Difference between revisions of "Hosting Provider"
(Sever rental) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 18:29, 2 October 2025
Technical Documentation: The "Hosting Provider" Server Configuration
This document details the technical specifications, performance metrics, recommended applications, and maintenance considerations for the standardized server configuration designated as the "Hosting Provider" platform. This design prioritizes high density, predictable I/O throughput, and robust multi-tenancy support, making it the backbone for modern shared and dedicated hosting environments.
1. Hardware Specifications
The "Hosting Provider" configuration is engineered around maximizing core count efficiency while ensuring sufficient memory bandwidth for typical web serving, database operations, and virtualization tasks inherent in a multi-tenant datacenter setting. Reliability and standardized component sourcing are key design pillars.
1.1. Chassis and Platform
The platform utilizes a standardized 2U rackmount chassis from a Tier-1 OEM, designed for high-airflow environments typical of hyperscale facilities.
| Component | Specification |
|---|---|
| Form Factor | 2U Rackmount (EIA-310-D compliant) |
| Motherboard | Dual-Socket Proprietary/Standardized Platform (e.g., Intel C741/C750 or equivalent AMD SP3r3/SP5) |
| Power Supplies (PSU) | 2 x 1600W 80 PLUS Titanium Redundant (N+1 configuration) |
| Cooling Solution | High-static pressure fan array (6x hot-swappable 60mm fans) optimized for 28°C ambient intake. |
| Management Controller | Integrated BMC supporting IPMI 2.0 and Redfish API standards. |
1.2. Central Processing Units (CPU)
The selection criteria for the CPU focus on achieving a high core-to-socket ratio with strong single-thread performance necessary for legacy application hosting, balanced against the efficiency of modern core architectures for containerization.
We currently deploy the following standard configuration:
| Parameter | Specification (Primary Deployment) |
|---|---|
| CPU Model Family | Intel Xeon Scalable (4th/5th Gen - Sapphire Rapids/Emerald Rapids) or AMD EPYC (Genoa/Bergamo) |
| Quantity | 2 Sockets |
| Cores per CPU (Minimum) | 32 Cores (64 Threads) |
| Total Cores / Threads | 64 Cores / 128 Threads (Minimum Base) |
| Base Clock Frequency | $\ge 2.4$ GHz |
| Max Turbo Frequency (Single Core) | $\ge 4.0$ GHz (Dependent on Power Budget Allocation) |
| L3 Cache | $\ge 128$ MB per socket |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | Max 350W per socket (Configurable in BIOS for density optimization) |
Note: For high-density VM hosting, specialized SKUs with higher core counts (up to 96 cores per socket) are used, often necessitating a reduction in maximum clock speed via BIOS tuning to maintain thermal envelopes. See Server Core Density Optimization for details on core provisioning strategies.
1.3. Random Access Memory (RAM)
Memory capacity and speed are critical for multi-tenancy, as memory allocation contention is a common performance bottleneck in shared environments. The configuration mandates high-speed, low-latency DDR5 modules.
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Type | DDR5 ECC RDIMM |
| Total Capacity (Minimum) | 512 GB |
| Total Capacity (Recommended Maximum) | 2 TB (Population of all 32 DIMM slots) |
| Module Size Standard | 32 GB or 64 GB DIMMs |
| Speed | 4800 MT/s (Minimum) or 5600 MT/s (Preferred) |
| Memory Channels Utilized | All 8 Channels per CPU utilized for maximum theoretical bandwidth. |
| Configuration Method | Balanced across all available channels, typically 16 DIMMs per CPU (32 total). |
The memory topology is strictly managed to ensure optimal inter-processor communication latency, adhering to best practices documented in NUMA Node Balancing.
1.4. Storage Subsystem
The storage architecture emphasizes high IOPS consistency and durability, utilizing a multi-tiered approach suitable for varying workload demands (OS/Boot, Metadata, Data). NVMe is mandatory for primary data pools.
1.4.1. Boot and System Storage
Used for the Hypervisor OS (e.g., VMware ESXi, KVM) and critical system logs.
| Drive Type | Quantity | Capacity | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| M.2 NVMe (SATA Mode Disabled) | 2 (Mirrored via HW RAID or Software RAID 1) | 960 GB | Hypervisor/Boot Partition |
1.4.2. Primary Data Storage (NVMe Pool)
This pool handles active tenant workloads, databases, and high-activity filesystems.
| Drive Type | Quantity | Total Raw Capacity | RAID Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.2/E1.S NVMe SSD (Enterprise Grade) | 8 Drives | 15.36 TB per drive (Total $\approx 122.88$ TB Raw) | RAID 10 or ZFS RAIDZ2 (depending on virtualization layer) |
Performance targets for this pool exceed 1.5 million sustained IOPS (4K Random Read/Write mixed workload). This is crucial for meeting Service Level Agreement (SLA) Guarantees for IOPS-sensitive tenants.
1.5. Networking Interface Controllers (NICs)
Redundant, high-throughput networking is non-negotiable. The configuration mandates dual-port, high-speed interfaces, typically utilizing PCIe 5.0 lanes for maximum offload capability.
| Port Group | Quantity | Speed | Interconnect Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Management (OOB) | 1 x Dedicated 1GbE | 1 Gbps | Standard RJ-45 |
| Data Plane A (Primary Uplink) | 2 x Dual-Port Adapter | 25 Gbps per port (Minimum) | SFP28 |
| Data Plane B (Storage/Inter-Node) | 2 x Dual-Port Adapter (Optional configuration for local storage replication) | 100 Gbps per port (Preferred) | QSFP28/QSFP-DD |
The use of RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE) is often enabled on the Data Plane B connections when integrated into a software-defined storage cluster, significantly reducing latency for storage operations across the cluster fabric. Network Interface Card Offloading features (e.g., Checksum, TSO, LRO) are heavily utilized to minimize CPU overhead.
2. Performance Characteristics
The "Hosting Provider" configuration is benchmarked against standardized mixed-workload profiles simulating common hosting scenarios: high-volume web serving, transactional database lookups, and light container orchestration tasks.
2.1. Synthetic Benchmark Results
The following results represent typical performance observed on a fully populated, production-ready system running a standard Linux Kernel (e.g., Ubuntu 24.04 LTS or RHEL 9) configured with KVM virtualization.
2.1.1. CPU Benchmarking (SPECrate 2017 Integer)
This metric reflects sustained throughput, critical for multi-tenant scheduling.
| Configuration Variant | Score (Relative) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Base (64 Cores) | $\approx 550$ | Balanced clock/power profile. |
| High-Density Tuning (96 Cores) | $\approx 780$ | Reduced clock speed (2.0 GHz sustained). |
| Single-Threaded Peak (Reference) | N/A | Focus is on aggregate throughput, not single-thread peak. |
2.1.2. Storage Benchmarks (FIO Testing)
Testing performed against the 8-drive NVMe RAID 10 pool (using 128K block size for sequential and 4K for random).
| Workload Type | IOPS (4K Aligned) | Throughput (MB/s) | Latency (99th Percentile, $\mu s$) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% Sequential Read | N/A | $\approx 18,500$ MB/s | N/A |
| 100% Sequential Write | N/A | $\approx 15,000$ MB/s | N/A |
| 70% Read / 30% Write (Random 4K) | $\approx 1,250,000$ IOPS | $\approx 5,000$ MB/s | $\le 150 \mu s$ |
The low 99th percentile latency is a direct result of using enterprise-grade NVMe SSDs with high endurance ratings (e.g., $>3$ Drive Writes Per Day - DWPD) and optimized Storage Controller Firmware.
2.2. Real-World Performance Profiling
Real-world performance validation focuses on the density of virtual machines (VMs) that can be reliably hosted while maintaining guaranteed service levels.
2.2.1. VM Density Testing
Testing involves deploying standardized VM templates (8 vCPU, 32 GB RAM) configured for typical LAMP stacks or Java application servers.
- **CPU Overcommit Ratio:** Stable operation observed up to a 6:1 CPU overcommit ratio (48 physical cores supporting 288 vCPUs) before observable degradation in multi-threaded transactional workloads ($\ge 10\%$ latency increase).
- **Memory Utilization:** The system maintains sub-1% ballooning/swapping activity at 90% physical RAM utilization, provided the underlying storage I/O subsystem is not saturated.
- **Network Saturation Point:** The 25GbE uplinks typically saturate around 45-50 concurrent tenants performing high-volume HTTP transactions, indicating the networking fabric is generally well-scaled for the CPU/RAM combination.
The performance profile confirms this configuration is **I/O bound** before it becomes CPU bound under heavy, mixed-load conditions, reinforcing the necessity of the high-performance NVMe array. For further reading on I/O profiling, consult Storage Latency Analysis.
3. Recommended Use Cases
The "Hosting Provider" configuration is optimized for environments requiring high resource density, predictable resource allocation, and strong fault tolerance.
This is the primary target market. The configuration supports hundreds of small to medium-sized websites, leveraging virtualization/containerization to divide resources efficiently.
- **Requirements Met:** High disk IOPS for database lookups (MySQL/PostgreSQL), sufficient RAM for PHP/Node.js application processes, and robust network egress.
3.2. Managed Kubernetes Clusters (Control Plane/Worker Nodes)
The high core count and large memory capacity make this platform excellent for hosting control plane components (etcd, API servers) or dense worker nodes for stateless microservices.
- **Advantage:** The dual CPU architecture provides excellent NUMA locality for container runtime processes, improving scheduling predictability compared to single-socket high-core count systems. See NUMA Optimization for Kubernetes.
3.3. Database Hosting (Mid-Tier)
While dedicated bare-metal might be preferred for Tier-0 OLTP systems, this configuration excels at hosting high-traffic, mid-tier relational and NoSQL databases where NVMe performance is paramount but the total dataset size remains below 50TB per host.
- **Configuration Note:** When deployed for database use, the CPU TDP limits may be relaxed slightly (if cooling allows) to maximize clock speed for transactional latency reduction.
3.4. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Density Testing
In specific scenarios where VDI density is prioritized over graphical performance, this platform can support up to 150 light-use virtual desktops, primarily due to the large RAM pool and high core count available for scheduling. VDI Density Metrics provide comparative data.
3.5. Environments NOT Recommended
This configuration is suboptimal for: 1. **High-Performance Computing (HPC) Clusters:** Lacks specialized accelerators (GPUs/FPGAs) and requires much higher per-core clock speeds. 2. **Massive Scale-Up Databases (e.g., Single large Oracle/SQL Server instances):** These often require 4TB+ RAM configurations and specialized, higher-TDP CPUs.
4. Comparison with Similar Configurations
To contextualize the "Hosting Provider" configuration, we compare it against two common alternatives: the "High-Density Compute" server (optimized for pure CPU/RAM ratio) and the "Storage Density Array" (optimized for raw HDD/SSD capacity).
4.1. Configuration Comparison Table
| Feature | Hosting Provider (2U, Balanced) | High-Density Compute (1U, CPU Focused) | Storage Density Array (4U, Capacity Focused) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Size | 2U | 1U | 4U |
| Max CPU Cores (Total) | $\approx 128$ | $\approx 192$ (Lower TDP) | $\approx 64$ |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 TB | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Primary Storage Type | 8 x NVMe U.2/E1.S | 2 x NVMe M.2 (Boot Only) | 24 x 3.5" SATA/SAS HDD + 4 x NVMe Cache |
| Max Network Speed (Uplink) | 2 x 25 Gbps (Dual Port) | 4 x 100 Gbps (Quad Port) | 2 x 10 Gbps |
| Target Workload | Multi-Tenancy, Web Services | High-Scale Virtualization, In-Memory Caching | Archival, Backup Targets, Large File Serving |
4.2. Performance Trade-off Analysis
The "Hosting Provider" server occupies the critical middle ground.
- **Vs. High-Density Compute:** While the 1U configuration offers more total CPU cores, it severely compromises I/O bandwidth and storage flexibility. A 1U chassis often limits power delivery to CPUs, leading to lower sustained clock speeds under load, making the 2U server's better thermal headroom an advantage for consistent performance. See Thermal Throttling in 1U Systems.
- **Vs. Storage Density Array:** The Storage Array sacrifices nearly all transactional performance (IOPS) for raw capacity. It is unsuitable for database or active web serving due to reliance on slower SATA/SAS interfaces, even with NVMe caching. The Hosting Provider is designed for *fast* access, not *large* access.
The selection of 25GbE networking over 100GbE in the Hosting Provider tier (Data Plane A) is a deliberate cost/performance decision; 25GbE provides sufficient throughput for most tenants while allowing for more physical PCIe lanes to be dedicated to the critical NVMe storage subsystem.
5. Maintenance Considerations
Maintaining the high availability and performance consistency of the "Hosting Provider" configuration requires adherence to strict operational procedures regarding power, cooling, and component replacement.
5.1. Power Requirements and Redundancy
Given the dual 1600W 80+ Titanium PSUs, the system exhibits excellent power efficiency but draws significant peak power.
- **Maximum Continuous Power Draw (Estimate):** $\approx 1100$ Watts (Full CPU load, 8x NVMe active, 80% RAM utilization).
- **Peak Power Draw (Spike):** Up to 1800 Watts during initial boot or high-load storage initialization.
- **Rack Power Density:** When deployed at scale, careful planning of rack PDUs is required. A standard 30A 208V rack can typically support 8 to 10 of these servers before exceeding safe continuous load limits. Refer to Datacenter Power Planning Guide for detailed density calculations.
Redundancy ($N+1$ PSU) is mandatory. Failover testing of the Power Distribution Unit (PDU) connections must be performed quarterly.
5.2. Thermal Management and Airflow
The density of components (two high-TDP CPUs and 8 NVMe drives) necessitates superior cooling infrastructure.
- **Intake Air Temperature:** Must be maintained below $28^\circ \text{C}$ (ASHRAE Class A1/A2 compliance) for guaranteed sustained boost clocks.
- **Fan Redundancy:** The hot-swappable fan array allows for single-fan failure without immediate thermal alarm, provided intake temperatures are nominal. Replacement of failed fans should occur within 48 hours to maintain adequate thermal headroom.
- **Dust Management:** Due to high static pressure fan requirements, filter integrity is crucial. Systems deployed in non-certified environments may require specialized front bezels or increased cleaning schedules to prevent degradation of heat sink performance, which directly impacts CPU Performance Degradation Due to Thermal Runaway.
5.3. Component Lifecycle Management
The primary failure points in this configuration are the SSDs and the high-speed NICs.
5.3.1. Storage Endurance Monitoring
The enterprise NVMe drives are rated for high endurance, but continuous I/O saturation requires proactive monitoring.
- **Metric:** Track the S.M.A.R.T. Health Status (specifically Media and Data Units Remaining) across the entire pool.
- **Action Threshold:** If any drive falls below 10% remaining life, it must be scheduled for replacement during the next maintenance window, regardless of current operational status, to avoid cascading failure in the RAID/ZFS array.
5.3.2. Firmware and Driver Updates
Due to the reliance on PCIe 5.0 interconnects and sophisticated storage controllers, firmware synchronization is critical for stability.
- **BIOS/UEFI:** Must be kept within one major revision of the OEM baseline to ensure compatibility with the latest CPU microcode and memory training optimizations.
- **NIC Firmware:** Critical for maintaining low latency on the 25GbE/100GbE ports. Outdated firmware can introduce unpredictable jitter, violating hosting SLAs. Updates must be validated in a staging environment before deployment across the production fleet. Firmware Validation Protocols detail this process.
5.4. Remote Management and Diagnostics
The BMC/IPMI interface is the first line of defense for remote troubleshooting.
- **Prerequisites:** Continuous network connectivity on the dedicated OOB port.
- **Key Monitoring Points:** Remote Console access must be verified monthly. Critical sensor readings (CPU Core Temp, DIMM Temp, PSU Status) must be actively polled by the DCIM system every 5 minutes. Any deviation outside the $\pm 5^\circ \text{C}$ range from the fleet average requires immediate investigation. Access to the Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) logs is essential for diagnosing POST failures or power cycling events.
The standardized nature of this build simplifies maintenance; spare parts inventories can be consolidated, reducing Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) significantly compared to bespoke server builds.
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️