Server infrastructure
Technical Documentation: Enterprise Server Infrastructure Configuration (Project Chimera v3.1)
This document provides a comprehensive technical overview of the standard high-density, high-throughput server configuration designated as Project Chimera v3.1. This architecture is optimized for scalable virtualization, large-scale database operations, and demanding HPC workloads requiring a balance of core count, memory bandwidth, and I/O throughput.
1. Hardware Specifications
The Project Chimera v3.1 configuration is built upon a dual-socket, 2U rackmount chassis designed for maximum component density while adhering to strict thermal envelopes.
1.1. Chassis and System Board
The foundation of this configuration is the proprietary **Chassis Model S-4200R**, a 2U rackmount unit supporting dual-socket configurations with redundant power supplies.
| Component | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2U Rackmount (450mm depth) | Optimized for high-density racks. |
| Motherboard | Dual-Socket Proprietary Platform (Socket P5/LGA 7529 compatible) | Supports UPI links up to 3.0. |
| Form Factor | E-ATX / Proprietary | Ensures compatibility with specialized backplanes. |
| Expansion Slots | 8x PCIe Gen 5.0 x16 (2 dedicated for NVMe/Storage controllers) | Total available lanes: 128 (from dual CPUs). |
| Power Supplies (PSU) | 2x Redundant 2400W Titanium Level (96% efficiency @ 50% load) | Hot-swappable, N+1 configuration. |
| Management Controller | Integrated BMC supporting Redfish API v1.1, IPMI 2.0 | Dedicated 10GbE management port. |
1.2. Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The Chimera v3.1 leverages dual-socket processing for superior memory channel access and inter-socket communication via Ultra Path Interconnect (UPI) links.
The selected CPU is the **Intel Xeon Scalable Processor (Sapphire Rapids Generation – Platinum Series)**, specifically optimized for memory-intensive workloads.
| Parameter | Specification (Per CPU) | Total System |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Platinum 8480+ (56 Cores / 112 Threads) | 112 Cores / 224 Threads |
| Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz (All-core turbo minimum) |
| Max Turbo Frequency | Up to 3.8 GHz (Single Core) | Varies based on thermal headroom. |
| L3 Cache (Smart Cache) | 112.5 MB | 225 MB Total |
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 350W | 700W Total CPU TDP (Excluding cooling overhead). |
| Memory Channels | 8 Channels DDR5 | 16 Channels Total |
| UPI Links | 4 Links @ 14.4 GT/s | Critical for inter-socket latency. NUMA configuration is paramount. |
1.3. Memory Subsystem
The memory configuration prioritizes high capacity and maximum bandwidth, utilizing DDR5 Registered DIMMs (RDIMMs) operating at the highest stable frequency supported by the chosen CPUs.
The system is configured for **1.5 TB** of high-speed memory, utilizing 16 of the available 32 DIMM slots (2 DIMMs per channel per CPU).
| Parameter | Specification | Total System Value |
|---|---|---|
| DIMM Type | DDR5-4800 ECC RDIMM | Standard for high-reliability applications. |
| DIMM Capacity | 64 GB per module | Optimized for cost/density balance. |
| Total DIMMs Installed | 24 DIMMs (12 per CPU) | Allows for future 2x expansion to 3TB. |
| Total Installed Capacity | 1.5 TB | 768 GB per CPU node. |
| Memory Bandwidth (Theoretical Peak) | ~3.07 TB/s (Aggregate) | Utilizing 16 channels at 4800 MT/s. |
| Memory Topology | Interleaved across all 16 channels | Optimized for minimizing latency. |
1.4. Storage Subsystem
The storage configuration is a hybrid approach, balancing ultra-fast transactional storage (NVMe) with high-capacity, high-endurance bulk storage (SAS SSDs).
The system utilizes a dedicated PCIe Gen 5.0 Storage Host Bus Adapter (HBA) for the primary NVMe array.
| Tier | Quantity | Type/Interface | Capacity (Per Unit) | Total Capacity | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 0 (Boot/OS) | 2x | M.2 NVMe PCIe Gen 5.0 (RAID 1) | 1.92 TB | 3.84 TB | Operating System & Hypervisor Boot. |
| Tier 1 (Hot Data/VM Storage) | 8x | U.2 NVMe PCIe Gen 4.0 (RAID 10 Array) | 7.68 TB | 61.44 TB | Primary transactional storage pool. |
| Tier 2 (Bulk Data/Archive) | 12x | 2.5" SAS 4.0 SSD (RAID 6 Array) | 15.36 TB | 184.32 TB | High-endurance storage for persistent data. |
| Total Usable Storage (Estimated) | N/A | N/A | N/A | ~240 TB (Post-RAID overhead) | Primary data repository. |
The storage subsystem is managed by a **Broadcom MegaRAID SAS 9690W HBA** configured in IT (Initiator Target) mode for the NVMe devices, leveraging the OS/Hypervisor software RAID capabilities for flexibility, and a dedicated hardware RAID controller for the SAS SSDs to offload parity calculations.
1.5. Networking and I/O Interfaces
Network connectivity is critical for this high-throughput server, mandating high-speed, low-latency connections.
| Adapter | Quantity | Speed / Interface | Protocol Focus | Role |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseboard Management (BMC) | 1x | 10 GbE Base-T | IPMI/Redfish | Out-of-Band Management. |
| Primary Data Fabric (LOM) | 2x | 100 GbE QSFP28 (Dual-Port PCIe Gen 5.0 Adapter) | RoCEv2 / TCP | VM Traffic, Storage access (iSCSI/RoCE). |
| Secondary Data Fabric (Expansion) | 2x | 25 GbE SFP28 (Onboard) | TCP/IP | Management subnet access, Backup traffic. |
| Interconnect (Optional/HPC) | 2x | InfiniBand NDR 400 Gb/s (via PCIe Gen 5.0 slot) | RDMA | High-Performance Computing cluster integration. |
The use of 100GbE adapters requires the server to be situated within a datacenter environment supporting high-density fiber optics and ToR switching capable of handling such throughput.
2. Performance Characteristics
The Chimera v3.1 configuration is designed to deliver industry-leading performance metrics in specific computational domains, primarily driven by its high core count, massive memory capacity, and PCIe Gen 5.0 throughput.
2.1. Compute Benchmarks (Synthetic)
Synthetic benchmarks illustrate the raw computational potential of the 224-thread configuration.
| Benchmark | Metric | Result (Aggregate) | Notes | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | SPECrate_2017_Integer | Rate Score | 1,850 | Reflects multi-core efficiency in branching code. | SPECrate_2017_Floating Point | Rate Score | 2,100 | Indicates strong suitability for scientific modeling. | Linpack (HPL) Peak Performance | TFLOPS (FP64) | ~14.5 TFLOPS | Theoretical peak performance under ideal conditions. | Prime Number Calculation | Time to Factor (2048-bit RSA) | 4.1 seconds | Demonstrates cryptographic acceleration capabilities.
2.2. Memory Bandwidth and Latency
The 16-channel DDR5 configuration yields exceptional memory throughput, which is often the bottleneck in large-scale virtualization or in-memory databases.
| Measurement | Value (Aggregate) | Comparison Context (DDR4-3200 Quad-Channel) |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Read Bandwidth | 3,050 GB/s | Approx. 2.5x improvement. |
| Peak Write Bandwidth | 2,890 GB/s | Significant improvement over previous generations. |
| Latency (First Access) | 68 ns | Acceptable latency given the capacity and speed. |
The low latency relative to the high capacity (1.5 TB) is a key differentiator for this configuration, directly benefiting applications like large in-memory database caching layers.
2.3. Storage I/O Throughput
The performance of the Tier 1 NVMe array (PCIe Gen 4.0 U.2 in RAID 10) is characterized by high IOPS and sustained sequential throughput.
- **Sequential Read:** 45 GB/s
- **Sequential Write:** 38 GB/s
- **Random Read (4K Q32T16):** 12.5 Million IOPS
- **Random Write (4K Q32T16):** 9.8 Million IOPS
These metrics confirm the system's ability to handle massive concurrent read/write operations characteristic of high-frequency transaction processing systems (OLTP). The PCIe Gen 5.0 lanes allocated to the primary HBA ensure that future storage upgrades (e.g., Gen 5.0 U.2 drives) will not be immediately bottlenecked by the CPU interconnect.
2.4. Virtualization Density
When running a hypervisor such as VMware ESXi or KVM, the Chimera v3.1 excels in density due to its core count and memory availability.
- **Virtual Machine Density (Standard Workload Profile):** Estimated 180-220 standard VMs (4 vCPU / 8 GB RAM each).
- **Density (High-Density Container/Microservice Profile):** Capable of supporting over 1,500 Kubernetes pods allocated with minimal resources (1 vCPU / 1 GB RAM).
This density is strongly influenced by the NUMA topology. Optimal performance requires careful VM placement to ensure processes primarily utilize local memory channels (Node 0 or Node 1) to avoid costly UPI interconnect traffic.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The specific blend of high core count, massive memory pool, and fast, redundant I/O makes the Project Chimera v3.1 ideal for several mission-critical enterprise workloads.
3.1. Enterprise Virtualization Host (VDI & Server Consolidation)
The density and resource availability make this the optimal platform for consolidating large numbers of diverse virtual machines. The 1.5 TB of RAM is sufficient to host hundreds of standard Windows or Linux VMs concurrently without relying heavily on swapping or ballooning techniques. The high core count ensures that even with significant oversubscription, performance remains acceptable for critical services.
3.2. Large-Scale Relational Database Servers (OLTP/OLAP)
For databases such as Oracle, SQL Server Enterprise, or modern distributed SQL systems (e.g., CockroachDB, YugabyteDB), the configuration is perfectly balanced: 1. **Memory:** Sufficient for loading the entire active working set (hot data) into memory, minimizing disk I/O latency. 2. **I/O:** The high IOPS of the NVMe array handles millions of small transactional reads/writes rapidly. 3. **CPU:** High core count allows for massive parallel query execution (OLAP) or efficient handling of many concurrent connections (OLTP).
3.3. High-Performance Computing (HPC) and AI/ML Training (CPU-Bound)
While GPU acceleration is preferred for deep learning training, the Chimera v3.1 is an outstanding platform for pre-processing data pipelines, running large-scale Monte Carlo simulations, or executing CPU-bound computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. The strong floating-point performance (SPECfp rate) and the extremely fast memory subsystem are key advantages here. Integration with a dedicated InfiniBand fabric allows for tight coupling within HPC clusters.
3.4. High-Throughput Caching and In-Memory Data Grids
For systems requiring massive, low-latency access to key-value stores like Redis or Memcached, this server configuration offers unparalleled density. A single server can host petabytes of cached data if utilizing large-capacity drives on Tier 2, or terabytes of actively used data directly in volatile memory, leveraging the 1.5 TB pool.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To understand the strategic placement of the Chimera v3.1, it must be compared against two common alternative server profiles: the "Density Optimized" (lower core/RAM, higher drive count) and the "Extreme Memory Optimized" (fewer cores, higher frequency, lower density).
- 4.1. Configuration Comparison Table
This table contrasts the Chimera v3.1 against a hypothetical Density Optimized model (fewer cores, higher clock speed, focused on storage density) and a Memory Optimized model (fewer sockets, maximum RAM per socket).
| Feature | Chimera v3.1 (Standard) | Density Optimized (Storage Focus) | Memory Optimized (Single Socket Focus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Configuration | 2x 56C (112C Total) | 2x 40C (80C Total) | 1x 64C (64C Total) |
| Total RAM Capacity | 1.5 TB (DDR5-4800) | 768 GB (DDR5-4400) | 2.0 TB (DDR5-5200) |
| Total NVMe Drives | 8x U.2 (Tier 1) | 16x U.2 (Tier 1) | 4x U.2 (Tier 1) |
| PCIe Gen Generation | Gen 5.0 | Gen 4.0 | Gen 5.0 |
| Theoretical Peak Compute (TFLOPS) | ~14.5 | ~11.0 | ~9.5 (Lower core count) |
| Density Score (VMs/Rack Unit) | High (Score: 8.5/10) | Medium (Score: 7.0/10 - limited by CPU headroom) | Low (Score: 6.0/10 - limited by socket count) |
| Ideal Workload | Balanced Virtualization, Database/OLTP | Scale-out Storage, Hyper-converged Infrastructure (HCI) | In-Memory Caching, Large Single-Instance Databases |
- 4.2. Analysis of Trade-offs
- **Versus Density Optimized:** The Chimera v3.1 sacrifices raw physical drive count for superior processing power and memory bandwidth. If the primary workload involves complex calculations or requires more than 80 CPU cores, the Chimera is superior. The Density Optimized model is better suited where hundreds of smaller VMs require local, fast storage access without heavy processing demands.
- **Versus Memory Optimized:** While the Memory Optimized configuration offers higher speed (DDR5-5200) and potentially higher total capacity (2TB), the Chimera v3.1’s dual-socket architecture provides significantly better parallel processing capability (112 cores vs. 64 cores). For workloads that scale across cores (e.g., parallel database queries), the Chimera offers better ROI despite slightly lower peak memory frequency. The NUMA management complexity is also lower on the single-socket configuration, though the Chimera’s UPI configuration is mature.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Deploying and maintaining the Chimera v3.1 requires adherence to strict environmental and operational protocols due to its high power density and reliance on high-speed components.
5.1. Thermal Management and Cooling
The combined TDP of 700W for the CPUs, plus the thermal load from the 24 high-speed DIMMs and the I/O controllers (estimated 150W for storage/NICs), results in a significant heat output per rack unit.
- **Required Airflow:** Minimum sustained airflow of 180 CFM across the chassis is required.
- **Recommended Rack Density:** Limit deployment to 30-35 units per standard 42U rack to maintain ambient intake temperatures below 24°C (75°F). Exceeding this risks thermal throttling of the CPUs, causing performance degradation below specified benchmarks.
- **Cooling System:** Deployment must utilize hot/cold aisle containment or high-efficiency in-row cooling units. Standard perimeter cooling is insufficient for sustained operation under full load. Cooling infrastructure must be provisioned for 4.5 kW per server unit (including PSU overhead).
5.2. Power Requirements and Redundancy
The dual 2400W Titanium PSUs provide substantial headroom, but the total system draw under peak load (e.g., heavy IOPS combined with 100% CPU utilization) can approach 2.1 kW.
- **Power Delivery:** Each server must be connected to a dedicated Power Distribution Unit (PDU) capable of delivering at least 2.5 kW dedicated capacity per feed.
- **Redundancy:** The N+1 PSU configuration mandates that the upstream power source (UPS/PDU) must support the simultaneous draw of both power supplies, even if only one is actively utilized during normal operation, to ensure seamless failover capability. UPS planning must account for the rapid load spike during PSU failover events.
5.3. Firmware and Driver Management
Maintaining performance parity requires strict adherence to the vendor-validated firmware matrix.
1. **BIOS/UEFI:** Must be updated to the latest revision supporting the chosen CPU stepping to ensure optimal UPI configuration and memory training parameters. 2. **HBA/RAID Firmware:** Storage controllers require frequent updates, particularly those managing NVMe devices, as new firmware often addresses performance degradation under specific I/O patterns (e.g., garbage collection latency spikes). 3. **Network Drivers:** For 100GbE adapters utilizing RoCEv2, the Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK) or specific kernel drivers must be validated against the hypervisor version to prevent packet drops or performance degradation due to context switching overhead. Driver lifecycle management must be automated.
5.4. Component Failover Procedures
Key maintenance procedures focus on minimizing downtime associated with component replacement:
- **Memory Replacement:** Due to the NUMA structure, replacing a DIMM requires shutting down the corresponding CPU node entirely, as hot-swapping DIMMs in this high-density configuration is not supported by the motherboard specification (unlike some lower-density blade systems).
- **Storage Failure:** The RAID 6 array on Tier 2 provides two-disk redundancy. Standard procedure involves replacing the failed drive, followed by an automated or manually initiated rebuild process, which can place significant load on the CPU subsystem (parity recalculation). Monitoring the CPU utilization during rebuilds is crucial to prevent degradation of Tier 1 services. SAN connectivity via the 100GbE fabric must also be verified during any storage maintenance.
The robust nature of the hardware allows for high utilization, but the complexity of the dual-socket, high-speed interconnect necessitates rigorous operational discipline to maintain the advertised SLA targets.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️