfer. High-speed, low-latency NICs are mandatory.
| Component | Specification | Rationale for HTTPS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Uplink | 2x 25 GbE SFP28 (LACP Bonded) | Provides 50 Gbps aggregate throughput for serving encrypted data streams. |
| Management/Out-of-Band | 1x 1 GbE Dedicated IPMI Port | Ensures administrative access independent of the main data plane. |
| Offloading Capabilities | TCP Segmentation Offload (TSO), Large Send Offload (LSO) | Reduces CPU overhead by handling basic packet processing in the NIC firmware, freeing CPU cycles for cryptography. |
1.5 Security Accelerators (Optional/Recommended)
For extremely high-volume environments (e.g., 50,000+ new connections per second), hardware acceleration dedicated solely to cryptography can be deployed.
- **TPM 2.0 Module:** For secure key storage and platform integrity verification TPM.
- **Dedicated Crypto Accelerator Card (e.g., Intel C620 Series Accelerator):** While modern CPUs have strong AES-NI, a dedicated card can handle up to 200 Gbps of symmetric encryption throughput independently of the main CPU cores, mitigating potential resource contention during heavy handshake periods. This card utilizes dedicated FPGAs or ASICs.
2. Performance Characteristics
The performance of an HTTPS server is typically measured by two key metrics: **Handshake Rate** (new connections per second) and **Sustained Throughput** (data transfer rate under established connections). This configuration excels due to the synergy between the high core count and hardware instruction support.
2.1 Cryptographic Benchmarks (Synthetic)
Benchmarks were conducted using `openssl speed` and specialized TLS load generators (e.g., `wrk2` targeting TLS 1.3 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384).
| Metric | Test Environment | Result (Median) | Comparison to Previous Gen (8280) | |---|---|---|---| | **New TLS Handshakes (per sec)** | 2048-bit RSA Key Exchange | 18,500 / sec | +45% Improvement | | **AES-256-GCM Encryption Rate** | Single Core (AVX-512) | ~25 GB/s | Significant acceleration via VNNI | | **SHA-256 Hashing Rate** | Multi-Core Saturation | 4.2 Million Ops/sec | Optimized instruction pipeline efficiency | | **Memory Latency (Read)** | DDR5 5600 MT/s | 68 ns | Low latency critical for session resumption lookup |
2.2 Real-World Load Testing
Testing involved simulating traffic using a realistic distribution of connection types: 10% new handshakes, 60% session resumption (0-RTT or 1-RTT), and 30% sustained data transfer.
2.2.1 Handshake Performance
The primary bottleneck for scaling HTTPS traffic is the initial key exchange, which is CPU-intensive.
- **Configuration Tested:** TLS 1.3, ECDHE-P521 key exchange.
- **Result:** The system maintained a stable 18,500 new connections per second for a 30-minute sustained period before TCP/OS buffer limits became the limiting factor, not CPU processing power. CPU utilization remained below 75% across the 112 active cores during this peak.
2.2.2 Sustained Throughput
Once established, the performance shifts to data transfer efficiency.
- **Test:** Serving a 1MB file repeatedly over 10,000 established connections.
- **Result:** Achieved a sustained aggregate throughput of **48.2 Gbps** across the bonded 2x 25GbE links, confirming that the NICs and memory bandwidth are sufficient to feed the network interface without CPU saturation from encryption/decryption overhead. This demonstrates effective TCP Offloading and efficient use of AES-NI acceleration.
2.2.3 Resilience and Failover
In a dual-CPU configuration, thermal throttling or failure of one CPU socket (e.g., due to cooling failure) was tested. The remaining socket (56 cores) maintained approximately 55% of the peak handshake rate (approx. 10,200 HPS), confirming graceful performance degradation rather than catastrophic failure, facilitated by the robust NUMA memory mapping.
3. Recommended Use Cases
This high-specification HTTPS configuration is engineered for scenarios where security overhead must be minimized while delivering massive amounts of encrypted data.
3.1 High-Volume API Gateways
Environments acting as the ingress point for microservices architectures, where every request requires authentication and encryption/decryption.
- **Requirement:** Extremely high rates of short-lived connections.
- **Benefit:** The high handshake rate (18.5k HPS) ensures that the gateway does not become the bottleneck for service mesh communication, even when using strong P-521 curves for forward secrecy.
3.2 E-commerce Transaction Processing
Web servers handling sensitive payment information or managing high volumes of concurrent authenticated user sessions.
- **Requirement:** Maximum security (TLS 1.3 mandatory) and low latency for checkout processes.
- **Benefit:** Low memory latency and fast session resumption minimize perceived latency for returning customers, improving User Experience.
3.3 Secure Media Streaming Servers
Serving encrypted content (e.g., DRM-protected video segments or large software downloads) where sustained high throughput is critical.
- **Requirement:** Sustained Gbps throughput over long-lived connections.
- **Benefit:** The ample DDR5 bandwidth and efficient symmetric encryption handling ensure that the 48 Gbps network capacity can be fully utilized without CPU starvation. This contrasts sharply with older configurations limited by DDR4 or lower core counts.
3.4 Certificate Authority (CA) Frontends
Servers responsible for issuing or validating digitally signed certificates, which involve intensive public-key cryptography (RSA/ECDSA verification).
- **Requirement:** High computational capacity for asymmetric operations.
- **Benefit:** The combination of high core counts and AVX-512 support provides superior performance for verifying complex digital signatures.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the Titan X-Pro 4U HTTPS stack, we compare it against two common alternatives: a mid-range dual-socket system (optimized for general virtualization) and a dedicated hardware acceleration box.
4.1 Configuration Baseline Table
| Feature | **Titan X-Pro 4U (HTTPS Optimized)** | Mid-Range Virtualization Server (Dual Xeon Silver) | Dedicated Hardware TLS Appliance (FPGA-Based) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores (Total) | 112 (P-8480+) | 48 (S-4314) | N/A (Dedicated ASIC/FPGA) |
| RAM Speed/Type | DDR5 5600 MT/s | DDR4 3200 MT/s | Minimal (Primarily for firmware/state) |
| Max Handshakes/Sec (Est.) | ~18,500 | ~4,500 | >50,000 (Often limited by host OS/network stack) |
| Sustained Throughput (Max Effective) | ~48 Gbps | ~18 Gbps | Limited by PCIe bus/Host Interface (Often 100G+) |
| Flexibility/Software Stack | High (Full OS/Container Support) | Moderate | Low (Proprietary Firmware) |
| Power Draw (Peak Load) | ~1800W | ~1200W | ~600W |
| Cost Index (Relative) | 1.0x | 0.4x | 2.5x |
4.2 Analysis of Comparison
- 4.2.1 vs. Mid-Range Virtualization Server
The primary difference lies in the **cryptography acceleration pipeline**. The P-8480+ CPUs offer architectural improvements (AVX-512, better AES-NI implementation) and significantly higher memory bandwidth (DDR5 vs. DDR4). This translates to a 4x improvement in initial handshake capacity, making the mid-range server unsuitable for high-scale DDoS Mitigation scenarios where handshake floods are common. The virtualization server is better suited for non-SSL intensive tasks like VM hosting or internal database serving where I/O latency is prioritized over cryptographic throughput.
- 4.2.2 vs. Dedicated Hardware TLS Appliance
Dedicated hardware appliances are superior in raw handshake volume, often offloading the entire TLS stack to specialized ASICs, thus freeing the host CPU entirely. However, they suffer from three major drawbacks addressed by the Titan X-Pro:
1. **Flexibility:** The Titan X-Pro runs standard Linux/Windows, allowing for complex application logic, debugging, and integration with Service Mesh technologies (like Istio or Linkerd) directly on the same hardware. The appliance often requires a separate host server to run the actual application logic. 2. **Protocol Updates:** Software stacks (like OpenSSL or BoringSSL used on the Titan) can be patched instantly for new TLS Protocol Versions or vulnerability fixes (e.g., Heartbleed remediation). Hardware appliances require vendor firmware updates, which can be slow or unavailable. 3. **Cost and Density:** The Titan X-Pro offers a superior performance-per-dollar ratio when considering the cost of running the application stack alongside the encryption layer.
The Titan X-Pro represents the optimal **software-defined cryptographic acceleration point** before committing to the rigidity of dedicated hardware.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Deploying a high-density, high-power platform optimized for constant computational load requires stringent attention to power, cooling, and firmware management.
5.1 Power Requirements and Redundancy
The dual high-TDP CPUs (250W+ TDP each) combined with numerous high-speed DDR5 DIMMs and NVMe drives place significant demands on the power delivery infrastructure.
- **Power Supply Units (PSUs):** The system must be configured with 2x 2000W (or greater) 80+ Platinum redundant PSUs. A single PSU failure must not cause immediate shutdown under full computational load.
- **Input Voltage:** Requires 208V/240V AC input in high-density racks to avoid tripping lower-amperage 120V circuits when both PSUs draw maximum current. Careful monitoring of PDU capacity is essential.
5.2 Thermal Management and Airflow
Sustained cryptographic operations generate continuous, high-density heat loads across the CPU dies and memory channels.
- **Cooling:** Requires a minimum of 100+ Linear Feet per Minute (LFM) of directed front-to-back airflow within the rack enclosure. Standard 1U server cooling profiles are insufficient. The 4U chassis design facilitates better internal airflow management, but the ambient temperature of the data center floor must not exceed 22°C (72°F) under peak load conditions to prevent thermal throttling of the Xeon processors.
- **Monitoring:** Implement proactive monitoring of the Server Management Interface (e.g., BMC/IPMI) for CPU temperature differentials between the two sockets, which can indicate localized cooling issues or the onset of thermal runaway on one processor.
5.3 Firmware and Software Patching Strategy
Maintaining the security posture of an HTTPS server requires timely updates to the cryptographic libraries and platform firmware.
- **BIOS/BMC:** Firmware updates must be tested rigorously, as newer versions often contain critical microcode updates that affect AVX-512 behavior or security patches related to Side-Channel Attacks (e.g., Spectre/Meltdown variants impacting cryptographic operations).
- **Kernel/OS:** Due to the performance sensitivity, kernel patching must be scheduled during low-traffic maintenance windows. Testing should confirm that new kernel versions have not regressed performance metrics for Interrupt Handling or NUMA memory access patterns, which directly affect TLS latency.
- **Cryptographic Library:** The chosen web server (e.g., Nginx, Apache, or specialized proxies like HAProxy) must use a highly optimized library (e.g., OpenSSL 3.x or BoringSSL) compiled with specific flags enabling all available CPU extensions (like `-march=native`). Regular library updates are necessary to adopt new, faster, and more secure Cipher Suites.
5.4 Certificate Management Lifecycle
The efficiency of the system is heavily dependent on utilizing TLS Session Resumption (via Session Tickets or IDs) effectively.
- **Key Rotation:** While the hardware accelerates the *use* of keys, the *management* of keys remains a software task. A robust automation pipeline (e.g., using ACME Protocol clients like Certbot) is required to rotate RSA/ECDSA keys before their expiration, minimizing service interruption during key replacement operations, which involves reading new large key files from the fast NVMe storage.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️