Server Colocation
Technical Deep Dive: Server Colocation Deployment Configuration
This document provides a comprehensive technical specification and operational guide for a high-density, enterprise-grade server configuration optimized for **data center colocation environments**. This configuration prioritizes reliability, density, and optimized power consumption (PUE efficiency) within a shared physical infrastructure context.
1. Hardware Specifications
The Colocation Server configuration detailed herein is designed for maximum performance within a standard 1U or 2U rack unit profile, adhering strictly to industry standards for interoperability (e.g., IPMI, OCP specifications).
1.1 Core Processing Unit (CPU)
The chosen platform leverages the latest generation of high-core-count processors optimized for virtualization density and sustained turbo frequencies.
| Parameter | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Model Family | Intel Xeon Scalable (Sapphire Rapids/Emerald Rapids) or AMD EPYC (Genoa/Bergamo) | Selection depends on workload profile (core count vs. per-core performance). |
| Socket Count | Dual Socket (2P) | Ensures high I/O throughput and memory bandwidth. |
| Cores per Socket (Minimum) | 32 Physical Cores | Total 64+ physical cores per server unit. |
| Base Clock Frequency | 2.0 GHz | Optimized for sustained load rather than peak burst. |
| Max Turbo Frequency | Up to 4.5 GHz (Single Core) | Achievable under proper thermal management. |
| L3 Cache (Total) | Minimum 128 MB per CPU | Critical for database and in-memory workloads. |
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 250W - 350W per CPU | Must be accounted for in Power Distribution Units (PDU) planning. |
| Instruction Sets | AVX-512, AMX, DDR5 ECC Support | Essential for modern ML/AI and high-throughput computing. |
1.2 Memory (RAM) Subsystem
Memory configuration is strictly standardized for high-speed access across all CPU sockets, utilizing the maximum supported DIMM population for the platform.
| Parameter | Specification | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Type | DDR5 ECC Registered DIMM (RDIMM) | Error correction and reliability are paramount. |
| Total Capacity (Minimum) | 512 GB | Scalable up to 4 TB depending on the chassis (1U vs 2U). |
| Configuration | 16 DIMMs populated (8 per CPU) | Ensures optimal interleaving and full memory channel utilization. |
| Speed | Minimum 4800 MT/s (JEDEC Standard) | Higher speeds require tuning and may impact stability in dense configurations. |
| Latency Profile | CL40 or better | Balancing capacity and latency is key for virtualization overhead. |
| Memory Channels | 8 Channels per CPU (16 total) | Maximizes bandwidth, crucial for data-intensive applications. |
1.3 Storage Architecture
The storage subsystem is designed for NVMe performance and high data redundancy, typically utilizing a Software-Defined Storage (SDS) approach or a high-performance hardware RAID controller.
1.3.1 Primary Boot/OS Storage
Dedicated, small-form-factor storage for the operating system and hypervisor.
- **Configuration:** 2x 480GB M.2 NVMe SSDs (SATA/PCIe)
- **Redundancy:** Mirrored (RAID 1) via motherboard or dedicated controller.
- **Purpose:** Host OS, boot partitions, and configuration files.
1.3.2 Data Storage Array
High-speed, high-endurance storage for primary application data.
| Drive Bay Count | Drive Type | Capacity (Per Drive) | Interface | Total Usable Capacity (RAID 6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10x 2.5" Bays | Enterprise NVMe SSD (e.g., U.2 or E3.S) | 7.68 TB | PCIe 4.0/5.0 | ~46 TB (Assuming 10+2 sparing) |
| Alternate (High Density) | 12x 3.5" SAS/SATA HDD (If required for archival) | 18 TB | SAS 24G | ~180 TB (Assuming RAID 60) |
- **Controller:** Hardware RAID Controller (e.g., Broadcom MegaRAID SAS 9580-16i) with 8GB+ cache and **NVMe support** (if applicable).
- **Data Protection:** RAID 6 or ZFS RAIDZ2/RAIDZ3 configurations are mandatory for enterprise data integrity. Refer to Data Redundancy Best Practices.
1.4 Networking Interface Cards (NICs)
Network connectivity must meet hyperscale requirements for low latency and high aggregate throughput.
- **Onboard:** Dual 10GbE Base-T (Management/IPMI)
- **Expansion (Primary Data):** Dual Port 25/50/100 GbE QSFP28/QSFP-DD Adapter(s).
* *Recommendation:* Dual Port 100GbE Mellanox/Intel NICs utilizing PCIe Gen 5 lanes.
- **Virtualization Offload:** Support for SR-IOV, RoCE v2, and TCP Segmentation Offload (TSO).
- **Management:** Dedicated out-of-band management port (IPMI/iDRAC/iLO) with separate VLAN tagging. See Server Management Protocols.
1.5 Chassis and Power
Colocation environments mandate high power efficiency and density.
- **Form Factor:** 1U Rack Mount (Max height 44mm) or 2U Rack Mount (for enhanced cooling and storage density).
- **Power Supplies (PSUs):** Dual Redundant, Hot-Swappable, Titanium or Platinum efficiency rated.
* **Total PSU Wattage:** 2000W - 3000W (N+1 redundancy required). * **Input:** AC 200-240V (High-voltage input preferred to reduce amperage draw and heat).
- **Cooling:** High-static-pressure fans (N+1 configuration). Airflow must strictly adhere to front-to-back cooling standards common in modern Data Center Cooling Standards.
---
2. Performance Characteristics
Performance validation for colocation deployments focuses on sustained throughput, power efficiency, and consistency under heavy multi-tenant load. Benchmarks are often contextualized against standard virtualization density targets.
2.1 Computational Benchmarks
Synthetic benchmarks provide a baseline understanding of raw hardware capability.
| Metric | Configuration A (High Core Count) | Configuration B (High Frequency/Lower Core) | Target Improvement vs. Previous Gen |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPEC CPU2017 Integer Rate | 1200+ | 950+ | >30% |
| SPEC CPU2017 Floating Point Rate | 1350+ | 1100+ | >35% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi-Core Score | 180,000+ | 130,000+ | N/A (Industry standard comparison) |
| Memory Bandwidth (Aggregate) | >500 GB/s | >450 GB/s | Essential for data-intensive VMs. |
- Note:* These figures assume optimal BIOS tuning, including disabling unnecessary power-saving states (like C-states deeper than C3) when running performance-critical workloads. Refer to BIOS Tuning for High Performance Computing.
2.2 Storage I/O Performance
Storage performance is critical, especially when multiple Virtual Machines (VMs) contend for the same physical NVMe resources.
2.2.1 NVMe Throughput
Testing typically uses FIO (Flexible I/O Tester) to simulate sequential and random workloads.
- **Sequential Read/Write (128K block, Queue Depth 64):** Expected sustained throughput of 15 GB/s to 25 GB/s across the entire array, depending on the RAID parity calculation overhead.
- **Random Read (4K block, QD32):** Target sustained IOPS exceeding 1.5 Million IOPS.
- **Random Write (4K block, QD32):** Target sustained IOPS exceeding 800,000 IOPS, heavily dependent on the write-caching policy of the RAID controller.
2.2.2 Latency Profile
Colocation environments often host latency-sensitive applications (e.g., financial trading, low-latency caching).
- **99th Percentile Latency (4K Random Read):** Must remain below 150 microseconds ($\mu s$). Exceeding $200 \mu s$ indicates potential I/O contention or underlying network saturation. See Storage Latency Analysis.
2.3 Power Efficiency and Thermal Density
In a colocation site, power draw directly impacts operational cost (OpEx) and physical density limits (Racks per Cage).
- **Idle Power Consumption:** < 250W (System fully booted, no active load, management services running).
- **Peak Load Power Consumption:** 1500W - 2200W (Dependent on CPU TDP and storage activity).
- **Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) Impact:** By selecting high-efficiency PSUs (Titanium rated >96% efficiency at 50% load), we minimize waste heat injected into the data hall, directly improving the overall PUE of the colocation facility. This directly relates to the thermodynamics discussed in Data Center Thermal Management.
2.4 Network Performance
Testing confirms link saturation capability and low latency across the fabric.
- **Latency (Intra-Server):** Zero-copy communication between VMs via technologies like RDMA (if supported by NICs) should achieve sub-1 microsecond latency between virtualized network interfaces.
- **Throughput Verification:** Using tools like iPerf3 or specialized network stress tools (e.g., Netperf) to confirm $95\%+$ utilization of the 100GbE links under sustained load tests. This is crucial for Network Fabric Scalability.
---
3. Recommended Use Cases
This high-density, high-I/O configuration is not suitable for simple web hosting but excels in environments requiring predictable, high-performance resource allocation, often managed via robust Virtualization Hypervisors.
3.1 Enterprise Virtualization Host (Hypervisor Density)
The significant core count and massive memory capacity make this an ideal host for running large numbers of virtual machines (VMs), especially those requiring guaranteed resource allocation.
- **Workloads:** Running VMware ESXi, Microsoft Hyper-V, or KVM.
- **Density Target:** 100 to 150 standard business VMs (e.g., Domain Controllers, File Servers, Application Servers) or 15-20 large, resource-intensive VMs (e.g., large SQL instances).
- **Benefit:** High consolidation ratio due to superior CPU/RAM balance.
3.2 High-Performance Database Systems (OLTP/OLAP)
The NVMe storage subsystem is the primary driver for database performance.
- **Online Transaction Processing (OLTP):** Excellent performance for high-concurrency transactional databases (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server) where low 4K random write latency is critical.
- **In-Memory Databases:** The 512GB+ RAM capacity allows for large portions of operational data sets to reside entirely in memory, maximizing query response times.
3.3 Container Orchestration Platforms
Serving as the backbone for Kubernetes or OpenShift clusters.
- **Role:** Dedicated Worker Node or Control Plane Master Node.
- **Requirement Met:** High network bandwidth (100GbE) handles the significant East-West traffic generated by service mesh communication and persistent volume mounting. High core count supports numerous container instances. Refer to Containerization Infrastructure Design.
3.4 Big Data Processing Nodes
Processing tasks that benefit from high memory bandwidth and large local storage caches.
- **Workloads:** Spark/Hadoop processing nodes requiring fast local scratch space (utilizing the NVMe array) and the ability to load intermediate datasets into the large RAM pool.
3.5 Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)
If configured with a higher core-to-thread ratio (i.e., choosing higher frequency CPUs over extreme core count), this server can efficiently host VDI sessions.
- **Consideration:** VDI is heavily sensitive to I/O contention during login storms. The high-IOPS NVMe array mitigates this risk significantly compared to traditional SAN-backed VDI. See VDI Infrastructure Planning.
---
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
Choosing the correct density is vital in colocation, as space (U-height) and power draw are billed resources. This section compares the recommended 1U/2U configuration against two alternatives: a density-optimized micro-server and a legacy, high-storage density server.
4.1 Configuration Matrix
| Feature | Recommended (High-Density Enterprise) | Alternative A (Density Optimized - 1U Micro) | Alternative B (Storage Heavy - 4U/JBOD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form Factor | 1U or 2U | 1U (Ultra-dense, fewer slots) | 4U or 5U (Includes external drive shelves) |
| Max Cores/Sockets | 2P (64+ Cores) | 1P (Up to 32 Cores) | 2P (Up to 96 Cores) |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 TB - 4 TB | 512 GB - 1 TB | 4 TB - 8 TB (Often slower DDR4/DDR5) |
| Internal NVMe Bays | 8 - 12 x 2.5" U.2/E3.S | 4 x M.2 or 2 x 2.5" | 8 x 2.5" (Plus external JBOD connectivity) |
| Network Speed | 100 GbE standard | 25 GbE or 50 GbE | 25 GbE (Often limited by PCIe lanes) |
| Power Efficiency (TDP Profile) | High (Optimized for sustained load) | Very High (Lower total power draw) | Moderate (Higher cooling overhead due to HDD density) |
| Ideal Workload | Virtualization, Databases, Cloud Native | Edge Computing, Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) | Archival Storage, Large Data Lakes (HDFS) |
4.2 Analysis of Trade-offs
- 4.2.1 Versus Density Optimized (Alternative A)
The density-optimized server sacrifices memory capacity and I/O expansion slots for maximum server count per rack unit. While excellent for NFV workloads where CPU cycles are king and storage is externalized (e.g., Ceph), it fails when large datasets must be locally cached or when a single hypervisor requires 1TB+ of RAM. The lower network speed (25GbE vs. 100GbE) also creates a significant bottleneck for inter-node communication in clustered environments. This relates directly to Network Topology Selection.
- 4.2.2 Versus Storage Heavy (Alternative B)
The storage-heavy configuration maximizes raw Terabytes per dollar, often utilizing slower, high-capacity HDDs. This is unsuitable for high-transaction workloads due to poor random I/O performance (latency often >1ms). While it offers massive capacity, the physical footprint (4U or more) and the associated cooling costs for spinning disks make it less desirable for premium, metered colocation power/space contracts. The high HDD count also increases Mean Time To Failure (MTTF) risk, requiring more robust Storage Failure Recovery procedures.
The recommended configuration strikes the optimal balance: sufficient I/O performance via NVMe, high memory capacity for virtualization, and modern networking to prevent fabric saturation—all within a manageable power and space envelope (1U/2U).
---
5. Maintenance Considerations
Deploying servers in a colocation facility necessitates strict adherence to the provider’s operational guidelines regarding power, cooling, and remote accessibility. Maintenance procedures must assume limited physical access.
5.1 Power and Circuitry Requirements
Colocation power is typically provisioned in Amperage (A) or Kilowatt (kW) blocks per rack. Accurate power budgeting is non-negotiable.
- **Power Budgeting:** The peak draw of 2200W (fully loaded) must be budgeted against the provided circuit capacity (e.g., 30A @ 208V = ~6.2 kW per circuit). Allowing a safety margin of 25% for unexpected spikes is standard practice.
- **Voltage Preference:** Utilizing 208V or 240V input (rather than 120V) is strongly recommended. Higher voltage reduces the current (Amps) drawn, minimizing heat generated in the PDU/rack cabling and maximizing the available power density per circuit breaker. See Electrical Safety in Data Centers.
- **Redundancy:** Dual, independent power feeds (A-side and B-side) must be utilized, with one PSU plugged into each feed to ensure resilience against single power path failures. This relies on the facility providing Diverse Power Feeds.
5.2 Thermal Management and Airflow
The high TDP components (300W+ CPUs) generate significant heat density ($kW/rack$).
- **Airflow Direction:** Strict adherence to the vendor's specified intake/exhaust (usually front-to-back). Mixing hot-aisle/cold-aisle strategies within a single rack unit is strictly prohibited as it leads to thermal recirculation and overheating of upstream or downstream equipment.
- **Density Limits:** Colocation providers often impose density caps (e.g., 8kW per rack). This configuration must be monitored via IPMI telemetry to ensure it does not exceed the allotted thermal budget, preventing accidental throttling or emergency shutdown by the facility operator. Refer to Server Hardware Monitoring.
- **Fan Speed Control:** BIOS/BMC should be configured to use a performance-based fan curve, prioritizing system cooling over acoustic noise (since noise is irrelevant in a dedicated cage/suite environment).
5.3 Remote Management and Diagnostics
Physical intervention is costly and slow. The Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) is the primary maintenance tool.
- **IPMI/iDRAC/iLO Functionality:** Must be fully operational and accessible over the dedicated management network. Key remote functions include:
1. Remote Console (KVM over IP) for OS-level interaction. 2. Virtual Media Mounting for OS installation or recovery ISOs. 3. Remote Power Cycling (Graceful shutdown, immediate power off). 4. Sensor Logging (Temperature, Voltage, Fan Speed) for proactive failure prediction. This ties into Predictive Maintenance Algorithms.
- **Firmware Updates:** A rigorous schedule for updating BIOS, BMC, and RAID controller firmware is necessary to maintain security patches and ensure compatibility with new OS kernels or hypervisors.
5.4 Physical Security and Inventory
In a shared colocation space, accountability for hardware assets is critical.
- **Asset Tagging:** Every server must have unique, durable asset tags (barcode/QR code) linking it back to the central Configuration Management Database (CMDB).
- **Chassis Security:** Locking bezels or screws must be used to prevent unauthorized physical access to drive bays or internal components, even though the facility itself is physically secured.
5.5 Disaster Recovery and Hot Spares
Since physical repair response times can range from 4 hours to 24 hours depending on the SLA, provisioning for hardware failure is essential for high availability.
- **Strategy:** Maintain a pool of hot spares (e.g., 1 spare PSU, 1 spare 100GbE NIC) stored locally in the colocation facility cage, if permitted.
- **Data Recovery:** Ensure the SDS/RAID configuration permits rebuilding arrays without immediate hardware replacement, allowing time for vendor RMA processes. See Storage Array Recovery Procedures.
---
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️