GPU Configuration
Technical Documentation: High-Density GPU Server Configuration (Model: GFX-A100-8X)
This document provides a comprehensive technical overview of the GFX-A100-8X server configuration, specifically designed for extreme parallel processing workloads. This architecture leverages the latest NVIDIA A100 Tensor Core GPU technology integrated within a high-throughput, low-latency platform.
1. Hardware Specifications
The GFX-A100-8X is engineered from the ground up to maximize GPU utilization and inter-GPU communication bandwidth. Every component selection prioritizes data throughput and power efficiency under sustained peak load.
1.1 System Overview
This configuration utilizes a dual-socket server motherboard designed for high-PCIe lane counts, necessary to support eight double-width GPUs and high-speed networking adapters.
| Feature | Specification | |
|---|---|---|
| Chassis Form Factor | 4U Rackmount (Optimized Airflow) | |
| Motherboard Model | Proprietary Dual-Socket Platform (Custom PCB) | |
| CPU Sockets | 2x Socket SP3 (AMD EPYC 7003 Series Compatible) | |
| Total PCIe Slots | 8x Full-Height, Full-Length (FHFL) x16 physical/electrical | |
| Internal Storage Bays | 16x 2.5" NVMe U.2 Bays | |
| Power Supply Units (PSUs) | 4x 3000W 80+ Titanium (Redundant N+2 configuration) | |
| Cooling System | Direct-to-Chip Liquid Cooling Loop (Primary GPU/CPU) with High-CFM Hot-Swap Fans (Secondary) |
1.2 Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The CPU complex serves primarily as the host processor, managing data staging, pre-processing, and orchestrating GPU workloads. High core counts and extensive PCIe lane availability are paramount.
| Component | Specification | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Model (Primary Selection) | 2x AMD EPYC 7763 (64 Cores / 128 Threads each) | |
| Total Cores / Threads | 128 Cores / 256 Threads | |
| Base Clock Speed | 2.45 GHz | |
| Max Boost Clock (Single Core) | Up to 3.5 GHz | |
| Total PCIe Lanes Available (CPU Aggregate) | 224 Lanes (128 from CPU1, 96 from CPU2 via xGMI interconnect) | |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB per CPU (512 MB Total) |
- Note: The choice of EPYC 7003 series ensures sufficient PCIe Gen4 lanes directly accessible to the GPU slots, minimizing I/O bottlenecks.*
1.3 Graphics Processing Units (GPUs)
The core computational element of this server. Configuration focuses on maximizing computational density and high-speed interconnectivity.
| Component | Specification | |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Model | 8x NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe Card (SXM4 variants can be substituted in specialized chassis) | |
| Total GPU Memory (HBM2e) | 640 GB (8 x 80 GB) | |
| Tensor Core Performance (FP16 w/ Sparsity) | 624 TFLOPS per GPU (Total: 4.99 PFLOPS) | |
| GPU Interconnect | NVLink 3.0 (600 GB/s bidirectional per GPU pair) | |
| PCIe Interface | PCIe Gen4 x16 (Dedicated connection per GPU) |
The NVLink topology is configured in a fully meshed structure utilizing the integrated NVLink Switch System on the motherboard to ensure all GPUs can communicate peer-to-peer at maximum speed, critical for large-scale model training.
1.4 Memory (System RAM)
System memory is configured to provide sufficient staging space for massive datasets, often exceeding the capacity of the GPU memory itself.
| Component | Specification | |
|---|---|---|
| Total System RAM | 2 TB DDR4-3200 ECC RDIMM | |
| Configuration | 32 DIMMs x 64 GB (Populating all 32 available slots) | |
| Memory Channels per CPU | 8 Channels | |
| Peak Aggregate Memory Bandwidth | ~512 GB/s |
1.5 Storage Subsystem
Storage emphasizes high Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) and low latency to feed the GPUs efficiently during data loading phases, preventing CPU starvation or data pipeline stalls.
| Component | Specification | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot/OS Drive | 2x 960GB Enterprise SATA SSD (RAID 1) | |
| Primary Data Storage Pool (Hot Tier) | 16x 3.84 TB NVMe U.2 SSDs (Configured as a single ZFS vdev or LVM stripe) | |
| Total Usable NVMe Storage | Approximately 61.4 TB (Raw) | |
| Peak Sequential Read Performance (Aggregated) | > 45 GB/s | |
| Peak Random IOPS (4K QD32) | > 15 Million IOPS |
The storage array is managed by a dedicated hardware RAID controller with a substantial onboard cache (16GB DDR4) to buffer write operations and accelerate small reads.
1.6 Networking
For distributed training paradigms (e.g., data parallelism across multiple nodes), high-speed, low-latency networking is mandatory.
| Interface | Quantity | Speed/Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Management (IPMI/BMC) | 1x 1GbE Dedicated | Standard Out-of-Band Management |
| Data Plane (High Performance) | 2x NVIDIA ConnectX-6 (or newer) | 200 Gb/s InfiniBand EDR/HDR or RoCE v2 |
| Standard Ethernet | 1x 25GbE Base-T | Standard In-Band Management/Storage Access |
The InfiniBand interfaces are configured for RDMA operations to facilitate fast, CPU-bypassing data transfers between this server and other compute nodes in a cluster environment.
2. Performance Characteristics
The true measure of this configuration lies in its ability to sustain high utilization across all eight GPUs simultaneously for complex computational tasks. Performance is heavily dependent on the workload's ability to scale across the NVLink fabric.
2.1 Computational Throughput Benchmarks
These benchmarks represent sustained performance metrics achieved under optimal thermal conditions and ideal workload distribution across the NVLink domains.
| Workload Type | Metric | Single A100 (Peak Spec) | GFX-A100-8X (Aggregate Theoretical) | GFX-A100-8X (Observed Sustained) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP64 (Double Precision) | TFLOPS | 9.7 | 77.6 | ~72.5 (93% Efficiency) |
| TF32 (Tensor Cores) | TFLOPS | 156 | 1248 | ~1180 (94.5% Efficiency) |
| FP16 (Tensor Cores w/ Sparsity) | PFLOPS | 1.25 | 10.0 | ~9.5 (95% Efficiency) |
| Memory Bandwidth (HBM2e) | GB/s | 2039 | 16,312 (Aggregate) | N/A (Limited by workload access patterns) |
2.2 Application-Specific Performance
- 2.2.1 Deep Learning Training (BERT Large)
Training large transformer models requires massive data movement and fine-grained synchronization. The NVLink fabric is the primary determinant of scaling efficiency beyond a single node.
- **Batch Size:** Global Batch Size of 1024 (Distributed across 8 GPUs)
- **Observed Throughput:** 8,500 - 9,200 samples/second.
- **Scaling Efficiency (vs. 1 GPU):** Scaling efficiency remains above 90% when comparing the 8-GPU system to a single A100 running the maximum batch size it can hold locally, demonstrating excellent NVLink utilization for gradient aggregation.
- 2.2.2 High-Performance Computing (HPC) - CFD Simulation
For workloads like Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) using solvers that rely heavily on dense matrix operations (e.g., LU decomposition), the FP64 performance is critical.
- **Benchmark:** LINPACK (Adapted for GPU execution)
- **Observed Performance:** Sustained 72.5 TFLOPS (FP64).
- **Bottleneck Identification:** In simulations that require frequent global synchronization across MPI ranks that span multiple nodes, the 200Gb/s interconnect bandwidth becomes the limiting factor rather than the GPU compute itself. This highlights the importance of network design.
- 2.2.3 Inference Acceleration
While the A100 is primarily a training powerhouse, its high throughput makes it excellent for high-volume, low-latency inference serving.
- **Model:** ResNet-50 (Batch size 1)
- **Latency:** Average end-to-end latency measured at 1.8 ms.
- **Throughput (Max Concurrent Requests):** Capable of serving over 150,000 requests per second when utilizing dynamic batching across all eight accelerators.
2.3 I/O Performance Analysis
The storage subsystem must keep pace with the aggregate memory bandwidth of the GPUs (16.3 TB/s theoretical aggregate HBM2e bandwidth, though practical access is lower).
- **NVMe Read Test (Sequential 128K):** 42.1 GB/s sustained read rate from the 16-drive array.
- **Impact:** This sustained read rate is sufficient to fill the required data buffers for most large-scale training runs before the CPU needs to stage the next block, ensuring GPUs remain busy >98% of the time, provided the data preprocessing pipeline is efficient. Failure to meet this threshold leads to I/O wait states.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The GFX-A100-8X configuration is overkill for standard virtualization, web serving, or light data analytics. It is specifically tailored for environments demanding peak floating-point operations and massive parallel memory throughput.
3.1 Large-Scale Deep Learning Model Training
This is the primary target workload. The 8x A100 configuration, coupled with high-speed NVLink, allows for efficient scaling of models that cannot fit onto a single GPU (e.g., models with over 50 billion parameters).
- **Model Architectures:** GPT-3 derivatives, large-scale diffusion models, massive recommendation systems, and complex sequence-to-sequence models.
- **Techniques Supported:** Full support for mixed precision training, Tensor Core utilization, and efficient Data Parallelism synchronization.
3.2 Scientific Simulation and Modeling (HPC)
For scientific domains requiring high precision (FP64) and large datasets that benefit from GPU acceleration, this configuration offers significant performance advantages over traditional CPU-only clusters.
- **Fluid Dynamics (CFD):** Solving large sparse matrices associated with Navier-Stokes equations.
- **Molecular Dynamics (MD):** Accelerating force calculations and integration steps for large protein folding simulations.
- **Weather and Climate Modeling:** Running high-resolution regional models where grid sizes necessitate massive parallel resources.
3.3 Data Analytics and AI Inference Serving
Although optimized for training, the massive aggregate memory (640 GB VRAM) makes it suitable for hosting extremely large, pre-trained models for real-time inference serving in production environments (e.g., multi-tenant serving platforms).
- **Model Hosting:** Serving several large language models concurrently, leveraging MIG capabilities if available on the specific A100 SKU to partition resources securely.
3.4 Cryptography and Scientific Computing
Workloads that are highly parallelizable, such as Monte Carlo simulations or certain types of cryptographic key derivation testing, benefit directly from the raw FLOPs density.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To understand the value proposition of the GFX-A100-8X, it must be benchmarked against two common alternatives: a CPU-centric high-core count server and a server utilizing the newer, higher-bandwidth NVIDIA H100 architecture.
4.1 Comparison A: CPU vs. GPU Server
This comparison highlights the fundamental difference in computational density between a top-tier CPU server and the GFX-A100-8X for AI/HPC workloads.
| Metric | CPU Server (2x EPYC 7763, No GPU) | GFX-A100-8X Server |
|---|---|---|
| Total FP32 TFLOPS (Approx.) | ~15 TFLOPS (AVX-512) | ~7,500 TFLOPS (GPU Tensor Cores) |
| Memory Bandwidth (System RAM) | 512 GB/s | 512 GB/s (System RAM) + 16.3 TB/s (HBM2e) |
| Power Consumption (Peak Load) | ~1.2 kW | ~5.5 kW (Excluding HVAC overhead) |
| Cost Efficiency (TFLOPS/$ Ratio) | Low | High (for AI/ML tasks) |
| Best Suited For | Branching logic, complex control flow, I/O heavy ETL | Massive parallel floating-point arithmetic |
4.2 Comparison B: A100 vs. H100 Architecture
The H100 represents the next generation. While the A100 configuration discussed here offers excellent value, the H100 provides significant improvements, particularly in Transformer Engine capabilities and interconnect speed.
| Feature | GFX-A100-8X (PCIe) | Hypothetical GFX-H100-8X (PCIe or SXM) |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Memory Type | HBM2e (80GB) | HBM3 (80GB or 120GB) |
| FP16 TFLOPS (w/ Sparsity) | 4.99 PFLOPS (Total) | ~16.8 PFLOPS (Total for SXM) |
| NVLink Speed | 600 GB/s | 900 GB/s (NVLink 4.0) |
| PCIe Generation | Gen4 | Gen5 (Doubled I/O bandwidth) |
| Transformer Engine Support | No (Software Emulation) | Native FP8 Support |
| Relative Cost (Approx.) | Baseline (1.0x) | 1.8x - 2.2x |
- Conclusion:* The A100 configuration remains highly competitive for workloads that do not strictly require the FP8 precision or the absolute maximum bandwidth provided by the H100 architecture, offering a superior price-to-performance ratio for existing infrastructure.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Deploying a high-density GPU server requires specialized infrastructure planning beyond standard rack-mounted servers due to the extreme power draw and heat dissipation requirements.
5.1 Power Requirements
The collective TDP of eight A100 GPUs (250W-300W each) combined with dual high-TDP CPUs, extensive RAM, and high-speed storage results in a massive system power draw.
- **Peak System Power Draw:** Estimated at 4,500W – 5,000W under full synthetic load across all GPUs and CPUs.
- **PSU Configuration:** The use of 4x 3000W PSUs in N+2 redundancy (requiring only 3 to operate fully) ensures that even with the failure of one PSU, the system maintains full operational capacity without throttling.
- **Data Center Requirement:** Must be deployed in racks rated for at least 8 kW per rack unit, utilizing high-amperage PDUs (e.g., 30A or 60A at 208V/240V). Standard 1U/2U server power density planning is insufficient. Power density management is crucial.
5.2 Thermal Management
The heat density generated by this configuration is substantial, necessitating robust cooling solutions.
- **Heat Dissipation:** Approximately 4.8 kW of thermal energy must be removed from the chassis under peak load.
- **Cooling Strategy:** The GFX-A100-8X utilizes a hybrid cooling approach:
1. **Direct-to-Chip (DTC) Liquid Cooling:** Primary heat sinks on the CPUs and GPUs interface with a closed-loop liquid cooling system that routes heat to a rear-door heat exchanger (RDHx) or a facility-level CDU (Coolant Distribution Unit). This is necessary to maintain GPU junction temperatures below 85°C during sustained 100% utilization. 2. **Airflow:** High-CFM, variable-speed fans (hot-swappable) manage cooling for the NVMe drives, RAM modules, and VRMs, drawing cool air from the front and exhausting hot air directly into the rear of the rack.
- **Acoustics:** Due to the high fan speeds required for air cooling secondary components, this server is unsuitable for deployment in standard office environments. Acoustic profiling indicates noise levels exceeding 75 dBA at 1 meter during peak operation.
5.3 Software and Driver Maintenance
Maintaining peak performance requires strict adherence to the CUDA and driver release schedules, often aligning with the latest OS kernel updates.
- **Driver Versioning:** Performance regressions are common if the server's GPU driver version drifts significantly from the version validated by the application vendor (especially for ML frameworks like PyTorch or TensorFlow).
- **Firmware Updates:** Regular updates to the BMC/IPMI firmware and the motherboard BIOS are required to ensure optimal PCIe lane allocation and power management profiles are correctly enforced, particularly concerning the PCIe root complex.
5.4 Interconnect Health Monitoring
The NVLink fabric is critical. Failure or degradation in one link can severely impact scaling efficiency.
- **Monitoring Tools:** Utilization of NVIDIA's `nv-smi` command combined with enterprise monitoring agents (e.g., Prometheus exporters) is necessary to track NVLink error counts and bandwidth utilization per GPU pair.
- **Troubleshooting:** Diagnostic procedures must account for the complex topology. Isolating a faulty GPU often requires validating the PCIe slot integrity as well as the direct NVLink connections between adjacent cards. Refer to the GPU Troubleshooting Guide for specific motherboard diagnostics.
5.5 Expansion Considerations
While highly dense, the 4U chassis allows for some expansion, primarily in networking and local storage.
- **Storage Scaling:** If the 61 TB NVMe pool is insufficient, external NVMe over Fabrics arrays can be attached via the 200Gb/s NICs, shifting the I/O boundary but maintaining low latency.
- **Future GPU Upgrades:** Due to the PCIe Gen4 limitation and the physical constraints of the 4U chassis, upgrading to future GPU generations (e.g., PCIe Gen5/6 capable cards) will likely require migrating the entire system to a newer, Gen5-native platform. The current configuration is optimized for the A100 lifecycle.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️