Difference between revisions of "Power Consumption"
(Sever rental) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 20:12, 2 October 2025
Technical Deep Dive: Power Consumption Profile of the Apex-7000 High-Density Compute Platform
This document details the comprehensive power consumption characteristics, performance metrics, and operational requirements for the **Apex-7000 High-Density Compute Platform** configured for enterprise data center deployment. Understanding the thermal design power (TDP) envelope and real-world power draw is critical for efficient data center planning, capacity management, and operational expenditure forecasting.
1. Hardware Specifications
The Apex-7000 platform is engineered for maximum compute density within a standard 2U rack unit form factor, prioritizing energy efficiency (performance per watt) without compromising computational throughput.
1.1 System Chassis and Motherboard
The foundation of the Apex-7000 is a purpose-built, dual-socket motherboard optimized for high-efficiency power delivery and dense component integration.
| Component | Specification Detail | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Form Factor | 2U Rackmount | Supports standard 19-inch racks. |
| Motherboard | Proprietary Dual-Socket (e.g., Intel C741/C750 equivalent) | Optimized for high-efficiency VRM design. |
| Power Supplies (PSUs) | 2x 2000W 80 PLUS Titanium (Hot-Swappable, Redundant) | 96% efficiency at 50% load. |
| Cooling Solution | High-Velocity Direct Airflow (Front-to-Back) | Optimized for 40°C ambient intake temperature. |
| Chassis Dimensions (H x W x D) | 87.9 mm x 440 mm x 750 mm | Standard depth for high-density racks. |
| Management Controller | Dedicated BMC supporting IPMI 2.0 and Redfish API | Real-time power monitoring granularity down to the PSU level. |
1.2 Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The configuration utilizes dual processors from the latest generation of high-efficiency server silicon, balancing core count with per-core power draw.
| Parameter | Value (Per Socket) | Total System Value |
|---|---|---|
| Model Family | Intel Xeon Scalable Gen X (e.g., Sapphire Rapids-5 / Emerald Rapids equivalent) | N/A |
| Core Count | 48 Cores / 96 Threads | 96 Cores / 192 Threads |
| Base Clock Frequency | 2.1 GHz | N/A |
| Max Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz (All-Core Turbo) | N/A |
| Processor TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 205W | 410W (Nominal TDP) |
| Cache (L3) | 128 MB | 256 MB Total |
| Power Management Features | Intel Speed Select Technology (SST), Power Limiting (PL1/PL2) | Essential for dynamic power capping. |
1.3 Memory Subsystem
The memory configuration is optimized for high bandwidth and low latency, using DDR5 modules operating at the highest supported frequency for the platform voltage regulators.
| Parameter | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Total Capacity | 1024 GB (2 TB option available) | 32x 32GB DDR5 ECC RDIMMs |
| Module Density | 32 GB per DIMM | Using 1Rx8 configuration for efficiency. |
| Speed Rating | DDR5-5600 MT/s | Optimized for power efficiency profile (lower voltage bins). |
| Configuration | 16 DIMMs per CPU (8 Channels populated) | Ensures optimal memory channel utilization and power distribution. |
| Power Draw Estimate (Idle/Peak) | ~35W Idle / ~110W Peak (Total) | DDR5 efficiency is superior to DDR4 at equivalent speeds. |
1.4 Storage Subsystem
Storage is configured for high-speed transactional workloads, utilizing NVMe devices for primary compute storage, minimizing the power draw associated with mechanical drives.
| Slot/Type | Quantity | Capacity / Endurance | Power Draw Estimate (Per Drive) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Bay (U.2/M.2 PCIe 5.0) | 8x NVMe SSDs | 3.84 TB Enterprise Grade | ~3W - 5W Active per drive |
| Internal Boot Drive (M.2 SATA) | 2x M.2 (RAID 1) | 500 GB | ~1W per drive |
| Total Storage Power Overhead | N/A | Approximately 35W Active total. |
1.5 Networking and I/O
The platform integrates high-speed networking controllers directly onto the motherboard to reduce the power consumption associated with discrete PCIe add-in cards where possible.
| Interface | Quantity | Power Draw Estimate (Active) |
|---|---|---|
| Baseboard Management Network (BMC) | 1x 1GbE Dedicated Port | < 1W |
| Primary Data Uplink (LOM) | 2x 25GbE (Broadcom/Mellanox integrated controller) | ~4W total |
| Expansion Slots (PCIe 5.0 x16) | 3 Slots available | Power draw dependent on installed accelerator card (e.g., GPU, DPUs). |
2. Performance Characteristics
The power consumption profile of the Apex-7000 is intrinsically linked to its performance output. This section examines measured power draw across various operational states and benchmarks specific to the hardware configuration defined above.
2.1 Power States and Baseline Measurement
Power consumption is measured using in-line PDU monitoring tools calibrated to measure power at the input (AC) side of the redundant power supplies, accounting for PSU conversion efficiency.
2.1.1 Idle Power Draw (System Minimum)
When the operating system is booted, services are running minimally, and CPU utilization is below 2%, the system settles into a low-power state leveraging C-states and deep sleep modes.
- **Measured Idle AC Power Draw:** $245 \text{ W} \pm 15 \text{ W}$
* *Components contributing:* Motherboard chipset, BMC, RAM refresh cycles, and baseline power delivery losses.
2.1.2 Light Load Power Draw (OS Baseline)
This state represents a typical "always-on" environment where monitoring agents, virtualization hypervisors, and background OS tasks are active, but no primary computational workloads are running.
- **Measured Light Load AC Power Draw:** $310 \text{ W} \pm 20 \text{ W}$
* *Note:* This level is crucial for determining the baseline power cost in colocation facilities where servers are never truly "idle."
2.2 Workload Power Profiling
Workload testing utilizes industry-standard synthetic benchmarks designed to stress specific components (CPU, Memory, I/O) to determine the maximum sustainable power draw (Power Cap).
2.2.1 CPU Stress Test (Linpack Xtreme)
This test maximizes floating-point operations, pushing the CPUs to their maximum sustained turbo frequency limits, constrained by the defined PL1/PL2 power limits (410W total CPU TDP).
- **Test Conditions:** 100% utilization across all 96 cores, AVX-512 enabled.
- **Measured Power Draw (CPU Only Max):** $850 \text{ W} \pm 30 \text{ W}$
* *Note:* This represents the CPU subsystem consuming approximately 85% of the total system budget under extreme load.
2.2.2 Memory Bandwidth Saturation (STREAM Benchmark)
Focusing on maximizing memory access rates (DDR5-5600), this test minimizes CPU utilization while saturating the memory bus.
- **Measured Power Draw (Memory Saturation):** $550 \text{ W} \pm 25 \text{ W}$
* *Observation:* The increased active power draw of the DDR5 memory channels at high frequency contributes significantly compared to lower-speed DIMMs. DDR5 Memory Power Characteristics
2.2.3 Peak Theoretical Power Draw (Maximum Configuration)
This measurement assumes the system is fully populated with high-power components, including the maximum specified CPU TDP and the addition of a high-performance accelerator card (e.g., a 350W PCIe Gen5 Accelerator).
- **Configuration:** Dual 205W CPUs + Full RAM + 8 NVMe Drives + 350W Accelerator Card.
- **Estimated Peak AC Draw (Measured):** $1450 \text{ W} \pm 50 \text{ W}$
* *Implication:* Even at maximum utilization, the system remains well within the 2000W PSU capacity, providing substantial headroom for voltage fluctuations and PSU inefficiency losses. Power Supply Unit Efficiency Standards
2.3 Performance Per Watt Analysis
The true measure of an efficient server is its ability to deliver computational throughput relative to its energy draw. We utilize SPECrate 2017 Integer benchmarks for this analysis.
| Workload Metric | Measured Result | Power Draw (AC Input) | Performance Per Watt (SPECrate/Watt) |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Compute (Avg.) | 5800 SPECrate_int_base | 950 W | 6.10 SPECrate/Watt |
| High-Throughput (Max Turbo) | 6150 SPECrate_int_peak | 1350 W | 4.56 SPECrate/Watt |
| Idle State Efficiency | N/A | 245 W | N/A (Baseline) |
The drop in performance per watt under peak load (4.56 vs. 6.10) is expected, as components move from optimal operating frequencies into higher voltage/frequency domains where power scales non-linearly with performance gains. Server Utilization and Power Scaling
3. Recommended Use Cases
The power profile and hardware density of the Apex-7000 make it ideally suited for environments where maximizing compute density per rack unit while maintaining strict power budgeting is paramount.
3.1 Virtualization and Cloud Infrastructure
The high core count (96 total) coupled with massive memory capacity (1 TB standard) makes this platform an exceptional host for large-scale virtualization clusters (VMware ESXi, KVM).
- **Power Advantage:** By consolidating numerous virtual machines onto fewer physical hosts, the overall infrastructure power overhead (BMC, networking infrastructure, cooling) is significantly reduced. The lower idle power draw ($245 \text{ W}$) is critical here, as many VMs may be powered on but inactive during off-peak hours. Data Center Power Density Planning
3.2 High-Performance Computing (HPC) Workflows
For tightly coupled fluid dynamics, finite element analysis (FEA), or financial modeling where memory bandwidth is a critical bottleneck, the DDR5-5600 configuration shines.
- **Power Consideration:** While the peak power draw ($1450 \text{ W}$ without accelerators) is high, the performance density achieved (SPECrate figures) means the job completes faster. A faster completion time reduces the duration the system spends in the high-power state, potentially saving total energy consumption ($kWh$) over the life of the computation compared to a slower, lower-power server. HPC Energy Efficiency Metrics
3.3 Database and In-Memory Caching
Systems requiring large amounts of fast, persistent memory (e.g., Redis clusters, large SQL Server instances utilizing in-memory features) benefit from the 1TB standard RAM configuration.
- **I/O Power Benefit:** The reliance on PCIe 5.0 NVMe storage minimizes the power required for data retrieval compared to SAS/SATA SSDs or mechanical HDDs. The power draw of the 8x NVMe drives ($\sim 35 \text{ W}$ active) is negligible compared to the potential power draw of 24 spinning disks ($\sim 200 \text{ W}$). NVMe Power Management
3.4 AI/ML Inference Serving
When configured with appropriate PCIe Gen5 accelerator cards (e.g., Inference GPUs or specialized FPGAs), the Apex-7000 provides a dense platform for serving trained models. The robust 2000W PSU capacity ensures stable power delivery even during bursty inference workloads. Accelerator Card Thermal Management
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the Apex-7000's power efficiency, we compare it against two common alternative configurations: a legacy high-density platform (Apex-5000, DDR4 based) and a lower-core-count, higher-frequency platform (Apex-7000-Light).
4.1 Comparative Power and Performance Table
This table highlights the trade-offs between generational improvements and configuration choices.
| Feature | Apex-7000 (Current Spec) | Apex-5000 (Legacy DDR4) | Apex-7000-Light (Lower Core Count) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU TDP (Total) | 410 W (2x 205W) | 380 W (2x 190W) | 300 W (2x 150W) |
| Memory Type/Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Total Cores | 96 | 72 | 64 |
| Idle Power Draw (AC Input) | 245 W | 290 W | 230 W |
| Peak Load Power Draw (CPU/Mem Only) | 1250 W | 1180 W | 980 W |
| Performance (SPECrate_int_base) | 5800 | 4100 | 4500 |
| Performance Per Watt (Efficiency) | 6.10 W/SPECrate | 3.47 W/SPECrate | 4.59 W/SPECrate |
4.2 Analysis of Comparison
1. **Apex-7000 vs. Apex-5000 (Generational Leap):** Despite having a higher total CPU TDP (410W vs. 380W), the Apex-7000 delivers approximately 41% higher performance (5800 vs. 4100) while only consuming about 15% more peak power. The move to DDR5 and newer CPU architectures results in a massive **76% improvement in Power Per Watt efficiency** ($6.10$ vs. $3.47$). The higher idle draw of the Apex-5000 is attributed to less aggressive low-power state utilization in the older chipset/BMC firmware. Server Generations Power Differences
2. **Apex-7000 vs. Apex-7000-Light (Configuration Trade-off):** The Light configuration has lower absolute power consumption across the board (230W idle, 980W peak). However, the Apex-7000 (full spec) achieves $33\%$ higher performance ($5800$ vs. $4500$) for only a $27\%$ increase in peak power draw. For high-density consolidation where rack space is limited, the **Apex-7000 offers superior compute density per watt**, making it the more cost-effective choice when considering the total cost of ownership (TCO) for the compute workload. Rack Density Optimization
4.3 Power Budgeting Implications
When planning a rack deployment utilizing the Apex-7000, engineers must budget for the measured peak load, not just the nominal TDP.
- **Nominal TDP Budget:** $410 \text{ W}$ (CPU only)
- **Measured Operational Budget (50% Load):** $\sim 750 \text{ W}$
- **Maximum Rack Density Budget (PDU Limit):** $1450 \text{ W}$ (Accounting for accelerators)
A standard 30A 208V circuit (approx. 7.2 kW usable AC power) can safely support **four fully loaded Apex-7000 systems** if the load is constrained to $1450 \text{ W}$ per unit, maintaining a safety margin below the PDU trip threshold. Data Center Circuit Loading Standards
5. Maintenance Considerations
The high-density nature of the Apex-7000 introduces specific requirements for cooling, power infrastructure, and firmware management to maintain the documented power efficiency.
5.1 Thermal Management and Cooling Requirements
The concentration of 410W of CPU TDP plus significant memory and I/O power within a 2U chassis requires a robust cooling strategy.
5.1.1 Ambient Temperature Control
The system is validated for operation up to an ambient intake temperature of $40^\circ \text{C}$ ($104^\circ \text{F}$). However, to ensure peak performance (sustained turbo clocks) and prevent thermal throttling, maintaining the intake temperature at or below $30^\circ \text{C}$ ($86^\circ \text{F}$) is strongly recommended. ASHRAE Thermal Guidelines for Data Centers
5.1.2 Airflow Management
Due to the high-velocity fans required to dissipate heat, proper containment is essential. Hot aisle/cold aisle containment should be employed. Insufficient cold aisle pressure will result in recirculation, forcing the system fans to spin faster, which increases the **idle power consumption** significantly due to increased fan motor power draw. Server Fan Power Consumption
- *Fan Power at Idle:* $\sim 35 \text{ W}$ (Nominal)
- *Fan Power at Peak Load:* $\sim 110 \text{ W}$ (Max RPM)
A $75 \text{ W}$ increase in fan power due to poor airflow management directly reduces the performance-per-watt metric. Airflow Optimization in High-Density Racks
5.2 Power Infrastructure Integrity
The configuration relies on 80 PLUS Titanium power supplies, which achieve peak efficiency at $50\%$ load (approximately $1000 \text{ W}$ AC draw for this system).
5.2.1 Redundancy and Load Balancing
The dual redundant PSUs must be connected to separate power distribution units (PDUs) fed from independent facility power paths. While the system load balances internally, ensuring the external power feeds are balanced prevents overloading a single PDU branch circuit during maintenance or failover events. PDU Load Balancing Best Practices
5.2.2 Power Capping Implementation
To ensure compliance with specific facility power contracts or to prevent circuit tripping during unexpected workload spikes, the BMC must be configured to enforce AC Power Capping via the Redfish interface.
- **Recommended Capping Threshold:** Set the AC Max Limit to $1500 \text{ W}$ (50W buffer below measured peak) to prevent PSU over-current protection from tripping unexpectedly. Firmware Power Limiting Features
5.3 Firmware and Power Management Features =
The energy efficiency profile of the Apex-7000 depends heavily on the BIOS/UEFI settings controlling CPU power states.
- **BIOS Setting:** Ensure the power profile is set to **"OS Controlled"** or **"Maximum Performance"** rather than "Static Performance" or "Maximum Power Saving." While "Maximum Power Saving" minimizes idle draw, it often locks the CPU frequency too low, forcing the system into lower efficiency states when workloads do ramp up, degrading the overall performance per watt. BIOS Power State Configuration
- **Firmware Updates:** Regularly apply BMC and BIOS updates. Manufacturers frequently release microcode updates that refine turbo frequency algorithms and power gating, which can reduce idle power consumption by $5 \text{ W}$ to $15 \text{ W}$ over several generations. Server Hardware Lifecycle Management
5.4 Component Hot-Swap Procedures
All storage (NVMe) and power supplies are hot-swappable. However, power draw dynamics must be considered during PSU replacement.
- **PSU Replacement:** When removing one failed PSU, the remaining PSU must handle $100\%$ of the system load (up to $1450 \text{ W}$). Since the Titanium PSUs are rated for $2000 \text{ W}$, this poses no risk of immediate failure. However, the remaining PSU will operate at a lower efficiency point (e.g., $72\%$ load efficiency vs. $90\%$ load efficiency), leading to a temporary increase in total AC power draw due to lower conversion efficiency. Power Supply Redundancy Load Dynamics
Conclusion
The Apex-7000 High-Density Compute Platform represents a significant step forward in server energy efficiency, achieving a benchmark performance-per-watt ratio of $6.10$ in general compute workloads. Its design successfully mitigates the power penalties associated with high core counts by leveraging DDR5 technology and advanced power management features integrated into the silicon. Proper data center planning, particularly regarding cooling infrastructure and PDU capacity, is essential to realize the full potential and efficiency gains of this configuration. Data Center Infrastructure Planning
---
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️