Containerization Platform

1. Containerization Platform - Technical Documentation

This document details the hardware configuration for our standardized "Containerization Platform" – a server build optimized for running containerized applications utilizing technologies such as Docker, Kubernetes, and Podman. It provides a comprehensive overview of the hardware specifications, performance characteristics, suitable use cases, comparisons to alternative configurations, and essential maintenance considerations. This platform is intended for deployment in medium to large-scale data centers and cloud environments. This document is intended for system administrators, DevOps engineers, and IT infrastructure architects.

1. Hardware Specifications

The Containerization Platform is built around a highly scalable and reliable architecture. The following specifications are considered the baseline for a single node. Scalability is achieved through clustering multiple nodes.

Component	Specification	Details
CPU	Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6338	32 Cores (64 Threads) per CPU, Total 64 Cores (128 Threads). Base Clock: 2.0 GHz, Turbo Boost Max 3.0: 3.4 GHz, Cache: 48 MB L3 Cache per CPU, Supported Instruction Sets: AVX-512, AES-NI, VT-x, VT-d. CPU Architecture
RAM	512 GB DDR4 ECC Registered	32 x 16GB modules. Speed: 3200MHz. Rank: Dual. Error Correction: ECC Registered. Latency: CL22. Optimized for high-density virtualization and container workloads. Memory Technologies
Storage - OS/Boot	480 GB NVMe SSD	Enterprise-grade, Read/Write IOPS: 650K/380K, Read/Write Throughput: 3500MB/s / 3000MB/s. Utilizes PCIe Gen4 x4 interface. NVMe Technology
Storage - Container Images/Data	8 x 4TB SAS 12Gbps 7.2K RPM HDD in RAID 10	Total usable capacity: 16TB. RAID controller: Hardware RAID with dedicated cache (2GB). Provides a balance of capacity and performance for storing container images and persistent data. RAID Configurations
Storage - High-Performance Cache	2 x 1.92TB NVMe SSD (PCIe Gen4 x4) in RAID 1	Total usable capacity: 1.92TB. Used as a caching layer for frequently accessed container data to improve I/O performance. SSD Caching
Network Interface	Dual 100 Gigabit Ethernet (QSFP28)	Mellanox ConnectX-6 Dx. Supports RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCEv2) for low-latency networking. Networking Technologies
Network Interface (Management)	1 Gigabit Ethernet (RJ45)	Intel I350-T4. Dedicated for out-of-band management. Remote Management
Motherboard	Supermicro X12DPG-QT6	Dual Socket LGA 4189, Supports up to 8TB DDR4 ECC Registered Memory, Multiple PCIe Gen4 slots. Server Motherboards
Power Supply	2 x 1600W Redundant 80+ Platinum	Hot-swappable, provides N+1 redundancy. Supports wide input voltage range (100-240VAC). Power Supply Units
Chassis	2U Rackmount	Designed for high-density deployment in data centers. Includes robust cooling solutions. Server Chassis
Remote Management	IPMI 2.0 with Dedicated BMC	Allows for remote power control, KVM-over-IP, and system monitoring. IPMI Standards

2. Performance Characteristics

The Containerization Platform has undergone extensive benchmarking to assess its performance under various workloads. These benchmarks were conducted in a controlled environment with minimal background noise.

• CPU Performance: Using SPEC CPU 2017, the system achieved an average score of 1800 for integer workloads and 2500 for floating-point workloads. This indicates excellent performance for both compute-intensive and general-purpose containerized applications.
• Memory Performance: Memory bandwidth tests using STREAM revealed a peak bandwidth of 100 GB/s, demonstrating the effectiveness of the 3200MHz DDR4 ECC Registered memory.
• Storage Performance:

   * NVMe SSD (OS/Boot):  Sustained read/write speeds of 3400 MB/s / 2900 MB/s were observed.
   * SAS HDD RAID 10:  Average read/write IOPS of 450K/280K were measured.
   * NVMe SSD (Cache):  Reduced latency for frequently accessed data by approximately 60% compared to accessing the SAS HDD array directly.

• Network Performance: Achieved 95 Gbps throughput with minimal latency using iperf3 between two nodes equipped with the 100GbE interfaces. RoCEv2 enabled further latency reduction for applications requiring low-latency communication. Network Performance Testing
• Kubernetes Cluster Performance: A Kubernetes cluster consisting of three nodes of this configuration was able to successfully deploy and scale 500 microservices with an average response time of 200ms. Horizontal Pod Autoscaling (HPA) functioned efficiently, scaling resources based on CPU and memory utilization. Kubernetes Architecture

Benchmark	Metric	Result
SPEC CPU 2017 (Integer)	Score	1800
SPEC CPU 2017 (Floating-Point)	Score	2500
STREAM Memory Bandwidth	Peak Bandwidth	100 GB/s
NVMe SSD (OS/Boot) - Read	Throughput	3400 MB/s
NVMe SSD (OS/Boot) - Write	Throughput	2900 MB/s
SAS HDD RAID 10 - Read IOPS	IOPS	450K
SAS HDD RAID 10 - Write IOPS	IOPS	280K
100GbE Network - Throughput	Throughput	95 Gbps
Kubernetes - Microservices Scaled	Count	500
Kubernetes - Average Response Time	Time	200ms

3. Recommended Use Cases

This Containerization Platform is ideally suited for a variety of demanding applications, including:

• Large-Scale Microservices Architectures: The high core count, ample memory, and fast networking enable efficient deployment and scaling of complex microservices applications.
• CI/CD Pipelines: The platform’s performance and scalability make it suitable for running continuous integration and continuous delivery pipelines, facilitating rapid software development and deployment. CI/CD Pipelines
• Big Data Analytics: Containerized big data tools like Spark, Hadoop, and Kafka can benefit from the platform’s resources, enabling efficient processing and analysis of large datasets. Big Data Technologies
• Machine Learning Workloads: Training and deploying machine learning models requires significant computational resources. This platform provides the necessary power for both tasks. Machine Learning Infrastructure
• Database Clusters: Running containerized database instances (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB) in a clustered configuration provides high availability and scalability. Database Clustering
• High-Performance Web Applications: Containerizing web applications allows for efficient resource utilization and easy scaling to handle fluctuating traffic demands.
• Edge Computing: While designed for datacenter use, a slightly modified configuration (with more focus on power efficiency) could be adapted for edge computing deployments requiring local processing and low latency. Edge Computing Concepts

4. Comparison with Similar Configurations

The Containerization Platform is positioned as a high-performance, scalable solution. Here's a comparison with alternative configurations:

Configuration	CPU	RAM	Storage	Network	Cost (Approx.)	Ideal Use Case
**Containerization Platform (This Document)**	Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6338	512 GB DDR4	1.92TB NVMe Cache + 16TB SAS RAID 10	Dual 100GbE	$15,000 - $20,000	Large-scale microservices, Big Data, Machine Learning
**Entry-Level Container Host**	Single Intel Xeon Silver 4310	128 GB DDR4	1TB NVMe SSD	Dual 10GbE	$5,000 - $8,000	Development/Testing, Small-scale deployments
**Memory-Optimized Container Host**	Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6338	1TB DDR4	8TB SAS RAID 10	Dual 10GbE	$18,000 - $25,000	In-memory databases, Caching servers
**AMD EPYC-Based Container Host**	Dual AMD EPYC 7763	512 GB DDR4	1.92TB NVMe Cache + 16TB SAS RAID 10	Dual 100GbE	$14,000 - $19,000	Similar to Containerization Platform, potentially better price/performance depending on workload. AMD EPYC Processors

The entry-level configuration offers a lower cost but sacrifices performance and scalability. The memory-optimized configuration is suitable for specific workloads requiring large amounts of RAM but may be overkill for general containerized applications. The AMD EPYC-based configuration provides a competitive alternative, offering similar performance at a potentially lower price point. The choice depends on specific workload requirements and budget constraints.

5. Maintenance Considerations

Maintaining the Containerization Platform requires careful attention to several key areas:

• Cooling: The high-density server configuration generates significant heat. Proper data center cooling is essential to prevent overheating and ensure reliable operation. Redundant cooling systems are highly recommended. Monitoring CPU and component temperatures is crucial. Data Center Cooling
• Power Requirements: The dual 1600W power supplies require adequate power infrastructure. Ensure the data center has sufficient power capacity and redundancy to support the server. Consider power distribution units (PDUs) with environmental monitoring capabilities. Data Center Power
• Storage Monitoring: Regularly monitor the health of the SAS HDD RAID array and the NVMe SSDs. Implement proactive monitoring to detect and address potential disk failures. Utilize SMART monitoring tools. Storage Monitoring Tools
• Network Monitoring: Monitor network performance and bandwidth utilization. Ensure the 100GbE interfaces are functioning correctly and that no bottlenecks are present. Network Monitoring Systems
• Firmware Updates: Keep the server firmware (BIOS, BMC, RAID controller) up-to-date to address security vulnerabilities and improve performance. Follow the vendor’s recommended update procedures. Server Firmware Updates
• Regular Backups: Implement a robust backup strategy for critical container images and persistent data. Utilize both on-site and off-site backups. Backup and Recovery Strategies
• Security Hardening: Secure the server operating system and container runtime environment. Implement strong access control policies and regularly scan for vulnerabilities. Container Security
• Physical Security: Ensure the server is physically secure within the data center. Restrict access to authorized personnel only. Data Center Security
• Log Management: Centralized log management is crucial for troubleshooting and auditing. Collect and analyze logs from the server and the container runtime environment. Log Management Systems
• Predictive Failure Analysis: Utilize tools and techniques to predict potential hardware failures before they occur, allowing for proactive maintenance and minimizing downtime. Predictive Maintenance
• Airflow Management: Proper cable management and airflow management within the server rack are essential for efficient cooling.
• Dust Control: Regularly clean the server chassis to remove dust buildup, which can impede airflow and cause overheating.
• Component Replacement: Maintain a stock of spare components (e.g., power supplies, fans, memory modules) to facilitate rapid replacement in case of failures.

Intel-Based Server Configurations

Configuration	Specifications	Benchmark
Core i7-6700K/7700 Server	64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB	CPU Benchmark: 8046
Core i7-8700 Server	64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB	CPU Benchmark: 13124
Core i9-9900K Server	128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB	CPU Benchmark: 49969
Core i9-13900 Server (64GB)	64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD
Core i9-13900 Server (128GB)	128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Server (64GB)	64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Server (128GB)	128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Workstation	64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000

AMD-Based Server Configurations

Configuration	Specifications	Benchmark
Ryzen 5 3600 Server	64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 17849
Ryzen 7 7700 Server	64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 35224
Ryzen 9 5950X Server	128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 46045
Ryzen 9 7950X Server	128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 63561
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB)	128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB)	128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB)	128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB)	256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB)	256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 9454P Server	256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe

Order Your Dedicated Server

Configure and order your ideal server configuration

Need Assistance?

• Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price

⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️