High-Performance Computing
Technical Deep Dive: High-Performance Computing (HPC) Server Configuration
This document provides a comprehensive technical specification and analysis of a standardized, state-of-the-art High-Performance Computing (HPC) platform designed for demanding computational workloads, including large-scale simulations, deep learning training, and complex data analytics. This configuration emphasizes maximum core density, high-speed interconnectivity, and massive memory bandwidth.
1. Hardware Specifications
The HPC configuration detailed below represents a modern, dual-socket rackmount system optimized for computational throughput and parallel processing efficiency. All components are selected based on enterprise-grade reliability and performance metrics suitable for 24/7 operation in a data center environment.
1.1 Central Processing Units (CPU)
The selection of the CPU is paramount for HPC workloads, prioritizing high core count and substantial L3 cache size to minimize memory latency during parallel execution.
| Feature | Specification 1 (Primary) | Specification 2 (Secondary) |
|---|---|---|
| Model Family | Intel Xeon Scalable (Sapphire Rapids/Emerald Rapids) or AMD EPYC (Genoa/Bergamo) | (Dependent on procurement cycle and specific workload optimization) |
| Sockets | 2 | Dual-Socket Architecture |
| Cores per Socket (Minimum) | 64 Physical Cores (128 Threads) | Total 128 Cores / 256 Threads |
| Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz | |
| Max Turbo Frequency (Single Core) | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
| Total L3 Cache | 128 MB per CPU (Minimum) | Total 256 MB L3 Cache |
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 300W per CPU (Max) | Total System TDP: ~600W (CPU only) |
| Instruction Sets | AVX-512, AMX (for AI acceleration), VNNI | Essential for optimized numerical computations |
1.2 System Memory (RAM)
HPC tasks are notoriously memory-intensive, requiring high capacity and maximizing bandwidth to feed the numerous CPU cores effectively. This configuration mandates the use of high-speed DDR5 technology.
| Parameter | Specification | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Total Capacity | 2 TB (Minimum) | Sufficient for large-scale molecular dynamics or CFD models. |
| Type | DDR5 ECC Registered (RDIMM) | Error correction is mandatory for long-running, sensitive simulations. |
| Speed/Frequency | 4800 MT/s (Minimum) or 5600 MT/s (Optimal) | Maximizing the frequency supported by the chosen CPU generation. |
| Configuration | 32 DIMMs (64 GB per DIMM) | Populating all available memory channels across both sockets (typically 8 channels per CPU) for maximum parallelism. |
| Memory Channels Utilized | 16 (Full utilization) | Critical for achieving peak theoretical memory throughput. |
1.3 Accelerators and GPUs
For modern HPC, general-purpose computing on graphics processing units (GPGPU) is essential for accelerating AI/ML training and specific simulation kernels (e.g., matrix multiplication).
The chassis must support a minimum of four full-height, full-length accelerators.
| Component | Specification | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerator Model | NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU (or equivalent AMD Instinct MI300 series) | 4 Units |
| Memory per Accelerator | 80 GB HBM3 | Ensures large models can fit entirely on-device. |
| Interconnect | NVLink/NVSwitch (Peer-to-Peer direct GPU communication) | Essential for multi-GPU training scalability. |
| PCIe Interface | PCIe Gen 5.0 x16 (Direct CPU connection) | Minimizing host-to-device latency. |
1.4 Storage Subsystem
HPC storage must balance ultra-low latency access for scratch space with high sustained throughput for checkpointing and result writing. A tiered storage approach is implemented.
1.4.1 Local Boot and OS Storage
- **Type:** 2 x 1.92 TB NVMe SSDs (RAID 1)
- **Purpose:** Operating System and local application binaries.
1.4.2 High-Speed Scratch Storage (Tier 1)
This storage is directly attached via high-speed PCIe lanes and is used for active computation datasets and immediate output.
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Type | U.2 or M.2 NVMe SSDs (Enterprise Grade) |
| Capacity per Drive | 7.68 TB |
| Quantity | 8 Drives |
| Total Raw Capacity | 61.44 TB |
| Interface | PCIe Gen 5.0 Host Bus Adapter (HBA) |
| Expected Throughput (Aggregated) | > 40 GB/s Read/Write |
1.4.3 Persistent Storage (Tier 2)
This storage is typically allocated for long-term results, large datasets, and system backups. It often interfaces with a larger NAS or SAN.
- **Type:** 4 x 15.36 TB SAS SSDs (RAID 6 or ZFS equivalent)
- **Purpose:** Persistent data storage and checkpoint archives.
1.5 Networking and Interconnect
High-speed, low-latency networking is the backbone of any clustered HPC environment. This configuration supports both high-bandwidth data movement and low-latency messaging for MPI communications.
- **Management Network (IPMI/BMC):** 1GbE standard.
- **Data Network (High Throughput):** 2 x 200 GbE or 400 GbE InfiniBand (HDR/NDR) or RoCE capable Ethernet adapters.
* *Requirement for InfiniBand:* Support for RDMA operations is critical for minimizing CPU overhead during inter-node communication.
- **Internal Fabric:** Support for PCIe Gen 5.0 fabric connectivity between CPUs (UPI/Infinity Fabric) and direct GPU-to-GPU links (NVLink/XGMI).
1.6 Chassis and Power
- **Form Factor:** 4U Rackmount (to accommodate cooling requirements for high-TDP components).
- **Power Supplies:** Dual Redundant (1+1) 3000W 80 PLUS Platinum or Titanium rated PSUs.
- **Cooling:** High-airflow front-to-back cooling solution, optimized for high static pressure fans (e.g., 8 x 80mm high-RPM fans). Consideration for direct-to-chip liquid cooling infrastructure is highly recommended for peak density.
2. Performance Characteristics
The hardware configuration translates directly into specific performance metrics. Benchmarking must focus on parallelism, memory latency, and sustained throughput rather than peak single-core frequency.
2.1 Theoretical Peak Performance
The theoretical peak performance is calculated based on the Aggregate Floating Point Operations Per Second (FLOPS).
- **CPU Theoretical Peak (FP64 Double Precision):** (Assuming 128 cores * 2.4 GHz base * 16 FMA cycles per instruction set utilization)
* *Note:* This calculation is complex due to AVX-512 vectorization and execution unit pipeline depth. A conservative estimate for modern dual-socket server CPUs is typically in the range of 4.0 - 6.0 TFLOPS (FP64) per socket. * **Total CPU FP64:** Approximately 10 - 12 TFLOPS.
- **GPU Theoretical Peak Performance (If equipped with 4x H100):**
* NVIDIA H100 typically offers ~67 TFLOPS (FP64 Tensor Core). * **Total GPU FP64:** 4 * 67 TFLOPS = 268 TFLOPS (FP64).
- **Aggregate Peak Performance:** The system's effective peak performance is dominated by the accelerators, reaching several hundred TFLOPS when specialized kernels are utilized.
2.2 Benchmark Results (Representative Examples)
Performance validation relies on standardized benchmarks that stress different aspects of the system balance (CPU-bound, Memory-bound, I/O-bound).
2.2.1 Linpack (HPL)
HPL measures sustained double-precision performance, often used for TOP500 ranking.
| Configuration Aspect | Result (FP64 GFLOP/s) |
|---|---|
| CPU Only (Dual Socket) | 8,500 – 10,500 GFLOP/s |
| CPU + GPU (4x H100) | 200,000 – 250,000 GFLOP/s (Dependent on optimized CUDA/ROCm libraries) |
2.2.2 Memory Bandwidth
Crucial for CFD and large data structure manipulation.
- **Observed Memory Bandwidth (CPU):** Utilizing all 16 channels of DDR5-5600, the system should achieve sustained bandwidth exceeding 800 GB/s aggregated across both CPUs.
- **GPU HBM Bandwidth:** Each H100 provides approximately 3.35 TB/s of HBM3 bandwidth, totaling over 13 TB/s available to the accelerators.
2.2.3 I/O Throughput
Measured using tools like `ior` against the Tier 1 NVMe scratch array.
- **Sustained Read/Write:** Consistent performance of 35 GB/s to 45 GB/s sequential read/write is expected from the 8-drive PCIe Gen 5.0 array, provided the HBA and underlying CPU lanes are fully utilized.
2.3 Latency Profile
Low latency is vital for tightly coupled simulations (e.g., iterative solvers).
- **Inter-CPU Latency (NUMA):** Cross-socket latency is typically 150ns – 250ns via the UPI link. Minimizing cross-socket memory access is a key tuning objective.
- **GPU Interconnect Latency (NVLink):** Peer-to-peer GPU communication via NVLink typically achieves < 5 microseconds latency, drastically outperforming PCIe transfers.
- **Network Latency (RDMA):** With a well-configured InfiniBand fabric, 1-way latency between nodes should be below 1.5 microseconds.
3. Recommended Use Cases
This high-density, high-bandwidth configuration is engineered to excel in computational domains where data parallelism and intensive floating-point operations are central.
3.1 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
- **Workloads:** Large-scale airflow simulations (aerospace), weather modeling, and turbulent flow analysis.
- **Why this configuration:** CFD codes (like OpenFOAM or Fluent) benefit immensely from high core counts (for domain decomposition) and the massive memory capacity to hold complex meshed data structures. The high-speed interconnect is crucial for synchronizing boundary conditions between compute nodes.
3.2 Scientific Simulations
- **Workloads:** Molecular Dynamics (MD simulations - e.g., GROMACS, NAMD), Quantum Chemistry calculations (e.g., VASP, Gaussian).
- **Why this configuration:** These simulations are often memory-bandwidth limited. The 2TB DDR5 pool and the sheer number of available CPU cores allow for modeling systems with millions of atoms or large basis sets efficiently.
3.3 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML)
- **Workloads:** Training large language models (LLMs), complex deep neural networks (DNNs), and large-scale image recognition models.
- **Why this configuration:** The inclusion of 4x top-tier GPUs provides the necessary tensor core throughput. The 2TB system RAM acts as a massive staging area for datasets that might exceed the VRAM capacity of individual GPUs during data loading phases (e.g., loading massive embedding tables).
3.4 Big Data Analytics and High-Frequency Trading (HFT)
- **Workloads:** In-memory database processing (e.g., SAP HANA scaling), real-time risk modeling.
- **Why this configuration:** The combination of high core count and massive RAM allows entire multi-terabyte datasets to reside in volatile memory, eliminating slow disk I/O bottlenecks during complex query execution.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To understand the value proposition of this dedicated HPC platform, it must be contrasted against alternative server architectures commonly deployed in data centers.
4.1 Comparison Table: HPC vs. General Purpose (GP) vs. Storage Server =
| Feature | HPC Optimized (This Configuration) | General Purpose (GP) 2U Server | Storage Optimized Server (Scale-Out) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores (Total) | 128+ (Focus on Core Density & IPC) | 64 (Focus on Clock Speed & Efficiency) | |
| Max DDR5 RAM | 2 TB+ (High Channel Count) | 1 TB (Standard 8-Channel) | |
| Accelerator Support | 4-8 Full-Height PCIe Gen 5.0 Slots | 1-2 Low-Profile Slots | |
| Internal NVMe Storage | 8-12 Drives (Focus on Speed via PCIe HBA) | 24-36 2.5" Drives (Focus on Capacity) | |
| Networking Priority | 200/400 GbE/InfiniBand (RDMA) | 2x 25GbE Standard | |
| Primary Metric | TFLOPS / Memory Bandwidth | Virtualization Density / Latency |
4.2 Comparison with GPU-Dense vs. CPU-Only HPC =
The primary architectural decision in HPC is balancing the investment between CPU compute power and specialized accelerator power.
- **CPU-Only HPC (High Core Count, No GPUs):**
* **Pros:** Excellent for highly serial tasks, codes that do not vectorize well, or those that rely heavily on complex, non-standard memory access patterns where GPU offload is inefficient. Lower initial cost. * **Cons:** Significantly lower peak TFLOPS ceiling (often 1/10th the performance of a GPU-enabled system for appropriate workloads). Poor performance in deep learning.
- **GPU-Dense HPC (e.g., 8x GPUs, less RAM):**
* **Pros:** Unmatched peak TFLOPS for highly parallel, matrix-heavy workloads (e.g., dense neural network training). Lower per-TFLOP power consumption. * **Cons:** Limited by the VRAM capacity of the GPUs (e.g., 8 * 80GB HBM3 = 640GB total VRAM). If the simulation requires 1TB of active memory, this configuration fails unless complex data shuffling is implemented, which incurs significant latency penalties. The CPU system RAM (2TB) in our proposed configuration acts as a critical overflow buffer.
- Conclusion on Comparison:** The proposed configuration strikes a balance, providing a massive CPU compute foundation (128+ cores, 2TB RAM) suitable for the host environment and memory-bound simulations, augmented by a powerful GPU array for acceleration tasks where applicable. This makes it a highly versatile "Workhorse HPC Node."
5. Maintenance Considerations
Deploying and maintaining high-density, high-power HPC servers requires specialized attention beyond standard enterprise server management.
5.1 Power and Electrical Infrastructure
The power draw is extreme. A single node configured with dual 300W CPUs and four 700W GPUs can easily draw 3.5 kW under full load.
- **Rack Density:** Racks supporting these nodes must be rated for high power distribution (e.g., 15 kW to 20 kW per rack). Standard 8 kW racks are insufficient.
- **PDUs:** Requires high-amperage Power Distribution Units (PDUs) capable of handling 30A or higher circuits, often requiring 208V or 400V input configurations rather than standard 120V. Redundant PSUs are non-negotiable.
5.2 Thermal Management and Cooling
Heat dissipation is the single largest operational challenge.
- **Airflow Requirements:** Requires high static pressure fans within the chassis to force air through dense component stacks (especially over stacked GPUs and deep CPU heatsinks).
- **Rack Density Management:** These nodes must be spaced appropriately or grouped into racks with dedicated hot/cold aisle containment to prevent recirculation of hot exhaust air, which degrades performance rapidly.
- **Liquid Cooling Feasibility:** For maximum density (e.g., moving to 8 GPUs or more powerful CPUs), the chassis must be compatible with direct-to-chip liquid cooling solutions to manage TDPs exceeding 1000W per socket.
5.3 Software Stack and Tuning
HPC systems rely on highly optimized software environments.
- **Operating System:** Typically a streamlined Linux distribution (e.g., RHEL, Rocky Linux, or Ubuntu LTS) optimized for minimal background processes.
- **MPI Implementation:** Careful selection and tuning of the MPI library (e.g., OpenMPI, MPICH) are required to leverage the specific RDMA capabilities of the chosen interconnect (InfiniBand or RoCE).
- **NUMA Awareness:** Application compilers and launchers (e.g., `numactl`) must be used to ensure processes are bound to the correct NUMA node corresponding to the memory they are accessing, preventing costly cross-socket traffic.
5.4 Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance
Standard hardware monitoring is insufficient; application-level metrics are also required.
- **Telemetry:** Continuous monitoring of GPU utilization, temperature, HBM utilization, and NVLink bandwidth via vendor-specific tools (e.g., NVIDIA DCGM).
- **Storage Health:** Monitoring the health and wear leveling of high-endurance NVMe drives is critical, as they experience far higher write amplification than standard SSDs in HPC scratch environments. Tools tracking TBW must be implemented.
- **Firmware Management:** Due to the tight integration of components (CPU microcode, GPU drivers, HBA firmware, and Network Interface Card firmware), an aggressive firmware update schedule is necessary to ensure compatibility and stability, often managed via a centralized BMC system.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️