Technical Deep Dive: The Workload Characterization Server Configuration (WCC-2024)

This document provides a comprehensive technical analysis of the **Workload Characterization Server Configuration (WCC-2024)**. This build is specifically engineered and tuned for environments requiring deep introspection into application behavior, performance profiling, and accurate simulation of complex, variable computational demands. The goal of this configuration is to provide a highly balanced, transparent platform where bottlenecks can be reliably isolated and measured across the CPU, memory subsystem, I/O fabric, and storage latency profiles.

1. Hardware Specifications

The WCC-2024 platform is built upon a dual-socket motherboard architecture utilizing the latest generation of high-core-count, moderate-clock-speed processors. This design philosophy prioritizes thread density and memory bandwidth over peak single-thread frequency, which is crucial for accurately simulating large-scale, multi-threaded production workloads.

1.1 Central Processing Unit (CPU)

The selection process for the CPU focused on maximizing L3 cache size per core and ensuring robust support for advanced virtualization and profiling instructions (e.g., Intel VTune extensions or AMD uProf capabilities).

CPU Configuration Details
Parameter	Specification	Rationale
Processor Model	2x Intel Xeon Gold 6548Y (or AMD EPYC 9354P equivalent)	High core count (32C/64T per socket) with significant L3 cache.
Total Cores/Threads	64 Cores / 128 Threads (Physical/Logical)	Provides substantial headroom for OS overhead, hypervisor layers, and concurrent profiling agents.
Base Clock Frequency	2.4 GHz	Stable baseline for predictable thermal and power behavior during sustained load testing.
Max Turbo Frequency	Up to 4.5 GHz (Single Core)	Necessary for burst performance testing and single-threaded component analysis.
L3 Cache Size	120 MB per socket (Total 240 MB)	Large L3 cache minimizes reliance on slower main memory (DRAM) during cache-sensitive profiling, improving measurement accuracy.
TDP (Thermal Design Power)	270W per socket	Requires robust cooling solutions, detailed in Maintenance Considerations.
Memory Channels Supported	8 Channels per socket (16 channels total)	Essential for achieving maximum memory bandwidth critical for data-intensive workloads.

1.2 System Memory (RAM) Subsystem

Memory speed and capacity are critical components in workload characterization, as memory stalls are often the most elusive performance bottleneck. The WCC-2024 employs a fully populated, balanced memory configuration to ensure maximum theoretical bandwidth utilization.

**Total Capacity:** 1.5 TB DDR5 ECC RDIMM
**Configuration:** 16 x 96GB DIMMs (8 per socket, balanced configuration)
**Speed:** 4800 MT/s (JEDEC Standard)
**Latency Profile:** Optimized for tight timings (e.g., CL40 or better, depending on silicon lottery).

The use of DDR5 provides significant generational leaps in bandwidth over DDR4, which is vital for modern concurrent workloads. Refer to Memory Subsystem Architecture for detailed channel interleaving strategies.

1.3 Storage Subsystem

The storage configuration is intentionally tiered to isolate latency characteristics: a fast NVMe pool for OS/profiling tools and a high-capacity, high-IOPS pool for dataset staging and I/O simulation.

Storage Configuration
Tier	Device Type	Quantity	Capacity	Interface / Protocol
Tier 0 (OS/Boot)	Enterprise NVMe SSD (PCIe Gen 5)	2 (Mirrored via ZFS/RAID 1)	1.92 TB	PCIe 5.0 x4
Tier 1 (Active Data/Scratch)	U.2/M.2 NVMe SSD (PCIe Gen 4)	8 (Configured as RAID-0/RAID-10 array)	16 TB Usable (approx.)	PCIe 4.0 x4 per drive
Tier 2 (Bulk/Archive)	15K RPM SAS HDD	4 (Configured as RAID-5 for capacity)	32 TB Usable (approx.)	SAS 12Gb/s

The primary focus for characterization is Tier 1, utilizing the raw IOPS and low latency of modern NVMe drives, often measured using FIO Benchmarking Utilities.

1.4 Platform and Interconnect

The platform utilizes a high-end server motherboard supporting the required 128 PCIe lanes for full utilization of all storage and network adapters without bifurcation bottlenecks.

**Chipset:** Dual Socket Platform (e.g., C741 or equivalent)
**PCIe Lanes:** Minimum of 128 usable lanes (Gen 4/Gen 5 capable).
**Network Interface Card (NIC):** 2x 100 GbE Mellanox ConnectX-6 (or equivalent) configured for RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE) capability. This is crucial for network-bound workload simulation and measuring inter-node communication overhead, as documented in RDMA Performance Tuning.

2. Performance Characteristics

The WCC-2024 is designed to exhibit high, consistent throughput across all major subsystems. Performance validation relies on synthetic benchmarks combined with application-specific profiling tools.

2.1 Synthetic Benchmarks

To establish a performance baseline, standardized benchmarks targeting specific resource constraints are executed.

1. 1. 1. 2.1.1 CPU Compute Performance

Compute performance is measured using SPECrate 2017 Integer and Floating Point metrics, focusing on the 'rate' score to reflect multi-threaded efficiency.

Synthetic Compute Baseline (Estimated)
Benchmark	Metric	Result	Notes
SPECrate 2017 Integer	Rate Score	~18,000 - 20,000	Reflects OS/System call efficiency and branch prediction accuracy.
SPECrate 2017 FP	Rate Score	~22,000 - 25,000	Heavily relies on AVX-512 utilization and memory bandwidth.
Linpack (HPL)	GFLOPS	> 10 TFLOPS (Double Precision)	Measures peak theoretical utilization under heavy vector processing.

1. 1. 1. 2.1.2 Memory Subsystem Bandwidth and Latency

Achieving maximum theoretical bandwidth is a key objective for this characterization platform.

**Bandwidth (Read/Write):** Measured using the STREAM benchmark. Expected peak aggregate bandwidth is consistently above **850 GB/s**.
**Latency:** Measured using the Intel Memory Latency Checker (MLC). Average latency across all channels should remain below **85 nanoseconds (ns)** under typical load profiles. High latency spikes indicate potential NUMA boundary crossing or cache thrashing issues, which must be flagged during characterization. See NUMA Awareness in Application Design.

2.2 I/O Performance Profile

The I/O subsystem is characterized by its ability to handle mixed workloads (sequential vs. random access) at varying queue depths (QD).

**NVMe Tier 1 (QD=1):** Random 4K read latency consistently below 25 microseconds ($\mu s$). This is the critical metric for transactional database characterization.
**NVMe Tier 1 (QD=128):** Aggregate sequential throughput exceeding **18 GB/s** (across the RAID array).

The focus here is not solely on peak throughput but on the **knee curve**—the point where increasing QD yields diminishing returns or significant latency degradation. This point is vital for tuning kernel I/O schedulers (see Linux I/O Scheduler Optimization).

2.3 Network Performance

With 100 GbE interfaces, the platform must sustain high-throughput, low-latency communication typical of distributed computing models.

**TCP Throughput (iperf3):** Sustained bidirectional throughput of 90-95 Gbps.
**RDMA Latency (ping-pong test):** One-way latency reliably below 1.5 $\mu s$. This low latency is essential when characterizing distributed caching systems or message passing interfaces like MPI.

3. Recommended Use Cases

The WCC-2024 configuration is not optimized for a single, monolithic workload (like pure HPC fluid dynamics), but rather for complex, heterogeneous environments where resource contention is the primary variable of interest.

1. 1. 3.1 Database Performance Tuning and Validation

This platform excels in validating complex database configurations where storage latency and concurrency conflict.

**OLTP Simulation:** High concurrency (thousands of active connections) stress testing on systems like PostgreSQL or SQL Server, focusing on the latency impact of small, random writes (Tier 1 storage).
**Data Warehousing (ETL Profiling):** Analyzing the throughput and CPU overhead associated with loading extremely large datasets, particularly when operating across the NUMA boundaries of the dual-socket system.

1. 1. 3.2 Virtualization and Container Density Testing

The large core count and massive memory capacity make this ideal for hypervisor stress testing and density validation for cloud-native environments.

**vCPU Overcommitment Analysis:** Determining the actual performance degradation when oversubscribing the 128 logical threads across numerous VMs/containers.
**KVM/Hyper-V Profiling:** Measuring the overhead introduced by the hypervisor layer itself under maximum guest load. This involves using Hypervisor Overhead Measurement Tools.

1. 1. 3.3 Complex Scientific Modeling and Simulation

For scientific applications that exhibit dynamic resource requirements (e.g., switching between heavy computation and significant data shuffling), the balanced profile is key.

**Graph Analytics (e.g., Neo4j, Apache Giraph):** These workloads are highly sensitive to both cache misses (CPU/RAM interaction) and random I/O access patterns during graph traversal. The large L3 cache mitigates some memory pressure, allowing clearer identification of I/O bottlenecks.
**Compiler Optimization Validation:** Compiling massive codebases (like the Linux kernel or large Chromium builds) while profiling code paths to measure the efficiency of different compiler flags (e.g., `-O3` vs. profile-guided optimization).

1. 1. 3.4 Network Function Virtualization (NFV)

The 100GbE capacity, combined with hardware support for flow steering and SR-IOV, positions this system for testing virtualized network appliances (vRouters, vFirewalls). The characterization focuses on measuring packet processing overhead per core, especially when bypassing the host OS kernel via DPDK or similar frameworks.

4. Comparison with Similar Configurations

To justify the WCC-2024's specific component choices, it is necessary to compare it against two common alternative server builds: a high-frequency configuration (HFC) and a maximum-density configuration (MDC).

1. 1. 4.1 Configuration Profiles

1. 1. 4.2 Performance Trade-offs Analysis

The WCC-2024 strikes a balance that is often overlooked in standard deployments.

**vs. HFC:** While the HFC will win in workloads demanding extreme single-thread performance (e.g., legacy simulation codes, certain GUI rendering tasks), the WCC-2024 provides significantly better scaling efficiency across 64 physical cores for modern, concurrent applications. The larger cache size also dampens the performance variability seen in the HFC when cache misses occur.
**vs. MDC:** The MDC maximizes raw thread count and total memory capacity, but often sacrifices crucial aspects for *characterization*: lower memory speed (DDR4 vs. DDR5) and significantly slower I/O latency due to reliance on SAS/SATA backplanes rather than direct PCIe connectivity for primary storage. The WCC-2024's high-speed NVMe array provides a much cleaner signal for I/O profiling.

The WCC-2024 is superior when the goal is to understand *why* a workload slows down under load, rather than just achieving the highest possible throughput number for a perfectly optimized benchmark. See Benchmarking Methodologies for deeper context.

5. Maintenance Considerations

The high-density, high-power characteristics of the WCC-2024 necessitate stringent environmental and operational controls to ensure data integrity and system longevity.

1. 1. 5.1 Power Requirements and Delivery

The combined TDP of the dual CPUs (540W) plus the high-power NVMe drives and networking components pushes the typical system power draw significantly higher than standard servers, especially under sustained load testing.

**System Peak Draw:** Estimated at 1000W - 1200W under full synthetic load (CPU stress + I/O saturation).
**Power Supply Units (PSUs):** Requires dual, redundant 1600W 80+ Platinum (or Titanium) PSUs. Redundancy is mandatory to prevent testing interruption due to single-point power failure. Refer to Server PSU Efficiency Standards.
**Rack Power Density:** Data center racks housing multiple WCC-2024 units must be provisioned with higher amperage circuits (e.g., 30A per rack unit) to prevent tripping breakers during simultaneous characterization runs.

1. 1. 5.2 Thermal Management and Cooling

The 270W TDP per CPU generates substantial localized heat density, demanding high-airflow cooling infrastructure.

**Airflow Requirements:** Minimum required static pressure in the server chassis fans, typically necessitating high-RPM, high-static-pressure fans (often requiring system BIOS configuration override from default "Acoustic" profiles to "Performance").
**Ambient Data Center Temperature:** The inlet air temperature must be strictly maintained below $22^{\circ}C$ ($72^{\circ}F$) to ensure the CPUs can maintain rated turbo frequencies without excessive thermal throttling. Monitoring the CPU Thermal Throttling Thresholds is a routine maintenance task.
**Liquid Cooling Readiness:** While air-cooled versions are standard, the WCC-2024 platform often supports direct-to-chip liquid cooling cold plates. For long-duration, maximum-utilization testing (e.g., 72-hour soak tests), liquid cooling is highly recommended to eliminate thermal drift as a variable.

1. 1. 5.3 Firmware and Driver Management

Maintaining a consistent software environment is paramount for repeatable characterization results. Any change in firmware can introduce subtle performance shifts that invalidate prior tests.

**BIOS/UEFI Stability:** Only use validated, Long-Term Support (LTS) BIOS versions. Avoid beta firmware during active characterization campaigns.
**Driver Consistency:** All storage controllers (HBA/RAID) and NICs must use vendor-blessed, performance-optimized drivers (e.g., specific kernel modules for RoCE). In Linux environments, ensuring the correct Kernel Module Parameters are set for high-performance networking is non-negotiable.
**Firmware Updates:** Storage firmware updates must be treated with extreme caution, as they can alter underlying garbage collection algorithms, directly impacting measured write amplification and latency stability.

1. 1. 5.4 NUMA Balancing and Alignment

Due to the dual-socket architecture, ensuring that processes are correctly bound to the nearest CPU socket and memory bank (NUMA node) is a critical operational step.

**OS Configuration:** The operating system (e.g., RHEL, Ubuntu Server) must be configured to respect NUMA topology. Tools like `numactl` are used extensively to launch profiling utilities directly onto specific nodes. For example, memory-intensive tests should be pinned to Node 0, while I/O agent processes might be pinned to Node 1 to minimize cross-socket traffic over the Ultra Path Interconnect (UPI) link.
**UPI Link Monitoring:** While the UPI link is extremely fast, excessive traffic across it (e.g., memory access from Node 1 to Node 0 memory) introduces measurable latency penalties. Monitoring UPI link utilization via platform-specific performance counters is necessary to validate application NUMA awareness. See UPI Interconnect Performance Metrics.

The WCC-2024 represents a high-fidelity platform designed for the rigorous demands of modern server optimization. Its balanced approach ensures that when a bottleneck is identified, the platform itself is not the limiting factor, providing clean, actionable data for architecture refinement.

---

Intel-Based Server Configurations

Configuration	Specifications	Benchmark
Core i7-6700K/7700 Server	64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB	CPU Benchmark: 8046
Core i7-8700 Server	64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB	CPU Benchmark: 13124
Core i9-9900K Server	128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB	CPU Benchmark: 49969
Core i9-13900 Server (64GB)	64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD
Core i9-13900 Server (128GB)	128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Server (64GB)	64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Server (128GB)	128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Workstation	64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000

AMD-Based Server Configurations

Configuration	Specifications	Benchmark
Ryzen 5 3600 Server	64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 17849
Ryzen 7 7700 Server	64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 35224
Ryzen 9 5950X Server	128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 46045
Ryzen 9 7950X Server	128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 63561
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB)	128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB)	128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB)	128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB)	256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB)	256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe	CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 9454P Server	256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe

Order Your Dedicated Server

Configure and order your ideal server configuration

Need Assistance?

Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price

⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️

Workload Characterization

Contents