Difference between revisions of "Network Diagram"
(Sever rental) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 19:46, 2 October 2025
Technical Documentation: High-Density 100GbE Network Aggregation Server Configuration (Project Chimera)
This document provides a comprehensive technical overview of the "Project Chimera" server configuration, specifically optimized for high-throughput network data aggregation, deep packet inspection (DPI), and software-defined networking (SDN) control plane operations. This configuration prioritizes PCIe lane availability, memory bandwidth, and robust network interface controller (NIC) support over raw single-thread CPU performance.
1. Hardware Specifications
The Project Chimera configuration is based on a dual-socket server architecture designed for maximum I/O density and sustained throughput. The core mission is to aggregate traffic from multiple 100 Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) links without introducing queuing delays or CPU bottlenecks during packet processing.
1.1. Base Platform and Chassis
The platform utilizes a 2U rackmount chassis supporting dual-socket motherboards with high lane counts.
| Component | Specification |
|---|---|
| Form Factor | 2U Rackmount, 8-bay NVMe/SAS |
| Motherboard Chipset | Intel C741 Platform Controller Hub (PCH) equivalent (Custom OEM/ODM implementation) |
| BIOS/UEFI Version | ServerFirmware v5.12.01 (Optimized for PCIe Gen5/CXL) |
| Power Supply Units (PSUs) | 2x 2200W Platinum Rated (N+1 Redundant) |
| Cooling Solution | High-Static Pressure Blower Fans, Direct-to-Chip Liquid Cooling option for CPUs (Recommended for sustained 400W+ TDP) |
1.2. Central Processing Units (CPUs)
The configuration demands processors with high core counts and, critically, extensive PCIe lane availability to service the numerous high-speed network adapters.
| Parameter | CPU 1 (Socket 0) | CPU 2 (Socket 1) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor Model | AMD EPYC 9654 (Genoa) | AMD EPYC 9654 (Genoa) |
| Core Count / Thread Count | 96 Cores / 192 Threads | 96 Cores / 192 Threads |
| Base Clock Frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Max Boost Frequency (Single Core) | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache Size | 384 MB (3D V-Cache configuration preferred) | 384 MB (3D V-Cache configuration preferred) |
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 360 W | 360 W |
| Total System Cores | 192 Cores / 384 Threads | N/A |
- Note on CPU Selection*: While Intel Xeon Scalable CPUs (e.g., Sapphire Rapids HBM variants) were considered, the EPYC 9004 series offers superior PCIe lane density (up to 128 lanes per socket), which is essential for fully populating the required number of 100GbE and NVMe devices without resorting to complex PCIe switch fabrics on the motherboard itself.
1.3. Memory Subsystem
Memory is configured for maximum bandwidth and capacity, balancing the needs of the operating system, kernel processing, and large flow tables (e.g., for Netfilter or eBPF maps).
| Parameter | Specification | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Capacity | 2 TB DDR5 ECC RDIMM | |
| Memory Type | DDR5-4800 Registered ECC (RDIMM) | |
| Configuration | 32 x 64 GB DIMMs (All 12 memory channels populated per socket) | |
| Memory Speed | 4800 MT/s (Operating at JEDEC standard for maximum stability under high utilization) | |
| Interconnect | CXL 1.1 Support (Disabled for current baseline configuration, reserved for future memory expansion) | |
| Memory Bandwidth (Theoretical Peak) | ~1.2 TB/s (Bi-directional) |
The use of DDR5-4800 ensures that the memory subsystem does not become the primary bottleneck when feeding data to the network interfaces, especially during operations like large flow table lookups or session state synchronization.
1.4. Storage Subsystem
Storage is optimized for fast logging, configuration persistence, and operating system responsiveness, not primary bulk data serving. A mix of fast local storage for operational data and NVMe for OS is mandated.
| Component | Quantity | Specification / Role |
|---|---|---|
| Boot/OS Drive | 2x M.2 NVMe SSD (RAID 1) | 1.92 TB each, PCIe Gen4 x4, Endurance Class 3 DWPD |
| Local Cache/Scratch | 6x U.2 NVMe SSDs | 7.68 TB each, PCIe Gen4 x4, High IOPS (Read/Write balanced) |
| Bulk Storage (Optional) | 2x 3.84 TB SAS SSDs | Used for long-term configuration backups or archival logs (Slower tier) |
| Storage Controller | Integrated Platform Controller (AHCI/NVMe Native) |
The heavy reliance on NVMe ensures minimal latency for storage operations, which is crucial if the server is tasked with writing connection metadata or security event logs in real-time.
1.5. Network Interface Controllers (NICs)
This is the defining characteristic of the Chimera configuration. It requires extensive PCIe capacity to support multiple high-speed ports utilizing DMA effectively.
We utilize an offload-heavy architecture, relying on specialized NICs to handle low-level tasks like checksum calculation, segmentation, and flow steering, thereby freeing up the 192 CPU cores for application logic.
| Slot Location | Controller Model | Quantity | Interface Speed | PCIe Interface | Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCIe Slot A (Primary) | Mellanox ConnectX-6 (or equivalent Intel E810-XXV) | 2 | 100 GbE QSFP28 | PCIe 4.0 x16 | Data Ingress/Egress (Primary Data Plane) |
| PCIe Slot B (Secondary) | Mellanox ConnectX-6 (or equivalent Intel E810-XXV) | 2 | 100 GbE QSFP28 | PCIe 4.0 x16 | Data Ingress/Egress (Secondary/Mirroring Plane) |
| PCIe Slot C (Management) | Intel I350-AM4 | 1 | 1 GbE RJ45 | PCIe 3.0 x4 | Out-of-Band Management (IPMI/BMC) |
| PCIe Slot D (Control/Sync) | Broadcom BCM57416 | 1 | 25 GbE SFP28 | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Control Plane Communication (e.g., Kafka/gRPC) |
- Total Network Capacity*: 400 Gbps aggregate ingress/egress, distributed across 4 dedicated 100GbE ports, all operating near line rate due to offloading capabilities.
1.6. Expansion Slots and Interconnect
The platform must support a minimum of four full-height, full-length PCIe 4.0 x16 slots dedicated to network expansion.
- **PCIe Topology**: The motherboard topology must support direct CPU access for at least two x16 slots per socket, minimizing reliance on the chipset for primary data paths.
- **CXL Support**: The platform is validated with CXL 1.1, although currently unutilized. This provides a pathway for future memory expansion or specialized accelerator cards (e.g., SmartNICs with integrated FPGAs).
Server I/O Architecture is the primary constraint in this build, dictating the selection of the dual-socket platform over high-core-count single-socket solutions.
2. Performance Characteristics
The Chimera configuration is benchmarked against its primary function: sustained, low-latency packet processing under heavy load. Performance metrics focus on throughput, latency jitter, and resource utilization under stress.
2.1. Network Throughput Benchmarks
Testing utilizes RFC 2544 methodology combined with specialized application-level testing using DPDK (Data Plane Development Kit) and XDP (eXpress Data Path) frameworks on a Linux kernel (v6.6+).
| Test Metric | Result (Unicast) | Result (Multicast/Broadcast) | Target Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (Gbps) | 99.8 Gbps | 98.5 Gbps | > 99.5 Gbps (Unicast) |
| Frame Loss Rate (%) | < 0.0001% | < 0.005% | < 0.01% |
| Average Latency (64-byte packets) | 650 nanoseconds (ns) | 710 ns | < 1.0 $\mu$s |
| Latency Jitter (99th Percentile) | 45 ns | 62 ns | < 100 ns |
- Observation*: The offloading capabilities of the ConnectX-6 NICs (e.g., VXLAN encapsulation/decapsulation, Flow tables) allow the system to maintain near-theoretical line rate even when the application layer is processing complex rulesets.
2.2. CPU Utilization and Offloading Efficiency
A critical performance indicator is the utilization split between the CPU cores and the NIC hardware accelerators.
Testing involved running a simulated 400 Gbps stream, applying stateful firewall rules (e.g., 1 million active connections tracked) using eBPF programs loaded onto the kernel.
| Metric | Value (CPU-Only Processing) | Value (NIC Offload + Minimal CPU) |
|---|---|---|
| Total CPU Utilization (Overall) | 98% (All cores saturated) | 35% (Primarily used for application logic) |
| Memory Bandwidth Saturation | 85% | 55% |
| Interrupt Rate (IRQs per second) | > 4,000,000 | < 500,000 (Poll Mode Drivers active) |
| Application Latency (End-to-End) | 15 $\mu$s | 3.2 $\mu$s |
The massive reduction in IRQ load (from millions to sub-half-million) confirms the effectiveness of using RSS and hardware acceleration (like the Mellanox Flow Table Offload) to prevent the networking stack from overwhelming the general-purpose cores.
2.3. Storage Performance
While secondary, storage performance ensures that operational overhead (logging, state writes) does not impact network performance.
- **IOPS (70% Read / 30% Write)**: Sustained 1.8 Million IOPS across the 6 NVMe drives.
- **Sequential Throughput**: 45 GB/s aggregated read speed.
This level of storage performance ensures that even if the network configuration requires writing connection metadata for every packet (a worst-case scenario for logging), the storage subsystem will not introduce latency spikes exceeding 50 $\mu$s.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The Project Chimera configuration is explicitly designed for environments demanding extreme network throughput coupled with deep, real-time analytical capabilities. It is not intended for general-purpose virtualization hosts or standard web serving.
3.1. High-Performance Network Monitoring and Security Appliances
This configuration is ideally suited for acting as the aggregation point for traffic mirrors (SPAN/TAP) in large data centers or Internet Exchange Points (IXPs).
- **Deep Packet Inspection (DPI)**: The high core count (192) allows specialized DPI engines (e.g., Suricata, Zeek) to process metadata extracted by the NICs at line rate. The sheer memory capacity (2TB) supports loading massive signature databases or certificate stores directly into RAM.
- **Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDPS)**: Acting as a perimeter defense sensor, it can analyze four independent 100GbE streams simultaneously, providing immediate threat correlation across all ingress points.
3.2. Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Control Plane
In Software-Defined Networking architectures, hardware like this serves as the central processing unit for network state management.
- **Flow Controller**: Managing millions of VXLAN or GENEVE tunnels. The 192 cores are utilized for complex routing table calculations and state synchronization across distributed fabric elements.
- **Telemtry Aggregation**: Ingesting massive volumes of streaming telemetry (e.g., gRPC or OpenConfig) from hundreds of network devices, processing the data, and forwarding summarized statistics to a central analytics cluster. The 25GbE control port is dedicated to this synchronization task, ensuring control traffic is isolated from the high-volume data plane.
3.3. Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Acceleration
When deploying critical, high-bandwidth virtual network functions (VNFs), this configuration provides the necessary headroom.
- **Stateful Firewalls/Load Balancers**: Deploying high-scale virtual firewalls (e.g., based on IPtables/NFTables or commercial VNFs) that require significant CPU time for connection tracking and NAT translation. The 400 Gbps capacity ensures the VNF can handle peak demand without dropping packets before the application layer sees them.
- **Network Testbeds**: Serving as a core component in validating new networking hardware or protocols, capable of generating and absorbing traffic at speeds exceeding current standard deployment limits.
Use Case Analysis confirms that configurations with lower PCIe lane counts (e.g., single-socket systems or older dual-socket platforms limited to PCIe Gen3) fail catastrophically under this load profile due to I/O starvation.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To justify the complexity and cost of the Project Chimera configuration, it must be benchmarked against two common alternatives: a high-core-count, lower-I/O server (Configuration Beta) and a specialized FPGA/DPU-based system (Configuration Alpha).
4.1. Configuration Taxonomy
| Configuration | CPU Focus | Network Bandwidth | Memory (Max) | Primary Bottleneck | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | **Project Chimera (Current)** | High Core Count, High PCIe Lanes | 400 Gbps (4x 100GbE) | 2 TB DDR5 | Cooling/Power Density | | **Configuration Beta (High Core/Low I/O)** | Extreme Core Count (e.g., 256+ Cores) | 100 Gbps (2x 100GbE) | 4 TB DDR4 | PCIe Lane Saturation (I/O) | | **Configuration Alpha (DPU/SmartNIC)** | Lower Core Count (e.g., 64 Cores) | 400 Gbps (4x 100GbE) | 512 GB DDR5 | Application Logic Complexity/FPGA Overhead |
4.2. Detailed Feature Comparison
This table highlights why the explicit focus on native PCIe Gen4/Gen5 lanes (as provided by the EPYC 9654) is crucial for this specific role.
| Feature | Project Chimera | Config Beta | Config Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native PCIe Lanes Available for Devices | 256 (Total) | 128 (Total) | 192 (Plus DPU internal fabric) |
| Maximum Installed 100GbE Ports | 4 (Full Speed) | 2 (Potentially limited by bifurcation) | 4 (Offloaded to DPU) |
| Application Logic Processing Power | Very High (192 Cores) | Extreme (256+ Cores) | Moderate (64 Cores + Auxiliary Processing on DPU) |
| Cost Efficiency for Pure Throughput | Moderate-High | Low (Over-provisioned cores) | High (If application complexity is low) |
| Latency Under Load (Stateful) | Excellent (3-5 $\mu$s) | Poor (10-20 $\mu$s due to I/O contention) | Good (1-3 $\mu$s, but dependent on DPU firmware maturity) |
| Memory Bandwidth | Excellent (1.2 TB/s) | Good (1.0 TB/s, DDR4) | Excellent (DDR5) |
- Conclusion*: Configuration Beta suffers from PCIe lane starvation; the CPU has the compute power but cannot ingest data fast enough. Configuration Alpha shifts processing responsibility to the DPU, which is excellent for simple tasks (e.g., basic flow steering) but struggles when complex, high-level application logic (like advanced machine learning inference on packet metadata) is required, as these tasks often perform poorly on embedded DPU processors compared to 96-core CPUs. Chimera strikes the optimal balance for I/O-intensive, CPU-heavy analytical tasks.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Deploying a 400 Gbps aggregation server requires rigorous attention to power delivery, thermal management, and physical reliability, given the high component density and sustained maximum load.
5.1. Power Requirements and Redundancy
The dual 2200W Platinum PSUs are necessary due to the combined TDP of the dual CPUs (720W) and the power draw of the four high-power NICs (each potentially drawing 50-75W under full load, plus cooling overhead).
- **Peak Power Draw**: Estimated sustained draw under 400Gbps load: 1500W – 1750W.
- **Rack Density**: Requires placement in racks certified for high-density power delivery (minimum 10 kW per rack unit). Proper PDU configuration is mandatory to ensure balanced load across phases.
5.2. Thermal Management
The primary maintenance challenge is heat dissipation. The 2U form factor constrains cooling capacity compared to 4U or pedestal systems.
- **Airflow**: Requires server room ambient temperatures maintained below 22°C (71.6°F). The chassis must be installed in a hot/cold aisle configuration with high static pressure airflow directed across the CPU heat sinks and NICs.
- **Liquid Cooling Option**: For environments running at 100% sustained load for weeks or months (common in core network monitoring), the liquid-cooled CPU option is strongly recommended to maintain lower junction temperatures, extending the lifespan of the silicon and preventing thermal throttling, which can manifest as unpredictable latency spikes. Thermal Management in Servers documentation must be strictly followed.
5.3. Firmware and Driver Lifecycle Management
Due to the complexity of the interconnected components (CPU, Chipset, 4x High-Speed NICs, NVMe drives), firmware consistency is paramount to avoid **PCIe bus stability issues** or unexpected buffer overruns on the NICs.
1. **BIOS/UEFI**: Must be updated concurrently with the Chipset Driver to ensure the PCIe topology is correctly initialized for Gen4/Gen5 lane allocation. 2. **NIC Firmware**: Mellanox/Intel firmware must be maintained at the latest stable version recommended by the application vendor (e.g., vendor of the DPI software). Outdated firmware often contains bugs related to flow table eviction or hardware timestamping accuracy. 3. **OS Kernel**: Requires specific kernel versions optimized for high-speed networking, typically utilizing modern scheduler algorithms and supporting RSS configurations that map specific 100GbE queues directly to dedicated CPU core clusters.
5.4. Diagnostics and Monitoring
Standard BMC/IPMI monitoring is insufficient. Advanced monitoring must be implemented:
- **Telemetry Integration**: Utilize in-band management features of the NICs (e.g., Mellanox MLNX_OFED tools) to continuously monitor hardware flow table usage, packet drop counters per queue, and PCIe bus error counters.
- **Jitter Logging**: Specific application monitoring focused on the 99th and 99.9th percentile latency metrics is required, as these indicate brief periods of resource contention that standard CPU utilization metrics mask. Server Monitoring Tools should be configured to alert on latency deviations exceeding 100 ns standard deviation over a 60-second window.
The Chimera configuration represents a bleeding edge of I/O density. Its maintenance demands specialized knowledge beyond standard server administration, requiring expertise in NIC Configuration and high-speed interconnect troubleshooting.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️