Server Room
Technical Documentation: The "Server Room" Configuration
This document details the specifications, performance metrics, recommended deployment scenarios, comparative analysis, and operational considerations for the high-density, enterprise-grade server configuration designated internally as the **"Server Room"** build. This configuration is engineered for maximum compute density and I/O throughput, targeting demanding virtualization and large-scale database workloads.
1. Hardware Specifications
The "Server Room" configuration leverages cutting-edge server architecture focusing on core count, memory bandwidth, and NVMe storage performance. It is designed primarily around the latest generation of dual-socket rackmount chassis (4U form factor).
1.1 Base Chassis and Platform
The foundation of this build is a certified 4U Rackmount Chassis designed for high thermal dissipation and hot-swappable component redundancy.
| Component | Specification Detail | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Form Factor | 4U Rackmount | Optimized for airflow and component density. |
| Motherboard Chipset | Dual Socket Intel C741/AMD SP5 Equivalent | Supports high-speed interconnects (e.g., PCIe Gen 5.0/CXL). |
| Power Supplies (PSU) | 2x 2400W 80+ Platinum Redundant (N+1) | Supports peak power draw under full synthetic load. Refer to power planning documentation. |
| Management Controller | Dedicated Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) supporting IPMI 2.0/Redfish API | Essential for remote monitoring and lights-out management. |
| Cooling Solution | High-Static Pressure Fan Array (N+2 Redundant) | Optimized for high TDP CPUs (up to 350W per socket). |
1.2 Central Processing Units (CPU)
The configuration mandates dual-socket deployment utilizing high-core-count processors to maximize virtualization density and parallel processing capabilities.
| Parameter | Specification | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Model (Example) | 2x Intel Xeon Scalable 6th Gen (e.g., Emerald Rapids) or AMD EPYC 9004 Series | Selection based on current stability and per-core performance benchmarks. |
| Total Cores (Minimum) | 128 Physical Cores (64C/Socket) | Ensures sufficient thread allocation for demanding container orchestration. |
| Base Clock Speed | $\ge 2.4\text{ GHz}$ | Balances thermal envelope against sustained performance. |
| Max Turbo Frequency | Up to $4.2\text{ GHz}$ (Single Core) | Crucial for latency-sensitive operations. |
| L3 Cache (Total) | $\ge 384\text{ MB}$ | Large unified cache minimizes main memory latency. |
| PCIe Lanes Supported | $\ge 160$ Lanes (PCIe Gen 5.0) | Required to support the extensive NVMe and high-speed NIC requirements. |
1.3 Random Access Memory (RAM)
Memory configuration prioritizes density and speed, leveraging the maximum supported DIMM count and the highest stable frequency for the chosen platform.
| Component | Specification | Configuration Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Total Capacity | $4096\text{ GB}$ (4 TB) | Achieved via 32 DIMMs per socket, utilizing 128GB RDIMMs. |
| Memory Type | DDR5 ECC Registered DIMM (RDIMM) | Error correction mandatory for enterprise stability. |
| Speed/Frequency | $DDR5-5600\text{ MT/s}$ or higher | Requires careful validation against CPU memory controller limits. |
| Memory Channels Utilized | 12 Channels per CPU (24 Total) | Maximizing memory bandwidth is critical for data-intensive tasks. Refer to memory population guidelines. |
| Persistent Memory (Optional Tier) | Up to 1TB Intel Optane PMem 300 Series | Configured in App Direct Mode for database acceleration. |
1.4 Storage Subsystem
The storage array is heavily skewed towards high-IOPS, low-latency NVMe devices, configured in a high-redundancy RAID/ZFS array. Direct-attached storage (DAS) is the primary focus, though external SAN options are supported via specialized HBAs.
| Drive Slot Count | Drive Specification | Total Usable Capacity (Approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| 24x Hot-Swap Bays (Front accessible) | 15.36 TB Enterprise NVMe SSD (U.2/M.2 Form Factor) | $\approx 250\text{ TB}$ Raw (Configured as RAID 60/ZFS RAIDZ2) |
| Boot Drives | 2x 960GB Enterprise SATA SSD (Mirrored) | Dedicated for OS and hypervisor installation. RAID 1. |
| IOPS Rating (Per Drive) | $\ge 1,200,000$ Read IOPS / $300,000$ Write IOPS (4K Random) | Ensures the storage subsystem does not become the primary bottleneck. |
| Interface | PCIe Gen 5.0 x4 per drive | Utilizes an integrated PCIe switch fabric on the motherboard. |
1.5 Networking Interface Controllers (NIC)
High throughput and low latency networking are non-negotiable for this configuration, essential for east-west traffic in clustered environments.
| Port Type | Speed | Quantity | Functionality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Data/Compute | 4x 100 GbE (QSFP28/QSFP-DD) | 2 pairs bonded for active/active failover. LACP utilized. | |
| Storage/Management Network (Out-of-Band) | 2x 10 GbE (RJ45/SFP+) | Dedicated for BMC/IPMI and storage array synchronization traffic. | |
| Internal Interconnect | 1x InfiniBand/Ethernet (200 Gb/s capable) | Optional, used only for specialized High-Performance Computing (HPC) integration. |
1.6 Expansion Capabilities
The platform supports significant expansion via PCIe riser cards, critical for specialized accelerators or high-speed storage controllers.
- **Total PCIe Slots:** 8x Full-Height, Full-Length Slots (PCIe Gen 5.0 x16 electrical where possible).
- **GPU/Accelerator Support:** Capable of accommodating up to 4x dual-slot, passively cooled accelerators (e.g., NVIDIA H100 or specialized AI inference cards). Power delivery must be validated against the 2400W PSU rating. Power calculations are essential.
---
2. Performance Characteristics
The "Server Room" configuration is benchmarked against industry standards to quantify its readiness for high-demand enterprise workloads. Performance is characterized by high throughput, excellent multi-threaded scaling, and superior I/O latency under load.
2.1 Synthetic Benchmarks
The following results represent aggregated scores from standardized testing suites run on a fully populated, validated system build.
| Benchmark Suite | Metric | Result | Comparison Baseline (Previous Gen Server) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPEC CPU 2017 Integer Rate | Base Rate Score | $\ge 12,500$ | $\sim 1.8\times$ Improvement |
| SPEC CPU 2017 Floating Point Rate | Base FP Rate Score | $\ge 14,000$ | $\sim 2.1\times$ Improvement |
| SPECjbb 2015 Max | Total Score | $\ge 750,000$ BBops/sec | Excellent Java Virtual Machine (JVM) performance scaling. |
| FIO (4K Random Read) | IOPS Sustained (99th Percentile Latency $< 1\text{ ms}$) | $\ge 4.5$ Million IOPS | Directly reflects NVMe subsystem efficiency. |
| Stream Triad (Memory Bandwidth) | Peak Bandwidth | $\ge 1.8\text{ TB/s}$ | Achieved by populating all 24 memory channels effectively. |
2.2 Virtualization Density and Scaling
A primary performance metric is the consolidation ratio achievable using leading hypervisors (VMware ESXi, KVM).
- **VM Density Testing:** On a standard configuration optimized for general-purpose Virtual Machines (VMs) requiring $4\text{ vCPUs}$ and $16\text{ GB}$ RAM each, the system reliably sustained **128 to 144 fully utilized VMs** before resource contention became measurable in the host kernel queue depth.
- **CPU Overhead:** Hypervisor CPU overhead remained below $2\%$ during peak load testing, indicating highly efficient hardware virtualization support (e.g., Intel VT-x/AMD-V extensions).
- **I/O Saturation Point:** The bottleneck during high-throughput transactional testing (simulating OLTP) shifted from the CPU/Memory complex to the **100GbE network fabric** at approximately $85\%$ utilization, confirming the storage and compute layers are well-balanced. See appendix for detailed network throughput graphs.
2.3 Thermal and Power Performance
Under maximum synthetic load (Prime95 blend + FIO stress testing), the system exhibits predictable thermal behavior, provided the ambient data center temperature is controlled.
- **Peak Power Draw:** Measured at $2150\text{ Watts}$ (excluding attached peripherals). This requires the dual $2400\text{W}$ PSUs to operate at approximately $90\%$ load capacity, ensuring thermal headroom for transient spikes.
- **CPU Core Temperature:** Average sustained core temperature stabilizes around $78^\circ \text{C}$ at $100\%$ utilization, well within the manufacturer's specified Tjunction limits ($T_{\text{Jmax}}$).
---
3. Recommended Use Cases
The "Server Room" configuration is an **over-provisioned platform** designed to eliminate bottlenecks in environments characterized by extreme resource demands and high I/O variance. It is not intended for standard web serving or low-density hosting.
3.1 Enterprise Database Management Systems (DBMS)
This configuration excels as a centralized database server for mission-critical applications.
- **In-Memory Databases (e.g., SAP HANA, Redis Clusters):** The $4\text{ TB}$ of high-speed DDR5 memory provides the necessary capacity for large datasets to reside entirely in RAM, minimizing reliance on storage latency.
- **High-Transaction OLTP Systems:** The combination of high core count (for query parsing) and massive NVMe IOPS (for write-ahead logs and transaction commits) allows this server to handle millions of transactions per second (TPS). Specific tuning for NUMA alignment is mandatory.
3.2 Large-Scale Virtualization Hosts (VDI/Server Farms)
As a hypervisor host, it supports dense consolidation.
- **Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI):** Capable of hosting hundreds of simultaneous, performance-sensitive VDI sessions (e.g., CAD workstations or trading terminals) where low perceived latency is paramount.
- **Container Orchestration (Kubernetes/OpenShift):** The high core count is ideal for running large numbers of Pods or microservices, where the high-speed networking supports efficient service mesh communication.
3.3 High-Performance Computing (HPC) and AI/ML Training
When equipped with appropriate accelerators, this platform serves as a potent node in a larger cluster.
- **Data Preprocessing:** The massive RAM and I/O bandwidth are perfect for ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) operations, rapidly feeding data pipelines to attached GPUs/accelerators.
- **Small to Medium Model Training:** For models that fit within the system's available combined GPU memory (if equipped), the fast interconnects ensure minimal synchronization overhead between compute elements. Review RDMA configuration documentation.
3.4 Data Warehousing and Analytics
Ideal for running complex analytical queries (OLAP) against large datasets.
- **Spark/Dask Clusters:** Can function as a powerful master node or a heavy-duty worker node, managing large intermediate datasets directly in memory before final aggregation.
---
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To justify the high capital expenditure associated with the "Server Room" configuration, it is essential to compare it against two common alternatives: a high-density storage server (HDS) and a standard dual-socket compute server (DCS).
4.1 Configuration Profiles Overview
| Feature | "Server Room" (SR) | High-Density Storage (HDS) | Dual Compute Server (DCS) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Form Factor | 4U | 4U/5U | 2U | | Max CPU Cores | 128 (High TDP Support) | 96 (Medium TDP) | 64 (Lower TDP) | | Total RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 1 TB ECC DDR4/DDR5 | 2 TB DDR5 | | Internal NVMe Bays | 24x High-End NVMe | 36x Mixed SAS/NVMe (Focus on Capacity) | 8x NVMe | | Network Speed | 4x 100 GbE | 4x 25 GbE | 2x 50 GbE | | Primary Bottleneck | Network Fabric (at peak load) | Storage Controller Latency | Core Count Saturation | | Cost Index | 1.0 (Reference) | 0.7 | 0.5 |
4.2 Performance Delta Analysis
The comparison highlights where the investment in the "Server Room" configuration yields tangible returns.
- **CPU Performance:** The SR configuration offers approximately $2.0\times$ the raw compute capability of the standard DCS due to higher core density and faster architecture support.
- **I/O Throughput:** The SR configuration achieves $3\times$ the sustained random read IOPS compared to the HDS, despite the HDS potentially having more physical drives, emphasizing the importance of PCIe Gen 5.0 and enterprise-grade flash endurance in the SR build. Consult storage benchmarking reports.
- **Memory Bandwidth:** The SR configuration's $1.8\text{ TB/s}$ bandwidth is critical. The HDS, often prioritizing density over speed (using lower-speed DIMMs), typically achieves $\sim 0.8\text{ TB/s}$.
4.3 When to Choose Alternatives
- **Choose HDS (High-Density Storage):** If the primary requirement is archival storage, large-scale backups, or data lakes where sequential read/write performance and raw capacity ($>1\text{ PB}$ per rack unit) outweigh single-transaction latency.
- **Choose DCS (Dual Compute Server):** For environments requiring high availability but moderate compute needs, such as smaller virtualization clusters, application servers, or general-purpose web farms where $2\text{U}$ footprint efficiency is prioritized over absolute maximum throughput. The DCS offers a better price-to-performance ratio for workloads that are not strictly I/O bound. Review rack density planning guides.
---
5. Maintenance Considerations
Operating the high-density, high-power "Server Room" configuration requires stringent adherence to specialized maintenance protocols, particularly concerning power delivery, thermal management, and component replacement.
5.1 Power Infrastructure Requirements
Due to the peak draw of $2150\text{W}$ (plus $300\text{W}$ overhead for ancillary components like HBAs and switches), the power infrastructure must be robust.
- **Circuit Loading:** Each server unit requires a dedicated $\text{C19}$ or equivalent connection, typically pulling $12\text{A}$ at $208\text{V}$ under full load. Standard $15\text{A}$ circuits are insufficient for sustained operation. Consult electrical engineering standards.
- **Inrush Current:** During initial power-up or recovery from an outage, the simultaneous spin-up of numerous high-capacity NVMe drives and large PSU arrays can cause significant inrush current spikes. Managed Power Distribution Units (PDUs) with soft-start capabilities are mandatory.
- **PSU Management:** Regular testing of the redundant PSU failover mechanism (simulated failure) must be scheduled bi-annually. The hot-swappable nature allows replacement without system downtime, provided the remaining PSU can handle the sustained load.
5.2 Thermal Management and Airflow
The dense concentration of high-TDP components necessitates specialized cooling strategies beyond standard enterprise cooling practices.
- **Airflow Direction:** Strict adherence to front-to-back airflow is required. Any blockage (e.g., poorly managed cabling in the rear) or recirculation can cause localized hotspots, leading to CPU throttling or component failure.
- **Hot Aisle/Cold Aisle Integrity:** Maintaining strict separation is crucial. A single breach in the containment can lead to a $5^\circ \text{C}$ rise in inlet temperature, potentially pushing $T_{\text{J}}$ closer to acceptable limits.
- **Fan Monitoring:** The BMC must report fan speeds continuously. Any deviation below $80\%$ nominal RPM on any primary cooling fan requires immediate investigation, as the system relies heavily on high static pressure fans rather than raw CFM volume. Establish alert thresholds.
5.3 Component Replacement and Diagnostics
The complexity and density increase the Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) if diagnostic procedures are not followed precisely.
- **NVMe Drive Replacement:** Drives should be replaced using the designated hot-swap procedure. After insertion, the operating system/firmware must recognize the new drive and initiate the rebuild process. If the rebuild fails, the array must be manually verified. Refer to the specific RAID/ZFS documentation for rebuild prioritization. Storage Array Rebuild Procedures.
- **Memory Diagnostics:** Due to the high DIMM count, intermittent memory errors are statistically more likely over time. Running comprehensive memory testing utilities (e.g., MemTest86+ or vendor-specific diagnostics) should be part of the quarterly preventative maintenance schedule, even if no errors are currently reported by the ECC logging.
- **Firmware Updates:** All major firmware components (BIOS, BMC, HBA, NICs) must be updated synchronously. A mismatch between the BIOS memory timing tables and the NIC firmware microcode can lead to intermittent link training failures at $100\text{ GbE}$. Firmware Compatibility Matrix.
5.4 Software Stack Considerations
The hardware demands a corresponding high-performance software stack to realize its potential.
- **NUMA Awareness:** Operating systems and applications must be explicitly configured to be NUMA-aware (Non-Uniform Memory Access). Incorrect process scheduling across the two physical CPU sockets will severely degrade performance due to excessive cross-socket communication latency over the UPI/Infinity Fabric links. NUMA Architecture Best Practices.
- **Storage Driver Optimization:** Utilizing the latest, vendor-certified NVMe drivers (e.g., specific vendor kernel modules vs. generic OS drivers) is critical to expose the full Gen 5.0 capabilities and leverage advanced features like Multiqueue I/O.
- **Licensing Implications:** High core counts often trigger significant licensing penalties for proprietary software (e.g., certain OS editions, database licenses). Software Licensing Audit Procedures must account for the 128 physical cores when calculating entitlement requirements.
5.5 Cabling Management
The $4\text{U}$ form factor combined with $4\times 100\text{GbE}$ optics creates significant cabling density at the rear.
- **Fiber Management:** Use high-density MPO/MTP connectors for the $100\text{GbE}$ runs. Cable routing must ensure that bundles do not impede the rear exhaust airflow path or interfere with the latching mechanisms of the hot-swap PSUs. Cable Management Standards for High Density Racks.
- **HBA/Riser Access:** Accessing internal PCIe riser cards for diagnostics or upgrades requires careful removal of the primary network cables first, as the risers are often situated directly behind the main NIC ports.
---
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️