HPC Cluster Architecture
HPC Cluster Architecture: The Apex High-Performance Computing System (Model: Apex-HPC-Gen5)
This document details the technical specifications, performance characteristics, operational requirements, and suitability of the **Apex-HPC-Gen5** architecture, a state-of-the-art High-Performance Computing (HPC) cluster designed for extreme computational throughput and low-latency inter-node communication. This configuration represents a significant leap in density and efficiency for data-intensive scientific simulations and large-scale AI model training.
1. Hardware Specifications
The Apex-HPC-Gen5 is built around a modular, tightly integrated design focusing on maximizing compute density per rack unit while ensuring high-speed data fabric connectivity. The cluster comprises three primary node types: Compute Nodes, Storage Head Nodes, and Management Nodes.
1.1 Compute Node Specifications (Apex-C5000)
The core of the cluster is the Apex-C5000 compute node, optimized for floating-point operations and memory bandwidth. Each chassis is a 2U form factor, supporting dual-socket configurations.
| Component | Specification / Model | Quantity per Node | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU (Primary) | Intel Xeon Scalable 4th Gen (Sapphire Rapids) - 64 Cores, 3.5 GHz Base | 2 | Supports AMX acceleration for AI workloads. |
| CPU (Secondary/I/O) | N/A (Integrated PCH) | N/A | Focus on maximizing core count and memory channels. |
| System Memory (DRAM) | DDR5 ECC RDIMM, 4800 MT/s | 16 TB total (32 x 512 GB DIMMs) | Utilizes 16 memory channels per socket for maximum bandwidth. |
| Local Accelerator (GPU) | NVIDIA H100 SXM5 (SXM5 Platform) | 8 | NVLink 4.0 enabled, 900 GB/s bidirectional peer-to-peer bandwidth. |
| Local NVMe Storage | PCIe Gen5 NVMe SSD (25.6 TB U.2) | 4 | Used for scratch space and checkpointing. Configured in RAID 10 via hardware controller. |
| Network Interface Card (Management) | Broadcom 100GbE (RJ-45) | 1 | Standard IPMI and cluster management traffic. |
| Network Interface Card (Interconnect - Primary) | NVIDIA Quantum-2 InfiniBand (NDR 400Gb/s) | 2 | Dual-rail configuration for fault tolerance and high-bandwidth MPI traffic. |
| Power Supply Units (PSU) | 80+ Titanium, Redundant Hot-Swap | 2 x 3000W | N+1 redundancy implemented at the chassis level. |
| TDP (Estimated Peak) | ~7.5 kW | N/A | Requires advanced Liquid Cooling Infrastructure. |
1.2 High-Speed Interconnect Fabric
The performance of an HPC cluster is often bottlenecked by the network. The Apex-HPC-Gen5 mandates the use of a non-blocking, fat-tree topology utilizing NVIDIA Quantum-2 InfiniBand.
- **Fabric Type:** NVIDIA Quantum-2 (NDR 400 Gb/s).
- **Topology:** Full Bisectional Bandwidth (FBB) Fat-Tree.
- **Switch Layer:** 64-port Quantum-2 400Gb/s switches (e.g., QM9700 Series).
- **Oversubscription Ratio:** 1:1 (Non-blocking) across all compute nodes.
- **Latency Target (All-to-All):** Sub-500 nanoseconds (typical measured latency < 350 ns).
- **Offloading:** Support for RDMA operations for MPI, SHMEM, and GPUDirect Storage.
A high-throughput, low-latency parallel file system is critical for distributing datasets and managing checkpoints. The Apex-HPC-Gen5 utilizes a highly parallelized Lustre implementation.
| Component | Specification | Quantity | Total Capacity / Throughput |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metadata Servers (MDS) | Dual Redundant Pair (HA Configuration) | 2 | N/A (Metadata operations) |
| Object Storage Targets (OST) | High-Density NVMe Flash Arrays (PCIe Gen5 Backplane) | 48 | 1 PB Usable Capacity |
| OST Controller Nodes | Dual-socket AMD EPYC (High I/O Throughput) | 4 | Dedicated CPU resources for I/O processing. |
| Aggregate Read Throughput | Measured sustained read rate | N/A | > 1.2 TB/s |
| Aggregate Write Throughput | Measured sustained write rate | N/A | > 900 GB/s |
| Client Connectivity | InfiniBand NDR (400Gb/s dedicated connection) | All Compute Nodes | Direct access via kernel bypass. |
1.4 Management and Storage Head Nodes
The cluster requires robust management infrastructure, separate from the compute fabric.
- **Management Nodes (x4):** Redundant servers running the Cluster Management Software (CMS), monitoring tools (e.g., Prometheus/Grafana), workload manager (e.g., Slurm), and provisioning tools (e.g., xCAT or OpenHPC).
- **Storage Head Nodes (x4):** Dedicated servers managing the Lustre OSTs, providing the interface between the compute nodes and the parallel file system layer. These nodes use high-core count CPUs optimized for I/O serving rather than raw FLOPS.
Total estimated rack density for a fully populated 40-node cluster (320 GPUs): Approximately 200 kW of peak power draw, requiring advanced PDU infrastructure.
2. Performance Characteristics
The Apex-HPC-Gen5 is benchmarked against industry standards to quantify its capabilities in key HPC domains. Performance is heavily skewed by the high ratio of GPU memory bandwidth to CPU core count.
2.1 Theoretical Peak Performance
The theoretical peak performance is calculated based on the aggregate capability of the installed accelerators and CPUs.
- **GPU Compute (FP64/FP32 Tensor Core):** Each H100 SXM5 delivers approximately 67 TFLOPS (FP64 Tensor Core) or 990 TFLOPS (FP16/BF16 Tensor Core).
* Total Cluster FP64 Tensor Core Peak: $320 \text{ GPUs} \times 67 \text{ TFLOPS/GPU} \approx 21.44 \text{ PetaFLOPS}$.
* Total Cluster FP16/BF16 Peak: $320 \text{ GPUs} \times 990 \text{ TFLOPS/GPU} \approx 316.8 \text{ PetaFLOPS}$.
- **CPU Compute (AVX-512 FP64):** Each Sapphire Rapids CPU offers approximately 2.0 TFLOPS sustained.
* Total Cluster CPU FP64 Peak: $640 \text{ Sockets} \times 2.0 \text{ TFLOPS/Socket} \approx 1.28 \text{ PetaFLOPS}$.
The system is overwhelmingly GPU-bound, achieving a theoretical peak near 317 PetaFLOPS (AI workloads) or 21 PetaFLOPS (traditional HPC double-precision).
2.2 Benchmarking Results (HPL and HPCG)
The High-Performance Linpack (HPL) benchmark measures sustained double-precision performance, while High-Performance Conjugate Gradient (HPCG) measures memory access and communication efficiency.
| Benchmark | Metric | Result | Efficiency vs. Theoretical Peak |
|---|---|---|---|
| HPL (Linpack) | Sustained FP64 Performance | 18.5 PetaFLOPS | 86.3% |
| HPCG | GFLOPS/Core | 12.1 GFLOPS/Core | N/A (Context dependent) |
| DGEMM (Local GPU) | Bandwidth Utilization | 98% | Measured against H100 SXM5 theoretical peak. |
| MPI Latency (Ping-Pong) | 128 Byte Message Latency (InfiniBand) | 345 ns | Extremely low latency crucial for tight coupling. |
The high HPL efficiency (86.3%) confirms the effectiveness of the 1:1 non-blocking interconnect and the optimized memory subsystem (DDR5/NVLink). The sustained performance indicates minimal overhead from data movement across the cluster fabric.
2.3 Interconnect Saturation Testing (All-to-All)
Testing the aggregate throughput of the fabric is essential for large-scale simulations requiring frequent synchronization (e.g., CFD).
- **Test:** 320 nodes exchanging 128 MB of data simultaneously (MPI_AlltoAllv).
- **Result:** Achieved 385 Gb/s aggregate throughput across the fabric, demonstrating near saturation of the 400 Gb/s links, validating the Fat-Tree design's non-blocking nature. This level of saturation is vital for complex CFD simulations.
2.4 Storage I/O Performance
The Lustre PFS must keep pace with the compute nodes, especially during checkpointing phases where all nodes write state simultaneously.
- **Checkpoint Test (40 Nodes):** Writing 100 GB state data per node.
- **Result:** Average write time recorded at 48 seconds. This translates to a sustained write rate of approximately 833 GB/s across the cluster, performing slightly below the theoretical 900 GB/s due to file system metadata overhead. This performance level prevents compute nodes from stalling during I/O waits.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The Apex-HPC-Gen5 architecture, characterized by its massive GPU density, high memory capacity per node, and ultra-low-latency interconnect, is tailor-made for specific, demanding computational tasks.
3.1 Large-Scale Deep Learning (AI/ML)
This is the primary target workload. The combination of H100 SXM5s connected via high-speed NVLink (within the node) and 400Gb/s InfiniBand (between nodes) minimizes communication bottlenecks during distributed training (e.g., using NCCL collectives).
- **Model Training:** Training massive transformer models (e.g., large language models like GPT-4 scale) that require synchronous updates across hundreds of GPUs. The 16TB of DDR5 per node allows for exceptionally large batch sizes locally, reducing the frequency of inter-node communication required for gradient aggregation.
- **Data Parallelism & Model Parallelism:** Excellent suitability for hybrid parallelism schemes due to the low latency fabric, enabling efficient model partitioning across the cluster.
3.2 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Weather Modeling
Traditional HPC workloads relying on explicit time-stepping schemes benefit immensely from fast nearest-neighbor communication and high floating-point throughput.
- **High-Resolution Simulations:** Modeling turbulent flow or global atmospheric dynamics where domain decomposition requires constant exchange of boundary data between adjacent processes. The sub-350 ns latency is critical here.
- **Finite Element Analysis (FEA):** Large, unstructured mesh simulations where solution convergence depends on rapid iterative updates across the entire computational domain.
3.3 Quantum Chemistry and Materials Science
Simulations requiring high precision and extensive eigenvalue calculations (e.g., Density Functional Theory - DFT).
- **Electronic Structure Calculations:** These tasks are often CPU-intensive but benefit significantly from GPU acceleration for matrix operations (the dominant step in many modern DFT codes). The balance of 128 CPU cores and 8 GPUs per node allows for efficient execution of optimized libraries like oneMKL alongside accelerated routines.
3.4 Genomic Sequencing and Bioinformatics
While often lower precision, the sheer volume of data processing benefits from the high aggregate I/O throughput of the Lustre file system and the parallel processing power of the GPUs for tasks like sequence alignment (e.g., using GPU-accelerated BLAST implementations).
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the Apex-HPC-Gen5, it is useful to compare it against two common alternatives: a traditional CPU-centric HPC configuration and a GPU-dense, but lower-interconnect, configuration.
4.1 Configuration Comparison Table
| Feature | Apex-HPC-Gen5 (GPU-Centric) | Mid-Range CPU Cluster (e.g., AMD EPYC/Intel Xeon) | GPU Dense, Low-Fabric Cluster (e.g., PCIe-based GPU servers) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Compute Unit | 8x NVIDIA H100 SXM5 (In-Socket) | 2x High-Core Count CPU (e.g., 128 cores) | 8x NVIDIA H100 PCIe (Standard Slot) |
| Interconnect Fabric | NVIDIA InfiniBand NDR (400 Gb/s, Non-blocking) | 100 GbE or 200 GbE HDR InfiniBand | 200 GbE or InfiniBand SDR/QDR (Often Fat-Tree with higher O/S ratio) |
| Memory per Node | 16 TB DDR5 | 4 TB DDR5 | 2 TB DDR5 |
| Inter-Node Latency (All-to-All) | < 350 ns | 1.5 µs – 5 µs (Ethernet) / 800 ns (HDR IB) | 500 ns – 1.2 µs (Depending on topology/switch hops) |
| Storage Access | 1.2 TB/s Aggregate Lustre (Dedicated IB) | 400 GB/s Aggregate (Shared Ethernet) | 800 GB/s Aggregate (Often SMB/NFS based) |
| Ideal Workload Fit | LLMs, Large-scale CFD, Molecular Dynamics | Traditional FEA, Monte Carlo simulations, Data Analytics | Small-to-Medium Scale AI/ML, GPU-accelerated libraries that tolerate moderate latency. |
4.2 Analysis of Differences
1. **Interconnect Superiority:** The Apex-HPC-Gen5’s commitment to NDR InfiniBand with a 1:1 bisectional bandwidth ratio is its defining feature. CPU clusters relying on standard Ethernet (even 400GbE) cannot match the RDMA performance required for tightly coupled MPI jobs. PCIe-based GPU clusters often suffer from having to share the main CPU's PCIe lanes or utilize lower-speed interconnects between servers, leading to higher latency than the SXM5/NVLink/NDR path. 2. **Memory Density:** The 16TB of DDR5 per node allows the Apex system to hold significantly larger problem sets entirely in fast host memory before needing to rely on slower storage or GPU memory swapping, which is an advantage over systems limited to 1TB or 2TB per node. 3. **Cost and Complexity:** The Apex configuration is significantly more expensive per watt and per rack unit than the Mid-Range CPU Cluster due to the cost of SXM5 GPUs and high-radix InfiniBand switches. However, for target workloads, the time-to-solution reduction justifies the capital expenditure.
5. Maintenance Considerations
The high density and power consumption of the Apex-HPC-Gen5 impose stringent requirements on the physical infrastructure and operational procedures.
5.1 Power and Electrical Infrastructure
Each Apex-C5000 node can draw up to 7.5 kW at peak load. A full rack (10 nodes) requires a sustained power delivery capacity exceeding 75 kW, plus overhead for management nodes and cooling infrastructure.
- **Power Quality:** Use of high-efficiency (Titanium rated) PSUs is mandatory. Implementation of UPS systems must account for the high inrush current during cold boot sequences.
- **Power Distribution:** Requires high-voltage AC (e.g., 480V three-phase) distribution directly to the rack PDUs, minimizing conversion losses.
5.2 Thermal Management and Cooling
The density of 8 H100 SXM5 GPUs, each generating over 700W of heat, necessitates advanced thermal solutions beyond standard air cooling.
- **Mandatory Cooling Type:** Direct-to-Chip (D2C) or Rear Door Heat Exchanger (RDHx) liquid cooling is required. Standard CRAC/CRAH units cannot effectively manage the heat flux density (kW/m²).
- **Coolant Requirements:** Use of treated, deionized water or specialized dielectric fluid (for immersion cooling setups) is necessary. Detailed monitoring of coolant temperature, flow rate, and pressure drop across the cold plates is essential for predictive maintenance.
- **Temperature Thresholds:** Inlet coolant temperature must be strictly maintained, typically between 20°C and 25°C, to ensure CPU/GPU junction temperatures remain below throttling limits (Tj Max ~105°C).
5.3 Interconnect Health Monitoring
The InfiniBand fabric requires dedicated monitoring beyond standard Ethernet checks.
- **Fabric Diagnostics:** Regular execution of `ibdiagnet` or proprietary vendor tools is necessary to detect link degradation, excessive symbol errors, or switch port flapping, which can severely degrade MPI performance without causing complete connection failure.
- **Firmware Management:** Strict version control for HCA (Host Channel Adapter) firmware, switch firmware, and network driver versions is crucial, as incompatibility between these components is a common source of intermittent performance degradation in high-speed fabrics. Refer to the OFED stack compatibility matrix before any update cycle.
5.4 Software Stack Stability
The sophisticated software stack (Lustre, Slurm, CUDA, NCCL) demands rigorous testing following any major update.
- **Kernel Dependencies:** Changes to the Linux kernel version often necessitate recompilation or revalidation of the InfiniBand drivers and the Lustre client modules. Unexpected behavior in kernel bypass operations can manifest as seemingly random job failures or severe latency spikes.
- **Storage Integrity:** Regular filesystem checks (e.g., `fsck` on MDS/MGS) and OST scrubbing routines must be scheduled during low-utilization windows to ensure data integrity across the petabyte-scale storage array.
5.5 Physical Access and Density Constraints
Servicing a node requires careful planning. Due to the liquid cooling manifolds attached to the components, hot-swapping components is complex.
- **Component Replacement:** Replacing a GPU or CPU often requires draining the local liquid loop section, disconnecting multiple quick-disconnect fittings, and performing careful thermal paste application, increasing Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) compared to air-cooled systems.
- **Rack Density Planning:** Physical layout must account for the necessary depth for the rear-side coolant distribution units and the required clearance for servicing the high-density power distribution units.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️