HDD Storage
Technical Deep Dive: HDD Storage Server Configuration (HDC-2024)
This document provides a comprehensive technical overview and engineering analysis of the standard **HDC-2024** server configuration, optimized specifically for high-capacity, cost-effective HDD-based bulk storage solutions. This configuration prioritizes raw data density and sustained sequential throughput over low-latency random access performance.
1. Hardware Specifications
The HDC-2024 platform is built upon a 4U rackmount chassis designed to maximize drive density while maintaining appropriate thermal management profiles for high-spin-rate mechanical media.
1.1. System Architecture Overview
The architecture is centered around a scalable storage controller interface, leveraging PCIe Gen 5 lanes to ensure the Host Bus Adapters (HBAs) are not bottlenecked by the CPU or chipset, especially when servicing large arrays of mechanical drives.
| Component | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Chassis Form Factor | 4U Rackmount (900mm Depth) | Supports up to 45 x 3.5" Hot-Swap Bays |
| Motherboard Chipset | Intel C741 Platform Controller Hub (PCH) | Optimized for high-speed I/O aggregation |
| CPU Sockets | Dual Socket (LGA 4677) | Supports Intel Xeon Scalable Processors (Sapphire Rapids) |
| Maximum System Memory | 8 TB DDR5 ECC RDIMM (32 DIMM slots) | Standard deployment uses 1TB or 2TB RDIMMs |
| Primary Boot Drive | 2x 480GB NVMe SSD (RAID 1) | M.2 form factor, PCIe Gen 4 x4 |
| Internal Interconnect | Dual 200GbE OCP 3.0 Mezzanine Card | For storage network connectivity (e.g., iSCSI or NVMe-oF) |
1.2. Storage Subsystem Details
The core strength of the HDC-2024 lies in its massive, redundant HDD capacity. We utilize enterprise-grade, high-capacity Helium-filled drives optimized for 24/7 operation.
1.2.1. Drive Configuration
The standard build utilizes 36 active 3.5" bays, reserving 9 bays for hot spares, cache expansion, or future scaling, depending on the deployment profile.
| Parameter | Specification | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Enterprise Nearline SAS (NL-SAS) HDD | Optimized for sequential bulk data access and power efficiency over traditional SAS |
| Drive Capacity (Per Unit) | 22 TB Native (CMR) | Current maximum economic density available as of Q3 2024 |
| Interface Protocol | SAS-4 (22.5 Gbps per lane) | Superior scalability over SATA for large arrays |
| Total Usable Capacity (RAID 6) | 748 TB (36 Drives Total - 4 Spares) | Assumes 34 active drives in an $N-2$ redundancy scheme |
| Raw Capacity (Maximum) | 990 TB (45 Drives) | Maximum physical density achievable in the chassis |
1.2.2. Host Bus Adapter (HBA) Configuration
Effective management of 45+ drives requires robust, high-lane-count controllers. We employ dedicated HBAs rather than traditional RAID cards to offload complex parity calculations to the host OS/software layer (e.g., ZFS or Ceph).
- **Primary HBA (Controller A):** Broadcom MegaRAID 9690W-48i (48-port internal, PCIe Gen 5 x16)
- **Secondary HBA (Controller B):** Broadcom MegaRAID 9690W-48i (48-port internal, PCIe Gen 5 x16)
These controllers are configured in a ***Split Backplane*** topology, where Controller A manages bays 1-24, and Controller B manages bays 25-45 (plus the 2 NVMe boot drives). This segregation ensures that a single HBA failure does not compromise the entire data set, adhering to High Availability (HA) principles.
1.3. Processor and Memory Configuration
To support the high I/O demands and the required software overhead (e.g., metadata management, deduplication, compression), the CPU and RAM capacity are substantial, even though the workload is largely I/O bound.
- **CPU Selection:** Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6558Y (48 Cores / 96 Threads per socket, 3.2 GHz Base, 4.0 GHz Turbo, 115 MB L3 Cache). Total system cores: 96C/192T.
- **Memory:** 2048 GB (2 TB) DDR5-4800 ECC RDIMM (32 x 64GB modules). This provides sufficient buffering for metadata operations and ensures that the OS kernel and file system caches remain highly effective during large sequential transfers.
Diagram of Data Flow in HDC-2024 Configuration
2. Performance Characteristics
Performance evaluation focuses on metrics critical for bulk storage: sustained sequential throughput and capacity resilience, rather than low-latency transaction rates.
2.1. Benchmarking Methodology
Testing was conducted using the FIO (Flexible I/O Tester) utility against a fully populated, 34-drive array configured in RAID 6 (ZFS RAIDZ2 equivalent). The system was loaded with 100TB of synthetic data prior to testing to ensure realistic wear layering and cache saturation effects were measured.
2.2. Sequential Throughput Analysis
The primary performance indicator for HDD arrays is sustained sequential read/write speed, which is directly proportional to the number of active drives and the interface speed.
| Operation | Block Size | Result (Average) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequential Read | 1M (QD=64) | 5.8 GB/s | Limited by the aggregate speed of the 34 active drives and PCIe Gen 5 bus saturation. |
| Sequential Write | 1M (QD=64) | 4.9 GB/s | Write performance is slightly degraded due to the parity calculation overhead inherent in the software RAID layer. |
| Sequential Read (Single Stream) | 1M | 285 MB/s | Reflects the peak performance of a single 22TB Helium drive. |
The 5.8 GB/s read throughput translates to approximately 46.4 Gbps, which is well within the capability of the dual 200GbE network interface cards (NICs) when operating at full utilization across multiple simultaneous client connections.
2.3. Random I/O Latency and IOPS
While not the primary function, random I/O performance dictates suitability for metadata-heavy workloads or small file serving. Mechanical drives inherently perform poorly in this metric compared to Solid State Drive (SSD) solutions.
- **4K Random Read IOPS (QD=32):** 1,850 IOPS
- **4K Random Write IOPS (QD=32):** 980 IOPS
- **Average 4K Read Latency:** 12.4 ms
These latency figures confirm that the HDC-2024 is unsuitable for high-transaction database workloads or high-frequency VDI environments, where latencies must remain below 1ms. The performance is adequate only for scenarios where I/O requests are large and infrequent, such as large file backups or archival retrieval.
2.4. Rebuild Performance and Resilience
A critical performance metric for large arrays is the time required to rebuild the array following a drive failure. Using RAID 6 ($N-2$), the system must reconstruct data from $N-2$ drives onto the hot spare.
- **Rebuild Rate (Sustained):** 180 MB/s per active drive (average across the array).
- **Total Rebuild Time (34 Drives, 22TB each):** Approximately 58 hours (2.4 days).
This rebuild time is a significant consideration, as it exposes the array to an elevated risk of a second drive failure (a "double fault") during the rebuild window. RAID Rebuild Strategies must be employed to mitigate this risk.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The HDC-2024 configuration is expertly tailored for scenarios demanding massive, persistent, and cost-effective storage capacity where sequential access dominates.
3.1. Primary Recommendations
- **Long-Term Archival Storage (Cold/Cool Tier):** Ideal for storing historical records, regulatory compliance data, and infrequently accessed media assets. The high capacity/cost ratio makes it significantly more economical than All-Flash Array (AFA) solutions for data that must be retained for 5+ years.
- **Media and Entertainment Asset Libraries:** Storing raw 4K/8K video footage, large scientific simulation datasets, and high-resolution imagery. These workloads are characterized by very large file sizes (100GB+) accessed sequentially during rendering or playback.
- **Backup Targets and Disaster Recovery (DR) Repositories:** Serving as the destination for network-based backups (e.g., Veeam, Commvault). The large capacity allows for multiple generations of backups to be retained on-premises before tape rotation or cloud migration.
- **Big Data Lake Ingestion:** When used as a component within a distributed file system like Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) or Ceph, the HDC-2024 provides the necessary raw capacity backbone for data ingestion pipelines before tiered promotion to faster storage tiers.
3.2. Workload Suitability Matrix
| Workload Type | Suitability Score (1-5, 5 being best) | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Video Rendering Source Storage | 4 | Excellent sequential throughput, capacity is key. |
| High-Frequency Trading Logs | 1 | Latency (12ms+) is completely unacceptable. Requires NVMe. |
| Virtual Machine (VM) Storage Pool | 2 | Acceptable for non-production/test VMs, but production VMs require better random I/O. |
| Compliance/Legal Archives | 5 | Low cost per TB and high density are paramount for static data. |
| Primary Database Storage (OLTP) | 1 | Insufficient IOPS and excessive latency. |
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To justify the HDC-2024's design choices (specifically the emphasis on mechanical drives and high-density chassis), it must be evaluated against the two primary alternatives: high-density SSD arrays and standard 2U server configurations.
4.1. HDC-2024 vs. High-Density All-Flash (HFA-2024)
The HFA-2024 configuration replaces all 3.5" HDDs with 2.5" U.2 NVMe SSDs, typically achieving 120 drive bays in a comparable footprint, but at a significantly higher cost per terabyte.
| Metric | HDC-2024 (HDD) | HFA-2024 (NVMe) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Capacity (4U Chassis) | ~990 TB | ~480 TB (Using 30TB U.2 drives) |
| Cost per Usable TB (Est.) | $12/TB | $65/TB |
| Sustained Sequential Read | 5.8 GB/s | 18.5 GB/s |
| 4K Random Read Latency | 12.4 ms | 0.15 ms |
| Power Consumption (Idle/Load) | 750W / 1800W | 1100W / 2500W |
- Conclusion:** The HDC-2024 offers **5x the capacity at 1/5th the cost per TB**, making it the superior choice for cold storage where latency is irrelevant. The HFA-2024 is reserved for mission-critical, high-transaction workloads where cost is secondary to performance and availability.
4.2. HDC-2024 vs. Standard Density Server (SDS-2U)
The SDS-2U configuration uses a standard 2U chassis, typically supporting 12 to 24 internal 3.5" drives, often utilizing simpler SATA controllers and less powerful CPUs.
| Metric | HDC-2024 (4U) | SDS-2U (2U) |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Drive Count | 45 | 24 |
| Maximum Raw Capacity | 990 TB | 528 TB |
| Density Ratio (TB/U) | 247.5 TB/U | 264 TB/U (Slightly higher density in 2U due to better packaging, but lower absolute capacity) |
| PCIe Lanes for Storage | 32 (2x PCIe Gen 5 x16) | 16 (1x PCIe Gen 4 x16) |
| Scalability Potential | High (via SAS Expander) | Low (limited backplane slots) |
- Conclusion:** While the SDS-2U offers marginally better TB/U density in some models, the HDC-2024 provides nearly double the absolute capacity per rack unit due to its 4U height, enabling the use of dual, high-lane-count HBAs, which is crucial for maintaining performance across 45 drives. The HDC-2024 is the clear choice for **scale-out deployments** where maximizing capacity per server footprint is vital.
4.3. Comparison to Tape Libraries
For archival purposes, Linear Tape-Open (LTO) libraries remain the lowest cost per TB solution, but they suffer from poor accessibility.
- **HDC-2024:** Online access, latency measured in milliseconds (after initial connection setup).
- **LTO-9 Tape Library:** Offline access, latency measured in minutes (mount/seek time).
The HDC-2024 serves as the *nearline* tier, bridging the gap between high-speed flash and slow, offline tape media.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Deploying high-density mechanical storage introduces specific challenges related to thermal dissipation, power integrity, and component serviceability.
5.1. Thermal Management and Cooling
The primary maintenance concern for the HDC-2024 is heat density. 45 spinning drives generate significant thermal load, often exceeding 1500W of pure heat output from the drives alone.
- **Airflow Requirements:** The chassis requires a minimum of 250 Linear Feet per Minute (LFM) of front-to-rear airflow velocity. Standard 1U/2U server racks may not provide sufficient cooling capacity.
- **Fan Configuration:** The chassis utilizes redundant, high-static-pressure 120mm fans (N+1 redundancy). These fans operate at higher RPMs than traditional compute servers, leading to increased acoustic output (Noise levels often exceed 65 dBA near the front).
- **Temperature Throttling:** The firmware is configured to initiate thermal throttling on the HBAs if the backplane temperature exceeds 45°C, which can temporarily reduce sequential throughput by up to 20%. Maintaining ambient rack temperature below 22°C is mandatory for optimal performance.
5.2. Power Requirements and Redundancy
The peak power draw of a fully populated HDC-2024 system, including dual CPUs, 2TB RAM, and 45 drives spinning up simultaneously, can momentarily spike above 2500W.
- **Power Supplies (PSUs):** Dual 2000W 80+ Titanium Hot-Swap Redundant PSUs are standard.
- **Inrush Current:** Due to the simultaneous spin-up of 45 HDDs, the system exhibits a significant inrush current event upon initial power-on or recovery from a power loss. Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) systems must be rated for this transient load, or a staggered power-on sequence must be implemented via the Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) interface. For safety, a controlled spin-up sequence is configured to stagger drive activation over 60 seconds.
5.3. Drive Failure Prediction and Replacement
Reliability hinges on proactive monitoring of the mechanical components.
- **S.M.A.R.T. Monitoring:** Continuous monitoring of Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology (S.M.A.R.T.) attributes (specifically Reallocated Sector Count and Seek Error Rate) is essential.
- **Predictive Failure Analysis (PFA):** The HBA firmware integrates with the host OS to provide PFA alerts. Any drive reporting a critical S.M.A.R.T. warning should be scheduled for replacement within the next maintenance window, *before* it fails and triggers a rebuild event.
- **Hot Swap Procedure:** Drives must be ejected using the physical release mechanism only. The system supports drive replacement while running (hot-swap), provided the array redundancy level (RAID 6) is maintained. The chassis features activity LEDs that clearly indicate which drives are currently participating in a rebuild operation, preventing accidental removal of an active drive.
5.4. Software Stack Considerations
The HDC-2024 is typically deployed with a storage operating system that leverages the raw block devices presented by the HBAs.
- **Operating System:** Linux (e.g., RHEL 9.x or Ubuntu Server LTS) or specialized OS like TrueNAS SCALE or Storage Spaces Direct.
- **Driver Stability:** Ensuring the HBA Driver Version is certified for the chosen OS kernel is critical. Incompatible drivers can lead to dropped I/O, data corruption, or controller instability during high-load rebuilds. Regular firmware updates for the HBAs are mandatory, often requiring scheduled downtime.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️