View source for API Load Testing Results

# API Load Testing Results

== Overview ==

API Load Testing Results represent a critical component of ensuring the stability, scalability, and responsiveness of any modern web application, and by extension, the [[Dedicated Servers]] hosting those applications. This article details the methodology and findings of recent load tests conducted on our infrastructure, specifically focusing on the performance of APIs under varying levels of concurrent user activity. Understanding these results is paramount for optimizing application performance, identifying potential bottlenecks, and ultimately delivering a superior user experience.  We aim to provide a comprehensive overview for developers, system administrators, and anyone interested in the performance characteristics of API-driven architectures.  This isn't merely about peak throughput; it's about understanding how the system *behaves* under stress, identifying breaking points, and informing capacity planning.  The tests covered a range of API endpoints, simulating realistic user workflows.  The focus was on key performance indicators (KPIs) such as response time, error rate, and throughput.  The data presented here will assist you in selecting the appropriate [[Server Configuration]] for your project.  These results directly inform our recommendations for resource allocation, particularly concerning [[CPU Architecture]] and [[Memory Specifications]]. The implications extend beyond simple hosting; it influences how we configure our [[Network Infrastructure]] to guarantee consistent performance.

== Specifications ==

The load tests were performed on a dedicated testing environment mirroring our production infrastructure. Below are the detailed specifications of the testing hardware and software.  The core objective of these tests was to determine the baseline performance and scalability of our APIs, and to provide data for future improvement.  The ‘API Load Testing Results’ are directly tied to these specifications.

{| class="wikitable"
! Component
! Specification
! Details
|-
| **Server Hardware** || Dedicated Server || Dell PowerEdge R750
|-
| CPU || AMD EPYC 7763 || 64 Cores, 128 Threads, 2.45 GHz Base Clock
|-
| Memory || 256 GB DDR4 ECC REG || 3200 MHz, 8 x 32GB DIMMs
|-
| Storage || 2 x 1TB NVMe SSD (RAID 1) || Samsung 980 Pro
|-
| Network Interface || 10 Gbps Ethernet || Intel X710-DA4
|-
| Operating System || Ubuntu Server 22.04 LTS || Kernel 5.15.0-76-generic
|-
| Web Server || Nginx 1.22.0 || Configured for optimal performance
|-
| Application Stack || Python 3.10, Flask || Utilizing Gunicorn as WSGI server
|-
| Database || PostgreSQL 14 || Configured with appropriate connection pooling
|-
| Load Testing Tool || Locust || Python-based load testing framework
|}

The software environment was configured to closely resemble our production environment, ensuring the accuracy and relevance of the results. We employed industry-standard monitoring tools, including Prometheus and Grafana, to collect detailed metrics during the tests.  Proper [[Database Optimization]] was crucial to achieving realistic results.  We also implemented robust [[Security Measures]] to isolate the testing environment from production systems.  The choice of PostgreSQL was deliberate, given its prevalence in many of our customer's applications.

== Use Cases ==

The APIs tested represent common functionalities found in a variety of web applications. Understanding these use cases provides context for the performance results.

*   **User Authentication:** Simulating user login and registration requests. This tests the API's ability to handle a large number of authentication attempts concurrently.
*   **Data Retrieval:**  Testing the performance of APIs that retrieve data from the database, such as product listings, user profiles, and search results.  This heavily relies on efficient [[Data Indexing]].
*   **Data Creation/Update:** Simulating API calls that create or update data, such as submitting forms, adding comments, or placing orders.  This is a write-intensive workload that stresses the database and storage systems.
*   **Complex Calculations:**  Testing APIs that perform computationally intensive tasks, such as image processing or financial calculations. This assesses the CPU performance.
*   **Real-time Data Streaming:** Evaluating the API's ability to handle continuous data streams, like chat applications or live dashboards.

Each use case was designed to mimic real-world user behavior as closely as possible.  We varied the request rate, concurrency levels, and data payload sizes to create a comprehensive testing scenario.  The selection of these use cases was guided by our analysis of common customer application patterns, ensuring that the results are relevant to a broad range of scenarios.

== Performance ==

The following tables summarize the performance metrics obtained during the load tests.  The results are presented for each use case, showing the average response time, throughput (requests per second), and error rate at different concurrency levels.  These ‘API Load Testing Results’ are vital for scaling applications.

{| class="wikitable"
! Use Case
! Concurrency (Users)
! Average Response Time (ms)
! Throughput (RPS)
! Error Rate (%)
|-
| User Authentication || 100 || 50 || 1200 || 0.1
|-
| User Authentication || 500 || 200 || 2500 || 0.5
|-
| User Authentication || 1000 || 500 || 2000 || 2.0
|-
| Data Retrieval || 100 || 20 || 5000 || 0.0
|-
| Data Retrieval || 500 || 80 || 6250 || 0.2
|-
| Data Retrieval || 1000 || 200 || 5000 || 1.0
|-
| Data Creati

[[Category:Server Hardware]]


== Intel-Based Server Configurations ==
{| class="wikitable"
! Configuration
! Specifications
! Price
|-
| [[Core i7-6700K/7700 Server]]
| 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB
| 40$
|-
| [[Core i7-8700 Server]]
| 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB
| 50$
|-
| [[Core i9-9900K Server]]
| 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB
| 65$
|-
| [[Core i9-13900 Server (64GB)]]
| 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD
| 115$
|-
| [[Core i9-13900 Server (128GB)]]
| 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD
| 145$
|-
| [[Xeon Gold 5412U, (128GB)]]
|  128 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe
| 180$
|-
| [[Xeon Gold 5412U, (256GB)]]
| 256 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe
| 180$
|-
| [[Core i5-13500 Workstation]]
| 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000
| 260$
|}

== AMD-Based Server Configurations ==
{| class="wikitable"
! Configuration
! Specifications
! Price
|-
| [[Ryzen 5 3600 Server]]
| 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe
| 60$
|-
| [[Ryzen 5 3700 Server]]
| 64 GB RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe
| 65$
|-
| [[Ryzen 7 7700 Server]]
| 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe
| 80$
|-
| [[Ryzen 7 8700GE Server]]
| 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe
| 65$
|-
| [[Ryzen 9 3900 Server]]
| 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe
| 95$
|-
| [[Ryzen 9 5950X Server]]
| 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe
| 130$
|-
| [[Ryzen 9 7950X Server]]
| 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe
| 140$
|-
| [[EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB)]]
| 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe
| 135$
|-
| [[EPYC 9454P Server]]
| 256 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe
| 270$
|}

== Order Your Dedicated Server ==
[https://powervps.net/?from=32 Configure and order] your ideal server configuration

=== Need Assistance? ===
* Telegram: [https://t.me/powervps @powervps Servers at a discounted price]

⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️