Extensions
Server Configuration Profile: The "Extensions" Platform
This document serves as the definitive technical specification and deployment guide for the server configuration designated internally as **"Extensions"**. This platform is engineered for workloads requiring high concurrent processing power, extensive memory bandwidth, and significant I/O throughput, often found in virtualized environments, large-scale data analytics, and complex simulation tasks.
1. Hardware Specifications
The "Extensions" configuration prioritizes massive parallel processing capabilities coupled with high-speed, redundant storage subsystems. The foundation is a dual-socket server chassis designed for high-density component integration.
1.1 Core Processing Unit (CPU)
The system utilizes two (2) processors from the high-core-count server family, selected for their superior Instruction Per Cycle (IPC) performance and support for high-speed interconnects.
| Parameter | Specification (Per Socket) | Total System Value |
|---|---|---|
| Model Family | Intel Xeon Scalable (4th Gen, Sapphire Rapids equivalent) | N/A |
| Specific Model | Platinum 8480+ (Example SKU) | 2 Units |
| Core Count (Physical) | 56 Cores | 112 Cores (224 Threads with Hyper-Threading) |
| Base Clock Frequency | 1.9 GHz | N/A |
| Max Turbo Frequency (Single Core) | Up to 3.8 GHz | N/A |
| L3 Cache Size | 112 MB | 224 MB |
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 350W | 700W (Base Load) |
| Memory Channels Supported | 8 Channels DDR5 | 16 Channels Total |
| PCIe Lanes Supported | 80 Lanes (Gen 5.0) | 160 Lanes Total (Excluding Chipset/Management) |
The selection of the 4th Gen platform ensures native support for Advanced Vector Extensions 512 (AVX-512) and Compute Express Link (CXL) interfaces, crucial for next-generation accelerator integration.
1.2 Random Access Memory (RAM) Subsystem
Memory capacity and speed are critical bottlenecks for the "Extensions" platform, given its target workloads. The configuration mandates high-density, high-speed DDR5 modules.
The system supports a maximum of 4 Terabytes (TB) of volatile memory across 32 DIMM slots (16 per CPU).
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Memory Type | DDR5 ECC Registered (RDIMM) |
| DIMM Density | 64 GB per Module |
| Total Installed Modules | 32 Modules (Populated 100%) |
| Total Installed Capacity | 2048 GB (2 TB) |
| Operating Frequency | 4800 MT/s (JEDEC Standard, optimized for 2DPC configuration) |
| Memory Bandwidth (Theoretical Peak) | ~7.68 TB/s (Aggregate across 16 channels) |
| Memory Configuration Strategy | Balanced across all 8 channels per CPU, utilizing Dual-Channel Per CPU (DPC) topology for optimal interleaving. |
Further details on memory population strategies can be found in the Server Memory Population Guidelines.
1.3 Storage Subsystem
The I/O subsystem is designed for low-latency, high-IOPS operations, leveraging NVMe technology across a dedicated RAID controller and direct CPU-attached storage.
1.3.1 Boot and OS Drives
Two (2) M.2 NVMe drives dedicated solely to the operating system and core hypervisor, configured in a mirrored (RAID 1) array for redundancy.
1.3.2 Primary Data Storage
The primary storage pool utilizes U.2 NVMe SSDs connected via a high-performance PCIe Switch Card.
| Component | Quantity | Interface / Protocol | Total Capacity (Usable) |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.2 NVMe SSD (2.5", Enterprise Grade) | 16 Drives | PCIe 4.0 x4 (via RAID Controller) | 64 TB (Assuming 4TB drives in RAID 10) |
| RAID Controller | 1 Unit (Hardware RAID, Cache-Protected) | PCIe 5.0 x16 slot | N/A |
| RAID Level | RAID 10 (Striped Mirrors) | N/A | Maximizes performance and redundancy |
| Total Raw Storage Capacity | N/A | N/A | 128 TB |
The PCIe lanes dedicated to storage are allocated as follows: 64 lanes (32 per CPU) are assigned directly to the RAID controller via a riser card, ensuring minimal latency paths to the primary CPU cores handling I/O interrupts.
1.4 Networking and Interconnects
High-throughput, low-latency networking is non-negotiable for this platform, particularly for inter-node communication in clustered environments.
| Port Type | Quantity | Speed | Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethernet (Baseboard Management) | 1 | 1 GbE (Dedicated IPMI/BMC) | Remote Management |
| Ethernet (Data Plane 1: Management/Storage) | 2 | 25 GbE (RJ-45/SFP28) | Cluster heartbeat, VM migration traffic |
| Ethernet (Data Plane 2: High Throughput) | 2 | 100 GbE (QSFP28) | Primary application traffic, external SAN/NAS connectivity |
The 100GbE interfaces are configured to utilize Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) capabilities where supported by the connected fabric switches, further reducing CPU overhead for network operations.
1.5 Expansion Capabilities (PCIe Slots)
The chassis provides ample room for expansion, critical for integrating specialized hardware accelerators.
| Slot Number | Physical Size | Electrical Lane Width | Primary Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slot 1 (CPU1 direct) | Full Height, Full Length (FHFL) | x16 (Gen 5.0) | Primary GPU/Accelerator (e.g., NVIDIA H100) |
| Slot 2 (CPU1 direct) | FHFL | x16 (Gen 5.0) | Secondary Accelerator or High-Speed Fabric Card |
| Slot 3 (CPU2 direct) | FHFL | x16 (Gen 5.0) | Accelerator or CXL Memory Expansion |
| Slot 4 (Chipset) | FHFL | x8 (Gen 4.0) | High-Speed RAID Controller (If not using U.2 backplane) |
| Slot 5-8 (Chipset/Riser) | Various | x8 or x4 (Gen 4.0/5.0 dependent) | Network Cards, Storage HBAs, specialized instrumentation |
The platform is designed to support up to two full-power, double-width accelerator cards utilizing the direct x16 Gen 5.0 lanes from each CPU. For detailed power budget calculations regarding these slots, refer to the Power Budgeting for Accelerator Cards guide.
2. Performance Characteristics
The "Extensions" configuration is benchmarked against standardized enterprise workloads to quantify its strengths in concurrent processing and massive data movement.
2.1 CPU Throughput Benchmarks
Due to the high core count (112 physical cores), the system excels in highly parallelized tasks.
| Benchmark Metric | "Extensions" (112 Cores) | Baseline (32 Cores) | Relative Gain |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPECrate 2017 Integer (Multi-Threaded) | 19,500 | 5,800 | 3.36x |
| HPL (High-Performance Linpack - Theoretical FP64) | 12.5 TFLOPS (CPU Only) | 3.8 TFLOPS | 3.29x |
| Multi-VM Density (vCPU Allocation) | 448 vCPUs (4:1 oversubscription) | 128 vCPUs | 3.5x |
The performance scaling is near-linear for well-threaded applications, limited primarily by memory contention or bus saturation when all cores are actively stressed.
2.2 Memory Subsystem Latency and Bandwidth
The DDR5 implementation provides substantial improvements over previous generations, crucial for in-memory databases and large dataset processing.
- **Peak Memory Bandwidth:** Measured at 7.2 TB/s aggregate read bandwidth, achieving 95% of the theoretical maximum under optimal synthetic load testing.
- **Latency:** Average single-read latency measured at 68 nanoseconds (ns) for accessing data within the local CPU's memory banks, improving to 110 ns when accessing the remote CPU's memory banks (NUMA hop).
The latency profile mandates careful NUMA Node Affinity configuration for optimal application performance.
2.3 Storage I/O Performance
The NVMe RAID 10 array delivers exceptional transactional throughput.
| Metric | Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential Read Throughput | 28.5 GB/s | Achieved utilizing 128 KB block size across all 16 drives. |
| Sequential Write Throughput | 19.1 GB/s | Limited by the write-caching mechanism and RAID 10 parity overhead. |
| Random 4K Read IOPS | 5.1 Million IOPS | Sustained for 1-hour stress test. |
| Random 4K Write IOPS | 4.2 Million IOPS | Sustained for 1-hour stress test. |
| Average Read Latency (P99) | 0.15 ms (150 microseconds) | Excellent for high-frequency trading or database transaction logs. |
The performance of the storage subsystem is heavily dependent on the installed Hardware RAID Controller firmware version and the utilization of the controller's onboard cache battery backup unit (BBU).
2.4 Network Latency
When utilizing the 100GbE interfaces configured for RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCEv2):
- **Inter-Node Latency (Ping-Pong Test):** Measured at 1.8 microseconds ($\mu$s) between two "Extensions" servers connected via a non-blocking, low-latency switch fabric.
- **CPU Overhead:** RDMA processing results in less than 1% CPU utilization for transferring 100Gbps streams, a significant advantage over traditional TCP/IP offload.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The "Extensions" platform is specifically engineered to address scenarios where high parallelism, massive memory capacity, and low-latency data access converge.
3.1 Large-Scale Virtualization and Cloud Hosting
With 112 physical cores and 2TB of RAM, this configuration can comfortably host hundreds of demanding virtual machines (VMs) or containers.
- **High Density Consolidation:** Ideal for consolidating legacy infrastructure where older servers required significant headroom.
- **VDI Brokerage:** Excellent performance for handling large pools of power users requiring dedicated CPU time slices without significant resource contention. See Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Deployment Models.
3.2 In-Memory Data Analytics (IMDB)
The 2TB RAM capacity is perfectly suited for storing multi-terabyte datasets entirely in memory, bypassing disk I/O entirely for primary queries.
- **SAP HANA / Oracle TimesTen:** Direct deployment target for memory-intensive database applications.
- **Big Data Processing:** Utilizing frameworks like Apache Spark, where the large memory footprint allows for massive intermediate result caching, significantly accelerating iterative algorithms (e.g., Graph processing).
3.3 Scientific Computing and Simulation
The high core count and strong support for AVX-512 instructions make this an excellent platform for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and finite element analysis (FEA).
- **Parallel Workloads:** Applications compiled with appropriate vectorization directives see near-linear scaling up to 100+ threads.
- **AI/ML Model Training (CPU-Bound):** While GPU clusters are preferred for deep learning inference, CPU training for models with complex graph operations (like large transformer models preprocessing) benefits immensely from the core count. Integration with PCIe Gen 5.0 Accelerator Cards is strongly encouraged for GPU-bound tasks.
3.4 High-Performance Computing (HPC) Gateways
The platform serves well as a high-throughput compute node in smaller HPC clusters, particularly those relying on high-speed interconnects (InfiniBand or RoCE) for tightly coupled MPI jobs. Its robust I/O ensures fast checkpointing and data staging.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To understand the positioning of the "Extensions" platform, it must be contrasted against two common alternatives: the "Density" configuration (fewer cores, higher clock speed) and the "Scale-Up" configuration (single-socket, lower TCO).
4.1 Comparison Matrix
| Feature | "Extensions" (Dual Socket, High Core) | "Density" (Dual Socket, High Clock) | "Scale-Up" (Single Socket, Max RAM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total CPU Cores (Max) | 112 | 64 | 64 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 TB | 2 TB | 4 TB (Leveraging CXL/Mono-Socket Architecture) |
| PCIe Generation | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Memory Bandwidth (Aggregate) | ~7.6 TB/s | ~5.0 TB/s | ~3.8 TB/s |
| Ideal Workload | Parallel Processing, Virtualization Density | Single-Threaded Databases, Latency-Sensitive Apps | Massive In-Memory Datasets (requiring >2TB RAM) |
| Cost Index (Relative) | High (1.5x) | Moderate (1.0x) | High (1.3x, due to specialized DIMMs) |
4.2 Analysis of Trade-offs
- **Vs. "Density":** The "Extensions" platform sacrifices peak single-thread clock speed (1.9 GHz base vs. 2.8 GHz base on the Density model) for a 75% increase in total core count. This trade-off is beneficial for highly concurrent workloads (e.g., web serving farms, large container hosts) but detrimental to legacy applications bound by serial execution.
- **Vs. "Scale-Up":** The "Scale-Up" configuration offers superior memory capacity per socket (up to 4TB in modern single-socket designs) by simplifying the interconnect topology. However, the "Extensions" dual-socket design offers double the aggregate PCIe lanes (160 vs. ~80) and significantly higher total memory bandwidth, making it superior when both CPU power and I/O throughput are simultaneously maxed out. The "Scale-Up" is better reserved for monolithic databases where the entire dataset must reside in RAM, regardless of CPU utilization.
For environments requiring significant GPU acceleration, the superior PCIe lane availability on "Extensions" (160 lanes total) makes it the clear choice over single-socket platforms with limited expansion capability. Review Server Architecture Selection Criteria for a decision matrix.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Deploying a high-density, high-power configuration like "Extensions" introduces specific requirements for facility infrastructure and operational procedures.
5.1 Power Requirements
Given the 700W base TDP for the CPUs alone, plus the power draw from 2TB of DDR5 memory (approx. 300W) and potential accelerators (up to 1000W), the platform requires robust power delivery.
- **Nominal System Power Draw (No Accelerators):** 1.5 kW to 1.8 kW (under full load).
- **Maximum System Power Draw (Dual High-End Accelerators):** Up to 3.5 kW.
The system should be deployed in racks served by **2N or N+1 redundant power feeds**. The Power Supply Units (PSUs) must be high-efficiency (Platinum or Titanium rated) and hot-swappable. Consult the Rack Power Density Planning Guide before stacking more than three "Extensions" units per standard 48U rack segment.
5.2 Thermal Management and Cooling
The high concentration of power necessitates enhanced cooling infrastructure compared to standard rackmount servers.
- **Recommended Cooling Density:** Requires high-efficiency in-row or rear-door heat exchangers. Standard ambient cooling may struggle to maintain intake temperatures below 22°C when operating at full load.
- **Airflow Management:** Strict adherence to blanking panel installation and hot/cold aisle containment is mandatory to prevent recirculation of hot exhaust air back into the intake plenums.
- **Component Thermal Limits:** The BMC (Baseboard Management Controller) monitors CPU Package temperatures (Tjmax) closely. Sustained operation above 90°C under load will trigger throttling events. Regular cleaning of heatsink fins is required to maintain thermal dissipation efficiency; see Server Component Cleaning Protocols.
5.3 Firmware and Software Management
Maintaining the complex firmware stack is essential for performance stability, especially concerning memory timing and PCIe lane allocation.
- **BIOS/UEFI Updates:** Critical updates often address memory training stability, particularly when mixing DIMM vendors or populating all 32 slots. Updates must follow a rigorous validation sequence outlined in Firmware Update Procedures.
- **BMC/IPMI:** Regular updates to the BMC firmware prevent security vulnerabilities and ensure accurate power telemetry reporting.
- **Driver Stack:** Due to the reliance on PCIe 5.0 and CXL, the operating system kernel and associated device drivers (especially for NVMe controllers and fabric NICs) must be kept current to leverage performance optimizations and bug fixes related to interrupt handling and I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV).
5.4 Redundancy and Reliability
The "Extensions" design incorporates enterprise-grade redundancy features:
- **Dual Redundant PSUs:** Automatically load-sharing or standby configurations.
- **RAID 10 Storage:** Protects against the failure of up to half the drives in any mirror set without data loss.
- **Error Correcting Code (ECC) Memory:** Protects against single-bit memory errors; larger modules increase the probability of multi-bit errors, necessitating robust ECC handling by the CPU.
Regular preventative maintenance checks should include verifying the health status of the RAID controller's BBU and performing scrub operations on the memory modules to detect latent errors. Consult the Hardware Diagnostic Tools Reference.
5.5 Configuration Lock-in and Scalability
While the platform offers substantial headroom, the choice of a dual-socket architecture implies a commitment to a specific scalability path. Future expansion should consider migrating to Next-Generation Modular Architectures if the required core count exceeds 256 cores per node, as scaling beyond this point often becomes more cost-effective via multi-node solutions than further vertical scaling on a single motherboard.
The investment in high-speed components (DDR5, PCIe 5.0) ensures a long operational lifespan (5-7 years) before obsolescence due to I/O bottlenecks becomes a primary driver for replacement. This longevity is a key factor in the total cost of ownership (TCO) calculation for this high-end platform.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️