Server Resource Usage
Server Resource Usage: Technical Deep Dive on the R-Series High-Density Compute Node (RH-DCN v3.1)
This document provides a comprehensive technical analysis of the **R-Series High-Density Compute Node, Revision 3.1 (RH-DCN v3.1)**, focusing specifically on its optimized configuration for balanced, high-throughput server resource usage. This configuration is designed to maximize core density and memory bandwidth while maintaining robust I/O capabilities suitable for virtualization, container orchestration, and demanding enterprise database workloads.
1. Hardware Specifications
The RH-DCN v3.1 is a 2U rackmount platform built on a dual-socket architecture, prioritizing current-generation processing power and high-speed interconnects. Detailed specifications are provided below.
1.1 Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The system utilizes dual Intel Xeon Scalable Processors (4th Generation, codenamed Sapphire Rapids), selected for their high core count and integrated Advanced Matrix Extensions (AMX) capabilities.
| Parameter | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Processor Model | 2x Intel Xeon Gold 6444Y | High-frequency SKU optimized for general-purpose computing. |
| Core Count (Total) | 32 Cores (16 per socket) | 64 Threads (Physical/Logical) |
| Base Clock Frequency | 3.6 GHz | Guaranteed minimum operational frequency. |
| Max Turbo Frequency (Single Core) | Up to 4.4 GHz | Dependent on thermal headroom and power limits. |
| L3 Cache (Total) | 60 MB (30 MB per socket) | Shared Last Level Cache across the die. |
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 250W per socket | Requires robust cooling infrastructure; see Section 5. |
| Instruction Sets Supported | AVX-512, AVX-512 VNNI, Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX), AMX | |
| Inter-Socket Link | UPI (Ultra Path Interconnect) 2.0 | 18 GT/s per link. |
The choice of the 6444Y SKU ensures a high base clock frequency, which is critical for many legacy applications and database transaction processing that are less sensitive to absolute core count but highly sensitive to clock speed fluctuations. The total logical core count of 64 provides ample capacity for virtualization density without immediate saturation under typical load profiles. CPU Scheduling algorithms must be tuned to leverage the UPI links efficiently.
1.2 Memory Subsystem (RAM)
The memory configuration emphasizes high bandwidth and substantial capacity to support memory-intensive applications like in-memory databases and large-scale caching layers.
| Parameter | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Total Capacity | 1024 GB (1 TB) | Achieved using 16x 64GB DDR5 RDIMMs. |
| Memory Type | DDR5 Registered DIMM (RDIMM) | Supports error correction and high density. |
| Speed / Data Rate | 4800 MT/s | Optimal speed for current-generation Xeon processors under a fully populated 8-channel configuration per socket. |
| Configuration | 16 DIMMs installed (8 per socket) | Utilizes 8 of the 8 available memory channels per CPU for optimal interleaving and bandwidth utilization. |
| Memory Controller | Integrated into CPU Package | Supports High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) technology only via specific dedicated SKUs (not present here). |
| Maximum Supported Capacity | 4 TB (Theoretical Maximum) | Requires transitioning to higher-density DIMMs (e.g., 256GB modules). |
The 8-channel configuration per socket is crucial for achieving the maximum theoretical memory bandwidth, which is often the primary bottleneck in high-performance computing (HPC) scenarios and large-scale data processing tasks. Memory Latency analysis confirms that the 4800 MT/s speed provides the best price-to-performance ratio compared to the marginally faster 5200 MT/s options, which often require higher voltage and generate more heat.
1.3 Storage Architecture
The storage topology is designed for high IOPS and low latency, utilizing a tiered approach combining NVMe for primary operations and SATA/SAS for bulk archival or secondary volumes.
| Component | Specification | Quantity / Role |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Boot/OS Drive | 2x 960GB Enterprise NVMe SSD (RAID 1) | For operating system and critical metadata. |
| High-Performance Data Tier | 8x 3.84TB U.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDs | Configured in a ZFS RAIDZ2 array (6 usable TB). |
| Bulk Storage Tier | 4x 16TB SAS Hard Disk Drives (HDD) | Configured in a hardware RAID 10 array (32 TB raw). |
| Storage Controller | Broadcom MegaRAID SAS 9580-16i (HBA Mode for NVMe) | Manages SAS/SATA backend; NVMe drives are directly attached to the CPU PCIe lanes where possible. |
| Total Usable Storage Capacity | Approx. 38 TB (Config Dependent) | Highly dependent on RAID configuration chosen by the administrator. |
The configuration leverages PCIe Gen4 lanes directly from the CPU sockets for the primary NVMe tier, ensuring maximum throughput (up to 64 GT/s per drive cluster). Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) for the primary tier consistently exceeds 1.5 million read IOPS under synthetic load testing.
1.4 Networking Interface Controllers (NICs)
Network connectivity is critical for distributed workloads and storage access (e.g., Ceph, iSCSI). The RH-DCN v3.1 features a flexible dual-port configuration.
| Port Assignment | Specification | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Port 1 (Primary) | 2x 25 Gigabit Ethernet (25GbE) | Dedicated to East-West traffic and high-speed storage access (e.g., NVMe-oF). |
| Port 2 (Management/Out-of-Band) | 1x 10 Gigabit Ethernet (10GbE) | Dedicated to Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) and remote monitoring (IPMI/Redfish). |
| PCIe Interconnect Bus | PCIe Gen 4.0 x16 Slot | Dedicated slot for the primary 25GbE adapter to ensure full bandwidth saturation is possible. |
The use of 25GbE provides a significant leap over traditional 10GbE, crucial for minimizing network latency in clustered environments. Network Interface Card (NIC) Offloading features are enabled to reduce CPU overhead.
---
2. Performance Characteristics
Evaluating the resource usage profile of the RH-DCN v3.1 requires benchmarking across CPU-bound, memory-bound, and I/O-bound scenarios. The performance characteristics detailed here reflect optimized firmware and operating system tuning (e.g., large page support activated, NUMA balancing).
2.1 Synthetic Benchmarks
Synthetic benchmarks provide a baseline understanding of the system's raw computational ceiling.
2.1.1 CPU Performance (SPECrate 2017 Integer)
SPECrate measures throughput capacity, reflecting how many tasks the system can complete concurrently.
| Metric | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| SPECrate 2017 Integer Peak | 1850 | Reflects performance with all optimizations enabled. |
| SPECrate 2017 Floating Point Peak | 2100 | Higher score due to strong FP performance of the 6444Y SKU. |
| Memory Bandwidth (Peak Read) | ~250 GB/s | Measured using STREAM benchmark across all 16 DIMMs. |
The Integer score of 1850 demonstrates excellent throughput, positioning this configuration well above previous-generation dual-socket systems utilizing lower TDP processors. The Floating Point score is robust, making it suitable for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) preprocessing or complex modeling tasks, albeit not as optimized as dedicated HBM-enabled accelerators. Benchmark Integrity is maintained by disabling hyperthreading during FP tests to isolate core performance variance.
2.2 Real-World Workload Performance
Real-world performance is often constrained by resource contention—the interplay between CPU, memory, and I/O.
2.2.1 Virtualization Density (VMware ESXi)
The system was tested by deploying standard Enterprise Linux virtual machines, each allocated 4 vCPUs and 16 GB RAM.
- **Maximum Stable Density:** 30 Virtual Machines
- **CPU Utilization (Average Load):** 75%
- **Memory Utilization (Average Load):** 85%
When pushing past 32 VMs, CPU Ready Time (a key virtualization metric) began to exceed acceptable thresholds (>5%), indicating that the 64 logical cores were becoming saturated, forcing the scheduler to wait for core availability. This suggests the sweet spot for pure VM hosting is around 28-30 VMs, allowing headroom for burst traffic and management overhead.
2.2.2 Database Performance (OLTP Load)
Using the TPC-C benchmark simulation, focusing on transactional throughput (Transactions Per Minute - TPM).
| Configuration Parameter | Result (TPM) | Bottleneck Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| RH-DCN v3.1 (Full Config) | 850,000 TPM | Limited by the speed of the NVMe I/O subsystem under heavy commit load. |
| RH-DCN v3.1 (RAM Disk Only) | 1,550,000 TPM | Limited by UPI inter-socket communication latency for cross-core transactions. |
The discrepancy between the I/O-bound (850k TPM) and memory-bound (1.55M TPM) results clearly illustrates the primary resource constraint in typical enterprise database deployments: persistent storage speed. Administrators should prioritize extremely fast Storage Area Networks (SANs) or utilize persistent memory modules (if available in future revisions) to push past the 1M TPM barrier. NUMA Node Affinity was strictly enforced during these tests to ensure data locality, yielding a 12% improvement over unpinned tests.
2.3 Power and Thermal Profile
The high core count and frequency result in a significant power draw, which directly impacts cooling requirements.
- **Idle Power Consumption (OS running, no load):** 180W
- **Peak Power Consumption (Stress Test - Prime95 + Full I/O):** 1150W
- **Sustained Operational Power (80% Load):** 850W
The thermal output requires redundant, high-CFM cooling units. The system operates optimally when ambient rack temperatures are maintained below 22°C (71.6°F). Exceeding 25°C often triggers dynamic frequency throttling to maintain the 250W TDP per socket, reducing peak performance by approximately 5-8%. Power Distribution Unit (PDU) sizing must account for this peak draw, especially in high-density racks.
---
3. Recommended Use Cases
The RH-DCN v3.1 configuration is uniquely suited for environments demanding high per-core performance coupled with substantial memory capacity. Its strength lies in balancing CPU utilization with rapid data access.
3.1 Enterprise Virtualization Host (Hypervisor)
This configuration excels as a primary host for large virtual machine consolidation efforts.
- **Rationale:** 64 logical cores provide generous capacity for scheduling, and 1TB of fast DDR5 RAM ensures that even high-memory VMs (e.g., 32GB allocations) can be densely packed without excessive ballooning or swapping. The fast 25GbE networking supports high-speed vMotion and storage migration traffic.
- **Tuning Focus:** Ensure Hypervisor Memory Management settings prioritize Transparent Page Sharing (TPS) only if memory utilization is consistently below 90%, otherwise, disable TPS to prevent computational overhead.
3.2 High-Performance Caching and In-Memory Data Grids
Applications relying on massive datasets held entirely in RAM benefit significantly from the 1TB capacity and high memory bandwidth.
- **Examples:** Redis Cluster nodes, Apache Ignite, large JVM heaps for application servers.
- **Advantage:** The high core count allows the application threads to execute rapidly while the memory controller efficiently feeds data, minimizing wait states. The low-latency NVMe tier serves as a fast write-back cache or persistence layer.
3.3 Container Orchestration (Kubernetes Worker Nodes)
When running high-density containerized microservices, the RH-DCN v3.1 acts as a powerful worker node.
- **Suitability:** Ideal for stateful sets or services requiring significant local scratch space (leveraging the fast NVMe tier) or those that are CPU-intensive (e.g., compiled code build pipelines).
- **Consideration:** Careful resource requests and limits must be set within Kubernetes to prevent a single rogue container from monopolizing the high-frequency cores, leading to CPU Throttling across other pods.
3.4 Medium-Scale Relational Database Servers (OLTP/OLAP Hybrid)
While dedicated storage arrays might be required for massive-scale deployments, this server is excellent for departmental or regional database servers.
- **OLTP Benefit:** High base clock speed ensures fast transaction commits.
- **OLAP Benefit:** The 1TB RAM allows large query result sets and indexes to reside in memory, dramatically accelerating reporting queries. The storage configuration supports both transaction logs (NVMe) and historical data storage (SAS HDD).
---
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the RH-DCN v3.1, we compare it against two common alternatives: a CPU-optimized configuration (higher core count, lower clock) and a memory-optimized configuration (higher RAM capacity, lower core count).
4.1 Configuration Matrix
| Feature | RH-DCN v3.1 (Balanced) | CPU-Optimized (High Core) | Memory-Optimized (High Capacity) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Model | 2x Gold 6444Y (32C/64T, 3.6GHz Base) | 2x Platinum 8480+ (112C/224T, 2.0GHz Base) | 2x Gold 6430 (32C/64T, 2.1GHz Base) |
| Total RAM Capacity | 1024 GB DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s | 512 GB DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s | 2048 GB DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s |
| Total PCIe Lanes Available | 112 Lanes (Gen 4.0) | 112 Lanes (Gen 4.0) | 112 Lanes (Gen 4.0) |
| Approximate System Cost Index (Normalized) | 1.0x | 1.4x | 1.2x |
| Typical Peak Power Draw | 1150W | 1400W | 950W |
4.2 Performance Trade-off Analysis
- 4.2.1 vs. CPU-Optimized Configuration
The CPU-Optimized configuration (e.g., 112 cores) offers significantly higher aggregate throughput, evidenced by a projected SPECrate score increase of approximately 50%. However, this comes at the cost of: 1. **Higher Latency:** Lower base clock speed (2.0 GHz vs. 3.6 GHz) means individual threads execute slower. 2. **Increased Power/Cost:** Higher TDP processors and increased licensing costs for high-core count software. 3. **Memory Contention:** With only 512GB RAM, memory-intensive workloads will suffer from increased swapping or reliance on slower NVMe tier access, negating the core advantage.
- Conclusion: RH-DCN v3.1 is superior for transactional workloads, web serving, and latency-sensitive tasks where fewer threads require faster execution.*
- 4.2.2 vs. Memory-Optimized Configuration
The Memory-Optimized configuration provides double the RAM (2TB) but sacrifices significant clock speed and peak memory bandwidth (running at 4400 MT/s vs. 4800 MT/s).
- **Trade-off:** While excellent for massive in-memory caching layers (e.g., single-instance SAP HANA), the lower core frequency (2.1 GHz) results in noticeably poorer performance (estimated 25% lower) in CPU-bound tasks like compilation or complex simulation preprocessing.
- **Storage Impact:** The slower memory speed can subtly increase the effective latency experienced by the storage subsystem due to slower data staging in the CPU caches. Cache Coherency Protocols might also experience minor strain due to the increased number of DIMMs.
- Conclusion: RH-DCN v3.1 strikes the optimal balance for general-purpose enterprise workloads where both compute speed and substantial memory allocation are necessary.*
---
5. Maintenance Considerations
Proper maintenance is essential to ensure the RH-DCN v3.1 operates within its guaranteed performance envelope, particularly given its high power density.
5.1 Thermal Management and Airflow
The 2U form factor combined with dual 250W TDP CPUs demands strict environmental controls.
- **Intake Requirements:** Maintain cool aisle temperatures below 22°C (71.6°F).
- **Airflow Direction:** Ensure proper front-to-back airflow. Blanking panels must be installed in all unused drive bays and PCIe slots to prevent recirculation and hot spots around the CPU sockets. Rack Density Planning must account for the heat load (approximately 1.2 kW per unit under full load).
- **Fan Profiles:** The system firmware should be set to "Performance" or "High Cooling" mode if the ambient rack temperature exceeds 20°C, even if this increases acoustic output. Throttling due to thermal limits is far more detrimental to performance than increased fan noise.
5.2 Power Requirements and Redundancy
The peak draw of 1150W (plus peripheral draw) necessitates robust power infrastructure.
- **PDU Rating:** Each server should be connected to a minimum 20A (or 16A at 240V) circuit, utilizing redundant A/B feeds.
- **Power Supply Units (PSUs):** The system ships standard with dual 1600W 80 PLUS Titanium redundant PSUs. While 1600W exceeds the 1150W peak draw, this overhead is necessary to maintain efficiency (Titanium rating requires higher load) and accommodate spikes during high-speed NVMe write bursts. Power Supply Efficiency ratings are critical for operational expenditure (OPEX) calculations.
5.3 Firmware and Driver Lifecycle Management
Maintaining optimal performance requires disciplined adherence to the vendor-recommended firmware stack, especially concerning the memory controller and PCIe root complex.
- **BIOS/UEFI:** Updates often contain critical microcode patches that improve Intel SGX security posture and enhance memory retraining sequences, which can stabilize performance on the DDR5 bus.
- **Storage Controller Firmware:** Crucial for NVMe drive reliability and performance consistency. Outdated firmware can lead to increased Write Amplification Factor (WAF) or premature drive failure. A maintenance window should be scheduled quarterly for driver and firmware checks.
- **NUMA Awareness:** Ensure the operating system kernel (Linux or Windows Server) is running a recent version that fully understands and respects the UPI topology to prevent cross-socket memory access penalties. NUMA-aware Application Development is recommended for software running on this host.
5.4 Storage Health Monitoring
Given the reliance on the 8-drive NVMe pool for high-speed operations, proactive monitoring is mandatory.
- **S.M.A.R.T. Data:** Continuous polling of NVMe drive health indicators (e.g., Media Wearout Indicator, Temperature) is necessary.
- **RAID Array Scrubbing:** For the ZFS array, a full data scrub should be initiated monthly to detect and correct silent data corruption (bit rot). This process is CPU-intensive but essential for data integrity. Data Integrity Checks using checksumming are the primary defense against corruption.
5.5 Expansion Slot Utilization
The system offers significant expansion via PCIe Gen 4.0 slots. Any added components must be evaluated against the existing resource utilization.
- **I/O Bottlenecks:** If a third high-speed component (e.g., an external GPU accelerator or a second 100GbE card) is added, it will compete for the limited PCIe lanes emanating from the CPUs. Adding bandwidth-intensive devices may force the primary 25GbE NICs down to x8 lanes or saturate the UPI links if the workload involves significant inter-node communication. PCIe Topology Mapping should be consulted before installing non-standard expansion cards.
---
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️