Security Audit Schedule
Technical Documentation: Security Audit Schedule Server Configuration (SAS-C1)
This document details the technical specifications, performance metrics, recommended deployment scenarios, comparative analysis, and maintenance guidelines for the specialized **Security Audit Schedule Server Configuration (SAS-C1)**. This configuration is engineered specifically for high-throughput, low-latency log aggregation, analysis, and scheduled compliance reporting, demanding robust I/O capabilities and high memory density.
1. Hardware Specifications
The SAS-C1 is built upon a dual-socket, high-density platform optimized for intensive data processing across multiple concurrent security information and event management (SIEM) workloads. Reliability and data integrity are paramount in this design.
1.1 System Board and Chassis
The foundation of the SAS-C1 is the proprietary **Chassis Model X-9000R**, a 2U rackmount unit designed for optimal airflow management when densely packed with NVMe storage.
| Component | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Motherboard | Dual Socket Intel C741P Chipset Platform (Customized SKU) | Supports up to 4TB of DDR5 ECC RDIMM. |
| Chassis Form Factor | 2U Rackmount (850mm Depth) | Optimized for high-density storage bays. |
| Power Supplies (PSUs) | 2 x 2000W Platinum Rated (1+1 Redundant) | Hot-swappable, supporting peak load requirements during large-scale log ingestion bursts. |
| Cooling Solution | High-Static Pressure Fan Array (6x 60mm Hot-Swap) | Designed for operation in ambient temperatures up to 35°C (ASHRAE Class A2). |
1.2 Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The configuration mandates dual-socket deployment utilizing processors optimized for high core count and substantial L3 cache, critical for rapid pattern matching against large datasets.
The selected processors are the **Intel Xeon Scalable Processor series (5th Generation, codenamed 'Sapphire Rapids-SP')**, configured for a balance between clock speed and core density.
| Metric | CPU Socket 1 | CPU Socket 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Xeon Platinum 8580+ | Xeon Platinum 8580+ |
| Cores / Threads | 64 Cores / 128 Threads | 64 Cores / 128 Threads |
| Base Clock Frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Max Turbo Frequency (Single Core) | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache (Total) | 120 MB | 120 MB |
| Total System Cores/Threads | c|}{128 Cores / 256 Threads} |
This configuration provides significant parallel processing capability essential for log analysis pipelines and concurrent execution of scheduled tasks.
1.3 Memory Subsystem (RAM)
Given the in-memory indexing requirements of modern SIEM solutions (e.g., Elasticsearch, Splunk Indexers), the SAS-C1 prioritizes high capacity and low latency DDR5 implementation.
| Component | Specification | Configuration Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Type | DDR5 ECC Registered DIMM (RDIMM) | Supports full error correction capabilities. |
| Speed | 5600 MT/s (PC5-44800) | Optimized for the C741P memory controller. |
| Capacity (Total) | 1024 GB (1 TB) | Achieved via 8 x 128 GB DIMMs. |
| Channel Utilization | 8 Channels Populated (4 per CPU) | Ensures optimal memory bandwidth utilization to prevent CPU starvation. |
| Memory Mode | Quad-Rank Configuration | Selected for density while maintaining performance stability. |
Further details on memory topology can be found in the DDR5 Memory Architecture Guide.
1.4 Storage Configuration
The storage subsystem is the most critical component for audit scheduling, requiring extremely high random read/write IOPS for fast query execution against historical data, coupled with high sequential write throughput for real-time ingestion. A tiered storage approach is mandatory.
= 1.4.1 Tier 0: Operating System and Metadata
Used for the OS, hypervisor (if applicable), and critical application metadata stores.
- **Type:** 2 x 1.92 TB NVMe SSD (PCIe Gen 4 x4)
- **RAID Level:** Mirrored (RAID 1) for redundancy.
- **Purpose:** Boot drive and high-frequency metadata access.
= 1.4.2 Tier 1: Hot/Warm Data Indexing
This tier handles the actively queried and most recent security events (typically the last 30 days).
- **Type:** 8 x 7.68 TB Enterprise NVMe SSD (PCIe Gen 5 U.2/E3.S form factor preferred, Gen 4 utilized for current build)
- **RAID Level:** RAID 10 implementation across the 8 drives.
- **Aggregate Capacity (Usable):** Approximately 23 TB usable storage post-RAID overhead.
- **Interface:** Dedicated PCIe switch fabric (via Broadcom PEX switch) to ensure full Gen 4 x64 bandwidth to the host CPUs.
= 1.4.3 Tier 2: Cold Storage Archive
For long-term compliance data retention (1–7 years).
- **Type:** 12 x 16 TB Nearline SAS (NL-SAS) Hard Disk Drives (HDDs)
- **RAID Level:** RAID 6 (Double Parity)
- **Aggregate Capacity (Raw):** 192 TB Raw Capacity.
- **Interface:** SAS HBA (Host Bus Adapter) with 12Gb/s throughput.
| Tier | Type | Quantity | Capacity Per Unit | Total Raw Capacity | RAID Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS/Metadata | NVMe (Gen 4) | 2 | 1.92 TB | 3.84 TB | RAID 1 |
| Hot/Warm Index | NVMe (Gen 4) | 8 | 7.68 TB | 61.44 TB | RAID 10 |
| Cold Archive | NL-SAS HDD | 12 | 16 TB | 192 TB | RAID 6 |
| Total Usable Capacity (Approx.) | c|}{30 TB (Hot/Warm) + 160 TB (Cold Archive)} |
- 1.5 Networking Interface Controllers (NICs) ===
High-speed, low-latency networking is crucial for both receiving massive streams of security logs and facilitating rapid data retrieval for scheduled reporting across the network fabric.
- **Ingress/Log Reception:** 2 x 25 Gigabit Ethernet (25GbE) ports, dedicated to SIEM ingestion streams.
- **Management/Storage Access:** 2 x 10 Gigabit Ethernet (10GbE) ports, dedicated for out-of-band management (IPMI/BMC) and internal storage cluster communication (if clustered).
- **Optional High-Speed Interconnect:** 2 x 100GbE InfiniBand (IB) or RoCEv2 capable ports for integration into high-performance computing (HPC) or large-scale data lake environments.
Reference Server Network Interface Standards for detailed driver and offload specifications.
2. Performance Characteristics
The performance validation for the SAS-C1 configuration focuses heavily on I/O latency and sustained throughput under heavy, sustained load, simulating peak audit cycle execution.
- 2.1 I/O Benchmarking ===
Storage performance is measured using FIO (Flexible I/O Tester) under controlled conditions simulating mixed read/write workloads typical of database lookups and log indexing.
| Workload Profile | Block Size | Read IOPS (Avg) | Write IOPS (Avg) | Latency (P99, μs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequential Write (Ingestion Simulation) | 128 KB | N/A | 850,000 IOPS | 150 μs |
| Random Read (Query Simulation) | 4 KB | 1,100,000 IOPS | N/A | 75 μs |
| Mixed R/W (50/50) | 64 KB | 580,000 IOPS | 580,000 IOPS | 110 μs |
The high IOPS capability of the Tier 1 array ensures that scheduled audits—which often involve complex, multi-stage queries across the indexed data—complete within defined Service Level Objectives (SLOs).
- 2.2 CPU and Memory Throughput ===
CPU performance is benchmarked using SPEC CPU 2017 Integer Rate metrics, reflecting the parallel nature of log parsing and correlation tasks.
- **SPECrate 2017 Integer:** 550 (Estimated aggregate score based on dual 8580+ configuration).
- **Memory Bandwidth (Sustained):** Measured at approximately 320 GB/s aggregated read bandwidth across all 8 memory channels.
This throughput is essential for avoiding CPU bottlenecks when feeding data from the high-speed NVMe storage into the processing cores for analysis.
- 2.3 Real-World SIEM Simulation ===
To validate suitability for its intended purpose, the SAS-C1 was tested running a standard compliance suite (simulating GDPR/PCI DSS reporting requirements) against a dataset representing 90 days of log activity (approximately 40 TB indexed).
- **Log Ingestion Rate Sustained:** 500,000 Events Per Second (EPS) sustained over 24 hours without dropping events onto the Tier 2 buffer.
- **Scheduled Audit Report Generation Time (90-Day Scope):** 4 hours, 12 minutes.
* *Note:* A baseline system with lower RAM (512GB) and slower storage (SATA SSDs) measured 9 hours, 55 minutes for the same task.
This demonstrates the effectiveness of the high core count and high-speed NVMe indexing in accelerating critical compliance activities. For more on performance tuning, see SIEM Performance Tuning Best Practices.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The SAS-C1 configuration is purpose-built for environments where data volume, regulatory scrutiny, and required response times intersect.
- 3.1 Primary Use Case: Compliance and Scheduled Auditing ===
This is the intended primary function. The system is optimized to handle the computational load generated by generating detailed, historical audit reports required by regulatory bodies (e.g., HIPAA, SOX, PCI DSS).
- **Requirements Met:** High-speed data retrieval from cold storage (Tier 2) combined with rapid processing of recent data (Tier 1).
- **Benefit:** Reduces the window of exposure during the audit preparation phase by minimizing report generation time.
- 3.2 Secondary Use Case: High-Volume Log Indexer/Aggregator ===
When deployed as the primary indexer within a distributed SIEM cluster, the SAS-C1 excels due to its massive I/O capacity.
- It can sustain high ingestion rates from multiple collection points (e.g., firewalls, application servers, network devices) without impacting query performance for analysts (due to the dedicated Tier 1/Tier 2 separation).
- It is suitable for environments generating between 10 TB and 20 TB of new security data per month, based on the storage ratios defined in Section 1.4.
- 3.3 Tertiary Use Case: Data Forensics and Incident Response Platform ===
For organizations requiring rapid deep-dive analysis during high-severity incidents, the SAS-C1 provides the necessary horsepower. Fast random reads on the NVMe array allow forensic investigators to quickly search massive historical datasets for indicators of compromise (IOCs) that might span weeks or months. This supports the Digital Forensics Workflow.
- 3.4 Environments NOT Recommended ===
The SAS-C1 is over-specified and cost-inefficient for: 1. General-purpose virtualization hosts (where CPU clock speed might be favored over core count). 2. Simple file serving or backup targets (where high-capacity, low-cost SATA/SAS HDDs would suffice). 3. Environments with very low log ingestion rates (< 10,000 EPS).
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the SAS-C1's value proposition, we compare it against two common alternatives: the SAS-LITE (a budget-conscious option) and the SAS-HPC (a high-end, real-time analytics option).
- 4.1 Configuration Comparison Table ===
| Feature | SAS-C1 (Security Audit Schedule) | SAS-LITE (Budget SIEM Node) | SAS-HPC (Real-Time Analytics) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU (Total Cores) | 128 Cores (Xeon Platinum) | 64 Cores (Xeon Gold) | 192 Cores (Xeon Max Series) |
| RAM Capacity | 1 TB DDR5 | 512 GB DDR5 | 2 TB HBM/DDR5 Mix |
| Tier 1 Storage Type | 8 x 7.68 TB NVMe (Gen 4) | 4 x 3.84 TB SATA SSD | 16 x 7.68 TB NVMe (Gen 5) |
| Total Usable Hot Capacity | ~30 TB (RAID 10 NVMe) | ~10 TB (RAID 5/6 SATA) | ~90 TB (RAID 10 NVMe) |
| Networking Focus | Balanced 25GbE Ingress/Egress | 10GbE Standard | Dual 100GbE Infiniband |
| Primary Optimization | Historical Query Performance & Data Integrity | Cost-Effective Indexing | Lowest Possible Query Latency |
- 4.2 Performance Delta Analysis ===
The primary performance differentiator lies in the storage subsystem and memory capacity.
- **SAS-C1 vs. SAS-LITE:** The SAS-C1 offers approximately 3x the usable hot storage capacity and achieves 5x the random read IOPS due to the move from SATA SSDs to high-end NVMe drives and doubling the RAM. This directly impacts the time required to execute complex audit queries spanning months of data.
- **SAS-C1 vs. SAS-HPC:** The SAS-HPC sacrifices some long-term archival capacity (Tier 2) in favor of pure processing speed (higher core count, Gen 5 NVMe, and specialized memory). The SAS-HPC is better suited for real-time threat hunting where sub-millisecond latency is critical, whereas the SAS-C1 is optimized for scheduled batch processing where throughput over several hours is the key metric. The SAS-C1 provides a superior cost-to-performance ratio for compliance workloads.
For deeper dives into performance characteristics of different storage media, review Storage Media Benchmarking.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Proper maintenance of the SAS-C1 is crucial to maintain the integrity of security logs and ensure compliance reporting deadlines are consistently met.
- 5.1 Power and Environmental Requirements ===
Due to the dual 2000W Platinum PSUs and the high density of NVMe drives, the power draw and thermal output are significant.
- **Maximum Power Draw (Peak):** Estimated 1800W under full indexing load (100% CPU, 90% Storage Read/Write utilization).
- **Power Density:** Requires placement in racks rated for high power density (minimum 10 kW per rack unit).
- **Thermal Output:** Requires robust hot/cold aisle separation and adequate CRAC/CRAH unit capacity. Consult the Data Center Cooling Standards for deployment guidelines.
- 5.2 Firmware and Driver Management ===
Maintaining the integrity of the storage stack is non-negotiable. Outdated firmware on the NVMe controllers or the SAS HBA can lead to silent data corruption or unexpected I/O latency spikes, directly jeopardizing audit data validity.
- **Priority Components for Updates:**
1. BIOS/UEFI (to ensure memory stability and CPU microcode compliance). 2. NVMe Controller Firmware (PCIe Switch/RAID Card). 3. Operating System Kernel/Drivers (especially storage drivers).
A formal Firmware Update Protocol must be established, typically scheduling major firmware updates during pre-approved maintenance windows, as these often require full system reboots.
- 5.3 Storage Health Monitoring ===
Proactive monitoring of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 arrays is essential.
- **NVMe Health:** Monitor S.M.A.R.T. data, specifically tracking *Media Errors* and *Temperature Threshold Exceedances*. Given the high IOPS profile, NVMe drive endurance (TBW rating) must be tracked against expected write amplification.
- **HDD Health (Tier 2):** Monitor reallocated sector counts and predictive failure indicators on the NL-SAS drives. A RAID 6 array can tolerate two drive failures, but immediate replacement of a failing drive minimizes the risk during subsequent rebuilds.
Tools such as OS-native monitoring agents (e.g., `smartctl` or vendor-specific tools) should feed data into the central Server Health Monitoring System.
- 5.4 Backup and Disaster Recovery (DR) ===
While the server utilizes internal redundancy (RAID 1/10/6), this does not protect against logical corruption or catastrophic site failure.
- **Cold Archive Replication:** The Tier 2 data (the bulk of the compliance record) must be replicated offsite, ideally using object storage services optimized for long-term, infrequent access.
- **Index Backup:** The Tier 1 index data should be snapshotted daily and backed up to the cold archive or a dedicated backup target, facilitating quick restoration if the primary index becomes corrupted during an upgrade or data ingestion failure. Refer to Data Redundancy Strategies for detailed RTO/RPO targets.
The robust nature of the SAS-C1 configuration allows for high confidence in data retention, provided the established maintenance schedules are adhered to. This configuration is a cornerstone for Regulatory Compliance Infrastructure.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️