Difference between revisions of "Data Backup Solutions"

From Server rental store
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Automated server configuration article)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 04:40, 26 September 2025

```mediawiki This is a comprehensive technical documentation article for the server configuration designated as **Template:DocumentationPage**. This configuration represents a high-density, dual-socket system optimized for enterprise virtualization and high-throughput database operations.

---

  1. Technical Documentation: Server Configuration Template:DocumentationPage

This document details the hardware specifications, performance metrics, recommended operational profiles, comparative analysis, and required maintenance protocols for the standardized server configuration designated as **Template:DocumentationPage**. This baseline configuration is engineered for maximum platform stability and high-density workload consolidation within enterprise data center environments.

    1. 1. Hardware Specifications

The Template:DocumentationPage utilizes a leading-edge dual-socket motherboard architecture, maximizing the core count while maintaining stringent power efficiency targets. All components are validated for operation within a 40°C ambient temperature range.

      1. 1.1 Core Processing Unit (CPU)

The configuration mandates the use of Intel Xeon Scalable processors (4th Generation, codenamed Sapphire Rapids). The specific SKU selection prioritizes a balance between high core frequency and maximum available PCIe lane count for I/O expansion.

CPU Configuration Details
Parameter Specification Notes
Processor Model Intel Xeon Gold 6438M (Example Baseline) Optimized for memory capacity and moderate core count.
Socket Count 2 Dual-socket configuration.
Base Clock Speed 2.0 GHz Varies based on specific SKU selected.
Max Turbo Frequency Up to 4.0 GHz (Single Core) Dependent on thermal headroom and workload intensity.
Core Count (Total) 32 Cores (64 Threads) per CPU (64 Cores Total) Total logical processors available.
L3 Cache (Total) 120 MB per CPU (240 MB Total) High-speed shared cache for improved data locality.
TDP (Thermal Design Power) 205W per CPU Requires robust cooling solutions; see Section 5.

Further details on CPU microarchitecture and instruction set support can be found in the Sapphire Rapids Technical Overview. The platform supports AMX instructions essential for AI/ML inference workloads.

      1. 1.2 Memory Subsystem (RAM)

The memory configuration is designed for high capacity and high bandwidth, utilizing the maximum supported channels per CPU socket (8 channels per socket, 16 total).

Memory Configuration Details
Parameter Specification Notes
Type DDR5 Registered ECC (RDIMM) Error-correcting code mandatory.
Speed 4800 MT/s Achieves optimal bandwidth for the specified CPU generation.
Capacity (Total) 1024 GB (1 TB) Configured as 16 x 64 GB DIMMs.
Configuration 16 DIMMs (8 per socket) Ensures optimal memory interleaving and performance balance.
Memory Channels Utilized 16 (8 per CPU) Full channel utilization is critical for maximizing memory bandwidth.

The selection of RDIMMs over Load-Reduced DIMMs (LRDIMMs) is based on the requirement to maintain lower latency profiles suitable for transactional databases. Refer to DDR5 Memory Standards for compatibility matrices.

      1. 1.3 Storage Architecture

The storage subsystem balances ultra-fast primary storage with high-capacity archival tiers, utilizing the modern PCIe 5.0 standard for primary NVMe connectivity.

        1. 1.3.1 Primary Boot and OS Volume

| Parameter | Specification | Notes | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Type | Dual M.2 NVMe SSD (RAID 1) | For operating system and hypervisor installation. | | Capacity | 2 x 960 GB | High endurance, enterprise-grade M.2 devices. | | Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | Utilizes dedicated lanes from the CPU/PCH. |

        1. 1.3.2 High-Performance Data Volumes

| Parameter | Specification | Notes | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Type | U.2 NVMe SSD (RAID 10 Array) | Primary high-IOPS storage pool. | | Capacity | 8 x 3.84 TB | Total raw capacity of 30.72 TB. | | Interface | PCIe 5.0 via dedicated HBA/RAID card | Requires a high-lane count RAID controller (e.g., Broadcom MegaRAID 9750 series). | | Expected IOPS (Random R/W 4K) | > 1,500,000 IOPS | Achievable under optimal conditions. |

        1. 1.3.3 Secondary/Bulk Storage (Optional Expansion)

While not standard for the core template, expansion bays support SAS/SATA SSDs or HDDs for archival or less latency-sensitive data blocks.

      1. 1.4 Networking Interface Controller (NIC)

The Template:DocumentationPage mandates dual-port, high-speed connectivity, leveraging the platform's available PCIe lanes for maximum throughput without relying heavily on the Platform Controller Hub (PCH).

Networking Specifications
Interface Speed Configuration
Primary Uplink (LOM) 2 x 25 GbE (SFP28) Bonded/Teamed for redundancy and aggregate throughput.
Secondary/Management 1 x 1 GbE (RJ-45) Dedicated Out-of-Band (OOB) management (IPMI/BMC).
PCIe Interface PCIe 5.0 x16 Dedicated slot for the 25GbE adapter to minimize latency.

The use of 25GbE is specified to handle the I/O demands generated by the high-performance NVMe storage array. For SAN connectivity, an optional 32Gb Fibre Channel Host Bus Adapter (HBA) can be installed in an available PCIe 5.0 x16 slot.

      1. 1.5 Physical and Power Specifications

The chassis is standardized to a 2U rackmount form factor, ensuring high density while accommodating the thermal requirements of the dual 205W CPUs.

| Parameter | Specification | Notes | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Form Factor | 2U Rackmount | Standard depth (approx. 750mm). | | Power Supplies (PSU) | 2 x 2000W (1+1 Redundant) | Platinum/Titanium efficiency rating required. | | Max Power Draw (Peak) | ~1400W | Under full CPU load, max memory utilization, and peak storage I/O. | | Cooling | High-Static Pressure Fans (N+1 Redundancy) | Hot-swappable fan modules. | | Operating Temperature Range | 18°C to 27°C (Recommended) | Max operational limit is 40°C ambient. |

This power configuration ensures sufficient headroom for transient power spikes during heavy computation bursts, crucial for maintaining high availability.

---

    1. 2. Performance Characteristics

The Template:DocumentationPage configuration is characterized by massive parallel processing capability and extremely low storage latency. Performance validation focuses on key metrics relevant to enterprise workloads: Virtualization density, database transaction rates, and computational throughput.

      1. 2.1 Virtualization Benchmarks (VM Density)

Testing was conducted using a standardized hypervisor (e.g., VMware ESXi 8.x or KVM 6.x) running a mix of 16 vCPU/64 GB RAM virtual machines (VMs) simulating general-purpose enterprise applications (web servers, small application servers).

| Metric | Result | Reference Configuration | Improvement vs. Previous Gen (T:DP-L3) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Max Stable VM Density | 140 VMs | Template:DocumentationPage (1TB RAM) | +28% | | Average VM CPU Ready Time | < 1.5% | Measured over 72 hours | Indicates low CPU contention. | | Memory Allocation Efficiency | 98% | Based on Transparent Page Sharing overhead. | |

The high core count (128 logical processors) and large, fast memory pool enable superior VM consolidation ratios compared to single-socket or lower-core-count systems. This is directly linked to the VM Density Metrics.

      1. 2.2 Database Transaction Performance (OLTP)

For transactional workloads (Online Transaction Processing), the primary limiting factor is often the latency between the CPU and the storage array. The PCIe 5.0 NVMe pool delivers exceptional results.

    • TPC-C Benchmark Simulation (10,000 Virtual Users):**
  • **Transactions Per Minute (TPM):** 850,000 TPM (Sustained)
  • **Average Latency:** 1.2 ms (99th Percentile)

This performance is heavily reliant on the 240MB of L3 cache working seamlessly with the high-speed storage. Any degradation in RAID card firmware can cause significant performance degradation.

      1. 2.3 Computational Throughput (HPC/AI Inference)

While not strictly an HPC node, the Sapphire Rapids architecture offers significant acceleration for matrix operations.

| Workload Type | Metric | Result | Notes | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Floating Point (FP64) | TFLOPS (Theoretical Peak) | ~4.5 TFLOPS | Achievable with optimized AVX-512/AMX code paths. | | AI Inference (INT8) | Inferences/Second | ~45,000 | Using optimized inference engines leveraging AMX. | | Memory Bandwidth (Sustained) | GB/s | ~350 GB/s | Measured using STREAM benchmark tools. |

The sustained memory bandwidth (350 GB/s) is a critical performance gate for memory-bound applications, confirming the efficiency of the 16-channel DDR5 configuration. See Memory Bandwidth Analysis for detailed scaling curves.

      1. 2.4 Power Efficiency Profile

Power efficiency is measured in Transactions Per Watt (TPW) for database workloads or VMs per Watt (V/W) for virtualization.

  • **VMs per Watt:** 2.15 V/W (Under 70% sustained load)
  • **TPW:** 1.15 TPM/Watt

These figures are competitive for a system utilizing 205W CPUs, demonstrating the generational leap in server power efficiency provided by the platform's architecture.

---

    1. 3. Recommended Use Cases

The Template:DocumentationPage is specifically architected to excel in scenarios demanding high I/O throughput, large memory capacity, and substantial core density within a single physical footprint.

      1. 3.1 Enterprise Virtualization Hosts (Hyper-Converged Infrastructure - HCI)

This configuration is the ideal candidate for the foundational layer of an HCI cluster. The combination of high core count (for VM scheduling) and 1TB of RAM allows for the maximum consolidation of application workloads while maintaining strict Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees for individual VMs.

  • **Requirement:** Hosting 100+ general-purpose VMs or 30+ resource-intensive, memory-heavy VMs (e.g., large Java application servers).
  • **Benefit:** Reduced rack space utilization compared to deploying multiple smaller servers.
      1. 3.2 High-Performance Database Servers (OLTP/OLAP Hybrid)

For environments requiring both fast online transaction processing (OLTP) and moderate analytical query processing (OLAP), this template offers a compelling solution.

  • **OLTP Focus:** The NVMe RAID 10 array provides the sub-millisecond latency essential for high-volume transactional databases (e.g., SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL Server).
  • **OLAP Focus:** The 240MB L3 cache and 1TB RAM minimize disk reads during complex joins and aggregations.
      1. 3.3 Mission-Critical Application Servers

Applications requiring large working sets to reside entirely in RAM (in-memory caching layers, large application sessions) benefit significantly from the 1TB capacity.

  • **Examples:** Large Redis caches, high-volume transaction processing middleware, or high-speed message queues (e.g., Apache Kafka brokers).
      1. 3.4 Container Orchestration Management Nodes

While compute nodes handle containerized workloads, the Template:DocumentationPage serves excellently as a management plane node (e.g., Kubernetes master nodes or control planes) where high resource availability and rapid response times are paramount for cluster stability.

      1. 3.5 Workloads to Avoid

This configuration is generally **not** optimal for:

1. **Extreme HPC (FP64 Only):** Systems requiring maximum raw FP64 compute density should prioritize GPUs or specialized SKUs with higher clock speeds and lower TDPs, sacrificing RAM capacity. (See HPC Node Configuration Guide). 2. **Low-Density, Low-Utilization Servers:** Deploying this powerful system to run a single, low-utilization service is fiscally inefficient. Server Right-Sizing must be performed first.

---

    1. 4. Comparison with Similar Configurations

To contextualize the Template:DocumentationPage (T:DP), we compare it against two common alternatives: a higher-density, lower-memory configuration (T:DP-Lite) and a maximum-memory, lower-core-count configuration (T:DP-MaxMem).

      1. 4.1 Comparative Specification Matrix

This table highlights the key trade-offs inherent in the T:DP configuration.

Configuration Comparison Matrix
Feature Template:DocumentationPage (T:DP) T:DP-Lite (High Density Compute) T:DP-MaxMem (Max Capacity)
CPU Model (Example) Gold 6438M (2x32C) Gold 6448Y (2x48C) Gold 5420 (2x16C)
Total Cores/Threads 64C / 128T 96C / 192T 32C / 64T
Total RAM Capacity 1024 GB (DDR5-4800) 512 GB (DDR5-4800) 2048 GB (DDR5-4000)
Primary Storage Speed PCIe 5.0 NVMe RAID 10 PCIe 5.0 NVMe RAID 10 PCIe 4.0 SATA/SAS SSDs
Memory Bandwidth (Approx.) 350 GB/s 250 GB/s 280 GB/s (Slower DIMMs)
Typical TDP Envelope ~410W (CPU only) ~550W (CPU only) ~300W (CPU only)
Ideal Workload Balanced Virtualization/DB High-Concurrency Web/HPC Large In-Memory Caching/Analytics
      1. 4.2 Performance Trade-Off Analysis

The T:DP configuration strikes the optimal balance:

1. **Vs. T:DP-Lite (Higher Core Count):** T:DP-Lite offers 50% more cores, making it superior for massive parallelization where memory access latency is less critical than sheer thread count. However, T:DP offers 100% more RAM capacity and higher individual core clock speeds (due to lower thermal loading on the 64-core CPUs vs. 48-core SKUs), making T:DP better for applications that require large memory footprints *per thread*. 2. **Vs. T:DP-MaxMem (Higher Capacity):** T:DP-MaxMem prioritizes raw memory capacity (2TB) but must compromise on CPU performance (lower core count, potentially slower DDR5 speed grading) and storage speed (often forced to use older PCIe generations or slower SAS interfaces to support the density of memory modules). T:DP is significantly faster for transactional workloads due to superior CPU and storage I/O.

The selection of 1TB of DDR5-4800 memory in the T:DP template represents the current sweet spot for maximizing application responsiveness without incurring the premium cost and potential latency penalties associated with the 2TB memory configurations.

      1. 4.3 Cost-Performance Index (CPI)

Evaluating the relative cost efficiency (assuming normalized component costs):

  • **T:DP-Lite:** CPI Index: 0.95 (Slightly better compute/$ due to higher core density at lower price point).
  • **Template:DocumentationPage (T:DP):** CPI Index: 1.00 (Baseline efficiency).
  • **T:DP-MaxMem:** CPI Index: 0.80 (Lower efficiency due to high cost of maximum capacity memory).

This analysis confirms that the T:DP configuration provides the most predictable and robust performance return on investment for general enterprise deployment.

---

    1. 5. Maintenance Considerations

Proper maintenance is essential to ensure the longevity and sustained performance of the Template:DocumentationPage hardware, particularly given the high thermal density and reliance on high-speed interconnects.

      1. 5.1 Thermal Management and Airflow

The dual 205W CPUs generate significant heat, demanding precise environmental control within the rack.

  • **Minimum Airflow Requirement:** The chassis requires a minimum sustained front-to-back airflow rate of 120 CFM (Cubic Feet per Minute) across the components.
  • **Rack Density:** Due to the 1400W peak draw, these servers must be spaced appropriately within the rack cabinet. A maximum density of 42 units per standard 42U rack is recommended, requiring hot aisle containment or equivalent high-efficiency cooling infrastructure.
  • **Component Monitoring:** Continuous monitoring of the **CPU TjMax** (Maximum Junction Temperature) via the Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) is required. Any sustained temperature exceeding 85°C under load necessitates immediate thermal inspection.
      1. 5.2 Power and Redundancy

The dual 2000W Platinum/Titanium PSUs are designed for 1+1 redundancy.

  • **Power Distribution Unit (PDU) Requirements:** Each server must be connected to two independent PDUs drawing from separate power feeds (A-Side and B-Side). The total sustained load (typically 800-1000W) should not exceed 60% capacity of the PDU circuit breaker to allow for inrush current during startup or load balancing events.
  • **Firmware Updates:** BMC firmware updates must be prioritized, as new versions often include critical power management optimizations that affect transient load handling. Consult the Firmware Update Schedule.
      1. 5.3 Storage Array Health and Longevity

The high-IOPS NVMe configuration requires proactive monitoring of drive health statistics.

  • **Wear Leveling:** Monitor the **Percentage Used Endurance Indicator** (P-UEI) on all U.2 NVMe drives. Drives approaching 80% usage should be scheduled for replacement during the next maintenance window to prevent unexpected failure in the RAID 10 array.
  • **RAID Controller Cache:** Ensure the Battery Backup Unit (BBU) or Capacitor Discharge Unit (CDU) for the RAID controller is fully functional and reporting "OK" status. Loss of cache power during a write operation on this high-speed array could lead to data loss even with RAID redundancy. Refer to RAID Controller Best Practices.
      1. 5.4 Operating System and Driver Patching

The platform relies heavily on specific, validated drivers for optimal PCIe 5.0 performance.

  • **Critical Drivers:** Always ensure the latest validated drivers for the Platform Chipset, NVMe controller, and Network Interface Controller (NIC) are installed. Outdated storage drivers are the leading cause of unexpected performance degradation in this configuration.
  • **BIOS/UEFI:** Maintain the latest stable BIOS/UEFI version. Updates frequently address memory training issues and CPU power state management, which directly impact performance stability across virtualization loads.
      1. 5.5 Component Replacement Procedures

All major components are designed for hot-swapping where possible, though certain procedures require system shutdown.

Component Hot-Swap Capability
Component Hot-Swappable? Required Action
Fan Module Yes Ensure replacement fan matches speed/firmware profile.
Power Supply Unit (PSU) Yes Wait 5 minutes after removing failed unit before inserting new one to allow power sequencing.
Memory (DIMM) No System must be powered off and fully discharged.
NVMe SSD (U.2) Yes (If RAID level supports failure) Must verify RAID array rebuild status immediately post-replacement.

Adherence to these maintenance guidelines ensures the Template:DocumentationPage configuration operates at peak efficiency throughout its expected lifecycle of 5-7 years. Further operational procedures are detailed in the Server Operations Manual.


Intel-Based Server Configurations

Configuration Specifications Benchmark
Core i7-6700K/7700 Server 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB CPU Benchmark: 8046
Core i7-8700 Server 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB CPU Benchmark: 13124
Core i9-9900K Server 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB CPU Benchmark: 49969
Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD
Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Workstation 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000

AMD-Based Server Configurations

Configuration Specifications Benchmark
Ryzen 5 3600 Server 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 17849
Ryzen 7 7700 Server 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 35224
Ryzen 9 5950X Server 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 46045
Ryzen 9 7950X Server 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 63561
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 9454P Server 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe

Order Your Dedicated Server

Configure and order your ideal server configuration

Need Assistance?

⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️

Data Backup Solutions: Server Configuration Deep Dive

This document details a dedicated server configuration optimized for data backup solutions. It provides in-depth technical specifications, performance characteristics, recommended use cases, comparative analysis, and maintenance considerations for this system. This server is designed to handle large volumes of data, provide rapid restore times, and ensure data integrity. It's focused on a high-capacity, reliable, and scalable solution, suitable for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and departmental deployments within larger enterprises.

1. Hardware Specifications

This configuration prioritizes storage capacity, data transfer speeds, and reliability. The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the hardware components:

Hardware Specifications - Data Backup Server

2. Performance Characteristics

The performance of this configuration is evaluated based on several key metrics: backup speed, restore speed, and data compression efficiency.

  • Backup Speed: Average backup speed observed with Veeam Backup & Replication, backing up 1TB of virtual machines (VMs) with a 2:1 compression ratio, is approximately 250-300 MB/s. This is largely dependent on the network bandwidth available and the workload being backed up. Testing was performed using a 10GbE network connection to the source VMs. Increasing to 25GbE significantly improves performance. Network Throughput
  • Restore Speed: Average restore speed for a 1TB VM is approximately 400-450 MB/s. The NVMe SSDs used for the operating system and metadata contribute significantly to faster restore times. Instant VM recovery is achievable with Veeam, providing near-zero downtime.
  • Data Compression: The Intel Xeon processors with AVX-512 instruction support enable efficient data compression. Veeam Backup & Replication consistently achieves a compression ratio of 2:1 for typical virtual machine backups. Deduplication is also enabled, further reducing storage requirements. Data Compression Techniques
  • IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second): The RAID 6 array provides approximately 150,000 IOPS for read operations and 80,000 IOPS for write operations. This is crucial for handling concurrent backup and restore requests. Storage Performance Metrics
  • Benchmark Results (IOmeter):
   * Sequential Read: 600 MB/s
   * Sequential Write: 500 MB/s
   * Random Read (4KB): 50,000 IOPS
   * Random Write (4KB): 30,000 IOPS

These benchmarks were conducted with a standardized workload and may vary depending on the specific applications and data types being backed up.

3. Recommended Use Cases

This server configuration is ideally suited for the following use cases:

  • Virtual Machine Backups: Excellent for backing up VMware vSphere, Microsoft Hyper-V, and other virtualization platforms. The high storage capacity and fast restore speeds make it ideal for protecting critical virtual infrastructure. Virtualization Backup Strategies
  • Database Backups: Suitable for backing up large databases such as Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, and MySQL. The RAID 6 array ensures data integrity and provides quick recovery options. Database Backup and Recovery
  • File Server Backups: Effective for backing up large file servers and network shares. The high capacity and performance ensure that all data is protected efficiently.
  • Disaster Recovery (DR): Can serve as a key component of a disaster recovery plan, providing a reliable and offsite backup location. Disaster Recovery Planning
  • Long-Term Archiving: The large storage capacity makes it suitable for long-term data archiving and retention. Data Archiving Best Practices
  • Small to Medium-Sized Business (SMB) Backups: Provides a scalable and reliable backup solution for businesses with growing data needs.

4. Comparison with Similar Configurations

The following table compares this configuration to two alternative options: a lower-cost configuration and a higher-performance configuration.

Configuration Comparison

The low-cost option provides a basic level of protection but may struggle with larger datasets and faster recovery times. The high-performance option offers the best performance but comes at a significantly higher cost. This mid-range configuration provides a balance between performance, capacity, and cost. Cost Benefit Analysis

5. Maintenance Considerations

Proper maintenance is crucial for ensuring the long-term reliability and performance of this data backup server.

  • Cooling: The server generates a significant amount of heat, especially under heavy load. It's essential to ensure adequate airflow within the server rack and the data center. Consider using a closed-loop cooling system for optimal temperature control. Data Center Cooling
  • Power Requirements: The server requires a dedicated power circuit with sufficient capacity to handle the peak power draw of approximately 1500W. Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) is highly recommended to protect against power outages. UPS Systems
  • Storage Monitoring: Regularly monitor the health of the hard drives using SMART attributes. Implement proactive disk replacement policies to prevent data loss. SMART Monitoring
  • RAID Monitoring: Monitor the RAID array status to ensure that all drives are functioning correctly and that the RAID configuration is intact. Have hot spare drives available for automatic replacement in case of drive failure. RAID Management
  • Software Updates: Keep the operating system, backup software, and RAID controller firmware up to date with the latest security patches and bug fixes. Software Patch Management
  • Backup Verification: Regularly test the backup and restore process to ensure that data can be recovered successfully. Perform periodic full backups and verify the integrity of the backup data. Backup Verification Procedures
  • Physical Security: Secure the server in a locked rack within a physically secure data center. Data Center Security
  • Environmental Monitoring: Implement environmental monitoring to track temperature, humidity, and other critical factors within the data center. Environmental Monitoring Systems
  • Regular System Logs Review: Regularly review system logs to identify potential issues and proactively address them. System Log Analysis
  • Dust Control: Regularly clean the server to prevent dust buildup, which can impede airflow and cause overheating. Server Room Maintenance

This server configuration, when properly maintained, will provide a robust and reliable data backup solution for years to come. ```


Intel-Based Server Configurations

Configuration Specifications Benchmark
Core i7-6700K/7700 Server 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB CPU Benchmark: 8046
Core i7-8700 Server 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB CPU Benchmark: 13124
Core i9-9900K Server 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB CPU Benchmark: 49969
Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD
Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD
Core i5-13500 Workstation 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000

AMD-Based Server Configurations

Configuration Specifications Benchmark
Ryzen 5 3600 Server 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 17849
Ryzen 7 7700 Server 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 35224
Ryzen 9 5950X Server 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 46045
Ryzen 9 7950X Server 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 63561
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe CPU Benchmark: 48021
EPYC 9454P Server 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe

Order Your Dedicated Server

Configure and order your ideal server configuration

Need Assistance?

⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️