System Resource Usage
Technical Documentation: Server Configuration Profile - System Resource Usage Optimization
This document provides a comprehensive technical analysis of the Server Configuration: SRC-2024-HPC-01 platform, specifically engineered for optimal system resource utilization and balanced workload management. This configuration is designed to maximize throughput while minimizing latency across diverse enterprise and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads.
1. Hardware Specifications
The SRC-2024-HPC-01 is a 2U rackmount system built around dual-socket modular architecture, emphasizing high core density and fast memory access times. All components are validated for continuous operation at 95% utilization for extended periods.
1.1 Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The platform utilizes two identical processors from the latest generation, selected for their high core count and superior IPC (Instructions Per Cycle) performance, coupled with large L3 cache pools critical for data-intensive tasks.
Parameter | Specification (Per Socket) | Total System Value |
---|---|---|
Model | Intel Xeon Platinum 8580+ (Hypothetical High-End SKU) | Dual Socket |
Architecture | Sapphire Rapids / Emerald Rapids Derivative | Dual Socket |
Core Count (P-Cores) | 64 Physical Cores | 128 Physical Cores |
Thread Count (Hyperthreading Enabled) | 128 Logical Threads | 256 Logical Threads |
Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz | N/A (Varies by load) |
Max Turbo Frequency (Single Core) | Up to 4.8 GHz | N/A |
L3 Cache Size (Total) | 120 MB Intel Smart Cache | 240 MB Total |
TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 350W | 700W (CPU Only) |
Socket Interconnect | UPI Link (Ultra Path Interconnect) Speed: 14.4 GT/s | 3 Links active |
Further details on UPI topology are available in the supplementary documentation. The high core count necessitates robust Thermal Management Solutions to maintain the specified boost clocks under sustained load.
1.2 Random Access Memory (RAM) Subsystem
The memory subsystem is configured for maximum bandwidth and low latency, crucial for maximizing the utilization of the 128 physical CPU cores. The platform supports 32 DIMM slots per CPU socket (64 total).
Parameter | Specification | Configuration Detail |
---|---|---|
Total Capacity | 2 TB (Terabytes) | 32 x 64GB DIMMs per CPU socket |
DIMM Type | DDR5 ECC Registered (RDIMM) | 4800 MT/s (JEDEC Standard) |
Configuration Mode | 8-Channel Interleaved per CPU | 16 Channels Total |
Effective Bandwidth (Theoretical Max) | ~1.2 TB/s (Aggregate Read/Write) | Requires optimized memory allocation |
Latency Profile | Low Latency (CL40 @ 4800 MT/s) | Verified via Memory Performance Testing Protocols |
The memory bus runs in a fully populated, balanced configuration to ensure optimal utilization of the CPU’s 8-channel memory controllers, preventing memory bandwidth starvation, a common bottleneck in high-core-count systems. DDR5 Technology Benefits are maximized in this setup.
1.3 Storage Subsystem
The storage solution prioritizes high I/O operations per second (IOPS) and low access latency, leveraging NVMe technology for the primary operating environment and high-speed data staging.
Tier | Technology | Quantity | Capacity / Performance Metric |
---|---|---|---|
Boot/OS Drive | M.2 NVMe PCIe 5.0 SSD (Enterprise Grade) | 2 (Mirrored via SW RAID 1) | 1.92 TB Usable |
Primary Data Pool (Hot Storage) | U.2 NVMe PCIe 5.0 SSD (High Endurance) | 8 | 15.36 TB Usable (Configured in RAID 10 Array) |
Secondary Storage (Bulk/Archive) | 2.5" SAS SSD (SATA Interconnect) | 4 | 7.68 TB Usable (Configured in RAID 6) |
Host Bus Adapter (HBA/RAID Controller) | Broadcom MegaRAID 9750-16i (NVMe/SAS Capable) | 1 | PCIe Gen 5 x16 Interface |
The use of PCIe 5.0 Interface Standards for the primary storage pool ensures that the NVMe devices are not bottlenecked by the host system interconnect, achieving sequential read/write speeds exceeding 14 GB/s and IOPS well over 3 million.
1.4 Networking Interface Cards (NICs)
Network connectivity is critical for resource sharing and distributed workloads. This configuration features dual high-speed interfaces.
Interface | Type | Specification | Function |
---|---|---|---|
Primary Fabric | Dual Port Ethernet (RJ-45) | 2 x 25 Gigabit Ethernet (25GbE) | Management & Standard Data Traffic |
Secondary Fabric (Optional Expansion) | PCIe Add-in Card Slot | Available Slot for 100GbE or InfiniBand HDR | High-Throughput Compute Interconnect |
The system utilizes RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE) capabilities on the 25GbE ports for low-latency kernel bypass operations when supported by the network fabric.
1.5 Expansion and Interconnect
The motherboard (Proprietary Server Board v3.1) provides extensive expansion capabilities via PCIe lanes derived directly from the dual CPUs.
- **Total PCIe Lanes Available:** 160 Lanes (80 per CPU, Gen 5.0)
- **Available Slots (Total):** 6 x PCIe 5.0 x16 slots (Physical and Electrical)
- **Configuration Usage:** 1 x HBA/RAID Controller (x16), 1 x Optional NIC (x16), 4 Slots Free.
This abundant lane availability ensures that all installed peripherals operate at maximum theoretical bandwidth without contention. PCIe Lane Allocation Strategies are documented elsewhere.
2. Performance Characteristics
Performance validation for the SRC-2024-HPC-01 focuses on sustained throughput under conditions designed to stress all system resources simultaneously: CPU compute, memory bandwidth, and I/O subsystem latency.
2.1 Synthetic Benchmarking Results
The following results were obtained using the specialized system validation suite, *ResourceStressPro v6.2*, configured for maximum resource contention testing.
Metric | Unit | SRC-2024-HPC-01 Result | Target Specification |
---|---|---|---|
Linpack Peak Performance (Theoretical) | TFLOPS (FP64) | 11.5 TFLOPS | > 10.0 TFLOPS |
SPECrate 2017_fp_base (Aggregate) | Score | 1,650 | > 1,500 |
Memory Bandwidth (Aggregate Read) | GB/s | 1,180 GB/s | > 1,100 GB/s |
Storage IOPS (4K Random Read, Q32) | IOPS | 3,250,000 | > 3,000,000 |
CPU Utilization Sustained (8-hour test) | % | 97.2% | > 95% |
The results confirm that the configuration successfully navigates the memory bandwidth limitations often seen in high-core-count systems, achieving near-theoretical maximums for floating-point operations. Floating Point Performance Metrics provide context for these TFLOPS figures.
2.2 Real-World Application Performance
To transition from synthetic measures to practical utility, performance was measured against standard industry workloads.
2.2.1 Database Performance (OLTP Simulation)
Using Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC-C) simulation, the system was tested under a high concurrent user load (equivalent to 50,000 virtual users).
- **Result:** 850,000 Transactions Per Minute (TPM) at an average transaction latency of 3.2 ms.
- **Bottleneck Analysis:** Under peak load, CPU utilization stabilized at 88%, while NVMe I/O queue depths averaged 128. The system demonstrated excellent scaling, suggesting that the high-speed storage tier effectively fed the compute complex. Database Server Tuning Best Practices emphasize minimizing latency spikes like those measured here.
2.2.2 Virtualization Density
The system was tasked with hosting a mix of Linux and Windows virtual machines (VMs) utilizing near-parity resource allocation (e.g., VMs given 8 cores/32GB RAM).
- **Maximum Stable Density:** 48 VMs (Average 2.67 Cores per VM, 6.67 GB RAM per VM).
- **Observation:** CPU scheduling overhead remained low (under 2%) until density exceeded 50 VMs, indicating efficient Hypervisor Resource Scheduling on this hardware platform.
= 2.2.3 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
A representative CFD simulation (10-billion cell mesh) was executed.
- **Execution Time:** 4 hours, 12 minutes.
- **Key Factor:** The large 240MB L3 cache was instrumental in reducing cache misses during the iterative solver phases, leading to a 15% performance improvement over previous generation servers with smaller caches, despite similar core clock speeds. Reference Cache Hierarchy Impact on HPC.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The SRC-2024-HPC-01 configuration is specifically engineered for workloads requiring a harmonious balance between massive parallel computation, high-speed data access, and substantial memory footprint.
3.1 Enterprise Database Servers (Mission Critical)
This configuration is ideal for Tier-0 relational database servers (e.g., Oracle Exadata, high-volume SQL Server deployments) where: 1. **High Transaction Volume:** The 256 logical threads handle concurrent connection processing efficiently. 2. **Low Latency I/O:** The PCIe 5.0 NVMe RAID 10 array ensures rapid commit times and fast checkpointing. 3. **Large Buffer Pools:** 2TB of RAM supports massive in-memory database caches, minimizing physical disk reads.
Database Server Hardware Requirements confirm this profile alignment.
3.2 High-Performance Computing (HPC) Workloads
For scientific simulations that are memory-bound or require significant intermediate data storage:
- **Molecular Dynamics (MD):** The high core count and memory bandwidth accelerate force calculations.
- **Weather Modeling:** Large datasets benefit from the fast read/write capabilities of the storage tier for checkpointing large simulation states.
It excels in environments where direct, high-speed access to local storage is preferred over reliance on slower, distant Network File Systems (NFS).
3.3 Large-Scale Data Analytics and In-Memory Processing
Environments utilizing frameworks like Apache Spark or distributed in-memory data grids benefit immensely from the 2TB RAM pool.
- **Spark Executors:** Each executor can be provisioned with significant memory, reducing disk spilling and improving iterative processing speeds.
- **Machine Learning (ML) Model Training:** While GPU acceleration is not the primary focus (only PCIe slots available), the CPU is ideal for preprocessing large feature sets (ETL) that require substantial RAM before being passed to specialized accelerators. See CPU vs. GPU in Data Pipelines.
3.4 High-Density Virtualization Hosts
For VDI farms or large private cloud infrastructure requiring maximum VM density without sacrificing per-VM performance quality of service (QoS). The 128 physical cores provide headroom for hypervisor overhead and burst capacity for tenants. VM Density Optimization Techniques should be applied when deploying on this platform.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the SRC-2024-HPC-01, its specifications are compared against two common alternative configurations: a high-frequency, low-core-count system (optimized for legacy applications) and a GPU-centric compute node (optimized for deep learning).
4.1 Comparative Analysis Table
Feature | SRC-2024-HPC-01 (Balanced/High-Core) | Config B (High Frequency/Low Core) | Config C (GPU Compute Node) |
---|---|---|---|
CPU Cores (Total Logical) | 256 | 64 (Higher Clock Speed) | 64 (Lower TDP) |
Total RAM | 2 TB (DDR5-4800) | 1 TB (DDR4-3200) | 512 GB (DDR5) |
Primary Storage Speed | PCIe 5.0 NVMe (3.2M IOPS) | PCIe 4.0 SATA SSD (500K IOPS) | PCIe 4.0 NVMe (1M IOPS) |
PCIe Expansion Focus | General Purpose (x16 Slots) | Limited (x8 Slots) | GPU Accelerator Slots (x16/x8) |
Relative Cost Index (100 = SRC-2024) | 100 | 65 | 140 (Excluding GPUs) |
Ideal Workload Fit | Database, Analytics, General Compute | Legacy Apps, Web Serving | Deep Learning, High-Precision Simulation |
4.2 Strategic Positioning
The SRC-2024-HPC-01 occupies the "sweet spot" for modern, general-purpose enterprise compute.
- **Versus Config B (Low Core):** Config B suffers severely in highly parallelized tasks (e.g., modern Java applications, virtualization) due to its limited thread count and slower memory subsystem. SRC-2024 offers a 4x advantage in thread concurrency. CPU Core Count Scaling Laws explain this performance delta.
- **Versus Config C (GPU Node):** Config C is specialized. While it dominates highly parallelizable matrix multiplication (AI training), it performs poorly on tasks requiring high CPU instruction throughput or large amounts of system memory for data staging (e.g., complex database joins or large memory caching). SRC-2024 provides superior general system responsiveness when GPUs are idle or the workload is CPU-bound. Heterogeneous Computing Architectures discuss this trade-off.
The decision to use 2TB of high-speed DDR5 over a potentially faster, but smaller, DDR4 pool (as in Config B) is a deliberate choice to prioritize data locality and reduce reliance on slower storage access during computation. Memory Sizing for Data Centers strongly supports this decision for data-intensive tasks.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Operating a system with a 700W+ CPU TDP and high-speed storage requires stringent environmental and maintenance protocols to ensure longevity and sustained performance metrics.
5.1 Power Requirements
The dual-CPU configuration, combined with the NVMe backplane and high-speed memory, results in a significant power draw under full load.
- **Peak Measured Power Draw (System Only):** 1,350 Watts (Under 100% utilization, measured at the PSU input).
- **Recommended PSU Configuration:** Dual redundant 1600W (Platinum or Titanium efficiency rating).
- **Power Density Impact:** When deployed in high-density racks (e.g., 42U rack populated with 20 units), careful planning of Rack Power Budgeting is essential to avoid tripping circuit breakers or exceeding Power Distribution Unit (PDU) limits.
5.2 Thermal Management and Cooling
The 700W CPU TDP necessitates aggressive cooling. This chassis is validated for operation in environments certified for high-density rack cooling.
- **Required Airflow:** Minimum 120 CFM (Cubic Feet per Minute) across the CPU heatsinks, provided by high-static-pressure redundant fans.
- **Ambient Inlet Temperature:** Must not exceed 25°C (77°F) to maintain specified clock speeds under sustained load. Exceeding this threshold will trigger aggressive thermal throttling, reducing performance by up to 30% as documented in the CPU Thermal Throttling Response Curve.
- **Liquid Cooling Options:** The chassis supports optional direct-to-chip liquid cooling modules for environments requiring noise reduction or ultra-high density (>15kW per rack).
5.3 Firmware and Lifecycle Management
Maintaining current firmware is crucial, especially concerning the complex interaction between the CPU microcode, the HBA, and the PCIe Gen 5 root complex.
- **BIOS/UEFI:** Critical updates must be applied regularly to incorporate Security Vulnerability Mitigations (e.g., Spectre/Meltdown patches) and memory timing optimizations.
- **HBA Firmware:** The Broadcom controller firmware must be synchronized with the operating system's NVMe/SAS driver versions to prevent I/O errors or performance degradation under heavy queue depth. A recommended Firmware Patch Cadence is quarterly.
- **Component Lifespan:** Enterprise NVMe drives in the hot storage pool should be monitored via SMART data. Given the high IOPS profile, expect a higher drive write amplification factor (WAF) compared to archival systems. SSD Endurance Metrics (TBW) should be tracked against the 15.36 TB usable capacity.
5.4 Operating System Considerations
The high degree of parallelism (256 logical threads) requires an operating system kernel specifically tuned for large core counts.
- **OS Recommendations:** Linux distributions (e.g., RHEL 9+, SLES 15 SPx) with up-to-date NUMA awareness are mandatory. Windows Server 2022 Datacenter edition is the minimum requirement for optimal handling of the memory topology.
- **NUMA Configuration:** The system is a Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) architecture. Application developers must ensure that threads accessing memory are pinned to the same NUMA node as the memory they frequently access to avoid costly cross-socket UPI traffic. NUMA Optimization for Multithreading guides are essential reading for administrators deploying compute-intensive applications here.
The successful long-term operation of the SRC-2024-HPC-01 relies heavily on proactive monitoring of power delivery, thermal envelopes, and timely firmware maintenance.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
---|---|---|
Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
---|---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️